Excellent letter here from the Dr. Sonja Boehmer-Christensen to the BBC detailing just how subtle but pernicious it propagandises on behalf of the AGW lobby has become.
The BBC is the subject of a post on Watts Up With That today, which finishes with:
All in all, this was not a well thought out or well researched video presentation by the BBC, and in my opinion it does a disservice to the citizens that pay taxes through television licenses to support the BBC.
mentions Tol but, unfortunately but predictably, the article itself has not been a featured page in the ongoing propaganda fest. However, even though the article has the appearance of even-handedness, the authors cannot forbear to include this statement
“These critics are not climate change sceptics, but researchers with years of experience who believe that human-induced climate change is real and that we need to act now.”
In other words: the science and the statistics and the economics may be crap but let’s do something – anything!!
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
JohnC March 24, 2023 at 6:22 am on Midweek 22 March 2023An aggressive protestor tries to push her through security to get at someone speaking and as they push her back...
JohnC March 24, 2023 at 2:03 am on Midweek 22 March 2023World Athletics bans transgender women from competing in female world ranking events https://www.bbc.com/sport/athletics/65051900 The woke t...
JohnC March 24, 2023 at 1:07 am on Midweek 22 March 2023Ukraine war: The front line where Russian eyes are always watching https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65028217 This video is amusing beca...
pugnazious March 24, 2023 at 1:00 am on Midweek 22 March 2023It's on the BBC now but somehow they miss this fuller explanation [from the Mail].... 'Superdrug claimed female staff were...
pugnazious March 24, 2023 at 12:47 am on Midweek 22 March 2023https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOzf5XXftrU The Scottish Nationalists had leaders who were keen to forge links with the Nazis before the war...
JohnC March 23, 2023 at 11:46 pm on Midweek 22 March 2023Not being an expert on these things, I wonder what on Earth 'Cultural marxism' is doing at the top of...
taffman March 23, 2023 at 11:38 pm on Midweek 22 March 2023https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-65044061 "Two Welsh freeports are to be created which aim to bring 20,000 jobs and investment worth £5bn...
JohnC March 23, 2023 at 11:34 pm on Midweek 22 March 2023He knows he's safe because he has the vote of the racists.
G.W.F. March 23, 2023 at 10:45 pm on Midweek 22 March 2023Khan knows that he can never be voted out
Guest Who March 23, 2023 at 10:35 pm on Midweek 22 March 2023Seems to have the old boys in the various political clubs circling her little finger.
What does she know? The BBC have Roger Harrabin the greatest ‘scientist’ since Einstein.
Sonja isnt much liked in Climategate circles…
From: “Graham F Haughton” <G.F.Haughton@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: “Phil Jones” <p.jones@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: RE: Dr Sonja BOEHMER-CHRISTIANSEN
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:32:24 -0000
[my extract]
“Since Sonja retired I am a lot more free to push my environmental interests without ongoing critique of my motives”
from http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=1065&filename=1256765544.txt
Can I advise her not to go walking alone in the woods.
The BBC is the subject of a post on Watts Up With That today, which finishes with:
All in all, this was not a well thought out or well researched video presentation by the BBC, and in my opinion it does a disservice to the citizens that pay taxes through television licenses to support the BBC.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/24/bbc-botches-grade-school-co2-science-experiment-on-live-tv-with-indepedent-lab-results-to-prove-it/
Also on Bishop Hill, Richard Tol joins in to eviscerate Stern’s highly dubious economic take on AGW
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/12/23/richard-tol-on-stern.html
No mention – that I can find – by the BBC. However, to be fair, this 3-year old article co-authored by Simon Cox
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6295021.stm
mentions Tol but, unfortunately but predictably, the article itself has not been a featured page in the ongoing propaganda fest. However, even though the article has the appearance of even-handedness, the authors cannot forbear to include this statement
“These critics are not climate change sceptics, but researchers with years of experience who believe that human-induced climate change is real and that we need to act now.”
In other words: the science and the statistics and the economics may be crap but let’s do something – anything!!