Guess the BBC didn’t forgive Blair for the Iraq War and Dyke having to fall on his sword, and Blair still relying on Murdoch to get his message across:
1.58pm from Ruth Turner (Blair’s director of government relations at No 10):
So BBC chose [MPs] Sarah McCarthy-Fry, Julie Morgan and George Mudie who are hostile rather than Mike Gapes, Ann Clwyd and Karen Buck [who] are reasonable and supportive. This is a campaign organisation and not a news outlet!
3.36pm from Jonathan Powell [Blair’s long-serving chief of staff]:
Did we publish his three foreign policy speeches as a pamphlet? TB wants to send to Murdoch.
Make of that what you will….this is yet another open thread to take you into the weekend….
Re-Latest Islamic jihad massacre of non-Muslims in KENYA.
Before any Beeboids try to appease Al Shabab jihadists-
“ON ITS TWITTER ACCOUNT, DEVOUT MUSLIM GROUP AL-SHABAB PRAISES 9/11 HIJACKERS, VOWS TO CONTINUE FIGHTING AGAINST WEST”
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/09/on-its-twitter-account-devout-muslim-group-al-shabab-praises-911-hijackers-vows-to-continue-fighting.html
INBBC may still want to deny it, but this is what Islamic jihad is about:-
“‘All Muslims leave… we only want to kill non-Muslims’: Gunmen massacre at least 30 in Kenyan shopping mall after releasing anyone who could prove they were Islamic by reciting a prayer”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2427892/Nairobi-mall-Gunmen-massacred-22-Kenyan-shopping-centre-targeted-non-Islamics.html
Kenya shopping centre attack BBC News -
6 minutes ago
The BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms and conditions apply…
YEP! … i bet
I blame Kenyan foreign policy and inequality.
Compare this highly censored and sanitzed BBC report with the Daily Mail’s front page splash on their website – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-24186780
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2427892/Nairobi-mall-Gunmen-massacred-22-Kenyan-shopping-centre-targeted-non-Islamics.html
Where there are Muslims, there will be inevitably be intolerance, violence and/or disharmony.
Mass immigration into Britain, from Islamic countries, as advocated by the likes of INBBC, as bound to include the entry of Islamic jihadists and their supporters.
After all day urging its audience to avoid jumping to the conclusion that the Kenyan attack was the work of “terrorists”, the BBC now accept that Al-Shabaab have something to say about the attrocity, but have not explicitly claimed responsibility. In fact the responsibility lies with the Kenyan government for killing innocent Muslims in Somalia. No blood on the jihadis’ hands it would seem
I’m surprised the BBC didn’t try to spin the old right-wing Christian extremist crap. Muslims can blow things up, kill in broad daylight, chuck hand grenades into churches and yet the BNP and the EDL get a much harder time! Pathetic
This time, the Islamic jihadists have singled out for execution and have massacred over 30 individual non-Muslims at the Westgate Shopping Mall, Nairobi, not the Westfield Shopping Mall, London.
George R
That was my thought too, when I heard the news. Some years ago there was talk of UK “men” thinking of attacks on big UK shopping centres or night clubs – and Westgate would be an obvious target.
I would not be at all surprised if such ideas are still current among some of the “men”.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6195914.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6818699/Terrorist-plot-to-bomb-London-foiled-by-police-on-the-beat.html
Not yet
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-24184748
Surprised no ones this. Two ‘British men’ arrested on suspicion of endangering an aircraft which was forced to land at Stanstead – the airport reserved for terrorism & Hijackings.
“A Sri Lankan Airlines Airbus A330 diverted into Stansted at approximately 19.30 this evening ”
Looks like the usual suspects then !
“Essex men”, you mean …
Israel soldier abducted and killed in West Bank
Will the BBC get around to naming the soldier? He was 20-year-old Tomer Hazan.
Will the BBC correct the map? Qalqiliya is in the Palestinian Authority (West Bank?) not as it appears just over the Israeli border.
Will the BBC correct the headline? The correct adjective is Israeli?
Will the BBC admit the event really happened and is not just a claim (which could subsequently be disproved) by the Israelis?
