Ok, here you go, middle of the week and a new one of these. Hope you enjoyed the BBC pushing out loads of pro-muslim PR this morning. It seems that “only” 27% of UK muslims support Jihadi butchers. That’s around 700,000 by my calculation. Over to you…
MID WEEK OPEN THREAD…
Bookmark the permalink.
ONE NEWS – order of priority
1.00 Jihadi John
1.xx Jimmy Saville
1.xx RBS
1.17 Headlines & trailer for local news
1.17 Award for gallantry to a soldier
1.20 Immigration – Increasing number of long term, Hague says Tories not worried – it’s a ‘Problem of success’
1.21 Report on BBC
Looks like a ‘result’ for the Beeb. UKIP’s best story before May has been neutralised.
Downing Street denied that the Jimmy Savile reports were being published today to distract attention from the immigration figures. As Rowena Mason reports, when the prime minister’s spokeswoman was asked this if this was the case at the lobby briefing, she replied: “It’s clear that both issues are getting prominent coverage.”
Well; she would say that… but she knows it’s a deceit.
Hague says Tories not worried – it’s a ‘Problem of success’
makes a change from the bleating aging population I suppose
inept, short sighted, the usual mill owner mentality … and as usual for a Tory incorrect. Not worried? eh!… yes put it out of your mind entirely … how bloody deluded, how dangerous are these people?.
How many more Jihadi Johns can we take in this small island ?
If I was a Conservative MP, I would defect to UKIP .
There’s not many Conservative MPs left in the Conservative Party.
You could be right, but take the scenario that if all the so called ‘Conservative’ MPs had the bottle to drop the party line and cross over to UKIP. They would take all their voters plus more…. and get the Great back in to Britain.
The Millipeed would then be PM ,with the support of Nicola Krankie . Then things will get really bad , you will be harking back to the “Good Old Days” of Blair , even Brown , & definitely Cam . Be careful what you wish for , the future is SNP /Millipeed .
Ok Essex Man, just what are the Tories doing about immigration , migration or what ever they dress it up as ?
Some commenters on a BBC Have your say site refer to a Cardiff University inquiry into BBC bias.
http://theconversation.com/hard-evidence-how-biased-is-the-bbc-17028
Apologies if this was discussed at the time but commentators on here may like to review and comment on its findings, which appear to be air time equals bias that way.
I wonder if they ever tried the interruption index test that someone on here conducted a few years ago.
I wonder if they checked out the “(Labour) government denies the opposition claim of x”, but do not play the opposition spokesman making the point, whereas it now seems Labour claims, cue soundbite, and then the government denies. Or the “Israel blasts Gaza …. after some rockets were fired” against “Palestinian rockets fired into Israel bring retaliation”.
If they found no anti Israel bias did they ask why the BBC still will not publish the Balen report?
The Cardiff University study was a whitewash (The governing body there, The Council, really need to investigate what rubbish is being produced there and is tarnishing their good name).
Civitas showed the whole report for the BBC Trust was a load of bollocks.
Strangely enough, the BBC did not find time to report the Civitas investigation.
Click to access impartialityatthebbc.pdf
Do Jihad John has been unmasked (allegedly
When Jihad John was first named I said that if the government was looking for someone called John they would never find him why not look for someone called Mohammed? Of course none of the online papers would publish and today we have him named. And I was right!
The comments on this Guardian live blog get very interesting around page 4 re. Jihadi John. The earlier stuff is mainly about the immigration figures, but a surprising number of the later comments would fit in very well in this blog.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2015/feb/26/nick-cleggs-call-clegg-phone-in-politics-live-blog
This blog makes great reading, you get the usual leftards on with a cozy chat making excuses for the perpetrator and trying to spread harmony through their garbage ideals and then they disappear when the truth and hard facts confronts them.
It must be great to live in la la land surrounded by fluffy bunnies and angels, fortunately for us there is a rapidly growing band who live with reality and see the hell that is being built around us by the religion of peace and the bbc and many of us take over pathetic blogs like that above of the guardian.
Rod Liddle in The Spectator:
To be ‘groomed’ is to gain instant victim status
It was stated on the BBC … that these three girls … had been ‘groomed’…
I daresay that in the BBC’s next report they will not merely have been ‘groomed’, but will also have been ‘vulnerable’. Words which have been co-opted by the liberal left to mean whatever they want them to mean.
iSLAMOFAUXBIA 😀 … I knew it …
If I kept at it, it would eventually catch on
Conservative Woman: The Cliff Richard affair is damning evidence the BBC cares little for journalistic standards
… it seems, the BBC was hell-bent on nailing Sir Cliff – irrespective of the strength of the evidence – and therefore they conned the [South Yorkshire Police] force into panic reactions. What happened subsequently has been described as ‘shocking collusion’ to besmirch the singer’s reputation.
