They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
Fedup2Jun 5, 10:19 Midweek 4th June 2025 Hate crime – 31 months and a death sentence in a prison Islamic wing ….
Fedup2Jun 5, 10:19 Midweek 4th June 2025 Labour HQ – a tip – if you are gonna use this tired amateur hour nonsense – hand pick your…
Up2snuffJun 5, 10:12 Midweek 4th June 2025 TOADY Watch #2 – some good news, the ‘West’s’ damaging Greta Thunberg will be prevented by Israel from doing the…
taffmanJun 5, 10:08 Midweek 4th June 2025 “Trump bans travel from 12 countries to the US” Message to PM. It’s about time Great Britain banned ‘irregulars’ crossing…
Up2snuffJun 5, 10:04 Midweek 4th June 2025 MM, working? I suspect that if there is poverty in the household that one, or both parents, will be unemployed…
MarkyMarkJun 5, 09:59 Midweek 4th June 2025 Blink twice if you are in a trapped relationship and need assistance!
tomoJun 5, 09:59 Midweek 4th June 2025 They’re going to bring in a law against wire cutters aren’t they? https://twitter.com/realMaalouf/status/1930330006175027695
moggiemooJun 5, 09:58 Midweek 4th June 2025 Send them back. It’s cheaper to supply the nuggets to them abroad
The Queen and Phillip have too much class to sue a sick man, he has clearly lost it. Losing his son in unfortunate circumstances is punishment enough.
How would it reflect on the Royal Family if they did sue?
Not well. And he gets priviledge to say it all again.
I am not lawyer, but this is mind-numbingly obvious, or so I would have thought…
Well I’m sure they won’t be shopping in Harrods ever again.
They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Not all it would seem Hugh:
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
If this is “yet more”, where is your previous evidence? Don’t have any, right?
To sue shows an absence of class.
Rather than an absence of guts? You sure about that?
Anonymous, do us a favour, get a bloody pseudonym that will make a you a bit more identifiable so we’ll know who the hell we’re talking to in future.
sorry it’s me.
I am absolutely certain that people with class do not sue. It does not take guts – guts is rising above it.
The Queen wasting time suing that tacky little oik (now clearly ill) – can you honestly imagine it?
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Sarah Jane:
“tacky little oik”.
For someone to use such archaic language as that and then suggest to a poster:-
“Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”
I think is just too ironic to bear Sarah Jane.
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Come on, Sarah-Jane, examples and evidence please. Can’t come up with any? Thought not.