Will the BBC write that the soldier was persuaded to visit his murderer’s home and was not in the West Bank in any sort of official capacity?
For a lot more detail:
IDF soldier murdered by Palestinian in West Bank
BBC website story on Nairobi now has headline with ‘Brits’ in it. Don’t they know that is a pejorative term?
Can you imagine one reading ‘Pakis killed in Newcastle’?
as mentioned in my post above
BBC 1 – Sunday Muslim oops Morning Live
Ta Ra! …… Do Muslim veils deepen divisions?
The viewers question …
Is wearing the niqab a matter of RELIGIOUS??? freedom or does the veil deepen divisions within society? …
(the BBC knows the veil has nothing to do with religion, is an overt political statement, is not in the Quran, and is discouraged from both the Hajj and the Mosque.
The question is deliberately misleading …
indicating to the viewer that this garment is a religious item, as a given fact)
hmm! and … could this be another viewer spanking for the biased broad cresent
Had to laff @ Ed today with his random members of the English public whooping and applauding at his off the cuff speech.
Of course bBC was in on the joke too, except the real British public don’t fall for this crap anymore.
After about 30 minutes and breakdowns I finally managed to submit this complaint to the BBC:
In the report of the Nairobi murders, you use the term ‘Brit’ in your headline: ‘Brits caught in Kenya attack.’
‘Brit’ is now a racist term. It is normally used pejoratively or at best sneeringly.
If the headline read ‘Pakis caught in Kenya attack’, the headline writer would be sacked by the BBC.
Could you please stop using it, even in headlines? I notice the story goes on to use the term ‘Britons’ which is acceptable.
This usage illustrates a problem I increasingly notice on your online news website, and that is badly or unedited stories often showing a sort of metropolitan bias.
Presumably you will also be writing to all the tabloids to make the same complaint. The Sun uses Brit in its headlines, typically when a plucky sportsman has won something. In fact, you must be the only person in Christendom aware of this pejorative usage.
I cant speak for Framer but as an atheist I find your use of the term ‘Christendom’ mildly offensive and if I were forced to pay for your opinions under threat of imprisonment (as I am by the BBC) I might be minded to write you a letter of complaint .But as I’m not I defend your right to make a humourless ass of your self at every opportunity, in fact I encourage you to do so as often as possible
(By the way I’ve been boycotting the sun for some time)
Seriously?
A few Daily Mail headlines from the last week:
‘Massive Superstar’ Froch vows to knock out Groves ‘in style’ ahead of Brit showdown
Murray pays the price as busy Brit may take a break after summer exertions
Brit wins home round of world diving
Perhaps you can enlighten me as to how these are ‘derogratory’.
On the other hand, perhaps you are being fantastically oversensitive. Given the space devoted elsewhere to the media’s overreaction to the word ‘sluts’, some may see your overreaction to a word which is in common usage as, well, ironic.
Which you duly did ,in spades
The issuer of the pejoritive term ‘Brit’ is the uniquely funded BBC. If the Sun does use the term ‘Brit’ and I object to that then I can withhold funding from the Sun. I am not obliged to fund the Sun because I subscribe to ‘Ferret Features’ magazine.
I am also aware of this pejorative use of the word ‘Brit’ so Framer is not the only person in ‘Christendom’ who is aware of this usage. If the usage of pejorative terms is not allowed for certain nationalities then it must not be allowed for any nationalities.
That is only fair isn’t it?
If people genuinely believe the BBC using the term ‘Brit’ is pejorative than that is IMO a classic example of the supposed bias being in the interpretation of the reader/listener/ viewer rather than in the actual content of what is broadcast. I have never before heard anyone say they find being called a Brit offensive. If you do then fine, but I suspect you’ll be in a tiny minority.
Thanks for your thoughtful contribution to the main issue of the day .
One example which I heard from Gerard Adams of IRA fame a few years ago: “… … to get the Brits to butt out of Ulster.”
It all depends who is using it … some American Blacks call themselves “niggaz” but would object if a honky used the same word.
