GOOGLING AUNTIE?

Good lord – and just when we thought the anachronism of the license-tax was bad enough, comes the news that Google could be be hit with an online advertising tax to boost the coffers of the BBC, under proposals being discussed by the Government.

“Ministers are considering taxing search engines, download websites and broadband providers to fund public service TV and the roll-out of broadband…”

One more reason to get shot of the totalitarian half-wits in power. I presume there will be black arm bands and solemn music played at the BBC the day hard Labour is thrown out of power by the British people.

Bookmark the permalink.

62 Responses to GOOGLING AUNTIE?

  1. Anonymous says:

    ps Can’t you moderate comments

       0 likes

  2. Anonymous says:

    ps Can’t you moderate comments

       0 likes

  3. wonderfulformyage says:

    What can’t he call himself what he likes? If he breaks the rules thats different, but you can’t decide what someone calls themselves nor what they say.

    Are you some sort of control freak?

    Who cares what he is called? I don’t see a problem, except one that you are making.

    relax, if he breaks the rules thats different, meanwhile stop your control freakery.

       0 likes

  4. wonderfulformyage says:

    What can’t he call himself what he likes? If he breaks the rules thats different, but you can’t decide what someone calls themselves nor what they say.

    Are you some sort of control freak?

    Who cares what he is called? I don’t see a problem, except one that you are making.

    relax, if he breaks the rules thats different, meanwhile stop your control freakery.

       0 likes

  5. wonderfulformyage says:

    What can’t he call himself what he likes? If he breaks the rules thats different, but you can’t decide what someone calls themselves nor what they say.

    Are you some sort of control freak?

    Who cares what he is called? I don’t see a problem, except one that you are making.

    relax, if he breaks the rules thats different, meanwhile stop your control freakery.

       0 likes

  6. wonderfulformyage says:

    What can’t he call himself what he likes? If he breaks the rules thats different, but you can’t decide what someone calls themselves nor what they say.

    Are you some sort of control freak?

    Who cares what he is called? I don’t see a problem, except one that you are making.

    relax, if he breaks the rules thats different, meanwhile stop your control freakery.

       0 likes

  7. Anonymous says:

    Interesting to see what dv does 😉

    Will you follow about all day to delete his comments?

       0 likes

  8. Anonymous says:

    Interesting to see what dv does 😉

    Will you follow about all day to delete his comments?

       0 likes

  9. Anonymous says:

    Interesting to see what dv does 😉

    Will you follow about all day to delete his comments?

       0 likes

  10. Anonymous says:

    Interesting to see what dv does 😉

    Will you follow about all day to delete his comments?

       0 likes

  11. A Tangled Web says:

    And obviously they’d be promoting diphtheria, malaria and smallpox in the Third World as wanting to abolish the BBC is tantamount to ceasing the funding of the WHO…Northwestener, I really don’t know what you are on about here? What has illness and disease got to do with funding the bbc?

       0 likes

  12. North Northwester says:

    “A Tangled Web”
    And obviously they’d be promoting diphtheria, malaria and smallpox in the Third World as wanting to abolish the BBC is tantamount to ceasing the funding of the WHO…
    Northwestener, I really don’t know what you are on about here? What has illness and disease got to do with funding the bbc?

    “A Tangled Web” – glad you asked. It was an analogy.
    Now read on…

    The United Nations and the BBC are both beloved of our county’s Left-wing statist governing class because they both do evil lousy things that they and their whacko supporters like.

    For example, the United Nations, whose voting majority mostly consists of oil-rich absolute monarchies, dictatorships, communist tyrannies and Islamist hell-holes, spends an inordinate amount of time and effort excusing the Arab Islamist genocide in Darfur because Red China has troops there to protect their oil supplies; and in attacking Israel – the Middle East’s only established democracy; and in voting in measures to criminalize any criticism of Islam or Muslim countries as offensive to ‘religion.’ Just the one religion, you’ll find.

    Now, leaving aside the actual up-front Marxists and barking mad Islamist whack-jobs who openly support this kind of mass-murdering evil, when people like me argue for example that the free countries of the world ought to leave the farcical UN to stew on its own juices and form a body that insists on there being an actual democracy and a free society before a state joins, then the soft-Left and soggy centre will join the evil Left and throw up a straw-man chorus of ‘Oh, but the World Health Organization beat smallpox and still does a lot of vaccination work in the Third World. If the West leaves the UN, then many children will die’ (as if a new moral and democratic world body couldn’t or wouldn’t finance and run such programmes.)

    Likewise with the BBC. When the BBC continues in its cultural Marxist way blood libelling the Jews of the Middle East by describing Israel’s inadvertent bombardment of civilians (because the jihadist larval coprolites and cousin-husbands of Hamas and Hezbollah like to cower amongst civilians) as ‘targetting,’ i.e., deliberately aiming at with the intention of killing, and when the BBC spends a fortune investigating its own coverage of the Lebanon war for blatant anti-Israeli bias and then when the report finds that hell, yes, the BBC’s output is spectacularly biased against Israel and the BBC spends another fortune on persuading a judge to declare the results of the research secret, well…

    Well then people like me come along and say things like, ‘Hey, kids, why don’t we break up the BBC for parts and sell to the highest bidder?’ or ‘Spread the licence fee around a bit in the hope of some coverage not actually dictated by the angel Gabriel to the illiterate Robert Fisk and Jeremy Bowen,’ or’ Why not just close the bloody thing down and let the papers fill the airwaves at their own expense.’

    Now, leaving aside the actual up-front Marxists and barking mad Islamist whack-jobs who openly support this kind of truth-murdering evil, then the soft-Left and soggy centre will join the evil Left and often someone calling himself a ‘Conservative MP’ (though I have a better name which I won’t use here as there are probably ladies present) and throw up a straw-man chorus of ‘Oh, but the BBC puts on Last Night of the Proms and Songs Of Praise, and if we broke up the BBC those programmes would never happen!’ As if all the rest of the BBC’s 365-days-per-year annual output wasn’t the ideological opposite of Last Night of the Proms and Songs of Praise anyway.

    So, the UN and the BBC are both irredeemably corrupt, culturally Marxist, Islamist-loving sumps for British taxpayer’s money and preach hate and evil in the world, and each has one small sugar-coated treat that is used to shield and excuse all the rest of the sewage that is their standard output.

    See?

    PS

    Oh, and on the subject of names, mine is actually North Northwester.
    At least, it is when I’m discussing socio-political events here in the UK and all across the Earth.

    When I’m discussing matters galactic I go by a slightly different version of my name -North N Wester.

    😉

    Why don’t you, for clarity’s sake, go by some other, not-misleading name such as
    ‘Anything Else; the commentator formerly known as “A Tangled Web”, but definitely not David Vance,’ or something?

       0 likes