Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
9 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
pugnaziousJun 28, 20:24 Weekend 27th June 2026 Yep…they don’t know the motive but, er, it’s not terror related….I guess there are known knowns, known unknowns and unknown…
vladJun 28, 20:10 Weekend 27th June 2026 A Somali Muslim drives into a white crowd in London but the police assure us it’s not terrorism. Forgive me…
diggJun 28, 20:02 Weekend 27th June 2026 Yes the Royal family changed from one of the most endearing to one of the most ridiculous in just one…
diggJun 28, 20:00 Weekend 27th June 2026 I have other names for him but I’ll keep them to myself in this age of vile, lefty 30 months…
Rob in CheshireJun 28, 19:58 Weekend 27th June 2026 Louise Haigh? The convicted fraudster? That Louise haigh?
MarkyMarkJun 28, 19:30 Weekend 27th June 2026 Men to dangle in front of women in the name of tolerance. ……….. Labour conference: Not right to say only…
tomoJun 28, 19:24 Weekend 27th June 2026 I wonder if Linton on Ouse holiday camp is enforcing gender rules? https://twitter.com/Artemisfornow/status/2071215617663717431
Rob in CheshireJun 28, 19:04 Weekend 27th June 2026 Well if race doesn’t exist, what’s the problem with the flag of England? We’re all English now bruv.
Rob in CheshireJun 28, 19:03 Weekend 27th June 2026 I don’t think Trump would waste his time meeting this tosser.
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.