They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
tomoApr 5, 08:15 Weekend 5th April 2025 Princess van der Leyen news [img]https://i.ibb.co/N6nV5S9V/EU-greenies.png[/img]
ZephirApr 5, 08:14 Weekend 5th April 2025 Video: caption competition ? “Meeting rescheduled, or, should have used Zoom” Trump touts airstrike on Houthis, showing video: Will ‘never…
tomoApr 5, 08:11 Weekend 5th April 2025 Taking it at face value there… selling 3.2 billion for 20 million is equivalent to 0.625 pennies on the pound.…
Ian RushlowApr 5, 07:54 Weekend 5th April 2025 …seeing people openly selling drugs or walking around with guns “like it was normal”. So, just like London then.
AsISeeItApr 5, 07:54 Weekend 5th April 2025 Meta and Pinterest make secret donation to Molly Russell charity (BBC) Not all that secret then was it?
DoublethinkerApr 5, 07:50 Weekend 5th April 2025 All the Globalist free traders are decrying Trump’s tariffs and claiming that he is an economic dunce if he opposes…
AsISeeItApr 5, 07:25 Weekend 5th April 2025 Supermarkets selling Russian fish ‘funding Putin’s war’ – frets the poundshop junior Guardian that is the i paper Russian fish…?…
DeborahApr 5, 07:24 Weekend 5th April 2025 Daily Mail on line, it is because of Trump”s tariffs that it is necessary to reduce the ‘fines’ for car…
ScrobleneApr 5, 06:21 Weekend 5th April 2025 This is fun…! https://youtu.be/u8TQU0qO7S0?si=g5SorYRCrboVfQCC Comments through the roof too!
The Queen and Phillip have too much class to sue a sick man, he has clearly lost it. Losing his son in unfortunate circumstances is punishment enough.
How would it reflect on the Royal Family if they did sue?
Not well. And he gets priviledge to say it all again.
I am not lawyer, but this is mind-numbingly obvious, or so I would have thought…
Well I’m sure they won’t be shopping in Harrods ever again.
They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Not all it would seem Hugh:
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
If this is “yet more”, where is your previous evidence? Don’t have any, right?
To sue shows an absence of class.
Rather than an absence of guts? You sure about that?
Anonymous, do us a favour, get a bloody pseudonym that will make a you a bit more identifiable so we’ll know who the hell we’re talking to in future.
sorry it’s me.
I am absolutely certain that people with class do not sue. It does not take guts – guts is rising above it.
The Queen wasting time suing that tacky little oik (now clearly ill) – can you honestly imagine it?
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Sarah Jane:
“tacky little oik”.
For someone to use such archaic language as that and then suggest to a poster:-
“Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”
I think is just too ironic to bear Sarah Jane.
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Come on, Sarah-Jane, examples and evidence please. Can’t come up with any? Thought not.