There’s no smoke, without a boy scout being vigorously rubbed…
And he’s Christian. Funny that. No.
BBC now blaming Thatcher for Savile. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-31628420.
As long as it deflects attention from the teflon coated BBC themselves.
Unbelievable, the go to excuse for just about everything bad the left cause!
I think Thatcher’s death was the catalyst for Jihadi John’s need to cut heads off, the atrocious UK persecution of muslims in the 80s drove him over the edge!
BBC giving time to CAGE, the Muslim terrorist enablers, and allowing a spokesperson to give a 15 min diatribe on why ‘it’s all the West’s fault’, that their wonderful friend decided to cut off peoples heads.
All without interruption or questioning.
Even for the BBC, this is a disgrace, and is no more than absolution for Muslim atrocities.
OK, CAGE are taking questions, but still, they were allowed airtime to lambast, security forces & Western culture in general.
These people are terrorist apologists.
Yes, the BBC have a man from CAGE called Asim Qureshi assuring me that Jihadi John was really a very nice man and it’s this country’s fault that he’s turned out the way he has. Well excuse me BBC, but I’m not taking Quereshi’s word for anything. Here’s why:
Pure Oxygen Thief.
From Cat Stevens to La Di Da Gunner Graham in just a few years?
Time has not been kind to him has it?
Ta for posting this-to see his queasy transformation into a snake in the wests laundry basket, whilst THIS is the original version is very taqqiya isn`t it?
Lennons Allah-awful “Beautiful Boy” needs a rendition…does this bloke know the fate of blokes who trade their beard lice and henna tips within his own “Dar Al Islam”.
A camp caliphate?…not on the cards surely!
This guy and all his supporters need to be removed from this country . They will be much happier, and so will we.
Well todays Moaners Hour (previously known as wimmins hour) on Radio 4 was a real sixth form leftie crazed gossip shop today.
Not content with oppressing the general populace in their day to day lives, the Fascists now want to regulate what goes on in the bedroom, and who you can and can’t be attracted to !
“Racial Preferences and Dating
If you have a racial preference when dating, is it a matter of sexual attraction or can it ever be considered racist? Jenni speaks to Bim Adewunmi, Culture Editor at Buzzfeed and Head of Dating at Time Out, Charly Lester about whether our dating preferences say something about us. ”
So if you aren’t attracted to obese black women or men then you are not going to be able to filter them out via dating site questionnaires and you’re obviously a waycist. On the other hand if you are attracted to them then you are a vile fetishist and a waycist !
It was a jaw droppingly fucked up discussion which really belonged in the asylum not even the 6th form common room !
Bit rude to asylum inmates. But I can see where you’re coming from.
Forget it – bloody link didn’t work.
Plus of course some people are choosing to only date members of the opposite sex. Outrageous! They are clearly suffering from homophobia. The only practical solution to achieving full equality and diversity is if the state controls matters and allocates partners to ensure quotas for race, gender, disability and TV viewing preferences are met.
ITBB entertaining on the ‘Oo, me sir, me!’ aspects of scoopage which, as we all know, is the path the market rate glory:
http://isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/breaking-news.html
Seems, yet again, newsniffer has detected that the ever-ethical BBC editorial has undergone necessary evolutions as facts emerge.
So, from ‘tell it often enough’ to ‘don’t ask; don’t tell’?
The “BBC learns” phrase really gets under my skin. It’s the job of BBC News to learn things which they then tell us. If they hadn’t learnt it, they couldn’t tell us so there’s no need to sound so self-congratulatory.
Is that like Peston and Robinson learned that GB was going to raise VAT and dutifully told us in advance as intended, but Gordon bottled it and left the two with egg on their faces.
Anyone noticed just how few scoops Peston has had since 2010. Did something happen that year to cause his source(s) to dry up.
Wish him well if he gets on the shortlist for editor at the Guardian. Just like Pollyanna, he will hardly notice the difference in ethos.
Probably the same CAGE interview as noted above on Radio 4, but edited down to 30 seconds on Radio 2 4pm news, but long enough to allow the quote (before he was radicalised) ‘he was a beautiful young man…’
WTF? The BBC spin has begun, its all the British Governments fault, but remember these people at CAGE must have known his identity all along, but the bBC still give them airtime.
INBBC Radio 5, post 16:10 today- ‘we’ll be discussing with Ming Campbell whether Jihadi John was alienated’.
