They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
wwfcJun 25, 23:02 Midweek 25th June 2025 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQBBDB61pIE&t=34s
tomoJun 25, 22:51 Midweek 25th June 2025 Laughing stock [img]https://i.ibb.co/Kt70KjZ/Screenshot-2025-06-25-22-47-33-57-40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg[/img]
FlotsamJun 25, 21:59 Midweek 25th June 2025 A finding confirmed by the excavation of Foster’s bottles.
tomoJun 25, 21:03 Midweek 25th June 2025 There’s some massive tits – that’s slam dunk certainty. I know of one that retired with a fat enough pension…
Emmanuel GoldsteinJun 25, 21:01 Midweek 25th June 2025 If we are going to include migration and net zero costs into the defence budget to make it to 5%…
Mustapha Sheikup al-BeebiJun 25, 20:57 Midweek 25th June 2025 “Uplift” – has she/ze/they been modelling brasieres on the side?!
Fedup2Jun 25, 20:57 Midweek 25th June 2025 Spotlight wicked issues means ‘ no crime hate incident ‘lefty speak Working in partnership – means spreading responsibility so that…
tomoJun 25, 20:41 Midweek 25th June 2025 Million pound pension and retire at 55? Certainly madam… https://twitter.com/Perky_43/status/1937935324035858647
tomoJun 25, 20:31 Midweek 25th June 2025 https://twitter.com/LeoKearse/status/1937939722376200348
Eddy BoothJun 25, 20:31 Midweek 25th June 2025 Think its about when one of the band members got mugged in Jamaica
The Queen and Phillip have too much class to sue a sick man, he has clearly lost it. Losing his son in unfortunate circumstances is punishment enough.
How would it reflect on the Royal Family if they did sue?
Not well. And he gets priviledge to say it all again.
I am not lawyer, but this is mind-numbingly obvious, or so I would have thought…
Well I’m sure they won’t be shopping in Harrods ever again.
They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Not all it would seem Hugh:
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
If this is “yet more”, where is your previous evidence? Don’t have any, right?
To sue shows an absence of class.
Rather than an absence of guts? You sure about that?
Anonymous, do us a favour, get a bloody pseudonym that will make a you a bit more identifiable so we’ll know who the hell we’re talking to in future.
sorry it’s me.
I am absolutely certain that people with class do not sue. It does not take guts – guts is rising above it.
The Queen wasting time suing that tacky little oik (now clearly ill) – can you honestly imagine it?
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Sarah Jane:
“tacky little oik”.
For someone to use such archaic language as that and then suggest to a poster:-
“Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”
I think is just too ironic to bear Sarah Jane.
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Come on, Sarah-Jane, examples and evidence please. Can’t come up with any? Thought not.