‘How strange must our system of politicks appear in future ages, when it appears, that while we were carrying on offensive wars in all quarters of the globe with vast fleets and armies, that an enemy rode triumphant in our own harbours.’
The BBC steadfastly refuses to engage in any meaningful debate about the dangers of importing an ideology that is totally at odds with that of the host nation…in fact of a whole ‘Civilisation’ ….and consider that that ‘civilisation’ is one that acts as a defender of last resort of the freedoms and human rights that are so often crushed by various regimes. If this ‘Western civilisation’ falls or neuters itself who will there be to help those subject to the most violent oppression. It seems ironically that the BBC and the Left are happy to see the rise of a militant religious tyranny that will introduce such oppressions and police them with a violence that is somewhat beyond ‘waterboarding’ that life becomes but a sterile desert in the name of some sort of twisted belief in ‘human rights’ of those who would take great pleasure in stripping you of your own human rights.
Hayek said:
‘…Many who think themselves infinitely superior to the aberrations of Nazism and sincerely hate all its manifestations, work at the same time for ideals whose realisation would lead straight to the abhorred tyranny.’
Who can doubt that the BBC agenda and the policies of politicians all lead to the eventual ‘triumph’ of an ideology that is no more than an ‘abhorred tyranny’?
Maryam Namazie said:
‘Freedom of expression matters. It is not a luxury, a western value and it’s
certainly not up for sale (though obviously governments and the UN mistakenly
think it to be so).
Sometimes – actually more often than not – it is all we have.
But like many other rights and freedoms, it becomes most significant and finds
real meaning when it comes to criticising that which is taboo, forbidden,
sacred.
Freedom of expression matters most, therefore, when it comes to criticising
religion.
Freedom of expression is one of the only means we have at our disposal to resist both camps of reaction and to protect humanity.
We have to defend it unequivocally and unconditionally.’
Churchill said this about the defeat of tyranny after the war (abridged):
‘This noble continent, comprising on the whole the fairest and the most cultivated regions of the earth; enjoying a temperate and equable climate, is the home of all the great parent races of the western world. It is the fountain of Christian faith and Christian ethics. It is the origin of most of the culture, arts, philosophy and science both of ancient and modem times.
What is this plight to which Europe has been reduced?
The vast quivering mass of tormented, bewildered human beings
Who wait in their cities and their homes
And scan the dark horizons for the approach of some new form of tyranny or terror with the sullen silence of despair.
But for the Great Republic across the Atlantic Ocean saving Europe from ruin and enslavement the Dark Ages would have returned in their cruelty and squalor.
They may still return.
The salvation of the common people in Europe from war and servitude
Must be established on solid foundations,
And must be created by the readiness of
All men and women to die rather than to submit to tyranny.
Let Europe arise.’
Have we already seen the imposition of the Tartan Taliban?….Gordon Brown must be drinking whatever Muslims drink…he’s a very angry, irrational man:
‘Good evening, you’re watching ITV News. We go over now to Westminster, where our political editor Tom Bradby has just come from interviewing Gordon Brown. Good evening, Tom. How was the Prime Minister?’
‘Good evening, Alastair. Interviewing Gordon Brown is not like interviewing any other politician.
‘Most encounters with party leaders or MPs form a distinct pattern. We come in, we sit down, we chat pleasantly. We do an interview, which is probing, highbrow or a bit brutal, as circumstances demand.
‘Then we exchange a few more pleasantries and we go away. End of story. Tony Blair was like this, David Cameron is. So are Alistair Darling, Nick Clegg, George Osborne and just about every other front-rank politician I can think of.
‘Not Gordon. Interviewing him is emotionally complicated. He doesn’t seem to understand that we are here to ask difficult questions and test his arguments by establishing contrary positions.
‘He nearly always tells us we are wrong, both on and off camera, and that we have not done our research. He often gets angry, sometimes sulks and from time to time looks brutally hurt.
‘I really don’t know what to make of it. It’s not politics as we know it.’ ‘
Islam, a religion, but not as we know it?