Biased BBC contributor Alan picks up on the fact that Richard Black has been busy since returning from his holidays…too busy to see this (or report it) from highly respected scientists and those who doubt the ‘Consensus’:
‘We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled. The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.’
It is Cosmic Rays Stupid. The high energy ones that is, NOT the low energy ones that the IPCC sites as proof that Cosmic Rays are not responsible. A last desperate attempt by the IPCC to dismiss the CERN CLOUD experiment. An exclusive piece of hot news from the scientific community that you will not hear from the BBC.
If Black (or another Beeboid) deigns to acknowledge this news, he’ll just suggest that they’re being funded by Big Oil. Or just ugly Right-wing Christians, as if those are automatic disqualifications.
Notice also how in that first link, Black describes the Heartland Institute as having “an overtly libertarian bent”, but places no such value label on ThinkProgress, which is a well-known Left-wing group. As always, if the BBC doesn’t provide a partisan tag, you know where they stand.
‘Black describes the Heartland Institute as having “an overtly libertarian bent”, but places no such value label on ThinkProgress, which is a well-known Left-wing group. ‘
FoI exclusions prevent much factual archive being assessed, and in matters of interpretation and semantics one is in jelly-stapling territory, but one day I would like to see a review of how the balance of such qualifiers is accorded.
http://www.netplaces.com/body-language/the-remarkable-head/yes-no-and-everything-in-between.htm
At least three of the nine remaining moonwalkers Buzz Aldrin, Charles Duke and Harrison Schmitt have come out as Enemies of Science, as the warmists call us.
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that Libertarians where regarded as very left wing socialists, a hundred years ago.