There are a few issues here really but unfortunately none we can hold the BBC to book for. Imagine the word Limey or Pom used in the same way, only certain nationalities use it and the usage can be both nickname and pejorative.
Another example is ‘Tory’: the BBC (and the UK Left in general) use it to say ‘nasty’, ‘toff’ etc but you can’t stop them as the Conservatives themselves use the name! It is who says it and how they say it.
Pakis out!
Brits out!
What’s the real difference?
CTC: the sun can use any terms it likes, I don’t HAVE to pay for that shit.
Now, the BBC? Not quite the same situation huh?
Guess that’s lost on you.
Few people find the term ‘Brit’ offensive, although it is interesting to speculate as to why this abbreviation is deemed acceptable but the abbreviation ‘Paki’ is not. Far more offensive to many people is the manner in which the BBC use the terms Briton or British when describing people who clearly are not except in the most narrowest of senses (e.g. they live in Britain for the purposes of claiming benefits or escaping justice in their homelands). This is done quite intentionally by the MSM in order to undermine concepts of national identity and cultural unity. Remember, to them we are all ‘Europeans’ or ‘Citizens of the world’ . It is, of course, perfectly acceptable to be, say, Pakistani or Somalian when it suits.
It is, of course, perfectly acceptable to be, say, Pakistani or Somalian when it suits.
Which begs the question: What future do our dear leaders at the BBC see for Pakistanis and Somalis if they are to be excluded from the One World Government? A quick shower before acceptance perhaps?
‘Telegraph’ (£):-
“BBC accused of ’bias’ in favour of assisted suicide.
“The BBC has been accused of acting as a ‘cheerleader’ for assisted suicide by broadcasting campaigners’ views on national television without opposition.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10325616/BBC-accused-of-bias-in-favour-of-assisted-suicide.html
Conflate this with the NHS Pathway and a light bulb clicks on.
Message for INBBC: no more euphemistic reports on Islamic jihad massacres.
An ‘Independent’ journalist (via CNN News) has compared this Islamic jihad massacre in Nairobi. to that of Mumbai, 2008.
The Al Shabab Islamic jihad massacre in Nairobi is targeting non-Muslims, but INBBC is relegating this vital part of Islamic jihad motivation of hate and murder. Al Shabab allowed Muslim to leave, but murdered as many non-Muslim hostages as possible.
“Horror in Kenya: ‘al-Shabaab claim responsibility as non-Muslims targeted in terror attack’ on Nairobi shopping centre.
“At least 39 dead and scores more injured as gunmen, armed with grenades, stormed affluent mall”
KATIE GRANT Author Biography , SEBASTIAN SALEK
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/horror-in-kenya-alshabaab-claim-responsibility-as-nonmuslims-targeted-in-terror-attack-on-nairobi-shopping-centre-8831413.html
As usual when there is a major terrorist attack overseas – the entire BBC twists and squirms to avoid using the words “TERRORISM” or “TERRORISTS”. In its news reporting on air, in Frank Gardiner’s piece, on tits website – the only words used are “gunmen” or “militants” or “fighters”.
The BBC was forced eventually to use the word terrorism to describe the London bombings – because it was in London.
There are British people caught up in the Nairobi massacre, it appears. But – just as with bombings at tourist centres in Egypt – the BBC avoids using the only proper words. How can shooting women and young children who could not recite a Muslim prayer be anything but Muslim terrorism ?
The BBC is truly sick to the core. Don;t try to reform it, it has bias verging upon evil in its DNA. Abolish it.
What INBBC is keen to censor, so that it can present a sanitised image of ‘the religion of peace’:-
“Kenya: ‘If You Were Muslim They Let You Go.’
Witnesses to the attack on a shopping centre in Nairobi say gunmen executed anyone who could not recite an Islamic prayer.”
http://news.sky.com/story/1144892/kenya-if-you-were-muslim-they-let-you-go
BBC promoting suicide again. Is that because they don’t get any money from over-75s, I wonder?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10325616/BBC-accused-of-bias-in-favour-of-assisted-suicide.html
Supplementary.
“BBC accused of being a ‘cheerleader’ for euthanasia after Labour peer talks about his plan for assisted death… but opponent is told not to turn up.