INBBC did not add-
‘we will be discussing with whether Adolf Hitler was alienated’.
Was Josef Stalin just a tortured soul cruelly abused by the Tsars secret police into being a mass murderer, was Pol Pot misunderstood by his pet rabbit ? The bbc aims to get to the truth of the matter.
Well if he is a beautiful young man, we can hope that his fellow inmates agree when he is jailed.
Hopefully it won’t come to that!
“..he was a beautiful young man.”
Smeagol was a harmless hobbit before he became the murderous slimy Gollum.
One has the impression that INBBC would have INBBC’s Jihadi John plus the jihadi brides back on the streets of London in a heartbeat, after a lavish INBBC welcome home exclusive.
After all, they are not the INBBC political enemy,
the anti-Islamic jihad,
English Defence League.
What a chance for a bbc exclusive “The Brides of Jihadi John” lavish production, exotic locations, war, will they, won’t they survive and get home ? Hard part will be getting some US network to stump up the readies, perhaps they’ll have to get Morgan Freeman to play John, who can play the three young lovers of our ” tortured ” young hero ?
Mark Reckless will have an opportunity to pick the scab off immigration on Question Time tonight. He’s more likely to go for it than Douglas Carswell, but not as forthright as Nigel Farage. Reckless and Shapps don’t get on since the defection, so it should be good popcorn viewing!
Panel:
Grant Shapps
Rachel Reeves
Tessa Munt
Mark Reckless
Camilla Long
What odds that the first question will refer back to ‘Meet The Ukippers’ 25 minutes discussing it leaving little time to discuss the real issues of the day, Mohammed Emwazi, immigration figures and Savile.
OT, but has Tessa ever been interviewed or referred to in any way by the BBC’s more senior male staff?
Say, James Naughtie (tee hee), or Andrew Marr (be still my sides)?
Great scrap on Sky just after 16:35 between Kay Burley and a beardy Islamist. It would be great if someone can post the vid.
Brilliant! Kay Burley refused to take his nonsense and he ripped out the earpiece and walked off in a huff!
I’ve always thought of Kay Burley as a lightweight; estimation now super-heavyweight!
Tweet links, must be about CAGE incident?
Tweets by KayBurley
That’s the one – is there a way to get a vid?
That apologist for Islamic terrorism is Cerie Bullivant who while on a control order did a runner in 2007 and whom the bBC (and the left) went to great lengths to paint as a….victim
This the bBC followed up with an interview where dickless was allowed to tell…his story
Be shocked as the bbC states:
“A man who last year sparked a national manhunt has spoken exclusively to the BBC, saying he is not the man the security services say he is.
Cry as they report:
“”The last two years of my life have been utterly devastated and controlled,” he told the BBC in his home in Dagenham, Essex.
“It devastates and dismantles every aspect of your life and what makes you a person. Friends would not talk to me anymore. I had only been put on it because of association – and the same thing could happen to them.”
Rejoice over this:
“The story of Cerie Bullivant begins in 2004. It was a difficult time in his life, drifting through bit jobs and struggling to care for his ill mother. A couple of old Asian schoolmates said Islam offered answers. The Harrogate-born 25-year-old was keen to learn – and he soon converted. “For me it was the best moment of my life,” he says. “I’m not the sort of person who speaks of great white lights – but that was the first time in my life I had felt a lifting. I had made the right decision.”
Become angry over:
“In January 2006 police officers stopped Bullivant and the Adam brothers from heading to Syria. MI5 assessed the trio were really heading for Iraq. Security service papers suggest “martyrdom operations” – suicide bombings against British or US troops. Bullivant says he was “baffled” and insists his trip was a backpacking adventure. The Home Office placed the brothers under control orders – and months later Bullivant joined them after MI5 expressed concern over his plans to go to Bangladesh.
and finally rejoice as the bBC answers his critics:
“I’m not a threat to national security. I’m British, I was born in this country. I have never been involved in anything that would harm the security of this country or the security of other countries.”
Yet here he is on telly, defending his blood thirsty mate. Nice one bBC.
This Islamic cunt was on newsnight and allowed Carte blanche to push his Pro-Terrorist agenda that JJ is a vicitm of the west.
Kay Burley has more balls and straighter questions than the entire bbc universe, take a bow Kay !
Well done Kay Burley. I particularly enjoyed her response after that clown had his hissy fit. A thoroughly deserved and justified moment of smugness. If only our national broadcaster would do the same…dream on.
That is exactly the sort of treatment these idiots should get every time they try to palm everyone off with their twisted logic to excuse these horrific actions.
‘he ripped out the earpiece and walked off in a huff!’
