If a Conservative politician had come out with the line that they would like to see a major UK city “Free of Pakistanis”, the BBC would (rightfully) be all over it. Yet when leading Cat impersonator and Israeli-hater George Galloway comes out with the contention that Bradford should be “Israeli-free” (by which he really means Jew Free) the BBC let it pass without that much comment. Maybe they agree with not so gorgeous George? I also note that Jew hating LibDem David Ward suggested than ‘the ban” on Israel should be UK wide. Again, a certain amount of obfuscation here but is he really saying he wants Jews out of the UK? The BBC didn’t pursue that line, too busy praising Nick Clegg when he suggests “the war on drugs” has failed and we need to legalise narcotics. Ah well – BBC priorities.
SHOULD BBC BE FREE OF ISRAELIS?
Bookmark the permalink.
The BBC had to let it pass because Galloway is being investigated by the thought Police for crimes against political correctness.
To comment might prejudice a trial if there is one.
SHOULD BBC BE FREE OF ISRAELIS?
… we should be free of the BBC,
Bradford, Bolton, Leicester, Birmingham, Tower Hamlets… tick, tick, tick
(mind you in No10),
yah! yah! did someone mention Hamlets?
pass the Pyms old chap
george galloway should be charged with alleged racially and religiously aggravated offences,that alleged hate speech he made on satarday to his islamist mates in leeds against isreal fits the criteria for serious action to taken against him by the police and the cps, if found gulity of any alleged offences he should be kicked out of parliament and also deported back to scotland on grounds that he is an alleged threat to are national security because he is allegedly inciting hatred against the israeli community in the uk that in the end wil lead to attacks on innocent jews on the streets and shopowners,this man has allegedly stepped over the line now and he must be punished severely by the courts,there should be no place for racism and anti semetism in the uk and those encouraging it whether it is allegedly galloway.the islamists,the liberals or the far left should be treated and dealt robustly by the law,away with you galloway,england has had enough of you.i have used the word alleged and allegedly for legal reasons when it comes to galloway because he has a habit of suing people on grounds that he has been libeled.so be very carefull that you use the word alleged when talking about galloway to cover yourself legally.
“Cleansing” out non-Muslims by Islam/Muslims from a Muslim area always starts this way.
When Muslims first come into a country, either illegally or by immigration, they rely on the kindness and good nature of the natives , for tolerance of their customs. As their numbers increase, demands increase, while some Muslims start up the Jihad. The moderate Muslims plead for tolerance, on the basis that the radicals are a tiny minority. We, in our ignorance or good nature, heed their pleas and fight on their behalf. Muslims increase in numbers, some now citizens, and consequently the jihad picks up, as they are quite confident that they cannot be deported. All the while we are accused of Islamophobia, racism, or worse.
Once a near majority is achieved by Muslims, then the natives who are a minority by now, start to face real persecution. Many leave the city/country.
This has been the case all over, where Muslims have become a majority, due to demographic growth, or by immigration. Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kashmir, Bosnia, Kosovo, Turkey, parts of the West Bank of “Palestine” – Christians are being driven out. This is also the case in parts of Indonesia such as the Moluccas, Sulawesi. Ditto in Nigeria. I can think of no exceptions.
We now have Bradford. Start with the Jews obviously.
And yet when the Jews do it (with a great deal more justification) there’s an outcry – we never here the end of it.
I confidently predict that George Galloway will get away with making that statement. He’s clever and very clued up on the British legal system. He chooses his words carefully… unfortunately
Unlike the hand=wringing lefties I wouldn’t mind seeing more civilised Israelis in this country; those I’ve met are always polite, well-mannered, educated, open-minded and tolerant…. then, there are these revolting and evil Isis scum that infest our cities like the bubonic plague, and which the Left seem very quiet about:
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/497046/F-off-Jew-What-I-was-told-when-I-photographed-a-jihadist-flag-flying-in-London
Much of our country is now occupied by Islamic fascists hellbent on imposing their foul beliefs on others. It must stop!
If Bradford, Leicester and Birmingham were full of Jewish people instead of Muslims all three cities would be much better places to live in.
Bradford did have a significant Jewish population in the second half of the 19th C. Largely of German origin, and not especially religious, they assimilated well. Frederick Delius, the composer, was born there. His family was of German origin, but not Jewish.
Bradford had become a very prosperous city by the 1900s.
Much later, waves of DPs (displaced persons) arrived and also assimilated well.
Early immigrants from Pakistan assimilated rather less well, but there was little trouble. More recently, something has gone badly wrong. Larger numbers = critical mass? Multiculturalism? Saudi shit stirring?
Take your pick.
This is so typical of the BBC – they promote their narrative by proxy. Whether it’s Galloway wanting to ban Jews or a ‘Palestinian’ whining about how his country was stolen from him or a tweeted link by a BBC correspondent to an article calling for the Israeli ‘colonists’ to be repatriated, the BBC allows the bigoted, racist pro-Islamic bile to be spewed without challenge.
Impartial? You joking me??
“leading cat impersonator…”
My cats are extremely angry at the comparison.
“At first they came for the Jews, but I did nothing, because I wasn’t a Jew”……..
Anybody remember that old poem?
What absolute gibbering idiots we have in our political and media classes (especially the twelve-year-olds who run our “world-class” State broadcaster), that they can’t see what’s happening in front of their eyes. Perhaps the steam off their Lattes fogs up their John Lennon glasses.
If it weren’t quite so tragic for our country and our children, it would be funny to watch them self-destruct.
‘Perhaps the steam off their Lattes fogs up their John Lennon glasses’
—
If it does, perhaps it can help rinse off any other splashes from their involvement that is staining them.
I have a 2 year old son. What will he see when he’s 12?
And where will the BBC be then?