“Labour’s Lord Falconer discussed assisted dying plans unopposed on BBC.
“Anti-euthanasia campaigner Dr Peter Saunders was due to appear on show.
“However, he was dropped and nobody was invited to take his place.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2428864/BBC-accused-cheerleader-euthanasia-Labour-peer-talks-plan-assisted-death–opponent-told-turn-up.html
Andrew Marr show…
oh god where to start..
Polly … Labour are good tories bad….
all agree we shouldn’t listen to anything bad about Labour…
UKIP laugh laugh….
Global warming is proven science don’t argue little people, just keep paying…
Ed is wonderful…
More ED next…
Wonder if he’s in for a tough grilling….
For INBBC: more global connection of Islamic jihad massacres, Kenya-Somalia-Britain.
The ‘Daily Mail’ relevantly refers to this in its Nairobi report:-
“The shootings came as British-born Jermaine Grant was due to go on trial in Mombasa. He is accused of plotting a bombing campaign against tourist hotels in Kenya with several accomplices, one of whom is Briton Samantha Lewthwaite, widow of the 7/7 bomber Germaine Lindsay.”
From report:-
“‘All Muslims leave’ order… then gang target victims who can’t name Prophet’s mother: Britons caught in crossfire as masked gunmen slaughter 43 in Kenyan mall and terrorists blog attack live on twitter”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2427892/Nairobi-mall-Gunmen-massacred-22-Kenyan-shopping-centre-targeted-non-Islamics.html
There were a lot of reports last year about Samantha Lewthwaite, widow of a 7/7 bomber (and a mother of 2 children ?) , being hunted in Kenya – she was training Islamist fighters. Some reports yesterday said there was a woman / women among the terrorists. I immediately thought of her.
Of course her name and existence would not be known to BBC listeners or viewers, they would never have dreamed of mentioning her. In their book she was just a white convert to the Religion of Peace.
The BBC – covering for scum cowards they won’t even describe as terrorists
Yes, whereas ‘Daily Mail’ coverage of Muslim convert, the Islamic jihadist, LEWTHWAITE, is usefully extensive, INBBC ‘coverage’ is relatively paltry.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?pageOffset=&pageSize=&sel=site&searchPhrase=samantha+lewthwaite&orderBy=dateDesc&_channelshortname=on&_channelshortname=on&_contenttype=on&dateupdated=&dateFrom=&dateTo=&_authornamef=on&_authornamef=on
That is a lot of Daily Mail links to articles about the Black Widow convert to Islam.
So it would have been hard for any Mail reader to not know about Lewthwaite and how dangerous she is.
BBC – crickets chirping. Typical.
I am still convinced there are supporters or fellow-travellers of Islamist terrorism in the newsrooms of the BBC, making sure the news is biased or omits proper coverage of the dangers we face.
And the BBC’s “security correspondents” are useless.
‘I guess the chickens are coming ‘home’ to roost’ to quote Lee Jasper on a recent celebrity mugging in our streets.
The horrific slaughter and targeting of innocent non-Muslims at a Westgate shopping centre in Nairobi.
Coming to Britain any time now! We have been warned.
Maybe the ubiquitous Polly could concentrate her highly perceptive mind on this very real possibility.
Just watching Ed Milliband on the Marr Show. Noticing in the back ground that even the Brighton Wheel has a token black carriage going round.
BBC news manage to find a Muslim injured victim (Omar Khan) to interview, no other injured interviewed…..
Good going considering Kenya is 83% Christian..
-And the Islamic jihadists singled out kafirs (non-Muslims).
Kafirs in Islam:-
“KAFIR:
“The language of Islam is dualistic. As an example, there is never any reference to humanity as a unified whole. Instead there is a division into believer and kafir (unbeliever). Humanity is not seen as one body, but is divided into whether the person believes Mohammed is the prophet of Allah or not.
“Kafir is what the Koran and Islam call the unbelievers. Kafir is the worst word in the human language.”
http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/kafir/
The BBC and Britain is being starved by the evil Tories meme. Yet again.
Could you feed a family of eight for £5.