Certainly goes a fair way to atoning for the Tottenham ‘you can’t say that’.
The tweets on the twitter link that Philip posted suggests that Burley was bristling with anger at these CAGE apologists all afternoon. She certainly didn’t hold back.
I ll get this one in before George R
You couldn t make it up alert
LONDON:
“Pak Minister for Interior and Narcotics Control Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan on Tuesday said the biggest hurdle in efforts against terrorism was growing … Islamophobia. 😀
Addressing a press conference in London, he said there was no Islam bashing at the summit in Washington on countering violent extremism and it was welcoming that nobody made …
… a connection between Islam and terrorism“ (shakes head!)
Islamophobia is an insult … 😀 … to the sacrifices made by thousands of Muslims,” he added. The minister was interacting with members of the press after meetings with US and British government officials in Washington and London respectively”
http://www.dawn.com/news/1165662/islamophobia-biggest-hurdle-in-fight-against-terrorism-nisar
That this guy is anywhere near a countering extremism conference eh! … must go to the same school of delusion as Obama
Going, going, gone….
The BBC makes all the badness go away
Version 0 : “Returning his first verdict, Recorder of London Judge Nicholas Hilliard said Paul Morgan, 46, from Liverpool, was unlawfully killed by terrorist gunfire”
Version 1: “Returning his first verdict, Recorder of London Judge Nicholas Hilliard said Paul Morgan, 46, from Liverpool, was unlawfully killed by extremist gunfire”
Version 2: “Returning his first verdict, Recorder of London Judge Nicholas Hilliard said he hoped the families of the men would “gain some comfort” from the inquest”
Newsniffer reveals how – as if by magic – the BBC has made those pesky terrorists disappear – well they can be a bit shooty
http://www.newssniffer.co.uk/articles/916981/diff/1/2
Blatant BBC style-book succor to islamic terrorists
That is… unsurprising, but still a bit of a mind boggle.
Cameron has failed with immigration promise, the BBC tells me. Good straight reporting, no problem with that. It’s the ‘experts’ who the BBC keep putting on where the problem lies. Telling that because the economy is in better shape now we should expect this increase. It’s normal. No, numbers like this have never been normal. It’s only from the late 1990s that this deluge started. And while your at it BBC, can you ask one of your ‘experts’ why there were still hordes coming here when the economy was, pardon me, down the shithole.
Can one of the their ‘experts’ tell us when the deluge will stop ? Looks like we are all going to vote for the greens as they are the only party who want to build 500,000 houses, mind I’m not sure if they meant 500,000 every year ad infinitum. Perhaps the bbc can do one of their ‘countryside’ programmes telling us where we can fit 500,000 houses every year….and the roads…..and the schools… And the hospitals…. And the railways……and, well you get the idea.
Do they think we are fools? These ‘migration’ figures represent additional people since last year. The ‘problem’ won’t start to go away until annual net migration is negative, not just ‘lower’.
It is the same scam we have been given for decades over ‘inflation’. Unless the inflation rate is negative we continue to pay more year-on-year. Last year’s rise in fuel prices, say, magically ‘falls’ out of this year’s rate calculation but we still pay the increased price. Similarly should (hah!) the net immigration rate go down we still have to accommodate the immigrants of previous years.
I honestly think our MPs and our arts-grad ‘journalists’ just don’t understand the basic maths. behind these rate figures.
The bbbc cant really argueabut thefailing economy anymore ,so it lookslike they are trying to use it as a “weapon. WEAPONISE” the economy has a ring to it
So now you know; Jihadi John is not a psychopathic mass murderer, he’s actually a softly spoken, sensitive, “beautiful boy”. He was corrupted because he was questioned, rather vigorously, by the security services who wanted to recruit him to spy on his colleagues. Poor lad. I mean it could easily happen to any of us. For fucks sake I received a parking ticket the other day; I’m off to Syria!
The way the Beeb are slanting this by the end of the day we’ll be apologising to him.
Well, Radio 4’s ‘PM’ with nice ‘Eddie’ Mair was certainly going this way for a while … until shortly before 17:15, when the BBC and other media got a real bitch-slapping from an expert on ‘British’ jihadists, who said it was ridiculous to claim ‘John’ was just any old person radicalized by alienation from society: he was known to have links to radical groups, was not from a poor background, etc.
Eddie Mair? A nasty piece of work if you ask me.
Beeboids: Race and Sport.
Beeboids report without demur today that South Africa demands that in future at least 50% of its rugby team must be of the black race.
So Beeboids will equally accept, without demur, that e.g. all England’s Premier football teams should comprise at least 50% white English-born players?
