58 Responses to One Man’s Terrorist …

←Older Comments
  1. Anonymous says:
    February 20, 2008 at 11:41 am

    The Queen and Phillip have too much class to sue a sick man, he has clearly lost it. Losing his son in unfortunate circumstances is punishment enough.

    How would it reflect on the Royal Family if they did sue?

    Not well. And he gets priviledge to say it all again.

    I am not lawyer, but this is mind-numbingly obvious, or so I would have thought…

       0 likes

  2. The People's Front of Judea says:
    February 20, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    Well I’m sure they won’t be shopping in Harrods ever again.

       0 likes

  3. Hugh says:
    February 20, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    They wouldn’t have to sue – that’s the point about criminal libel. He would be prosecuted. The “mind-numbingly obvious” problems facing the Royals that you’ve highlighted are precisely why it’s been suggested.

       0 likes

  4. Anonymous says:
    February 20, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    Not all it would seem Hugh:

    Because if he can be sued and they don’t sue him, then the royal family has no remaining guts.
    Bryan | 19.02.08 – 9:06 am | #

    Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”. To sue shows an absence of class. Does Bryan think that anyone here believes a word Fayed says?

       0 likes

  5. Bryan says:
    February 20, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.

    If this is “yet more”, where is your previous evidence? Don’t have any, right?

    To sue shows an absence of class.

    Rather than an absence of guts? You sure about that?

    Anonymous, do us a favour, get a bloody pseudonym that will make a you a bit more identifiable so we’ll know who the hell we’re talking to in future.

       0 likes

  6. Sarah Jane says:
    February 21, 2008 at 12:16 am

    sorry it’s me.

    I am absolutely certain that people with class do not sue. It does not take guts – guts is rising above it.

    The Queen wasting time suing that tacky little oik (now clearly ill) – can you honestly imagine it?

    The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.

       0 likes

  7. The People's Front of Judea says:
    February 21, 2008 at 6:27 am

    Sarah Jane:

    “tacky little oik”.

    For someone to use such archaic language as that and then suggest to a poster:-

    “Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”

    I think is just too ironic to bear Sarah Jane.

       0 likes

  8. Bryan says:
    February 21, 2008 at 9:56 am

    Yet more evidence of how out of touch Bryan is with his “public”.

    The more you write things like that, the more obvious it becomes how little you know.

    Come on, Sarah-Jane, examples and evidence please. Can’t come up with any? Thought not.

       0 likes

←Older Comments