Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
Eddy BoothSep 21, 19:23 Start the Week 21st September 2026 “Will you get £13,000 a year when you stop working? Here’s how to check” https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crq5x74yv6dxo “Workers pay National Insurance (NI)…
Richard PinderSep 21, 18:59 Start the Week 21st September 2026 Second English Village Considers Declaring Independence to Stop Migrant Influx: https://thenationalpulse.com/2026/09/21/second-english-village-considers-declaring-independence-to-stop-migrant-influx/
Richard PinderSep 21, 18:33 Start the Week 21st September 2026 The United Nations reports that England and Wales has the ‘highest rate’ of rape of any country in the world…
RichSep 21, 18:20 Start the Week 21st September 2026 Saying as some of the views expressed by us on here could have us miscalled fascists by actual effin’ fascists,…
Richard PinderSep 21, 18:17 Start the Week 21st September 2026 HOT NEWS: Vote winner. If you vote Lib-Dem. Then Men who self identify as Women can visit the Women’s toilet.…
vladSep 21, 17:54 Start the Week 21st September 2026 Gavin Ashenden on the imbecilic Archbishopette of Cunterbury. Thank God we’ll soon be done with the whole sorry lot of…
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.