Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
9 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
Fedup2May 15, 22:07 Weekend 16th May 2026 Unite The Kingdom Sluff – i think it accords with the view of the current regime as being built on vindictiveness …. ……
SluffMay 15, 22:01 Weekend 16th May 2026 Unite The Kingdom Ever keen to play the Politics of Envy game, so beloved by the Far Left budding Labour leaders, the BBC…
SluffMay 15, 21:53 Weekend 16th May 2026 Unite The Kingdom And next up in our ‘Celebrate diversity, embrace multiculturalism’ series, we have this……. Couple took underage sons abroad for marriage…
non-licence payerMay 15, 21:13 Weekend 16th May 2026 Unite The Kingdom Oliver v Burnham. That should tweak the conscience of one or two, but not aunty who could not give a…
micknotmikeMay 15, 21:09 Weekend 16th May 2026 Unite The Kingdom Evening troops, The bbc never miss a chance to push their own importance in front of all others, including Kings,…
Up2snuffMay 15, 20:58 Midweek 13th May 2026 BBC WEB-SITE Watch #1 – The BBC are obsessed with ethnic wimmin I present as evidence: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clypr8p2lewo
tomoMay 15, 20:58 Weekend 16th May 2026 Unite The Kingdom I was so wrong – I said Starmer would be out less than 6 months after the last GE https://youtube.com/shorts/QtKTn-qZF6c
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.