Glass Half Empty

 

Interesting listening to the aftermath of Osborne’s budget speech on the BBC…you’d hardly know that Ball’s got a pasting or that Labour had been soundly trounced.

You’d have no inkling that Osborne’s budget was based on a solid recovery and gave help to all levels of society….no inkling that under Labour 7.2% of the economy was destroyed.

 

Some key phrases from the OBR report upon which the budget is based:

In 2018-19, we expect the underlying balance to move into surplus for the first time in 18 years.

There is a roughly 5 per cent chance that the economy will shrink in 2014 and a similar chance it will grow by more than 5 per cent.

We  expect quarterly GDP growth to slow into 2014, gradually strengthening thereafter as productivity picks up and real earnings growth provides the foundation for a stronger and more sustained upswing. This recovery in productivity growth is perhaps the most important judgement in our economy forecast.

 

Note that ‘This recovery in productivity growth is perhaps the most important judgement in our economy forecast.‘…because the BBC doesn’t look at that….it just tells us that the recovery is a ‘false recovery based on consumer spending and borrowing’...but the OBR says that whilst there will be a slow down in 2014 after that the economy will grow based on productivity gains.

That is not something the BBC seems to want to advertise.

Here Nick Robinson and Robert Peston are carping, negative and critical of Osborne’s measures…for example the decision not to raise the car fuel duty…Imagine what they could do with £22bn – that, the chancellor revealed, is the cumulative cost of the ever-popular cancellation of planned rises at petrol pumps.

Ironic coming from Robinson…the same person who, when at ITV, took Labour to task for suggesting that the Tories would ‘cut‘ the NHS by £35 bn when the truth was they just wouldn’t match Labour’s proposed spending rise but would keep the budget at the then same level….but now Robinson plays the same game….categorising a future non-rise in income as a spending cut.

 

 

 

 

Here are some of the BBC’s key pointers for critiques of the Coalition that seem to be the editorial backbone to most BBC analyses:

First...Use the Labour narrative (contrast with how they talk of terrorism or the security wall in Israel)…Plan B is credible….and when proven not…go with the new one…the ‘Cost of living crisis‘ is real…and caused by the government’s policies….no one has ever been ‘poor’ before May 2010.

Second….Actually let’s not look back to Labour times...let’s talk about now…in other words let’s not blame Labour for the mess we’re in now.

Third…’Austerity’ is the real cause of our problems….and it isn’t necessary….‘Austerity’ is a purely ideological imposition….the Coalition is on a ‘mission to shrink the government beyond responsible economic stewardship’  That was the BBC’s Dominic Laurie…who seems to have stepped into Paul Mason’s loafers and taken on the mantle of advocate for big government, nationalisation and State intervention.

Fourth….Every government policy that is seen to benefit anybody is ‘electioneering‘ or ‘crowd pleasing populism’…whilst Miliband’s ‘price freeze’ was socially responsible policy making.

Fifth…..the recovery is a ‘false recovery’…based on consumer debt, the spending of savings and borrowing….‘BBC Political Editor Nick Robinson said the government was worried economic growth might not continue as it was mainly based on consumer spending’, (but don’t suggest going back to look at Labour’s record……after all wasn’t that the exact recipe for the leveraging up of the financial crash? Rule 1 applies…let’s not talk about Labour.)  It is remarkable how the BBC manages to ignore all those businesses who say they are doing a roaring trade and go on to paint a picture of doom and gloom.

The OBR does say consumer spending has boosted the growth, but here it explains a major factor in that spending….’Some forms of credit growth have picked up, in particular car finance, which has supported strong growth in car purchases and contributed to the unexpected strength of private consumption.’

Now it was only a few weeks ago that the BBC themselves looked at car buying and concluded that the rise in buying was due to more innovative and cheaper finance packages that gave customers more flexibility at a cheaper price…..I have to assume most people will have looked at their budgets and decided they can manage such deals….unlike the BBC who has decided that they are being reckless and spendthrift…based on what evidence they don’t say.

The OBR says that growth is coming from  increasing productivity, though still too low, but a productivity that will take over as the real driver of growth towards the end of next year….its most important judgement….and one the BBC ignores.

 

Remarkably you can hear all those points in one little interview on 5Live  (13:20) with the government’s Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Sajid Javid.…who held his own against three hostile BBC inquisitors.

 

 

Here is the Telegraph’s initial reaction…entirely different tone to that of the negative BBC:

The boot is on the other foot. Labour MPs now know what it was like for the Tories to have to sit through year after year of Gordon Brown economic triumphalism. For most of Labour’s time in power Budgets and Autumn Statements – or Pre-Budget Reports as Mr Brown rebranded the latter – were an ordeal for the Conservatives. He would rattle off great economic good news and a succession of giveaways, while they just sat there powerless to object. To this day watching Labour fritter away the golden economic recovery they inherited from John Major still rankles. Today, for the first time, George Osborne had a script he wanted to deliver, about economic success and measures that help voters and businesses. Perhaps the most telling moment, the one that caused a collective gasp, was when he revealed the updated figures for what he called the ‘Great Recession’ and a ‘calamity’: at the height of the crisis and on Labour’s watch GDP contracted by a jaw-dropping 7.2pc.