Yes easily, you don’t get a medal for a bit of simple shopping
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-24160472
Tina Jefferies, a single mother of seven children
1) Child benefit ALONE = £495 per month, You can buy a lot of Everyday Value products for £495
When is the next Food Bank story going to appear
Even money says there is one before Wednesday.
No sign of this woman starving yet.
Glandular?
Big boned
Not the warmest of welcomes to Brighton for BBC R4’s chief political correspondent. Heh.
“… I had that Enoch Powell in the back of my cab once, spoke twenty bleedin’ languages that man did, twenty, think he went a bit far with that speech and the rivers of blood stuff and all that but he’s got a point about all them darkies, tons of ’em, on the bloody BBC every day, not being racist or anything, mind you, that Trevor MacDonald is a real gent …
Priceless!
Actually, despite the [sigh], that post suggests Denmark may be waking up to how rotten it is.
The bbc1 – Sunday Muslim … i mean Morning Lie?
… erm I mean Live.
Doctors and orchestrates a supposed debate on the Niquab
right from the off, by lying, (not going to go through it all again, but it is a fact) … the RELIGIOUS GARMENT??? … with segment by someone babbling about closer to god in a black out curtain? …
look I could say I talk to god every day overtly … all the time … in public … they wouldn t even let me home for my bloody pyjamas!, an absurd, sad and politically correct farce.
It is what Islam does NOW!, here, abroad, now and historically does it oppress? does it discriminate? is it political?, is it an ideology, is it using the moniker of a religion/racism to lever extra privileges for itself, is it murderous, is it genocidal? does it validate child marriage? paedophilia? child gang rape, is it supremacist?, facist? does it create deliberate apartheid? …
Then … ask yourself? truthfully! if you believe the excusery, flawed incoherent babble spouted, in the bbc s trumpeted segment.
viewer vote 95% 😀 – best yet!
so … is the bbc going to act in the interest of the 95%
of its viewers? ….
ditch its absurd bias for the (as mentioned by
S Yaqoob earlier) the 2% of the population?
in every vote where the viewers get to express their choice the result is similar.
And what was the panalists’ reaction? People need more ‘education’ to understand the ‘truth’ about the veil so that they would not be the cause of divisiveness.
truth? … everything spouted about it, in the bbc filmed segment, in the bbc s “debate” question is patently false.
What made me laugh, somewhat hollowly, was that their reaction to a 95% poll was that the number could be reduced by education rather than accepting the vast majority, and a 95% is a Zimbabwean sized majority, find the veil divisive.
95% – that’s a lot of uneccessary “diversity” training 😀
I suppose there would be mass “navel gazing” in BBC HQ
if any one of our beebots came up with the idea, that the ahem … “tiny minority” 😀 (black out curtain wearers), of our 2% population
of muslims, would be a much more cogent option for intense
re education …
what? … question too difficult 😀
no eureka moment at al bbc?
I am confused are “Islamic militants” and “gunmen” the same thing as jihadi Muslim terrorists?
Dont let the new-age lexicon of the libtards confuse you.
They all fall into the definition of murderous Muslim Bastards. Simple really.
Muslims they are, first and foremost.
Following Allah’s lifestyle, commands, edicts.
Murderous bastards one and all.
No – one lot kill you quicker.
Lexicon-wise, I am now intrigued at the BBC ‘s latest rush email on victims.
Now I find any at the hands of such loons tragic, but I guess we must expect some country focus.
However, that it covers every skirting term possible to avoid detail beyond various terms of ‘Britishness’ that go no further than there, I do wonder who these poor folk may turn out be, and where from?
Fair play to Andrew Marr, just watched him make Milliband look like the juvenile
Waffelling student leftie that he is.
I caught the first BBC 1 England, “Question Time” question about the veil; typical liberal flip-flops and the pathological Jenny Wren journalist worrying about this issue actually fuelling “Islamophobic” thought patterns, and concerns that Islamophobes (and nasty parties) will use this issue for their own political ends.
And now, after the gun attack on the Kenyan shopping centre where witnesses are saying terrorists told moslems to leave and would be protected and that they only shot people they believed were non-moslems- I wonder what Question Time liberals think now about this uniform and declaration of moslem woman status?
