Is there is no sense of irony left in Beebland? In a tweet. Mark Mardell has linked to an article written by Alan Strathern who comes from Oxford University (so it must be true).
The article deals with Buddhists who attacked Muslims in Burma and Sri Lanka. I don’t quibble with Prof Strathern’s premise. “However any religion starts out, sooner or later it enters into a Faustian pact with state power. Buddhist monks looked to kings, the ultimate wielders of violence, for the support, patronage and order that only they could provide. Kings looked to monks to provide the popular legitimacy that only such a high moral vision can confer.” (For the purposes of this exercise please replace “Buddhist” for Muslim”).
Ooops! That’s not acceptable, is it?
But what is ironic about this? It’s Mardell’s tweet. He asks: “Can ANY religion be a ‘religion of peace’?” Excuse me while I pick myself off the floor wiping tears of laughter from my eyes.
obama on assad … any use of chemical weapons, will be a red line not to be crossed/game changer etc, as the narrative was pushed that the goverment was using them with no evidence.
obama on jihadis actually using chemical weapons .. we need much more time to collate information, vigorous investigation … ya da ya da ya da.
the news this morning says there is evidence the jihadis have used them and that the assad gov has not.
then we have the bbc report.
tomoAug 16, 20:28 Weekend 16th August 2025 weirdos – likely chums of Dale Vince That’s one sad Paliflagpole https://twitter.com/liamtuffs1/status/1956712844340199463
Guest WhoAug 16, 18:49 Weekend 16th August 2025 https://www.cordbusters.co.uk/bbc-is-building-a-radical-second-freely-streaming-box/? Because if there is one broadcaster known for being ‘radical’, it’s the BBC. The problem it may face is:…
Guest WhoAug 16, 18:46 Weekend 16th August 2025 I recall an article about the safety concerns of overloading. Might even have been the BBC.
Up2snuffAug 16, 18:27 Weekend 16th August 2025 pug, the BBC would be horrified if we said what motivated Vlad ‘the mad Aggressor’ Putin was Cathy Ashton’s visit,…
Richard PinderAug 16, 18:08 Weekend 16th August 2025 Ten books on ‘Death and Injury’ by Vaccination: (1) Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe and Effective Is Lying:…
Fedup2Aug 16, 18:04 Weekend 16th August 2025 Just following along the above post – sometime in the past year the was a conspiracy to pervert the course…
Fedup2Aug 16, 17:48 Weekend 16th August 2025 Non – they assume that people forget – but in modern language – they – like much of the msm…
Guest WhoAug 16, 17:38 Weekend 16th August 2025 https://jihadwatch.org/2025/08/netanyahu-giving-palestinians-a-piece-of-israel-wont-make-peace This should be raised by all supposed impartial media with all supposed historically learned politicians and then discussed calmly…
JohnCAug 16, 16:30 Weekend 16th August 2025 Top BBC headline: UK MP’s pressure Egypt to take in sick and injured children from Gaza. Only joking. This is…
non-licence payerAug 16, 16:08 Weekend 16th August 2025 https://www.facebook.com/reel/1365144101539826 I cannot speak for any aspect of the video but it looks like the UK and it looks like…
Any chance of a new open thread please?
Is there is no sense of irony left in Beebland? In a tweet. Mark Mardell has linked to an article written by Alan Strathern who comes from Oxford University (so it must be true).
The article deals with Buddhists who attacked Muslims in Burma and Sri Lanka. I don’t quibble with Prof Strathern’s premise. “However any religion starts out, sooner or later it enters into a Faustian pact with state power. Buddhist monks looked to kings, the ultimate wielders of violence, for the support, patronage and order that only they could provide. Kings looked to monks to provide the popular legitimacy that only such a high moral vision can confer.” (For the purposes of this exercise please replace “Buddhist” for Muslim”).
Ooops! That’s not acceptable, is it?
But what is ironic about this? It’s Mardell’s tweet. He asks: “Can ANY religion be a ‘religion of peace’?” Excuse me while I pick myself off the floor wiping tears of laughter from my eyes.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22356306
obama on assad … any use of chemical weapons, will be a red line not to be crossed/game changer etc, as the narrative was pushed that the goverment was using them with no evidence.
obama on jihadis actually using chemical weapons .. we need much more time to collate information, vigorous investigation … ya da ya da ya da.
the news this morning says there is evidence the jihadis have used them and that the assad gov has not.
then we have the bbc report.
bbc
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22424188