Ok, here you go, middle of the week and a new one of these. Hope you enjoyed the BBC pushing out loads of pro-muslim PR this morning. It seems that “only” 27% of UK muslims support Jihadi butchers. That’s around 700,000 by my calculation. Over to you…
MID WEEK OPEN THREAD…
Bookmark the permalink.
http://news.sky.com/story/1434014/cop-drags-mentally-ill-woman-by-shackled-ankles
Not seen this on the bbc as yet, I don’t expect to either.
Double jobbing, a good day to bury black news.
Despite Beeboid spin-
“A quarter of British Muslims have sympathy for motives behind Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris, new survey reveals ”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2968192/A-quarter-British-Muslims-sympathy-motives-Charlie-Hebdo-attack-Paris-new-survey-reveals.html#ixzz3Sl6QfZRG
“Muslim Opinion Polls’
“A ‘Tiny Minority of Extremists’?”
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/opinion-polls.htm
BBC – Miqdaad Versi of the Muslim Council of Britain says, “further research is needed”
… no sh-t shylock!, you can say that again.
The rest are telling lies according to taqiyya, the Islamic duty to deceive non believers.
The thing that bothers me about this is the way the biased BBC have skipped over the evidence like this and gone for the islamophilic evidence which only shows them in the best possible light.
Worse than that though almost half of those questioned thought that “Muslim clerics preaching that violence against the west can be justified are completely on message with mainstream Muslim opinion”.
That’s almost 2 million Muslims who feel that the message being delivered by what the government refers to as ‘hate preachers’ is resonant with their beliefs.
10% of “British” Muslims say that Charlie Hebdo got what they deserved….
so, if we stretch this out over the….ohhh, I dunno, 4 MILLION Muslims in the UK, that would make 400,000 Islamic nut jobs in our midst?
Nothing to see here….move on.
From what I’ve been able to find, this survey of our peace-loving Saracen occupiers asked about the Charlie Hebdo attack and the cartoons of their so-called prophet, but not about the murder of Jews in the kosher supermarket on the same day, or of the Jew outside the synagogue in Denmark.
I wonder if the approval rate for those murders would be as low as 10%. Maybe that’s why they didn’t asked te question (or suppressed the response)..
Finnish Comics Society … # Juis Suis Invertébré
“The show entitled “I am Charlie”, was on Monday closed for a third time amid security concerns.
The display had only been open for about 15 minutes, at Library 10 in the Helsinki’s main post office building.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/02/finland-i-am-charlie-cartoon-exhibit-closed-after-15-minutes-over-security-concerns
“This was the third time the exhibit was closed.
Organizers are persistent, however, and are searching for a different venue.
… Step back for a moment and remember:
these are just cartoons.
The world continues to bow to violent intimidation, which only ensures that it will get … more violent intimidation”
R Spencer
… look for it on BBC News? … nah! don t bother
they re too busy surveying Muslims … “feelings”
if it ain t … “trending” … with the Twitterfarties eh!
Culture, Media and Sport Committee’s inquiry into the Future of the BBC:
Biased BBC: “there is a perception that the whole structure of the industry is biased towards a self-perpetuating, middle class urban elite rather than being open to all on the basis of their talent” Several respondents commented that the BBC’s output was biased. “Everything apart from their news department is fine. BBC news is trash. Biased towards certain views and will do so subtly by using selective language in certain instances, reporting one side of an argument more than the other or leaving opposing opinions either as footnote at the bottom of an article, tucked away or not reporting it at all. It gets away with this due to its reputation for being unbiased with regards to political affiliation that people somehow think extends to other issues.”
Complaints: We recommend that Ofcom become the final arbiter of complaints over BBC content including matters concerning impartiality and accuracy. In 2013/14 the BBC received 192,459 complaints, the complaints were sent to a team of about 400 people in Belfast, of which 485 complaints went on to a team of about 30 people in the BBC’s Editorial Complaints Unit in London, and then 277 of these complainants appealed to the Trust for a third-tier review. Ofcom dealt with 12,774 complaints, 1,012 complaints raised substantial issues that warranted further investigation.
Only a handful of complaints where upheld by the BBC. I have seen the exact number somewhere, but could not find the number upheld, for this article.
BBC Parliament (Freeview Channel 131) from 9.30am tomorrow (Thursday) morning, Culture, Media and Sport Committee questions.
Richard, would you have any objections to me copying your post and pasting it into the comments section of a Breitbart London article ?
Apart from it containing extremely useful information I believe it may also open a few eyes, it certainly has mine re the complaints.
Yes, No problem
For any unable to view live broadcasts, this usually has what was published or shown soon after:
http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/future-of-the-bbc/
Richard, I am sure that I read somewhere that the total number of complaints eventually upheld was around 12.
Is that just twelve of the 485 Editorial Complaints Unit complaints upheld, or does it also include some of the 277 BBC Trust complaints being upheld.
With 1,012 upheld, you are better off complaining to Ofcom about the BBC.
Richard Ofcom won’t normally deal with BBc complaints. The usual BBc being a law unto themselves. However I have complained to Ofcom besides the 100 days of UKIP although off the top of my head I can’t remember that specific complaint & got nowhere just like my 2 complaints to advertising standards,r
“Everything apart from their news department is fine.”
and here was me thinking it was in the DNA of just about all they broadcast.
Their “comedy”, “drama”, as well as nominally “factual” programmes – including ones aimed at children are full of left-wing propaganda. Some more subtle and some very blatant.
True. And it’s the stealth propaganda that does the most damage. The constant drip of Leftism into the ears of viewers and listeners changes opinions without the victims even being aware of it.
Radio 4 is a wonderful example of this and a day’s critical listening provides incontrovertible evidence.
So, remind me… the BBC is often harping on about politics needing to be less about image and more about policies – a mantra rather favourable to Ed Miliband btw.
Enter Peter Henley BBC political journo – or should I say a journo who works for the BBC and specialises in politics…
What burning issues are on his mind recently?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-31606545
‘David Cameron’s check shirt makeover’
Open to comments, no less. Some might say a good chance for lefties to get stuck in against the hated Tories – but I’m sure our Peter Henley couldn’t possibly comment.
Burning issues… the Fire Brigades Union
Tweet Tweet.
Peter Henley @BBCPeterH · 2 hrs 2 hours ago
The Fire Brigades Union really doesn’t like Portsmouth Conservative and DCLG Minister @PennyMordauntMP
I don’t do embedded Tweet images but you can see the photo of a union man holding an SWP placard and wearing an offensive appendage on his nose which so amused our Peter Henley here:
The female MP in question has got quite a probosis – oh how the BBC laughed. I suppose being a Tory she doesn’t qualify for due respect no being a proper Sista
I said I don’t do embedded Tweets – now I appear to have done one.
Do we think think the person holding the socalist don’tworker poster is a fireman? Where did that photograph come from?
The person with the false nose & gormless grin ain’t even holding the placard…unless his arms are totally fecked up…
…And, it does not prove that the firemen’s union hates the tories, or Penny Mordaunt…otherwise the placard would have the “FBU” logo on it…no, that placard is a SWP concoction, proving that it is THEY that hate her…so Mr Henley is either lying of plain dim.
I’ll let you guys decide 🙂
as the BBCs racist chelsea fans story runs out of steam, for the next week the BBC will be race baiting with the following story:-
[b]Cameron and wife stand by and watch as black man is beaten up by whitey[/b]
pic didnt work but u can see it here
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/james-forsyth/2015/02/pmqs-second-jobs-lobbying-and-obsessive-crackpots/
The Austrians write into law that Muslims can only be equal to everybody else and yet the bBC (And Islamic world) finds fault:
Austria passes controversial reforms to 1912 Islam law
The Austrian parliament has passed controversial reforms to the country’s century-old law on Islam…..Muslim groups say the ban on foreign funding is unfair as international support is still permitted for the Christian and Jewish faiths.
They say the legalisation reflects a widespread mistrust of Muslims and some are planning to contest it in the constitutional court.
So what have the Austrians knocked out for Muslims living in the country here is how the Turkish media report the story:
Islam has been an official religion in Austria since 1912. The Islam law, known as Islam Gesetz, was introduced by Austria’s last emperor, Franz Josef, after the Austro-Hungarian Empire annexed Bosnia-Herzegovina.
The law guarantees Muslims numerous rights, including religious education in public schools.
However, the bill, prepared by Austria’s coalition of Social Democratic Party and People’s Party, aims to prohibit foreign funding for Islamic organizations in the country and impose a standardized German translation of the Quran and other religious texts.
It also regulates the teaching of Islam in the country.
Under the proposed legislation, employing preachers from abroad would be prohibited and imams must instead be trained at Austrian universities. Currently, 65 Turkish imams work in Austria, where there are 300 imams in total.
Ok, nothing wrong with that, but there’s more,
including the right for Muslims to take time off during Friday prayer and to go on holiday during certain religious festivals.
In addition, schools and other public institutions, including hospitals, the army and prisons will have to offer halal food in line with Muslim dietary rules.
Can anybody here find fault with the above. Muslims who for years have demanded to be treated as equals have got just that in Austria, yet they aren’t happy. and so they protest as usual and also as per usual the bBC reports the above as…..“controversial”
what is controversial about muslims in Austria is that for some strange reason, muslims in the Austrian army dont like saluting the Austrian flag. i cant for one moment think why
“Muslim conscripts of the Austrian army refused to salute the Austrian flag because this was incompatible with their faith.” They even turned their backs to their nations flag. In the good ole days they would have been executed for treason
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/928
Something about European civilisation and the gates of Vienna comes to mind. The horde was stopped in the middle ages but they are through the gates now alright.