No doubt some of them are thinking, well at least as an obvious Moslem she would have been protected in this latest horrific attack, if she had not been wearing it she may have been shot by mistake by the nasty terrorists(who of course are not really Moslems and perverting the religion of peace) as a non-moslem. Actually, every reason therefore to keep wearing it and to stop the non-moslems (and nasty Islamophobes) from demanding that the moslem women stop wearing it.
God forbid something like that should happen at London’s Brent Cross shopping centre, or that nice one next to the BBC in White City, or at a hospital in the NHS, and the wearing of veils had been forbidden, so many innocent moslem women may have been killed! God forbid, that they would have been mistaken for non-moslems! Didn’t that BBC journalist who was shot by terrorists also claim that he was a moslem- clearly you need to look and dress like a moslem as well. Paxman’s beard is a good start at the BBC.
I really think their perverted thought patterns function like this, and that they probably would have shrugged their shoulders and accepted in a dictatorship that some other religions, etc., wear yellow stars or sexual deviants, pink triangles on their clothes to distinguish them from other ‘normal’ people, and we should allow that too, if they wish to do so- it’s a freedom of choice matter. How else could they show that they were non-aryan? What is wrong with wearing your religion on your sleeve? Let her cover her face.
Liberal footnote to QT concerns: so, clearly, if you were a woman wearing a veil, and had been left alone by those racists in England asking for its removal (unlike the mainstream political parties in France, Belgium, Germany, etc.), a situation like this would have been very dangerous indeed, because clearly terrorists don’t target moslem women wearing veils. QED.
Somalia, and Islamic Jihadists in Britain.
If INBBC still does investigative reports, will it update this?:-
“Jihad: The Somalia connection.
“Numbers of young Britons heading for war-torn African country have soared.”
(‘Independent on Sunday’, 2009).
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jihad-the-somalia-connection-1786608.html
INBBC: Guantanamo and Islamic Jihadists.
Has INBBC reported this, or is it too far off its political message?:-
“Terrorist released from Guantanamo Bay after convincing officials he was no longer a threat to the West is killed fighting for Al Qaeda in Syria”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2428119/Terrorist-freed-Guantanamo-Bay-killed-fighting-Al-Qaeda-Syria.html
INBBC’s ‘Tiny Minority of Extremists’ are very active in their jihad murdering at present:-
E.g (and not a full list):-
1.) Kenya
“Death toll rises to 59 in terror attack on Kenya shopping mall”
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/09/22/attack-on-nairobi-mall-kills-10-people/
2.) Pakistan.
“56 killed, 120 injured as twin suicide blasts hit Christian church in NW Pakistan”
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/article/article_xinhua.aspx?id=168739
3.) Iraq.
“Over 69 killed in Iraq violence”
http://news.iafrica.com/worldnews/880537.html?
4.) Syria.
“New report says only one-third of Syrian rebels are ‘moderates’ — and those ‘moderates’ burn churches”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/09/new-report-says-only-one-third-of-syrian-rebels-are-moderates—-and-those-moderates-burn-churches.html
That must be all those moderates again!
“Stealth Anti-Israelism from the British Media”
By Ari Lieberman.
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/
“Israeli forces join effort to free hostages and end jihad attack at Kenya mall.”
[Excerpt]:-
“‘The Israelis have just entered and they are rescuing the hostages and the injured.’ The world’s scapegoat once again comes to the rescue. No word from Barack Obama, meanwhile, on sending any help. He is too busy aiding the jihadist brethren of these Somali jihad murderers in Syria.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/09/israeli-forces-join-effort-to-free-hostages-and-end-jihad-attack-at-kenya-mall.html
Obama is a boy doing a man’s job and failing very badly.
Sunday Morning Li(v)e this morning.
They had a heated, well not very, debate on the issue of Tottenham (spit) supporters calling themselves ‘yids’ and relating it to the use of ‘nigger’ and ‘paki’. Ohhh those naughty Tottingham peeps.
They had a Rabbi and an Iman on who both thought it was wrong and anti-Semitic.
