Excellent letter here from the Dr. Sonja Boehmer-Christensen to the BBC detailing just how subtle but pernicious it propagandises on behalf of the AGW lobby has become.
The BBC is the subject of a post on Watts Up With That today, which finishes with:
All in all, this was not a well thought out or well researched video presentation by the BBC, and in my opinion it does a disservice to the citizens that pay taxes through television licenses to support the BBC.
mentions Tol but, unfortunately but predictably, the article itself has not been a featured page in the ongoing propaganda fest. However, even though the article has the appearance of even-handedness, the authors cannot forbear to include this statement
“These critics are not climate change sceptics, but researchers with years of experience who believe that human-induced climate change is real and that we need to act now.”
In other words: the science and the statistics and the economics may be crap but let’s do something – anything!!
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
tomoJun 8, 23:32 Start the Week 9th June 2025 https://twitter.com/DebiEvansMatron/status/1931679591111823387 https://twitter.com/JamesMelville/status/1931716204596547832
Fedup2Jun 8, 23:03 Start the Week 9th June 2025 Excellent news – in the run up to the spending review the ‘senior police comrades ‘ £ and the £…
Fedup2Jun 8, 21:46 Start the Week 9th June 2025 On the upside – the ‘protesters ‘ are offering themselves up for instant deportation . It was inevitable that far…
ScrobleneJun 8, 21:31 Weekend 7th June 2025 That sounds like a good deal, Fed! I have come a cropper with duds occasionally, including buying DVDs from charity…
harry142857Jun 8, 21:17 Start the Week 9th June 2025 BBC up in arms about Trump arresting illegal immigrants and tear gassing protestors Dozy BBC presenter says they came prepared…
Fedup2Jun 8, 21:13 Weekend 7th June 2025 Up2 Im sketchy on how things are likely to pan out on the economic front – but if the Trump…
Up2snuffJun 8, 21:06 Weekend 7th June 2025 I have a notion that someone in the current Labour Government has announced nearly £6 billion of spending on something,…
MarkyMarkJun 8, 20:59 Start the Week 9th June 2025 I would like BBC verify that I was first and to ensure it was not BBC fake news! Inshallah as…
MarkyMarkJun 8, 20:26 Weekend 7th June 2025 Maybe! Yes and No! With a sprinkling of religion of peace … but no peace!
MarkyMarkJun 8, 20:23 Weekend 7th June 2025 All police to carry prayer mats and wear hijabs to confuse the rioters!
What does she know? The BBC have Roger Harrabin the greatest ‘scientist’ since Einstein.
Sonja isnt much liked in Climategate circles…
From: “Graham F Haughton” <G.F.Haughton@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: “Phil Jones” <p.jones@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: RE: Dr Sonja BOEHMER-CHRISTIANSEN
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:32:24 -0000
[my extract]
“Since Sonja retired I am a lot more free to push my environmental interests without ongoing critique of my motives”
from http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=1065&filename=1256765544.txt
Can I advise her not to go walking alone in the woods.
The BBC is the subject of a post on Watts Up With That today, which finishes with:
All in all, this was not a well thought out or well researched video presentation by the BBC, and in my opinion it does a disservice to the citizens that pay taxes through television licenses to support the BBC.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/24/bbc-botches-grade-school-co2-science-experiment-on-live-tv-with-indepedent-lab-results-to-prove-it/
Also on Bishop Hill, Richard Tol joins in to eviscerate Stern’s highly dubious economic take on AGW
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/12/23/richard-tol-on-stern.html
No mention – that I can find – by the BBC. However, to be fair, this 3-year old article co-authored by Simon Cox
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6295021.stm
mentions Tol but, unfortunately but predictably, the article itself has not been a featured page in the ongoing propaganda fest. However, even though the article has the appearance of even-handedness, the authors cannot forbear to include this statement
“These critics are not climate change sceptics, but researchers with years of experience who believe that human-induced climate change is real and that we need to act now.”
In other words: the science and the statistics and the economics may be crap but let’s do something – anything!!