Excellent letter here from the Dr. Sonja Boehmer-Christensen to the BBC detailing just how subtle but pernicious it propagandises on behalf of the AGW lobby has become.
The BBC is the subject of a post on Watts Up With That today, which finishes with:
All in all, this was not a well thought out or well researched video presentation by the BBC, and in my opinion it does a disservice to the citizens that pay taxes through television licenses to support the BBC.
mentions Tol but, unfortunately but predictably, the article itself has not been a featured page in the ongoing propaganda fest. However, even though the article has the appearance of even-handedness, the authors cannot forbear to include this statement
“These critics are not climate change sceptics, but researchers with years of experience who believe that human-induced climate change is real and that we need to act now.”
In other words: the science and the statistics and the economics may be crap but let’s do something – anything!!
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
StewGreen June 24, 2022 at 11:44 pm on Weekend 25 June 2022Ah actually the banned first comment chastised the Times for hiding the story about Boris seeking a top job for...
StewGreen June 24, 2022 at 11:40 pm on Weekend 25 June 2022Thursday The Times : BBC coverage is biased, say 39% of viewers The figure was 15 per cent for ITV,...
StewGreen June 24, 2022 at 11:28 pm on Weekend 25 June 2022Netflix = Wokeflix "My Monticello,” is being made as a Netflix film. The fictional novel is about a diverse group...
MarkyMark June 24, 2022 at 11:07 pm on Midweek 22 June 2022ANd then kneeling ....
MarkyMark June 24, 2022 at 11:06 pm on Start the week 20 June 2022https://duckduckgo.com/?q=biased+bbc&t=hs&va=l&ia=web Second entry .... https://biasedbbc.tv/
MarkyMark June 24, 2022 at 11:05 pm on Start the week 20 June 2022Gary Lineker claims poverty allowance for this past racist taunting.
tomo June 24, 2022 at 11:05 pm on Weekend 25 June 2022https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1540451803418054662
Kinell June 24, 2022 at 10:41 pm on Start the week 20 June 2022Hello Taffy, Just seen your reply. I get free travel on European railways and so have been to numerous places,...
StewGreen June 24, 2022 at 10:30 pm on Midweek 22 June 2022The missing image seems to be a rubbish strewn Glastonbury field from the Guardian in 2015 but it is set...
Nibor June 24, 2022 at 10:15 pm on Weekend 25 June 2022Prince Charles thinks sending people to Rwanda is appalling He should have words with his mother , who sent him...
What does she know? The BBC have Roger Harrabin the greatest ‘scientist’ since Einstein.
Sonja isnt much liked in Climategate circles…
From: “Graham F Haughton” <G.F.Haughton@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: “Phil Jones” <p.jones@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: RE: Dr Sonja BOEHMER-CHRISTIANSEN
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:32:24 -0000
[my extract]
“Since Sonja retired I am a lot more free to push my environmental interests without ongoing critique of my motives”
from http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=1065&filename=1256765544.txt
Can I advise her not to go walking alone in the woods.
The BBC is the subject of a post on Watts Up With That today, which finishes with:
All in all, this was not a well thought out or well researched video presentation by the BBC, and in my opinion it does a disservice to the citizens that pay taxes through television licenses to support the BBC.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/24/bbc-botches-grade-school-co2-science-experiment-on-live-tv-with-indepedent-lab-results-to-prove-it/
Also on Bishop Hill, Richard Tol joins in to eviscerate Stern’s highly dubious economic take on AGW
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/12/23/richard-tol-on-stern.html
No mention – that I can find – by the BBC. However, to be fair, this 3-year old article co-authored by Simon Cox
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6295021.stm
mentions Tol but, unfortunately but predictably, the article itself has not been a featured page in the ongoing propaganda fest. However, even though the article has the appearance of even-handedness, the authors cannot forbear to include this statement
“These critics are not climate change sceptics, but researchers with years of experience who believe that human-induced climate change is real and that we need to act now.”
In other words: the science and the statistics and the economics may be crap but let’s do something – anything!!