What occurred to me though, after a very one-sided debate where one out of three panalists was prevaricating and only one ‘guest’ was approving, was the attitude that Jews were better off not advertising themselves on the terraces. In fact, it seemed, that the panel seemed to think that football would be better off without Jews all together.
This attitude was highlighted by the fact that when they came to talk about robots ( and what an astonishing debate that was) the view of the Jew was not required and the Rabbi was replaced by a grinning child.
So, if you are Jewish take heed the warning – stay out of sight your opinions are not required unless it is to suit the BBCs current meme.
How long, I wonder before the idea mutates to the country being better off without Jews?
The BBC’s favourite radicals must be doing overtime around the globe (but, of course, it’s got nothing to do with that book, the Koran)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24193734
I need to catch up with these events in Kenya.
So, this Al Shishkebab group: are they the moderate arm of Al Qaeda? Can we talk to them?
Currently in hospital (staff great, systems buggered at near every stage; talk about lions lead by donkeys. Or, literally, death by clipboard), but too mean to fork out for the £10 daily telly feed. Being £10 on a dongle gets me all the net I can eat makes this a doomed business model.
But it also means I’m getting my ‘as it happens’ from sources I trust to be fast but honest, and then analysis afterwards from those who have professional integrity.
So, thanks to BBBC and links here too, I am quite up to speed as the tragic events in Kenya (& elsewhere… Seems like BOGOF at the local ROP massacre mart) unfold.
So it was…. Interesting.. To just get this ‘latest’ email from the world’s most events interpreter:
Nairobi standoff ‘kills 59’
At least 59 people killed – 175 injured – in attack in Nairobi shopping centre, government minister says
So… it seems guns don’t kill people: standoffs do.
I know they are desperate to avoid admitting the facts, but beyond their usual semantic backflips that really is cretinous.
I’m getting my ‘as it happens’
Now then, now then, be careful what you wish for on the NHS. Just remember to hide if you see someone in a tracksuit.
Oh and avoid the yellow pudding, it put me into remission on my last stint in hell.
GWS ‘natch.
OT. You had to go & jinx it.
So far the meals have been OK, but they appear to play musical wards on Sunday, and I ended up with previous guy’s veggie burger.
If anyone who shouldn’t got my pork and apple stew, expect the schedules to be cleared across the West Mids media estate, with stories of hospital admins lunging in slo-mo to knock it from the lips of some kid being treated for malnourishment.
And suddenly now present parents with Keith Vaz in tow seeking compo for the affront my highly missed dinner represents.
Around 60 people have been killed in the bombing of a church in Pakistan. An opportunity for the BBC to consider the persecution of Christians in that country? Nah. Instead we get a link to a two month old story entitled “Pakistan grapples with rising tide of extremist violence” (see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23319254). Just to set the scene it opens with a picture and the words “Worshippers react nervously when they hear raised voices outside the mosque”. It discusses Shia-Sunni violence – and there is certainly a lot of it there – but not a single mention of the attacks on Christians that have killed thousands during the past decade. Nor any reference to the dozen or so executed for blasphemy. Not any reference Pakistan’s constitution that prevents a Christian being the prime minister or a senior judge. Nope, they’re as quiet on this subject as your local bishop.
Why isn’t this on the BBC or MSM?
Dutch king declares end to welfare state
http://www.euronews.com/2013/09/18/dutch-king-declares-end-of-the-welfare-state/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2423751/Dutch-King-Willem-Alexander-declares-welfare-state-20th-century-over.html?ito=feeds-newsxml#
Main headline on BBC news text, “Britons amongst dead in Kenya”
The sad thing is that its highly unlikely that Briton in this case means what it used to, when I hear the word Briton it means ‘like me’ yet sadly today that’s not the case…
As an aside just finished watching the F1 race live on German TV (as the BBC prefer to waste money on The Voice) why is is that the Germans don’t suffer ‘placements’ in their adverts etc, German TV appears to be hideously white….
Link exchange is nothing else however it is just placing the other person’s website link on your page at
appropriate place and other person will also do similar in favor of you.