Is there is no sense of irony left in Beebland? In a tweet. Mark Mardell has linked to an article written by Alan Strathern who comes from Oxford University (so it must be true).
The article deals with Buddhists who attacked Muslims in Burma and Sri Lanka. I don’t quibble with Prof Strathern’s premise. “However any religion starts out, sooner or later it enters into a Faustian pact with state power. Buddhist monks looked to kings, the ultimate wielders of violence, for the support, patronage and order that only they could provide. Kings looked to monks to provide the popular legitimacy that only such a high moral vision can confer.” (For the purposes of this exercise please replace “Buddhist” for Muslim”).
Ooops! That’s not acceptable, is it?
But what is ironic about this? It’s Mardell’s tweet. He asks: “Can ANY religion be a ‘religion of peace’?” Excuse me while I pick myself off the floor wiping tears of laughter from my eyes.
obama on assad … any use of chemical weapons, will be a red line not to be crossed/game changer etc, as the narrative was pushed that the goverment was using them with no evidence.
obama on jihadis actually using chemical weapons .. we need much more time to collate information, vigorous investigation … ya da ya da ya da.
the news this morning says there is evidence the jihadis have used them and that the assad gov has not.
then we have the bbc report.
tomoJun 8, 10:12 Weekend 7th June 2025 Supermarket beef steaks only available to people who buy 50kg of soy mince. https://twitter.com/JohnMappin/status/1931429307530051763
ZephirJun 8, 10:04 Weekend 7th June 2025 I am familiar with that particular phenomena.
tomoJun 8, 09:51 Weekend 7th June 2025 And it’s why the goons in Brussels have the BBC on their “one click funds transfer” system [img]https://i.ibb.co/ZRNxVc53/chrome-TMEBofssx8.png[/img]
JohnCJun 8, 09:45 Weekend 7th June 2025 They would reflect the character of the fat oaf better if they used this one: [img]https://www.thetimes.com/imageserver/image/%2Fmethode%2Fsundaytimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F7c76f6ba-a784-11ec-a0e9-23fd932feb90.jpg?crop=678%2C452%2C143%2C23[/img]
tomoJun 8, 09:42 Weekend 7th June 2025 The Greenies can’t do arithmetic… so they lie. https://twitter.com/7Kiwi/status/1931624348290351313
tomoJun 8, 09:36 Weekend 7th June 2025 Front page billing [img]https://i.ibb.co/bM3LZQ1x/chrome-X1lf8-Nlk6i.png[/img]
tomoJun 8, 09:30 Weekend 7th June 2025 https://twitter.com/exRAF_Al/status/1931612846435049860
JohnCJun 8, 09:19 Weekend 7th June 2025 Israel is accused of the gravest war crimes – how governments respond could haunt them for years to come https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0r1xl5wgnko…
Emmanuel GoldsteinJun 8, 09:14 Weekend 7th June 2025 When the immigrants are the majority and take over do you think they will behave as the immigrants to America…
tomoJun 8, 09:09 Weekend 7th June 2025 [img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gs3-thwXgAApr-N?format=jpg&name=small[/img]
Any chance of a new open thread please?
Is there is no sense of irony left in Beebland? In a tweet. Mark Mardell has linked to an article written by Alan Strathern who comes from Oxford University (so it must be true).
The article deals with Buddhists who attacked Muslims in Burma and Sri Lanka. I don’t quibble with Prof Strathern’s premise. “However any religion starts out, sooner or later it enters into a Faustian pact with state power. Buddhist monks looked to kings, the ultimate wielders of violence, for the support, patronage and order that only they could provide. Kings looked to monks to provide the popular legitimacy that only such a high moral vision can confer.” (For the purposes of this exercise please replace “Buddhist” for Muslim”).
Ooops! That’s not acceptable, is it?
But what is ironic about this? It’s Mardell’s tweet. He asks: “Can ANY religion be a ‘religion of peace’?” Excuse me while I pick myself off the floor wiping tears of laughter from my eyes.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22356306
obama on assad … any use of chemical weapons, will be a red line not to be crossed/game changer etc, as the narrative was pushed that the goverment was using them with no evidence.
obama on jihadis actually using chemical weapons .. we need much more time to collate information, vigorous investigation … ya da ya da ya da.
the news this morning says there is evidence the jihadis have used them and that the assad gov has not.
then we have the bbc report.
bbc
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22424188