I live in Manchester, I’m scared…very scared.
The reason is I’ve been watching the news on the NHS devolution in Greater Manchester and it has disaster written all over it, allowing liebour MPs and councillors free reign over how billions of pounds of taxpayer’s money is to be spent on joint NHS and social reform sends a shiver down my spine.
The report had some floppy haired, wild eyed liberal from a Think Tank called ResPublica (apparently totally a impartial group) who enthused over the possibility of a doctor, who, if he/she, was confronted with a patient who had breathing difficulties, could PRESCRIBE..yes PRESCRIBE, a remedy of having said patient’s house damp proofed and lagged for warmth to cure them!!
It could work for me though, I live in a top floor flat of a four storey block which doesn’t have a lift, I occasionally suffer from gout and struggle to get up and down the stairs, I wonder if my doctor could prescribe a lift to be installed?
You only have to live and work in Manchester to see how run down many places have become thanks to permanent liebour rule. Many council estates resemble Chernobyl after the disaster and need huge amounts of money spending on them, if this problem is linked with poor health how long will it be before the money runs out and the real NHS needs aren’t being met?
Do I trust a lefty liberal to run a scheme like this…do I fcuk!! The ResPublic expert was Philip Blond, a friend of David Cameron’s, who, in 2011, was accused of ‘raiding the coffers of the group to lead a jet set lifestyle’ resulting in the group nearly going bust and numerous redundancies followed, if he thinks it’s a good idea then Manchester is in trouble.
Even liebour are sceptical, but I don’t know what to make of that, is it because Noddy Burnham has had the rug pulled from under him, we know how liebour hate good news! Either way Manchester is a guinea pig we know how dangerous medical experiments can be.
eu requirement–regionalization
You will be aware of how well Wales is doing on the A & E wait scale.
It has constantly amazed me that no matter how much governments “redistribute” to “poor” areas they never seem to get any better. Do all the people with get up and go do just that ?
I’m at a bit of a loss as to how Manchester being given it’s own NHS money will improve things. The BBc has been in the normal “speculation” mode that it reverts to when there are little facts to be had i.e. drag in some “experts” to give their “expert” opinion do they have a hot line to some centralised “expert” depository. As I far as I guess they will have to have a new post at the council for someone to deal with this massive amount of money who because of the responsibility will have to be paid a massive wage & then an admin team below that post. Of course as the rest of the country will continue as normal none of the existing posts doing these jobs will need to be axed. Or maybe not.
I could not agree more. I have met some of these councillors, and they do not impress me. Most are ineffective, and some are on the take from property developers. I would not trust them to run a sweetie shop.
For some reason Mr Osbourne has seen fit to saddle Greater Manchester with an unwanted uber-Mayor, and now this. The one thing missing is any sort of public consultation or vote. The whole thing stinks.
Here is the to-do list for day 1 of the councils new NHS reforms:
1. Approve a substantial increase in the Council officials salary to cope with the added responsibilities.
2. Appoint a number of additional managers to oversea the new scheme (make sure these managers have a proven track record in failure and if possible take on an existing person who can take early retirement on Friday and start their new role on Monday)
3. Chair a workshop to take place at a 5 star spa resort over a period of 4 days (don’t want to be travelling in our own time)
4. Organise fact-finding trips overseas (preferably somewhere warm with cheap sex available)
Anybody here read the bBC article on the demise of the Aral Sea. Anybody else think like I that the article take an inordinate amount of time to tell you why it has virtually all but disappeared? Instead of saying why, the reader is regaled to tit bits such as these:
1) Khojabay is a fisherman who lives in a desert. Almost everyone in his village used to fish for a living but in the 1970s the fish died, and the sea began to dry up. Steadily, over the past 40 years, around 60,000 sq km of water, in places 40m deep, has evaporated into thin air.
2)As the sea receded, the climate began to change. “We used to grow melons and other crops. We ate them, sold them in the market and made money,” he says. “We grew clover for our cattle and barley for ourselves.”But the rain stopped. Grass dried up, and the small freshwater lakes that once existed near the sea’s edge disappeared.
3)As the sea shrank, the huge volumes of pesticides and insecticides washed into it over the years gradually became more concentrated, until the fish turned over and died.
4)The chemicals once contained in the salty water – fertilisers and pesticides – are now blown around by the wind, and have entered the drinking water, she says. Women are warned not to breastfeed their babies.
Here is how the Guardian reported the same story last Oct, but in a much smaller article and with less flowery language than the bBC allowing the reader to understand exactly why the Aral Sea died:
In the 1950s, two of the region’s major rivers – the Amu Darya and and the Syr Darya – were diverted by the Soviet government to provide irrigation for cotton production in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, starving the Aral. It has been diminishing ever since, with the sea level dropping 16 metres between 1960 and 1996, according to the World Bank. Water levels are believed to be down to less than 10 per cent of what they were five decades ago.
It’s as if the bBC are trying to promote the reason as being something else other than the mass ineptitude of the Soviets
I thought the same when I read that BBC article.
A deceitful piece of journalism.
Agreed – sheer deceit and right out of the BBC textbook ‘How to tell a completely different story by only telling half of it’.
Though I’d commented on this so if this is a duplication sorry. I’ve heard this story before and it was some considerable time ago. The reason then given was diversion of water source to grow crops. I suspect someone has come across the story and re-imagined it.
Rotherham.
For Beeboids to report?:-
‘Daily Mail’-
“Rotherham police congratulate themselves with awards for going ‘above and beyond’ just 16 days after report slammed their ‘unacceptable’ treatment of 1,400 sexually exploited girls.”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2968250/Rotherham-police-congratulate-going-16-days-report-sexual-exploitation.html#ixzz3SmNFgL76
1,400 white girls…
Brushed under the PC prayer rug.
Still, let’s party.
I see the bBC has yet another Islamic victimhood article this time focussing on Gaza. Lyse Doucet Opines about the lot of poor Palestinians
But you know what, instead of bitching about why people aren’t opening their wallets to fund the rebuilding of Gaza. Why doesn’t somebody at the bBC ask:
“All this started after 3 Jewish children were kidnapped and murdered in coldblood by Hamas, instead of saying yes we murdered those boys, they launched wave after wave of rockets into Israel.”
In otherwords, Hamas and the peoples of Gaza have only themselves to blame. But to the bBC, that sailent fact cannot be told as it exposes the lie that the bBC promotes that..Islam can only be a religion of peace. Just think, where Gaza could be, if Hamas in 2005 had put down the AK47 and strove for peace, its people would have no problem working inside Isreal, they would have one of the best statelets in the region and they could actually say…We are followers of a relgion of peace. But as in every Islamic country in the world (Including East London/Bradford/Birmingham/Blackburn/Dewsbury) they live in a dump of their own making.
P.S
Anybody notice how the mother of the baby who froze to death is a fat cunt, so it appears they have enough money to feed her face.
Obesity in Gaza. You would think that the BBC, so conscious of obesity, would mention that it is a serious problem in Gaza – 8th in the world league for obesity.
A report on the subject, one of several
‘The results showed that obesity and being overweight are highly prevalent among women in the Gaza Strip. Independent predictors of obesity in the population studied were increasing age, high income, and housewives. This finding is an important baseline for the monitoring of obesity and overweight cases in the future and highlights the need for community-based programs to combat this problem in Palestine’.
(The trouble is those Joos who control the supply of food)
http://www.biomedcentral.com/2052-9538/1/7
Why don’t the silly fat women of Gaza just do some street running or organise a marathon ? Go to a local gym, play women’s football or hockey or swim on the sea ? The choices open to them are endless, must be bloody lazy to not find some time for exercise.
Or clear some rubble and start building…. the Beeb can’t claim that white men are stopping these women getting to work!
Depends whether they can participate in “normal” sports clothing and in public.
INBBC seems to favour the Islamisation of Britain.
‘The Commentator’-
“UK Muslim population of 26 million by 2051?
“No-one but a fool engages in scaremongering. But using the statistics and analysis of the Muslim Council of Britain, there is a real prospect of a UK Muslim population of 26 million by mid-century. Whatever your politics, serious people need to debate this, sensibly and honestly. No problem there, right?”
By Vincent Cooper.
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5632/uk_muslim_population_of_26_million_by_2051
The thing is what happens when we arrive at such a sizable number of muslims, will those areas (across the Pennines) vote to have Sharia law. It happened in Nigeria where the Northern Islamic half voted for Sharia, in Aceh in Indonesia , so why not in the Uk. we’ve already seen Sharia patrols in London, attacks on whites in Birmingham, Manchester and Yorkshire. Yet if Muslims get their way will they like each and every Islamic country end up exporting their peoples elsewhere.
Time to limit all state cash payments to a maximum of two children.
The effect on the number of children “born into poverty” would be positive too!
Have to laugh the top story on the bBC news website for the US and Canada.
US Supreme Court appears in favour of headscarf claim
Its as if, in a world full of news stories about the intolerance expressed by Islam towards others, the bBC feels that in order to combat that self promoted bad press Muslims can only seen as…Victims.
If anybody wants to see how the left have infected “community politics”, so the likes of Owen Jones can shout down opponents in debates-and claim to be “passionate and virtuous” in so doing-you need only look at last nights “Immigration St” on Channel 4.
Really didn`t knpw that the Brownshirts had now morphed into “community spokesmen” or “cultural advisers”.
Didn`t know that old prostitute haunts and run down estates now contained hooded gunmen, drug-addled nutters and agitprop gangstas who want their drug dens, their manors unmentioned and unvisited by prying eyes.
The programme was crap-but a revelation nonetheless.
