Excellent letter here from the Dr. Sonja Boehmer-Christensen to the BBC detailing just how subtle but pernicious it propagandises on behalf of the AGW lobby has become.
The BBC is the subject of a post on Watts Up With That today, which finishes with:
All in all, this was not a well thought out or well researched video presentation by the BBC, and in my opinion it does a disservice to the citizens that pay taxes through television licenses to support the BBC.
mentions Tol but, unfortunately but predictably, the article itself has not been a featured page in the ongoing propaganda fest. However, even though the article has the appearance of even-handedness, the authors cannot forbear to include this statement
“These critics are not climate change sceptics, but researchers with years of experience who believe that human-induced climate change is real and that we need to act now.”
In other words: the science and the statistics and the economics may be crap but let’s do something – anything!!
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
atlas_shrugged April 19, 2024 at 9:43 am on Midweek 17th April 20247. The accuser and accused shall always appear face to face before any officer, that both sides may be heard,...
moggiemoo April 19, 2024 at 9:36 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Would you go to this priest for confession? No chance I would.
moggiemoo April 19, 2024 at 9:21 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Islam's already well on its way to that.
MarkyMark April 19, 2024 at 9:07 am on Midweek 17th April 2024“But we have learnt somethings in the last 10 years. We have learnt that most of the press in free...
G April 19, 2024 at 8:57 am on Midweek 17th April 2024So what was the theory then? "Devolution in the UK has created a national Parliament in Scotland, a Welsh Parliament...
tomo April 19, 2024 at 8:32 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Not enough Covid medals have been handed out to officials? toecurling, gutless kerrappp..... ONS are the authoritative, robust statistical a...
Zephir April 19, 2024 at 8:30 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Whilst at face value this does seem extremely disturbing, the key to this is the conversation that this person had...
Fedup2 April 19, 2024 at 8:28 am on Midweek 17th April 2024The naughty step in their commons now has around 25 MPs over various defective types sitting on it … a...
tomo April 19, 2024 at 8:22 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Furries....... https://youtu.be/aLqKuskd9CQ
tomo April 19, 2024 at 8:12 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Martin Kulldorff - an interview... well away from the mainstream https://www.spiked-online.com/podcast-episode/why-we-must-take-on-the-autho...
What does she know? The BBC have Roger Harrabin the greatest ‘scientist’ since Einstein.
0 likes
Sonja isnt much liked in Climategate circles…
From: “Graham F Haughton” <G.F.Haughton@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: “Phil Jones” <p.jones@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: RE: Dr Sonja BOEHMER-CHRISTIANSEN
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:32:24 -0000
[my extract]
“Since Sonja retired I am a lot more free to push my environmental interests without ongoing critique of my motives”
from http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=1065&filename=1256765544.txt
0 likes
Can I advise her not to go walking alone in the woods.
0 likes
The BBC is the subject of a post on Watts Up With That today, which finishes with:
All in all, this was not a well thought out or well researched video presentation by the BBC, and in my opinion it does a disservice to the citizens that pay taxes through television licenses to support the BBC.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/24/bbc-botches-grade-school-co2-science-experiment-on-live-tv-with-indepedent-lab-results-to-prove-it/
0 likes
Also on Bishop Hill, Richard Tol joins in to eviscerate Stern’s highly dubious economic take on AGW
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/12/23/richard-tol-on-stern.html
No mention – that I can find – by the BBC. However, to be fair, this 3-year old article co-authored by Simon Cox
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6295021.stm
mentions Tol but, unfortunately but predictably, the article itself has not been a featured page in the ongoing propaganda fest. However, even though the article has the appearance of even-handedness, the authors cannot forbear to include this statement
“These critics are not climate change sceptics, but researchers with years of experience who believe that human-induced climate change is real and that we need to act now.”
In other words: the science and the statistics and the economics may be crap but let’s do something – anything!!
0 likes