They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
StewGreenAug 18, 00:33 Start the Week 18th August 2025 BBC LIE : “Look what the Jews did. They starved her.” https://x.com/Saul_Sadka/status/1957025496232755444 … “She had leukemia so advanced her bone…
StewGreenAug 17, 22:59 Start the Week 18th August 2025 13-year-old girl whose alleged rape and murder is being investigated by homicide detectives . Casey-Louise has been named by relatives…
Fedup2Aug 17, 22:58 Start the Week 18th August 2025 Jeff The footage shows the Bournemouth player trying to take a throw in as a creature wearing a Liverpool shirt…
Charlie FarleyAug 17, 22:55 Start the Week 18th August 2025 Jeff , A Bournemouth player ……..does he live in a Hotel on the Sea Front by chance ?
StewGreenAug 17, 22:46 Start the Week 18th August 2025 On 5th August 4 people replied to AP relaying stories of RECENT school lock down drills
JeffAug 17, 22:40 Start the Week 18th August 2025 Just something that caught my eye… The Premier League is back and the first game was between Liverpool and Bournemouth…unfortunately…
The Queen and Phillip have too much class to sue a sick man, he has clearly lost it. Losing his son in unfortunate circumstances is punishment enough.
How would it reflect on the Royal Family if they did sue?
Not well. And he gets priviledge to say it all again.
I am not lawyer, but this is mind-numbingly obvious, or so I would have thought…
Well I’m sure they won’t be shopping in Harrods ever again.
They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.
Not all it would seem Hugh:
Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
If this is “yet more”, where is your previous evidence? Don’t have any, right?
To sue shows an absence of class.
Rather than an absence of guts? You sure about that?
Anonymous, do us a favour, get a bloody pseudonym that will make a you a bit more identifiable so we’ll know who the hell we’re talking to in future.
sorry it’s me.
I am absolutely certain that people with class do not sue. It does not take guts – guts is rising above it.
The Queen wasting time suing that tacky little oik (now clearly ill) – can you honestly imagine it?
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Sarah Jane:
“tacky little oik”.
For someone to use such archaic language as that and then suggest to a poster:-
“Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”
I think is just too ironic to bear Sarah Jane.
Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.
The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.
Come on, Sarah-Jane, examples and evidence please. Can’t come up with any? Thought not.