Didn`t know that Labour/Liberal community activists were now able to call on their hoodie goons on the dole to threaten all and sundry in full view of the media cameras-and with no prospect of the police, the politicians(all Lib-Lab-Green weevils) doing diddly-squatter about it.
Truly creepy brownshirts wearing tie dye, lime green bandannas for the Duggan/Moaty/White Dee “Community of all the Tumbrils”.
And if a few white Tories, OAPs and decent family men get trampled underfoot by Labours New Breed…then so what?
Tomorrow must NEVER belong to this alliance of moochers and political cravens with public money and access to their drug barons(about the only royalty that is lauded these days).
No wonder this caste of creeps and serial filth bemoan a few hits on Dresden-Labours Brownshirts are alive and well in Southampton, and require the Islamic shave and the Lefty tattoo for the unreeducated clients like we will be.
I watched that programme: the main thing which really struck me was the utter contempt so many immigrants and their descendants have for the “lazy English” – quite appalling. It was as if we should be grateful to them for coming here, rather than them for being allowed to escape their hell holes of origin and come here bringing all their delightful cultural proclivities along too.
I also despaired at how afraid to speak out the Brits in the pub were, regarding the decline of our society due to the ongoing 60 year old multicultural project this country has been subjected to.
Yes because Britain and it’s lazy people were going nowhere , doing nothing ,until phony tony et started to rub the rights noses in it. Thanks tony, how did you manage to persuade all those people from such a variety of different high achieving nations to grit their teeth and settle in this cesspit. And thanks bbbc for constantly reminding me how lazy I am.
It was also the first occasion I heard the extraordinary term “Anglo-English” used by someone on Southampton local radio, whilst voicing her opposition to the making of this programme.
Give it 30-40 more years of mass, uncontrolled immigration, and that phrase will be common.
Like “Native American” or “Aboriginal Australians”
They might be kind enough to put us onto reservations…
On the other hand, they might just take us down to choppy chop square and save themselves a few bob.
Agreed. My hackles were raised by firstly the Asian shopkeeper (I would like to have him swear his takings as declared to Revenue were complete and truthful) who made allegations against British workers being lazy.
If only a screenshot showing the figures for unemployed Pakistanis Somalis Bangladeshis, percentages of those on benefits or in prison, had been displayed behind him to give the true picture. Could do the same for Romanians and other eastern Europeans. Why was that Portuguese immigrant,( here five minutes slagging off the British) in the UK at all? Family with kids, more pressure on local school and hospitals arriving soon.
Actually, I thought the programme was quite good, I realize it was not in the remit of the producers to challenge the comments made, but as I say above a screenshot with some actual figures on it would help.
In fact I suggest such a tactic displayed behind politicians making claims that are just not the whole truth or contra to what they said a year or so before would help to remember facts a little more reliably.
In the Torygraph, Dan Hodges takes the BBC to task for their Religion Of Peace stance:
The headline on the front of the BBC website linking to the research states: “Muslims ‘oppose cartoon reprisals’”. …
It’s a reassuring headline. It’s also wrong. Many Muslims – a majority – do indeed utterly oppose the murderous killings in Paris. But a very, very large number of Muslims don’t.
……
Below the report is an article by BBC Today program reporter Sima Kotecha. It begins: “Islam is a religion of peace and love – not violence: ….
That statement – and those sentiments – are simply not compatible with the BBC’s own research….
……
.
All of this raises two serious questions. The first relates to the BBC’s reporting…. Imagine if the BBC had commissioned a poll in the wake of the murder of Stephen Lawrence, and that poll had found 27 per cent of white Britons agreed with the statement “I have some sympathy for the motives behind his stabbing”. Imagine if, in an additional finding, 32 per cent of white Briton’s refused to endorse the statement “acts of unprovoked violence against black men can never be justified”.
Rightly, there would be outrage at those findings. And the BBC would be leading the charge. The focus, correctly, would be on the large number of people who expressed sympathy with the attacks. We would certainly not have religious propaganda masquerading as news analysis in the middle of the BBC’s report.
……
The BBC is wrong. Many Muslims have sympathy with the Charlie Hebdo killings. Far too many.
Over a quarter of British Muslims have sympathy for the Charlie Hebdo terrorists. That is far too many
A very good comparison from ICSCN.
How can it be ok to have sympathy with murder committed in response to a cartoon??
But the BBC spin it to say the majority oppose it??
Another comparison: if three Chelsea supporters shot dead six Palestinians and 27% of Chelsea supporters had sympathy with the murders… how explosive would be the response of the BBC?
..
The BBC was banging on about a further investigation into Cliff Richard on PM this evening. This typifies the modern BBC approach to journalism and its bias in a number of ways.
Don’t get me wrong, journalism is all about investigating and exposing wrong doing, alleged or otherwise, wherever it might be found. However, my problem is with the apparent way the BBC prioritises what it covers in detail and what it omits. As a national broadcaster, with a responsibility to educate and inform the population, what should get the priority here:
1. An aging pop star who is accused of inappropriate behaviour on a number of occasions.
OR
2. The presence of gangs of sexual abusers in a large number of UK towns and cities who have abused thousands of victims.
It really isn’t that difficult, is it?
A no-brainer though when you-as a pompous, self-aggrandising monopoly “broadcaster” need to defend yourself and “go for broke” in shamelessly trying to break an unfashionably-uncool Christian for a media nomination for its “scoop”.
Utterly despicable-but the BBC make their own news these days for themselves and to keep Labour in power at any cost.
ChrisH,
Good point ref the Christian vs RoP exchange rate.
An historical sex offence inquiry into singer Sir Cliff Richard has “increased significantly in size” and involves “more than one allegation”, police say.
The news from the police ‘just broke half an hour ago’, but they managed to get a Beeboid for Fiona Bruce to interview. Sir Cliff Richard says the police haven’t told him what they’re talking about. Doesn’t seem very just.
It comes the day after the Beeb and the police were severely criticised for the circus last year. Co-incidence?
“In what police say is the largest child sexual exploitation (CSE) investigation in the country – bigger than high profile cases in Rochdale and Rotherham – the men face a combined total of 59 charges, including rape, sexual activity with a child under 16 and trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation.”
http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/crime/child-sexual-abuse-ring-in-halifax-25-men-charged-police-reaction-1-7096362
Now I can’t say I expect the BBC to cover this story, but when a man in Salford is arrested and taken to court simply for telling the truth under some recently introduced Political Correctness law then I think a line has been crossed.
I can see nothing wrong with what he has done – others might differ.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/halal-food-stickers-salford-arrest-8721178
It won’t improve. I have for years maintained that the authorities will increasingly clamp down on “the right to diasgree” in a draconian effort to “maintain community relations.”
Mass immigration and its failure will result in your and my loss of liberty. Something our grandparents fought so hard to preserve.
The BBC have increasingly become so selective with the truth that they no longer bother even to try for the pretence of impartiality.
Put a protest sticker on Halal meat and you are arrested. Shout stupid abuse and jostle a man on the underground will result in Interpol and British police chasing you to the ends of the earth backed by an angry state broadcaster.
But mass rape of a thousand working class northern girls is all but ignored and three 16 year olds willingly run off to join a bunch terrorists that burns a man alive (amongst other horrors) are treated with sympathy and as victims.
This is a sick state. Tory, Labour and the pathetic Lib Dems have brought us here and there is nothing in their DNA that wants this rot to stop.
We want our country back and we will have it. UKIP.
If around 27 percent of a religious grouping passively accept or sympathise in some degree with the use of murder by their co- religionists, that is extremely disturbing for the UK and for the West in general . The BBC’s attempt to gloss over this is appalling and not acceptable in a taxpayer funded national broadcaster .
I notice that the BBC 6pm news version of the report ended with the reporter stating that many Muslims felt that if they are expected to integrate, then the non Muslim majority must in turn accept their views. Again it is highly dangerous and unacceptable for the BBC to peddle this kind of view about what is an incompatible trade -off. Our Western liberal society will be at risk within a generation should this wish prevail because of the growing percentage of Muslims in the population .
It was an unnecessary example of BBC editorialising from a snurty posh girl. Notice how “we” should do the work if only “we” were willing to allow them integrate. Funny how Sikhs, Chinese, Hindus, Greeks, Italians…have managed to integrate or at least rub along with the rest of us but this lot…oh whats the point…
If the BBC had Eurosceptic politicians appearing as regularly as Dianne Abbott etc. and earning the same money, then Daniel Hannan wouldn’t have to resort to this type of thing to top up his salary
BBC on FaceBook:
BBC News
Iran bombards a mock US aircraft carrier during military drills
As Comical Alidom goes, pretty special.
I can only presume they were going for laughs. The comments reflect this.
Took me back to another time:
I watched that video as well and couldn’t understand why the bBC included it. It has no news value whatsoever. However if I was to put on a pair of green tinted glasses as worn by the left when discussing the US. Then you can understand what a wetdream this is for the bBC. But here’s something the bBCs so called defence experts don’t want you to know.
The West knows all about Irans planned use of mass small boats armed with SSM to tackle larger capital ships, which is why they have spent a lot of money,time and effort in which to combat this asymmetric threat . One example is the longbow missile as used by the AH64D (Now E) Apache gunship aka..Hellfire launched from a vertical pod these fire and forget missiles are designed to take out swarming boats in one go. send 20 boats and 20 boats get destroyed before they enter missile firing range. Not only that but the Hellfire is getting replaced by the smaller, cheaper and more effective…griffin
The brits are doing likewise with Brimstone
and then there’s this:
US navy shows off ship-based laser weapon in Persian Gulf
Yes early days, but you know that things can only improve for the yanks.
