‘George Zimmerman’s innocent?????’
Say that in the tone of ‘Flash Gordon’s Alive!!?’ and you get the idea of the BBC’s incredulous reaction I just heard on the radio news announcement.
WHAT!!??? An almost whitish sorta man kills a ‘unarmed black boy’….surely he’s got to be guilty?
All the President’s men and all the President’s horses couldn’t jail ‘Whitey’.
Even though they tried to pin a charge of ‘child abuse’ upon him in the dying moments of the case…not bothering to inform the defence.
A charge which the BBC seems to have ignored. Could it be that the charge was so obvoiously ridiculous, drummed up in a last desperate measure to get Zimmerman for something, anything that the BBC knew it would discredit the prosecution’s case and how the public view this.
It could also be why the BBC have ignored the wider perspective of the US government’s determination to find Zimmerman guilty and the lengths they went to to try and ensure that….not least the shameful manipulation and interference by Obama when he said of the victim , Trayvon Martin: if he had a son he’d look like Trayvon.
Mark Steyn elaborates: