Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
9 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
JonathanRJul 21, 00:17 Start the Week 20th July 2026 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnHVawEBTo8 I liked this comment : “They forgot to mention the BBC gave us Jimmy Saville, Rolf Harris, Stuart Hall,…
JonathanRJul 21, 00:15 Start the Week 20th July 2026 Couldn’t do this now As none of the programmes that are mentioned are any good now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsdtyuSmoXs
JonathanRJul 21, 00:07 Start the Week 20th July 2026 I wonder if advertising its service by an ethnic “Comedian[sic] Romesh Ranganathan ” is really a clever marketing strategy by…
tomoJul 20, 23:43 Start the Week 20th July 2026 BBC already getting promotional treatment on YouTube ( in a ” now you see it, now you don’t” sort of…
atlas_shruggedJul 20, 23:00 Start the Week 20th July 2026 Kevin Keegan the footballing legend and also football manager has died. This year he was being treated for cancer. RIP…
Fedup2Jul 20, 22:52 Start the Week 20th July 2026 10pm bbc news – Ann Widdecombe murder charge mentioned in the headline – but nothing else – is he charged…
pugnaziousJul 20, 22:10 Start the Week 20th July 2026 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8cI5y1PnFg LOL…police still investigating motive…and it is vital no-one discuss this case at all….funny…could swear that when it is a…
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.