Anybody who gets paid as a so called defence expert at the bBC would know about the above.
longbow link
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2014/january/mfc-011414-longbow-missiles-demonstrate-littoral-attack-capability.html
Like the laser, not sure about the name of the vessel though!
Named after a city in Porto Rico. But don’t let the name blindside you. Currently based in the Arabian gulf, the ship is the centre for special force activity in the region.
Come on Pounce they would not get within 50 miles of a flat top, picked up by the carriers robocruiser escort or by the Hawkeye in the air. Then either the Rhinos sink ’em or the destroyer escort or the robocruiser itself. The US navy has always used a layered defence of its capital ships. The new US Longbow missile I would have thought was for small escorts for self defence.
If only we could afford layered defence for our two new flat tops, naming one of them Prince Of Wales is surely a very bad omen if you remember what happened to the last ship with that name.
Valid point, however lets not under estimate the Iranians. For a start the small boat swamping as you state wouldn’t bother a CVN, not with its escort and topcover. No for that the Iranians would simply swamp the area of a flat top with SSMs. lets say 100+, combine that with mini sub action, speed boats and even suicide attacks on land then the Yanks will take damage. However lets be honest, the Iranian armed forces will cease to exist within a day or so. Oh they would like all Islamic war mongers claim that they had won the war, but like the last time the clashed they would loose bigtime. Unless of course the Islamic commander in chief is still in office at the blackhouse. That traitor would have no problem blaming Israel and attacking them.
Hellfire is going to be phased out, its simply far too expensive (And old) and the Obama administration has alrteady signed the death warrant for that and surprisingly the tomahawk
http://www.businessinsider.com/death-of-tomahawk-and-hellfire-missile-program-2014-3?IR=T
Yes under Obama who has cut the US forces so much, we have seen the rise of so many problems around the world Russia/China/Iran/NKorea simply as they understand that the US under Obama have no will to fight.
Which is why so many countries who saw the US as a friend are rearming from elsewhere. (Eygpt just signed a deal with France for the Rafeal)
Naval brimstone tests
http://www.military.com/video/guided-missiles/surface-to-surface/brimstone-sea-spear-missile-demo/2748228581001/
Agree that the usual thing from these types is to proclaim a massive victory as their airforce litters the desert floor, but still can’t see the Irianians take on ( and out) a US carrier force. If they launch SSMs at them then the robocruisers and escorts will just hack them down, next to go would be the launcher sites followed by all navel/air assets within US range. You did hear about the Irianian Phantom which got too close to a US drone over the Gulf and was very surprised to find a unseen F-22 off his wing telling him to go home quickly did’nt you ? Kind of sums them up, lots of wild threats, lots of Stone Age weapons which would last five minutes in a real fighting war, the speedboats and mini subs are to allow the local loons the chance to die as martyrs, little more.
Attacking Irsael without having the bomb, oh well you do know what Tel Aviv has as weapon of last resort eh ? And with the bomb, well, that removes the biggest threat to the Saudis in exchange for a little radioactive dust floating across the Gulf.
And I do think the Egyptians are being wise buying Rafeal, Typhoon too expensive and too narrow in its role, F-35 far too expensive and looking still to be a turkey, buying French is a good option.
http://the-eyeontheworld.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/top-gun-for-real-in-persian-gulf.html
Ive heard that the F35 is doing pretty good. Over 100 built. Its going to be a game changer and the version I want to see is the IDF one. The Russian jet (t50) isn’t doing so well , with the possibility the Indians who are bankrolling it will pull out. China is plugging away, it’s 6th stealth fighter flew the other week. However to be honest it isn’t a stealth aircraft as such. But that will no doubt come later.
Korea, Turkey, Indonesia and Japan have all decided on stealt. However only Japan has a working example. The eurofighter is gaining an AESA radar however the British version will be more advanced . Currently the British field the most advanced Verizon of the jet. But I’ve also heard that the Saudi hold that honour. The rafeal is a good plane, I really like it, however the French need to pull their finger out as they are on the verge of losing their sale to India.
From Wikipedia “A 2014 Pentagon report found these issues:
First two mission data sets available November 2015, after USMC IOC.
Overall suitability relies heavily on contractor support and unacceptable workarounds.
Aircraft availability reached 51% but short of 60% goal.
Fuel Tanks don’t retain inerting for required 12 hours after landing.
High dynamic loads on the rudder at lower altitudes in 20-26 AoA preventing testing.
82 pounds added to F-35B in last 38 months, 337 pounds below limit.
Transonic Roll-Off (TRO) and airframe buffet continueto be a program concern.
572 defiences remain affecting Block 2B capability, 151 of which are critical.
VSim would likely not support planned Block 2B operational testing in 2015.
Maintainability hours still an issue.
ALIS requires many manual workarounds”
The major issue for UK death & destruction PLC is if the Stovl version, F-35B doesn’t work as advertised & they can’t use it on our carrier (singular) without steam catapults & then having to buy the F35C version just for the carrier which of course they won’t have the money to convert the carrier to catapults or the additional aircraft assuming the F35c will be more expensive as it’s larger. So possibly a future of carrier & no fixed wing aircraft perhaps we could borrow some US Marine corps Harriers.
In such a worst case scenario, we would have to go for STOBAR, as used by Russia, India and China. This would require installation of arrester wires, and keeping the ski jump. There would be no prospect of fitting catapults. This would mean several aircraft could be used, such as the F35C, FA18, Rafale and Sea Gripen. The alternative is to have two 65,000 ton helicopter carriers, which would go down in history as the worst defence procurement fiasco ever.
Seems you can get away with anything if you are Muslim….or even, ahem, “Re-Find” Islam:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2968534/Unlicensed-drink-driver-three-times-limit-crashed-car-avoids-jail-court-hears-Islam.html
Pathetic.
Just sat through tonight’s look east. 30 minute election broadcast for the labour party so blatant it’s actually shocking. Even the segment about this summer’s festivals didn’t escape, you see since cuts to art funding. ……well ,you get the idea, and we are paying for this crap.
The start of Radio 4’s ‘PM’ (17:00 >) had a strange, unbalanced feel to it for me. There were as usual the headlines, then several short related reports ALL on the HSBC revelations and the Parliamentary questioning. I kept thinking they were about to move on to another topic but then a bit more was added. It’s hard for me to judge how big a story this HSBC thing is, so maybe not bias, but it did feel odd at the time.
The driver of the bin lorry that killed six people in Glasgow’s George Square just before Christmas will not be prosecuted for his role in the accident. …
John Morton, the brother of Jacqueline, a 51-year-old tax office worker who died in the crash, earlier condemned the “wall of silence” surrounding the accident …..
Driver of Glasgow bin lorry that killed six people not to be prosecuted
In Oldham today it is reported that a Muslim who offered a £1000 bounty for the beheading of a man who broke into a Mosque received 80 hours community service.
A white man who was seriously mentally ill sent a series of letters to public officials calling for all Muslims to be beheaded has been sent to prison for four months.
In Manchester three people have been before the magistrates for plying for hire without a licence (Taxis) The white guy received a sentence more than twice both the Muslims put together !
If this happened the other way around the Fascists and their mates would be foaming at the mouth, and you wouldn’t be able to keep BBC journos from stringing up the Justice Minister.
How long will this anti white racism be allowed to go on before the supine & oppressed white public rise up.
There is no such thing as anti white racism – Jo Brand told us so.
She is a fuckwit.
Yes, her remarks are idiotic. If Mugabe and Black Zimbabweans, from a position of total power, victimize the White minority, how is that not racism, even by her stupid definition? You get the feeling she and others actually want Blacks to be victims (to justify their White self-hatred).
Or even a fuckallwit. Odious woman with no comedic talent = BBC contract for life.
I was born and bred in Oldham, my grandparents lived 2 streets away from that Mosque, my entire family were born in Werneth, right back to my great grandparents…That filthy Mosque was there way back in the 70’s…probably earlier too, but I can’t remember that far back…and it has not changed one bit, there is a clothes bank for “The Ummah” right next to it (not kidding)…Werneth is now and has been for a long time a “spot the white man” area…y’know, one of those “no go” areas we are told does not exist.
Oldham council are knocking down all the houses in the area, and building lovely new council houses for the….”population”, however, they are also holding large chunks of land….a “block” if you like back…I wonder what that land might be for…”Oldham Mega Mosque” anyone?
I’d hope it’s for a wall.
Currently on BBC2: Suffragettes Forever! The Story of Women and Power
Radio Times says:
‘Historian Amanda Vickery quite rightly doesn’t bother to hide her outrage and disgust as she begins her arresting three-part exploration of the oppression of British women by their menfolk.’
Don’t bother with balance, why don’t ya?
Strange how the BBC or any of their leftie mates won’t tell the inconvenient truth about the Suffragettes.
The only story you will hear is about their heroic struggle for votes for women.
This bit is true, but it’s only a small part of the truth. Prior to this only men had the vote, and only those men who owned property of a certain value.
When this law changed to allow all men the vote the outrages middle class women were actually campaigning for votes only for middle class women &men that lived in property over a certain value, and that men who lived in lesser dwellings actually lost the vote.
The reality was that it was a campaign for middle class people to have the vote but for the newly enfranchised men to lose theirs.
Now how do you think the far left BBC might deal with that rather embarrassing fact?
The BBC has just finished, Wednesday,a really good comedy programme called ‘Up the women’ It’s a knockabout comedy about a village group of Suffragettes, together with Upper, Middle Class snobbery; my wife and I loved it.
Well done BBC
On the other hand 10 seconds into Women’s Hour, today Thursday and the word racism cropped up…..over to Ken Bruce on R2.