Here was a catalogue of smart, well-judged measures that MPs can deploy on the doorstep as evidence of what the Government is doing to – as Mr Osborne said – get the country moving again. These delighted his own side and left Labour looking as if they now realise how wrong the Ed Balls economic strategy is turning out to be.

His statement also completes a remarkable political recovery for the Chancellor. The economy is the only thing that matters. But it should be noted that a year ago he was in deep trouble. The economy was going against him, his reputation was damaged by the omnishambles budget and he was in danger of becoming more unpopular with the public than is normally bearable for even the most thick-skinned politician. The moment when the crowd booed him as he presented medals at the paralympics was a personal low-point. To his credit, he never faltered, or tried to win easy popularity by trying to doctor his image. Now, he can bask in the plaudits he deserves for placing a bet and seeing it pay of. As he pointed out, there is still much work to be done. But for the moment at least he has an inkling of being a Chancellor who is master of all he surveys.

Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Glass Half Empty

  1. Chris says:

    Most worrying is the removal of the cap on students. That was a main artery for pakistan migration in labour’s term. Universities have become the most destructive entities in modern life. They spread vile anti white hate, propagate apartheid and act as gateways for mass immigration.

       49 likes

  2. Joshaw says:

    Osborne should have deferred his predictions and statement until January when there’ll be more fortune tellers available.

       13 likes

    • Span Ows says:

      LOL….lucky Heather young man? No? Agghh you’ll rot in hell and all your family with you.

         10 likes

      • Joshaw says:

        Heather? Does that mean we’ll get a reprieve while they all bugger off to Scotland?

        What will Wee Eck have to say about that?

           7 likes

    • John Anderson says:

      That really is a super article – naming the names and quoting the stupid quotes of all the gloommongers that have been written about here as prime examples of BBC bias – Paul Krugman, Jonathan Portes, David Blanchflower, Stephanie Flanders ….

         33 likes

    • David Preiser (USA) says:

      That’s a very entertaining article. After excoriating the BBC for what their own “journalists” said, and heaping scorn on them for the constant stream of Left-wing ideologues invited on air, he goes after Blanchflower, “Two Eds” Flanders, Portes and Krugman. Three are part of the constant stream of Left-wing ideologues, and Flanders was until recently their own Economics editor. I’m unaware of Skidelsky.

      He should have just titled the article, “The BBC should hang their heads in shame”.

         15 likes

  3. Neil Miller says:

    No this is sacrilege – a discussion of a subject other than Nelson Mandela at this time – the BBC would never allow this!

       37 likes

  4. Bob Nelson says:

    The BBC reported quite simply that Ed Balls accused the Chancellor of being ‘In denial’. Had they shown a video clip of the red-faced Balls making this statement, and the huge derision which followed, a different impression would be formed.

       56 likes

  5. S.Trubble says:

    Now we’ve got 2 ” Red Ed’s.

    Did anyone else sense the seething of Davis on R 4 this morning where he said that the type of recovery ” was not what the doctor ordered” Osborne managed it well and made short work of the empty suit.

       40 likes

    • johnnythefish says:

      But the Tories won’t give the ball a solid right boot when the open goal is gaping in front of them. How the BBC have the audacity to accuse the government of leading a debt-fuelled recovery when Brown’s economic miracle was built on nothing else (look at any graph of how public and personal debt took off almost vertically under Labour) shows pure Labour bias. Osborne should have reminded him of this, but didn’t. Playing the gentleman in politics gets you nowhere with today’s soundbite, mantra-driven electorate.

         21 likes

  6. will says:

    Even Mr Mandella rode to the BBC’s aid. Reports of his life & death replaced “Today in Parliament” (Radio 4 23.30) so the bawling of Mr Balls went unheard.

       31 likes

  7. stuart says:

    robert peston gets on my tits with his constant waffling,it is really annoying and i wish he would stop it,as for ed balls, he is on his way out you know,a little birdy has told me that ed millibands adviser and unofficial brains and the bbcs favorite son owen jones has reccomended ed balls for the chop before the next election.

       15 likes

  8. David Preiser (USA) says:

    It seems as if any vestiges of Nick Robinson’s Young Conservative attitude have long since disappeared. If he sees citizens’ and corporations’ private money as something better off in the hands of government (bemoaning the decision not to raise fuel duty), he can’t be a conservative, large C or small.

    He may have a few elitist impulses left which give the appearance of leaning to the Right (like when he grabbed some protester’s sign during a broadcast, and he did once rhetorically roll his eyes in a blog post about his BBC colleagues going overboard with celebrating Gordon Brown for saving the world), but he can hardly be considered anything like a conservative if he said that about government and spending. At best he’s a British version of a RINO, or the kind of Big Government/Social Conservative types who ran the Republican Party into the ground and damaged the country and the economy in the process.

    And would that be the same Dominic Laurie who tweeted the following?

    See, the attitude displayed in their tweets does translate into their reporting.

    Also, Alan makes an interesting point about the policy of so-called “Austerity” being dismissed and derided as something done out of pure ideology rather than any kind of honest conviction based on positions reached in a reasonable manner. It’s the exact same attitude we get about BBC reporting on US politics. Everything the Republicans or Tea Party movement want, they want only because of ideology, apparently irrational, whereas the President and the Democrats have sound policy ideas based on expert judgment.

    If they don’t agree with it, the people who do must be flawed somehow. There can be no legitimate opposition to policies or ideology held by a BBC journalist.

       10 likes