They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
JohnCJun 5, 05:56 Midweek 4th June 2025 Even worse digg, Hamas are deliberately getting all these women and children blown to pieces or maimed because they know…
JohnCJun 5, 02:25 Midweek 4th June 2025 Each time they get away with their outrageous racist bias, their red-line is moved out and that becomes their standard…
JohnCJun 5, 02:18 Midweek 4th June 2025 Are the surprise airfield attacks a turning point for Ukraine? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4gp2g7g47o It takes a special kind of idiot to work…
BRISSLESJun 4, 23:01 Midweek 4th June 2025 JR Read further up – about 5.15 I said the same thing !
diggJun 4, 22:26 Midweek 4th June 2025 The Israel v Hamas shitshow comes into focus if you just recall what happened. Hamas carried out a brutal and…
pugnaziousJun 4, 22:04 Midweek 4th June 2025 A charity chief does the usual virtue signal politicised anti-Israel puff-piece and Jeremy Bowen hypes it as… ‘a highly significant…
tomoJun 4, 20:58 Midweek 4th June 2025 awww…. https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/1930311580832674089
tomoJun 4, 20:53 Midweek 4th June 2025 They seem to have reduced the hard hats, hi-viz and assd. PPE at home.
Lefty WrightJun 4, 20:52 Start the Week 2nd June 2025 tomo Which will,no doubt, make a handful of African leaders very wealthy indeed.
The Queen and Phillip have too much class to sue a sick man, he has clearly lost it. Losing his son in unfortunate circumstances is punishment enough.
How would it reflect on the Royal Family if they did sue?
Not well. And he gets priviledge to say it all again.
I am not lawyer, but this is mind-numbingly obvious, or so I would have thought…
Well I’m sure they won’t be shopping in Harrods ever again.
They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Not all it would seem Hugh:
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
If this is “yet more”, where is your previous evidence? Don’t have any, right?
To sue shows an absence of class.
Rather than an absence of guts? You sure about that?
Anonymous, do us a favour, get a bloody pseudonym that will make a you a bit more identifiable so we’ll know who the hell we’re talking to in future.
sorry it’s me.
I am absolutely certain that people with class do not sue. It does not take guts – guts is rising above it.
The Queen wasting time suing that tacky little oik (now clearly ill) – can you honestly imagine it?
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Sarah Jane:
“tacky little oik”.
For someone to use such archaic language as that and then suggest to a poster:-
“Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”
I think is just too ironic to bear Sarah Jane.
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Come on, Sarah-Jane, examples and evidence please. Can’t come up with any? Thought not.