Prior to this, Melvyn Bragg and In Our Time, the subject was Eunuchs.
Had me thinking the BBC suffers from too much Balls and at the same time not enough. I think you will understand my concerns
Mrs Balls (a.k.a. Yvette Cooper) was on Radio 4’s aptly named TWATO with the (relatively speaking) Right-wing interviewer Edward Stourton, talking about the latest immigration figures shambles. Needless to say, there was no reference to Labour’s dire record in 1997-2010 but an admission by Stourton that there was not much anyone could do about it.
‘‘Historian Amanda Vickery quite rightly doesn’t bother to hide her outrage and disgust as she begins her arresting three-part exploration of the oppression of British women by their menfolk.’
And, quite rightly, no comparisons with certain communities in modern-day Britain were deemed necessary.
I too, have noticed the bBCs promotion of the story about how that Sir Cliff Richard investigation has been expanded. Which coming less than 24 hours after the South Yorkshire Police and the bBC were castigated for their televised raid on the man seems to me as a smoke screen in which to try and divert attention way from their incompetence.
Yes the Police force which failed over 1400 girls in Rotherham (One town alone) from the dirty grubby hands of Islamic pedophiles and the cock sucking wankers at the bBC who remained silent on the pedophiles, rapists within its ranks, while trying to smear anybody they can have decided to throw more mud at Cliff Richard. You know what, I hope they both fail. At a stroke, both will come under further investigation and heads will have to roll (Hopefully inside a mosque to the sounds of ‘Allah Ackba’) The leftwing inspired totalitarian world of PC has to addressed once and for all and If CR is found to be innocent, then maybe the bBC (And the fucking hopeless british bobby) will have to act within the law of the land and not the bible of PC.
Ten News leading on some big report on Jimmy Saville due tomorrow. ‘The BBC understands…’ leaks tonight. Neat trick to get a bit of smearing on Cliff done at the same time. No smoke without fire, and all that….
Anybody else heartily and utterly sick of “Comic” Relief?
I think they should rename it “Hand Relief” judging by the number of w@nkers that appear on it.
6 million red noses at a £1 each need to be sold just to pay the Board of Directors of Comic Relief.
Dig deep.
Yes, for about the last 30 years.
Yes, Not that I watch that much of the dire shite BBc churns out these days, but for me “comic relief” means I don’t watch any BBc at all on that day because it will be “celebrities” that I have no idea as to their identity doing something that will make me cringe. Any one else completely abandon BBc on the so called red nose day? Of course over the weekend there will also be the so called best bits of the self styled red nose day.
And you can guarantee it will be a record year as far as the amount raised in concerned, regardless of what is actually conned out of the public. They cannot afford to let anybody know it’s appeal is not what it was.
I might as well move to the Islamic Caliphate. Today has been IbBC’s Islam celebration day. For me it started with the IbBc’s premier Islamic propaganda news programme
Item:
The good news of how wonderful our fellow Muslim citizens are in their loyalty and love of the the UK and its values. In case anyone should misinterpret the findings of this IbBC commissioned poll, there was a nice female reporter to guide us in correctly interpreting the data (It appears from some of the the posts here that she did not reach you heartless bastards). I did feel a bit queasy when Mr Humphrey’s did not challenge anything she said and the IbBC did not think to invite anyone to dispute the gloss being put on the results of the poll. Quite right: Allah forbid.
The genocidal assault on the Bosnian Muslims commemorated by a Bosnian artist. No mention of the the role the USA played in bombing the Serbs and bring this this genocide to an end.
Then inevitably there was the ‘suffering’ of the people of Gaza. There was conversation between a mother living in Gaza and and Israeli mother living just two K from the border. This debate was clinched by the Gazan mother because the Israeli children had psychological support to help them with the trauma of living in a war zone.
There could have been more, but alas I kept falling into a stupor like a punch drunk boxer.
The Six O’clock news tonight dealt with the stunning poll and again we had the female reporter to guide us in the right direction. Fiona Bruce lead of the report with the poll indicating Muslims felt that the UK was turning against them. The nice reporter interviewed some very western looking young Muslim women. They spoke of how offended they were by the unfair treatment of Islam in the media etc.
There was an item on South Today (I think that is what it is called) about a young man who has gone to Syria to fight with Kurds. It appears that he may face prosecution if he returns to the UK. However, it was pointed out that since we had nothing to fear from the Kurds it was most likely that he would not be prosecuted. Switch to Muslim spokesman claiming that this was the usual double standard as only IS fighters would be persecuted/prosecuted.
Oh well this has been a long and tedious outline. Forgive me but I am totally fucked off.
Good, solid examples of the BBC’s shameless bias, JPJ. That’s what this site is all about!
Quiz time folks.
He could have been talking about the BBC and the tyanny of political correctness in 2015, but who said this and when?
“Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as ‘controversial, ‘extremist’, ‘explosive’, ‘disgraceful’, and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see.”
It was an MP who was bang on the money with his predictions. The one whose name must never be mentioned.
Correct. 10 points to Lobster!
The MP whose name must never be mentioned also warned how dangerous multiculturism could be;
“Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population….
To agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see “the River Tiber foaming with much blood.”
Interesting…..
Enoch Powell by the way. First quote 1970. Second 1968
A great P.M. who we never got = J. Enoch Powell.
Dunno.
Guess1: Socrates circa 420BC
Guess 2: Machiavelli circa 1525AD.
And the answers are: ‘Yes’ and ‘Not necessarily.’
Oh no!
Another walk-out in worktime of BBC-NUJ people at W1A will be on the cards now:-
for ‘Al Jazeera journalists’ again-
‘Sky News’-
“Paris Drone: Al Jazeera Journalists Arrested.
“The trio – apparently filming a report about mysterious drone sightings over the city – wind up in police custody themselves.”
http://news.sky.com/story/1434297/paris-drone-al-jazeera-journalists-arrested
For BBC-NUJ:-
Al Thani, Emir of Qatar, Islamic Al Jazeera.
Islamic Al Jazeera’s owner, Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, Emir of Qatar, who has just visited Obama in the White House-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamad_bin_Khalifa_Al_Thani
“EU, Qatar and Turkey.
Who Could Be Whipping Up Terrorists?”
by Bassam Tawil.
[Opening excerpt]:-
“Al-Jazeera — in Arabic — encourages terrorist attacks in Egypt and the Sinai Peninsula by the Muslim Brotherhood, and preaches the destruction of Israel, non-stop.
“Recently Al-Jazeera has been broadcasting a ‘documentary’ series glorifying Hamas and the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, its military-terrorist wing. The entire series is devoted to idealizing Islamist terrorism and encouraging mass-casualty terrorist attacks against Jews, in the name of radical Islamist ideology.”
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5241/eu-qatar-turkey-terrorism
Two headlines and reports of same case-
1.) ‘Jihadwatch’
“Brooklyn: Three Muslims charged with plotting to join Islamic State, shoot Obama”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/02/brooklyn-three-muslims-charged-with-plotting-to-join-islamic-state-shoot-obama
2.) INBBC- censoring word, ‘Muslim’-
“Three New York men sought to join Islamic State, FBI says”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31626877
‘Should the Internet be restricted?’, asks The Moral Maze
“While the hunt still goes on for the three teenage girls from London believed to be travelling to Syria to join IS there are calls for Twitter and other social media to do more to shut down websites used to disseminate IS propaganda and aid recruitment. One of the missing girls was reportedly following more than 70 Twitter accounts belonging to terrorist fighters or IS sympathisers; one of those is a British woman who tweets about life as a jihadi bride. IS has deployed social media in the battle for ideas as effectively as it has boots on the ground and there’s a terrible, but inescapable irony that they’re using one of the values that we hold most dear – freedom of expression -against us. Twitter says that it has a policy of not monitoring user content, but takes action when alerted to inappropriate posts by other users. Many social media sites see themselves as platforms rather than publications, and argue that it’s not their job to police people’s views. But is that a morally sustainable argument when vulnerable young people are being groomed online? Is it morally inconsistent to defend the rights of publications like Charlie Hebdo, but at the same time demand that the views of those who support IS are supressed? How far should we be willing to sacrifice freedom of speech and our privacy in the fight against terrorists on the internet?”
The answer, of course is no. BUT note this:
“there’s a terrible, but inescapable irony that they’re using one of the values that we hold most dear – freedom of expression -against us”
We have LOST our ‘freedom of expression’ by voluntarily submitting to and refusing to ‘blaspheme’ Islam. The answer to ‘radicalism’ is to constantly and publicly denounce the Koran and that can easily and calmly be done by exposing its internal contradictions to the public at large and Muslims in particular.
“How far should we be willing to sacrifice freedom of speech and our privacy in the fight against terrorists on the internet?”
It is like fighting a war where we are not allowed to even name the enemy, let alone say anything ‘nasty’ about them.
I think twitter/facebook/snapchat/etc all excellent tools which should be manipulated by our security services to get these savages to fuck off back to where they came from. We don’t even have to pay the airfares !!!!!!!!
‘Is it morally inconsistent to defend the rights of publications like Charlie Hebdo, but at the same time demand that the views of those who support IS are supressed? ‘
The BBC is fast disappearing up its own moral relativist arsehole.
The biased bint presenting the suffragettes show , should try downtown Riyadh ,in her next show . The Stoning & 1000 Lashes Committee, would soon show up & pass sentence ,wouldn`t be long before she would be begging for a quiet cell , & chains in the Tower of London .
Boohoo can it ever be justfied to taser a child boohoo?
————————————————————————-
Depends.
Is the ‘child’ 6 foot 4, 14 stone, and carrying a shank.
