Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
Richard PinderAug 31, 13:30 Start the Week 31st August 2026 Burnham renames Strait of Dover, “Strait of Islam”. Trump renames Lake Ontario, “Lake America”.
Fedup2Aug 31, 13:21 Start the Week 31st August 2026 Plenty of corruption competition amongst the Marxists – a lawyer minister for injustice claimed £34000 on a fact finding visit…
pugnaziousAug 31, 12:54 Start the Week 31st August 2026 No need for a whole new wardrobe and a bit of lippy….just hang on for Polanski to be PM…. ‘Give…
moggiemooAug 31, 12:53 Start the Week 31st August 2026 I was going to post something similar earlier but figured a racist, mysogynistic (but true, especially true) comment by an…
tomoAug 31, 12:49 Start the Week 31st August 2026 BeeBeeSeeFwee was supposed to have been euthanised / put out of its misery a decade ago?
pugnaziousAug 31, 12:45 Start the Week 31st August 2026 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0oxGuSxvdeE Commentator Libby Purves on Times suggests Badenoch has to be careful not to be seen as an ‘angry black…
tomoAug 31, 12:26 Start the Week 31st August 2026 [img]https://i.ibb.co/DgSXRwbx/Irish-Tinkers-are-the-worst.jpg[/img] Traveller problem hits the MSM… As with migrants in general – our public bodies tasked with dealing with this…
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.