No, not THAT one! I mean Mohammed el Baradei. Did you catch this interview with this snake oil salesman this morning. As he points out, he doesn’t hate America, just its policies. He doesn’t hate Israel, he just wants equality for Palestinians. Lovely guy and a nice reception from the BBC.
LOVING MOHAMMED
Bookmark the permalink.
I have no problem with invited talking heads from the “Islamic Community” being invited to the BBCs Green Room for halal snacks.
I do have a problem when there is ANY attempt by the BBC to presume that they are in any way “spokespersons” because they are “democratically” entitled to speak on behalf of Muslims.
Leadership-democracy and one stemming from the other is NOT in any way an Islamic construct at all-EVER! Yet the BBC seem to think that Bunglawalla, Choudhery etc are voted for and speak with the blessing of the Mosque-with Al Quada now sending out postal votes for a Northern Assembly under Al Prescottabad out there somewhere!
WE have a Religious Affairs team paid for by licence-might even be still in the Spirit Zone of the O2 Arena for all I know-but if The Koran does NOT say that the faithful are perfectly entitled to talk out of both sides of the same mouth to confound-and yes annihilate-the kaffir/infidels(that`s the rest of us by the way!) then hope that I`ll be told in a loving way!
The BBC seem to think that they are associate Islam supporters in their wish to see the churches turned to rubble. They might be thinking that the shahid may leave them a virgin or a bunch of grapes as reward for their quisling cringeing approach to all things Islamic. Not so-and all good Muslims are as repelled by the BBCs knock kneed ignorance and patronising as we are!
Finally-quelle surprise that Bin Laden was in Pakistan…anyone would think that the BBC does not listen to its own correspondents when they were doing many, many programmes on the collusion between aspects of Pakistans ruling elite and their kinsmen in the Pashtun etc. How then can they feign this shock and horror if not to pour bile in the open wound that is U.S/ Pan Arabic(Islamic) relations?
The BBC is the nastiest little gossip over the garden fence, yet seems to think that she has education and reason enough to be so!
Any of us wishing to get our news from her ought to check the washing line first! Her dirty washing may not be the only hangings she causes by her aimless seeking of thrills at other peoples cost
“quelle surprise that Bin Laden was in Pakistan”
Quelle surprise indeed!
‘Good God! What the hell’s that?’ shouts Pakistan
cj,
Your last sentence is spot on. The BBC’s shameless dhimmitude contributes to terrorism. The blood is on the hands of the Beeboids as much as on the terrorists’ hands.
But, the Beeboids don’t care how many innocent people die so long as it furthers their perverted agenda.
I’ll say it again, Beeboids are the pits of the earth.
In fact I have more respect for the terrorists. At least they are honest about their objectives.
Egypt, Baradei, INBBC: anti-Israel.
Of course, a key political reason why INBBC attempts to further uprisings in Islamic countries (Muslim Brotherhood enabling, as such uprisings are), is to further political hostility towards Israel.
” A Hate-Israel Spring”
[Extract]:
“Only now is it beginning to dawn on some elements in the media (mainly online websites) that the vaunted Arab spring is likely to prove a nuclear winter to Israel and the United States. Yet for those willing to see them, there were plenty of signs from the beginning that Western style liberal democracy was not on the agenda of most of the anti-Mubarak demonstrators in Cairo. The most obvious were quite literally signs—numerous placards in Tahrir Square showing Mubarak with a Magen David etched into his forehead. Palestinian Arab journalist Khaled Abu Toameh reports that the Western media also managed to overlook the burning of Israeli and American flags by demonstrators and the slogans against Israel and the U.S. chanted in Tahrir Square.”
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9425/pub_detail.asp
Didn`t hear this, but thought “In Our Time” today very revealing about the source of the problems!
Poor ole Melvyn was getting rattier by the minute as he tried to get straight answers to his simple questions about Islamic Law. His three experts(including Mona Siddiqi as ever ,whenever things Islamic pop up) would not give him a straight answer to anything about its history(contradictory) its consequences( stoning is “potentially barbaric” said one of them) ot its sheer entanglement with expedient State hacks and warlords of the tribes at the time!
Yet this Sharia is what Rowan sees an accommodation with in his prayers!
There were vast implications in this brief lifting of the niqab today. The academics are divided and disingenuous, and Melvyn did not get a clear answer to any question he asked. It is truly confusing and,in my view is simply tacked on to Judaic law with power and might justifying its fought for monopoly. Sadly for Geoffrey Robertson Q.C etal,no wriggle room for him-if only the poor fool knew that!
As the E.U slice and dice it in amongst its toxic land fill that goes by the name of “harmonisation” or respecting rights in their diversity” we really need to know the origins of our troubles today.
Thank you Melvyn for doing this-albeit “en passant” as they say
I love the “potentially” barbaric !