Is it a libby wibby middle-aged leftie-weftie droidess facing the shank?
Or is it some poor bloody copper.
Droidnews the gift that always gives.
Lycette sp Douchebag on full howl because buildings flattened by Israeli retaliation for 4,500 incoming rockets have stayed flattened.
‘There are many reasons’, she lied – ‘Israeli restrictions…’
Unfortunately the editor had spliced in footage of a Hamas march which told the whole story (inadvertently).
Lads, put down tour RPG launchers and pick up some fucking shovels.
There are many reasons’, she lied – ‘Israeli restrictions…’
And the fact it takes so much effing concrete to build those tunnels, is another….
A 16 year old girl has been missing for 6 days in Bristol, although it has been reported on local bBC news, no wall to wall mentions on the bBC UK News website or radio news.
Why not? Does she not belong to the right demographic?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2968397/Family-fear-worst-introverted-16-year-old-daughter-missing-nearly-week-police-search-ground-clues.html
And finally Toricutz have seen the income of the Peak District national park ‘fall by 30% over the past three years’.
On comes ‘The Chief Executive howling,
‘I don’t know what we’ll do, I suppose we’ll have to look at alternative sources of income.’
Yes, treacle, it’s called ‘getting off your arse’.
From Nicholas Sturgeon down they think the sole job of a Chief Executive is to decide how to distribute the handouts.
The private sector has a rather different idea of the role of Chief Executive.
Did you spot it? I saw it. On the 22:00 BBc 1 news they ran the bank bashing story of the moment. During the story they show a demonstration, you see they can run some stories about demonstrations, about the bank. Trouble is there are so few people there , just like the ring around the Oslo synagogue, so super tight shot and then in desperation to make it look like a crowd they zoom right in on the banners. Awesome. As I’ve said before a standard reporting method used by the BBc when it suits their agenda.
I couldn’t watch, I’m off work sick at the moment and have seriously overdone the bbc daytime TV bit and am sick of the constant drip feed of biased bullshit, most of it over nothing major, such as the HSBC atrocity that has cost the lives of milli…oh no, sorry that was the other side’s lead happy story!
Now, what will be tomorrow’s all day liebour party political broadcast, could a short glimpse of Newsnight have just given me a hint with it’s lead story of how the older generation have stolen the futures of today’s yoof by daring to have a pension and own a house and being against all attempts to move the country forward by paying everyone a £50k a year wage and cover the countryside with cardboard two up two down match boxes to house the rapidly growing immigrant population and the muslim hordes.
You’d think people would have worked it out by now but then you watch the Matthew ‘cliche’ Wright show and you realize that we are living in a zombie nation.
The trailer for Newsnight at the end of the TEN NEWS was Evan Davis saying We’re looking at a big theme of this election – fairness between the generations.
That’s the BBC – once again – trying to establish a theme that garners youth votes for Labour; not something from real people on the street. It’s just an attempt at a self-fulfilling prophecy. Utterly deceitful.
A Newsnight teaser on behalf of the Labour Party?
It will be interesting to see whether this now develops as Labour’s position, confirming to us all, something else about Miliband’s November briefing (instructions) to Senior BBC executives and editors.
Let’s just watch. once again, for the choreography and the same use of language.
Bear in mind we’re part of the way there already with Labour saying that they will withhold pensioner benefits for the ‘better off pensioners’ – despite not defining what a ‘better off pensioner’ is*..or the actual cost of means-testing the benefits, which probably means that it’s a bit of Labour spiteful posturing that will save no money but appeal to the basest instincts of the envious – a bit like the 50% tax rate. One nation Labour at work.
Also it is worth noting that Rachel Reeves has already said that the Benefits Cap will be applied to the sate pension. Something that is likely* to devastate the plans of millions who have saved for their retirement.
*We don’t know the answer to these questions or the implications, because no one at the BBC has bothered to ask the question.
Why?
Glen this seems to be developing into an agenda. The pensioners living their “Privileged” lives. “The most you can currently get is £113.10 per week. for the basic state pension. Hardly what I would call enough for a privileged lifestyle. But then of course they didn’t give out figures and let’s not forget this isn’t free this is if you’ve qualified by paying enough NI for it. On top of this the suggestion older people should have the vote removed as they inconveniently vote for the wrong political parties. Hey on top why not get them off the roads they probably just drive around in the rush hour in the rush hour to add to the traffic and pollution.
The BBC/Labour and the Left in general have been stoking this generational war for some time. The reason is simple: the older generation are seen as mainly Tory voters whilst the younger ones have been through the BBC/educational establishment Room 101 treatment.
That report on Muslim attitudes. In the real world there is no cultural mixing at all. Maybe a little in London middle class circles but in the rest of England nothing at all. Attend sporting, fairs, country events of all types and it as if the Muslim population is non existent.
It would be preferable if this were not so but it is. As the Muslim numbers approach 50 % what future has this country got?
It the current situation continues we will end up with parallel communities having nothing in common besides a passport.
We ,the ethnic British are uncomplaining and seem to think our world will always go on.
This is a mistake. Islam is confident and sure of it’s destiny. To most of us descended from the age of the Enlightenment the concepts inherent in Islam and Sharia are incomprehensible. That is the honest truth.
I really believe we must consider leaving England and Europe. The important thing is to know that this will be necessary and that there will be a time when you have to go and go quickly. Staying will not be an option.
That this attitude is drastic goes without saying and if enough of us hold to it then it will affect both our own and our country’s future.
Look to the Pacific North West of Canada and the US. Try to live and plan that this might come to pass.
The British liberal elite that bought this about had no idea what it was doing and still does not. Look to your own and to your own resources. In the end that is the way of the world as it has always been.
Dave S,
Sadly, your comments are spot on.
Agreed. Very good post.
Sorry, not leaving, we will fight, we will have friends who will help us and yes it will get very bloody, leave my land, the graves of my family ? To them ? Never. They will have to cut my head off, I’ll take a few of the bastards with me. Rather see the place turned into a nuke desert, maybe there will be a use for our nuke subs after all, destroy what we cannot hold, but never ever give it up without a fight.
D1004. I am with you on this. For the sake of our children, we have to stand up and fight against this evil scum until the last drop of blood is shed.
Some day very soon these people are going to try and declare a muslim sharia state, within our state.
This will be the first big step to doing the same with the whole country. I am sorry, but i am not optimistic about our future.
In 1990 I flew from San Francisco to Vancouver along with about thirty others.
At Vancouver we took on fuel and additional passengers to the extent that I couldn’t see any spare seats. The majority of the new passengers appeared to be elderly Indians, presumably returning from visiting their migrant children.
US immigration policy positively discriminates in favour of non-Europeans.
The self-loathing of ‘western’ culture was developed in the USA and Canada believes in can ‘do’ multi-culturalism when others have failed. Consequently I wouldn’t offer much hope for a new life in any of the ex-colonies.
Perhaps we could take on Sudan when the last Sudanese has made it to Italy?
I have good contacts in Montana. Seems to be a fine empty place. Idaho also and North Dakota and Wyoming. .The important thing is that there is space and land to work. There is no guarantee the USA will remain intact and it seems likely that these Western states can go it alone maybe taking in parts of Canada.. Forget California and the East Coast.
These are only speculations. Like I said it is important to be prepared for the unexpected. Europeans built the West and there is no reason we cannot thrive there.
If Europe is to descend into a theocratic nightmare of ignorance then the New World will do for us as it did in the past.
Immigration policy in the USA changed totally after passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act in 1965, sponsored by that great American Senator Edward Kennedy. US Immigration policy had always favoured European immigrants. Not after 1965 though.
Of course, at the time, the political class lied that it would not change the racial profile of the country. In fact, that could be its only outcome, and so it has come to pass. Whether they were liars or fools is a moot point. I think they were liars, the fools were anyone who believed them.
Sadly, the American political class is as corrupt and depraved as our own when it comes to the betrayal of its own people.
Excellent post and spot on, but sadly you’re deluded if you think that what is happening here is not happening in the US and Canada.
Not everyones cup of tea, but occasionally I listen to Alex Jones (not the One Show airhead) and if you listen beyond the self promotion and bull, a lot of what he talks about reflects exactly what is happening here, in fact its happening in the whole of the Western World.
Birthrates alone dictate that unless things change quickly and dramatically our days are numbered.
“I really believe we must consider leaving England and Europe.”
Sorry, but NO. That is total surrender. In any case, where would we go?
If we get to an “us or them” situation, they are the ones who must go. Some people will recoil in horror at that. Too bad. This would have been an easy decision for our forebears but even some of the more robust amongst us have been influenced by limp-wristed multiculturalism. Everyone who chose to come here must have realised that they were entering a European country shaped in the Judeo-Christian tradition. If they made a mistake in doing so, they must leave.
We killed thousands of Germans, people not unlike us, between 1939 and 1945, because we were directly or indirectly threatened. Let me make this clear – I’m not suggesting we kill unwanted immigrants, but we need to get back some of that steel and fight for what we have left.
Cameron, the BBC, SKY and most of the DT disgust me.
“In the real world there is no cultural mixing at all.”
True. Went to the Tower last week – my Wife had never been. Quite busy for February but, at a guess, 97% white. A tiny number of black people, some of whom were clearly tourists, but plenty of white English with kids (half-term). I didn’t see one Muslim who was identifiable as such, which is not the case on the street.
I’ve commented on this before. It’s the same at the Proms, in theatres, traditional events, State occasions.
London is big enough to get by. Places like Bradford, with only one centre, have been devastated.
We have parallel communities, largely avoiding each other. Thanks a lot Cameron, Blair, BBC etc.
Next week I will be at Crufts. No moslems there, so pleased to see many Japanese tourists who are genuinely friendly and interested. But very much a white person’s activity. It used to be a BBC high point of the year. On a personal note – I do hope the five thousand watching my performance of Michael Jackson’s Thriller with a giant dog will find something of interest.
Bit like War Remembrance parades etc – hideously white – not the usual BBC third world shapshots of our school classrooms and high streets.
Well the Religion of Peace does have a problem with dogs doesn’t it? I think the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) once stepped on a dog turd or something. Anyway, they’re haram.
And now, coincidentally, we have this:
Equality and Diversity in the Classical Music Profession
If people from certain neighbourhoods can’t be bothered to go to the most accessible concerts like the Proms, what are the chances of them ending up in the LSO?
Doesn’t seem to be a problem for people of SE Asian origin.
Quotas next, I expect. Give me strength!
Joshaw yes the multi cultural race mixing illusion of television land certainly isn’t what my eyes tell me.
Leaving Scotland is something I would have never contemplated before, but since the Referendum it is something I have thought several times about. Other commenters here mention the US, which would have been my first choice, but again over the last ten years of visiting there and staying with my friend in Los Angeles, they are headed full steam on the same road we are, albeit about five years behind. Pro-Islam, Anti-Capitalism, Anti-White. Europe? forget it. More Islamic than the Middle East. Australia/New Zealand appeals due to it’s 1960’s UK feel but unfortunately has the same rabid lefty arseholes doing their best to destroy the place. Sadly I think there are few places I would be welcomed or accepted…………..but for the sake of survival I fear our future lies East to Russia………….
That sort of choice reminds me of the choice I had in the referendum between Salmond or Brown.
Well we all know why the English never got to vote on that even the 15-16 year olds.
The impressionable 15-16 year olds.
Oh, damn. Wrong story. They’re only impressionable when it suits.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2969436/BBC-mauled-MPs-slam-bosses-squandering-money-accuse-corporation-never-apologising-insist-licence-fee-axed.html
I submitted my comments on the BBC to the Parliamentary CMS Committee in December 2013 and they have been included in the report as part of the Witness written evidence (in the annexes):
My point at the bottom:
“d. A large proportion of UK residents, feel the BBC is alien to their views, (mainly those that do not vote Labour, feel the BBC has a left slant and bias on EU, immigration, climate change, politics and religious affairs). ”
Quote:
“Comments from an ex career soldier and B&B owner since leaving the military, who is now retired:
What should the BBC be for and what should be the purpose of public service broadcasting?
I would like to see the role of the BBC minimised and radically reformed to produce, without bias nor fear and favour, only news and current affairs, combined with information representing the UK, its nations, regions and communities and bringing the UK to the world and the world to the UK. My reasons:
a) The landscape has changed in this digital age since the BBC has now become one of a multitude of other media outlets that can be chosen, including free, online and subscription options.
b) A radically reformed and minimised BBC would avoid the numerous taxpayer abuses e.g.
(1) Financial ineptitude:
(i) Gigantic waste on failed IT scheme.
(ii) Lonely Planet purchase.
(iii) Enormous Staff Pay-offs.
(iv) Tax avoidance staff schemes.
(v) Move to Salford
(vi) Unbelievable high management salaries.
(vii) Staff perks etc, etc, etc etc,………………..
(2) Immoral appeasement of criminal behaviour and cover ups like Saville and many other scandals.
(3) Privatisation of the successful commercial broadcasting parts of the BBC would relieve the enormous mandatory tax price to the viewer, who can then choose to subscribe. I believe the TV Licence can no longer be justified for the following reasons:
(i) There is an increasing avoidance and loathing of paying the enormous TV Licence Fee by:
a. Migrants and foreigners residing in the UK.
b. The poor cannot afford such a high tax.
c. The Magistrates Courts largest offence it deals with by the hundreds of thousands annually is non-payment of the TV Licence which is an absolute national scandal.
d. A large proportion of UK residents, feel the BBC is alien to their views, (mainly those that do not vote Labour, feel the BBC has a left slant and bias on EU, immigration, climate change, politics and religious affairs).
December 2013
PUBLISHED TODAY – PDF COPY OF PARLIAMENTARY REPORT ON BBC CAN BE FOUND HERE:
Click to access 315.pdf
Worth popping that over to the dedicated thread on this.
There are those who just want the facts.
And a few who just want the ones the BBC wants interpreted for them.
Well done !
And, for balance:
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/feb/26/bbc-future-report-no-long-term-licence-fee-end-of-the-trust-less-content-is-more
Rather liked this, all things considered:
“The Guardian read the 164-page House of Commons culture, media and sport select committee report on the future of the BBC so you don’t have to”
Word to wise Graun readers… as this is the Graun, about the BBC… it may be worth sparing the time to read direct. Who knows what happens in the edit these days?
The next general election is the last vote we will ever have (or care to make. A stand against the ruling liberal elite. There cannot be a future for any future democracy in the EU when it has already planned to drastically reduce the number of serving MP’s, (Labour or Conservatives MP’s have no future) Democarcy in a Federalised Europe 85 local regional MP’s as ‘reps’) and increase the number of MEP’s – responding only to Brussels legislation and telling the MP’s what the EU wants! All our English institutions will go along with our national identity (the BBC has already lost its identity). If we have any future at all, it is despite the existing BBC propaganda and the Saudi slush money and the EU multicultural (failed) engineering agendas. The last vote we will ever have – in our lifetime – is to save England from being demolished. That’s why I am voting UKip.
Me too.
I only get 5L from 6 to 7 but it seems 9 out of 10 so called experts invited on to comment on whatever politically correct, social engineering topic they’re discussing is a woman. I have no problem with female experts but it appears 5L are all out to advance their agenda.
Breakfast News is the same, normally a generic Joyce Thacker type with left leaning views.
BBC breakfast. Saville, seems lots of people knew & nothing was done…sound familiar? Back to bank bashing this time RBS and it is compulsory to mention that it is @80% owned by the tax payer every single bloody time they say “RBS”. The future of the licence fee complete with some utter fucktard telling us it could be added on your council tax & that would avoid having to make any prosecutions for non payment of the license fee, oh yea that sounds fair another enforced payment for the lefty truth bending complaint ignoring shower who’s services you rarely or never use and switch prosecution from their stasi to the local authority for council tax instead.
Well I kid you not: Savile:
Charlie Stayt interviewing the usual clowns. Two reasons why those poor nurses didnt report Savil’s kiddy-fiddling.
There wasn’t even a mandatory duty to report it. Well, that’s all right then, except to say it wasnt, because as someone posted earlier, that made them accessories after the fact.
Two, and you’re all ahead of me here, it was the fault of the Prime Minister at the time….now I wonder who that could be….who insisted against advice in giving him a knighthood.
It was implied the political establishment knew enough about him to try and stop the knighthood, but did fuck all to protect his victims. You see, if not for that, all those nurses would have reported the bastard.
You couldn’t make it up, except the bbc cintinue to do so.
Bastards.
Al Beeb reporting that net migration (or whatever you call it ?) is up yet again ! Where is the PM and the government ?
Vote UKIP.
Is this the greatest example of ‘burying bad news’ – in the world – evah?
Today has long been fixed as the date of the last set of immigration figures before the election – an absolute dynamite event for UKIP – a huge election issue, no matter what The Beeb says.
Just by co-incidence, on the same day:
1) LibLabCon MPs release a report on the BBC.
2) BBC releases report on Jimmy Saville.
3) Stoke Mandeville hospital releases a report on Jimmy Saville.
So the immigration figures have been completely cleared from the headlines by the usual Saville hysteria. How convenient was that?
Getting one of our founding signaTorys in to No.10 was our greatest ever achievement.
To be fair to the Torygraph; immigration is their headline:
David Cameron immigration pledge in tatters as net immigration stands at 298,000
David Cameron has failed in his pledge to slash immigration after figures show the net flow in to the country in the last year stood at 298,000.
The figure is a huge embarrassment for the Prime Minister and means immigration is higher than it was when he took office.
……
The total number of people arriving in the UK in the year to September 2014 was 624,000 – the highest on record.
But seriously did anyone in all honesty really think Cameron was going to cut immigration figures?
Well, D Camoron will just lie about it, he does about Islam, the economy, the NHS, in fact just about everything, so immigration is no problem, short term gain f-ck everyone else is the Tory game.
For him … why change he s a Selfservative, after all,
the one overriding factor, he s just looking after
… “his own”
I doubt it is an embarrassment to Cameron. The man is a fool on steroids. I read and correct me if I am mistaken that he is now interfering in the Ukraine. Sending troops on so called training missions. Putin will be worried!.
The Russian army is very far from the demoralised force of the early 1990s. It would eat Nato for breakfast.
Memo to Cameron. Putin is not Hitler. Russia is not Nazi Germany and it is none of our business.
BREAKING: BBC NHS News Channel – Anite McVeigh: The BBC can name ‘Jihadi John’. (His name is Mohammed).
So, if three reports aren’t enough to displace immigration, a bit of blood and gore about JJ should do the job … They’re employing the old ‘Some viewers may find these scenes disturbing..‘
I’ve been watching for an hour now… no mention of the ‘I’ word.
Mohammed, you say? Now what were the chances of that?
If only he would … “find” religion and lead a more “pious” life eh!
Where is Willian Vague and his “hug a hadi” when you need him.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2968534/Unlicensed-drink-driver-three-times-limit-crashed-car-avoids-jail-court-hears-Islam.html
Finding the name; that’s where your licence fee goes.
At 11.00, sixteen minutes on Mohammed; moving on to Saville now. Maybe there’ll be time for a quick mention of immigration before the weather at 12.00.
Not one mention of the ‘I’ word, but, despite the fact that the murdering scumbag was born in Kuwait he is being described as British? A British IS fighter…how does this look to the rest of the world?
We are now adopting foreign IS fighters, is it not bad enough that we are sending enough ‘homegrown’ terrorists!! E.T. was more British than this man.
Indeed the headline is
”Jihadi John’ named as Mohammed Emwazi from London’
From London?
They go on to quote this group:
http://www.cageuk.org/
Which appears to be some sort of ‘charity’ that campaigns on behalf of the likes of Guantanamo Bay detainees, saying that they are actually nice guys and it’s all a misunderstanding.
The BBC quotes Cage, and has video, describing Mohammed Emwazi as a “beautiful young man”.
In other words, our security forces, completely at random, harassed an innocent young Briton, going on safari, and it’s our fault he’s now a violent murderer.
What they completely fail to mention is that the leader of Cage is himself a jihadist, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2970521/Outrage-group-blames-MI5-radicalising-extremely-kind-Jihadi-John-fled-Syria-kill-people-ISIS.html
So in other words the BBC are apologists for jihadists, seeking to apportion the blame for evil on us nasty Britons, and unquestioningly accepting that a jihadist sympathiser is a ‘human rights campaigner’.
The willingness of the BBC to empathise with Islamist terror knows no depths, it seems.
Here’s the video of Cage’s leader calling for jihad against the west:
N “I came he left” Campbell, on 5Live, there s no phone in today, as
the UKs leading news hounds, want to know why?, how?, is it even conceivable J Sovile, got, the power, the influence to engage in his disgusting practices?
……. when even most junior employees knew about it, must have widely known … been an open secret then?
oops nearly forgot
……. in Stoke Mandeville
Thats handy, the bbbc can name jihadi john on the day of the Saville report and withthemp’s report also out today, what’s the chances eh?
You could be right, a quote from the DT
“Immediately after the Washington Post published the name, the BBC also released a story, explaining they had chosen not to unmask Jihadi John earlier for operational reasons”
Operational reasons?
Operational reasons….Otherwise known as a complete embarrassment…I mean, how do feign disgust when you are supplying the evil regime going with a constant stream of new recruits?
Just like the failure to tell the Turkish authorities of the Jihadi Kitten….sshhh, maybe they’ll get homesick and come home.
This country is a laughing stock, it’s a liberal joke, every country should look at the UK’s political class and do the exact opposite. I’m ashamed to be British today.
Our coward politicians should be on the phone to their counterparts in Japan, the U.S., France and every other nationality who has suffered at the hands of Mohammed Emwazi and apologize profusely.
“A liberal joke”, and choosing abject cowardice, whilst at the same selling us out for a few petrodollars, for their own gain.
Angling to get more political power for Islam, whilst
spitefully, chastising the poorest and most vulnerable
of our own people.
D Camoron and the No10 traitors … Criminals all
Here’s the BBC ‘breaking’ (no sniggering at the back) e-mail:
‘Jihadi John’ named as London man
IS militant known as ‘Jihadi John’, believed to have beheaded hostages, is Mohammed Emwazi from London, BBC learns
London boy, eh? Lucky
If he’d been from Glasgow he may never have had his day in the spotlight.
“If he’d been from Glasgow he may never have had his day in the spotlight. ”
Your point being what?
Morning Albaman. No job to go to this fine morn? (c) A. Sarf London Public Transport Customer.
Or are you on station for the day?
Cryptic, isn’t it?
As pioneered by satirists such as HIGFNY’s Ian Hislop, who is known to poke fun at power needing holding to account, but still controls and often abuses the legal system.
Allegedly.
Yours in teasing, GW
“Cryptic, isn’t it?”
Absolute nonsense would be nearer the mark.
Still here?
Careful, there’ll be talk you have nowhere else to be.
Now, this mark… would this be one you set and judge, perhaps?
Guessing yes.
The Telegraph report showed an appalling influx of well over 600,000 people. With a correspondingly awful figure for net migration.
But these are simply the gross numbers. Underneath is an even worse picture – we are losing skilled Brits who would otherwise be contributing significantly to the UK economy and taxation and would not be a drain on social services, and importing huge numbers of low or nil-skill people who are in very many cases contributing damn-all to the economy and taxation and are a huge burden on social welfare. In other words – a dilution of Britain’s economic effectiveness – quite apart from “community” issues and dilution of our national culture.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11435529/Britains-brightest-leaving-in-brain-drain-and-replaced-with-low-skilled-migrants.html
At last, the bbc’s refusal to mention another ‘I’ word can no longer be avoided. This is great news for UKIP and a seriously bad one for liebour, the bbc and the lying tories.
It is further proof that not only can the liberal ruling class prevent mass immigration they don’t want to because they are hell bent on following the new world order of mass multiculturalism at any cost, the ‘global village’ in action.
The most embarrassing aspect of the piece was the bbc actually had Yvette Cooper advising on where the tories have gone wrong? Are they for real? Liebour pontificating about mass immigration, how short are their memories? It just beggars belief.
At last, the bbc’s refusal to mention another ‘I’ word can no longer be avoided
Brillo is doing a job on Cameron on The Daily Politics. He’s making a big fuss over why the Tories wouldn’t provide a spokesperson. He’s listing the (embarrassing) questions that he would have asked.
But…. DP has about 150k viewers; nothing like the multiple news programmes…. and on these immigration is far down the order. So the ‘5 minutes a week’ people probably miss the significance.
Brillo is one of the few non lugenpresse people around.
The rest of them are useless .
Buy the way a must read is Takuan Seiyo’s latest on Gates of Vienna.
Sheer brillance and very angry as the situation in our West merits. Imagine reading that out on the BBC. The lot of them would have a mass seizure – if they could understand words of more than two syllables.
Beeboids politically lined up with Labour Party for unlimited, open-door,
mass immigration into Britain in 1997 Election;
Beeboids campaign for more of the same now.
Glen. Saw that but doesn’t she have lovely hair? Do you think she cuts it herself. The reality is many people have a short memory and it must be great to be like that. Forget Labour abolished the 10p tax because nobody needed it. Flooded the country with migrants. Bumped fuel prices up and up. Even down to the fact I remember under the Labour regime the commercial radio stations were running public service adverts almost wall to wall mostly about bloody surestart, that’s all gone. Some of us however have very long memories.
…importing huge numbers of low or nil-skill people who are in very many cases contributing damn-all …
Indeed; but worse, unscrupulous employers are also importing really good young people, grinding out older Brits, neglecting to train, squeezing the wages and – to crown all – boasting ‘what a good boy am I – about how ‘diverse’ their company is. Some of the young stay, but some live frugally and save money to set themselves up at home…. taking their skills off with them. Disaster, every way you look at it.
“short term gain, for the few, f-ck everyone else,”
D Camoron, might not exactly ahem, “word” it like that,
but that is exactly what is happening, all going to Tory plan … no wonder they spent so long in their self deserved wilderness
The on going issue “we need trained people” well why not train them then is the obvious solution. My nephew is just applying for an apprenticeship. Of course I didn’t realise until recently the minimum wage for apprentices is £2.73 compared to the “normal ” under 18 rate of £3.79
Population replacement is well under way. The liberal dream made reality. Change the people and then create the ideal society.
Never has a more stupid policy been inflicted on this country.
But now these fools cannot admit they were wrong. To do so would consign them to oblivion and to public condemnation.
Which is why voting for the Liblabcon lot is an act of treason against future generations. Whatever happens these people must never be supported again.
Question for Beeboids:- how does your designated “militant,” Mohammed Emwazi, compare with your designated “far right,” anti-Islamic jihad, English Defence League?
It’s not just the BBC but the whole of the MSM which has revealed its institutional racism in this matter. The suspect is not called John and never was – this was simply a mechanism to make him seem like a home grown Brit. Nor is he British or a Londoner – he’s a Kuwaiti living in this country. If he has a British passport it is of no more significance to him than a choice of credit card or football team to support (which is how the BBC and political establishment view nationality).
Tonight’s PM R4 seems to determined to sink even lower than usual in its willingness to provide a conduit for Jihadist propaganda. Emwazi apparently was a wonderful gentle, beautiful young man incapable of violence. Yet somehow the security services hounded him for being a Muslim, he felt he didn’t belong to British society so was forced to go to Syria to find fulfilment there. R4 types, in recentweeks, do seem to have been voicing concern about Islamic “militants” destroying cultural artefacts in Syria. Nothing to do with the Koran and the “real” ROP, of course, just an outbreak of irrational beastliness. It is a pity the BBC is not as concerned about the living embodiments of English culture, still, but not for much longer, their viewers and listeners. Whether a statue of a Roman god, an Eqyptian mummy, an apostate, or the non-muslim population of England, these are all marked for extirpation by Islam.
Tonight’s PM R4 seems to determined to sink even lower than usual in its willingness to provide a conduit for Jihadist propaganda. Emwazi apparently was a wonderful gentle, beautiful young man incapable of violence. Yet somehow the security services hounded him for being a Muslim, he felt he didn’t belong to British society so was forced to go to Syria to find fulfilment there. R4 types, in recentweeks, do seem to have been voicing concern about Islamic “militants” destroying cultural artefacts in Syria. Nothing to do with the Koran and the “real” ROP, of course, just an outbreak of irrational beastliness. It is a pity the BBC is not as concerned about the living embodiments of English culture, still, but not for much longer, their viewers and listeners. Whether a statue of a Roman god, an Eqyptian mummy, an apostate, or the non-muslim population of England, these are all marked for extirpation by Islam.