Or, do Beeboids deem racial hard-ball OK for black South Africa, but not for white England?
George, that’s a pointless comparison to make for two reasons.
1 – Premier League teams can choose who they buy, whereas international teams can’t.
2 – There isn’t the same history of race relations in England as there is in South Africa.
This is about cricket, but when you say that the BBC reports “without demur” on racial quotas in South Africa you can see here that that is not true.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-31593301
Or here, when racial quotas were abolished in 2007
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/front_page/7082466.stm
Discrimination for blacks is approved by political ‘left’ and Beeboids, but discrimination for whites isn’t.
So you agree you were wrong to say the BBC reported it “without demur”?
No. I am right. The Beeboid report today (on rugby not cricket, where you are wrong) contains double standards on race, adopting South African practice of discrimination for black sportsmen, which you support.
There is a paragraph in the article which reads: “SARU chief executive Jurie Roux stressed the move to expand black participation is “not a quota system”.”
To me, that implies that quotas are a bad thing if Roux had to “stress” that this move is not trying to impose one; there is a defensive tone to “stressed”. Unless you disagree with this analysis, this shows that the BBC does “demur” about whether quotas are a good thing.
This is an article about South African rugby, so why would it talk about other nations? What double standards are present in this piece?
2013-
“South Africa introduce rugby racial quotas”
http://www.scotsman.com/sport/rugby/latest/south-africa-introduce-rugby-racial-quotas-1-3045768
In what way does that answer my points?
Channel 4: 20% of staff will be from ethnically diverse backgrounds by 2020. The launch follows similar initiatives at the BBC, ITV and Sky and comes almost a year after Lenny Henry launched an impassioned attack on broadcasters for failing to represent Britain’s ethnically diverse population.
What is the BME population of the UK? 14%? So what do you call this guarantee to allocate 20% of places to them. Note: I wouldn’t object to giving 30% of places to them on genuine merit, but…..
Now, you can argue that this scheme is not a quota system – go right ahead. As Orwell wrote…
Everything faded into mist. The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth.
Well done for changing the subject.
“We value and respect every individual’s unique contribution to the BBC and try to ensure that no one group or individual is unlawfully disadvantaged.”
…
“Taking the above as a whole, the corporate average for all staff has been raised from a previous 12.5% to 14.2% for ethnicity and remains almost the same for disability at 5.3%”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/diversity/workforce
You’ve lost me? You just posted a link where the BBC boast of their quotas….. I thought you were arguing that they don’t believe in quotas?????
For one thing my link showed that their target is for 14.2% BME staff, which pretty much exactly corresponds to the % BME population in the UK.
http://www.runnymedetrust.org/blog/188/359/Who-are-we-Census-2011-reports-on-ethnicity-in-the-UK.html
It doesn’t seem unreasonable to me to aim for equal representation of BMEs.
But I wasn’t arguing that the BBC didn’t believe in quotas, merely pointing out that George was wrong to assert that in that rugby article the BBC reported on it “without demur”.
I bet christal wouldn’t like it if broadcasters had a quota on the number of gay people in the entertainment industry that reflected the national 2%.
ChrisL
February 26, 2015 at 9:39 pm
///In what way does that answer my points///
He answered your ‘points’, you annoying little twerp. Now feck off.
“My South African Adventure: ‘Is Rugby Racist?'”
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/my-south-african-adventure-rugby-racist-1462920
Sounds like the Springboks have just relegated themselves from elite rugby for a while.
Families of the girls that fled to Syria have appealed for their return in a press statement, they announced that since they left they’ve been in despair, losing out on 60 quid a week family tax credits and their Uncle Aziz hasn’t had a shag in a weekl
You are awful.(in the Dick Emery sense, in case it reads wrong)
Yep, as predicted the BBC is lapping up the CAGE press conference and consuming: hook, line and sinker, the whole “Jihadi John was alienated by British security services” crap.
Watch out for Gitmo Bay references in Newsnight later today.
Radio 4 schedule today…
11.00 From our own correspondent. BEST NIGHTCLUB IN AFRICA
11.30 Writing a new South Africa. THABISO MOHARE LOOKS AT THE LITERARY AND SPOKEN WORD SCENES IN SOUTH AFRICA
14.15 Afternoon Play. SCENES OF A CRIME. SET IN MUMBAI. INDIA
15.30 Open Door. Featured Author. LEBANESE WRITER RABIH ALAMEDDINE DISCUSSES HIS LATEST WORK WHICH FEATURES A LEBANESE WOMAN WHO TRANSLATES GREAT LITERARY WORKS INTO ARABIC.
16.00 News. HEADLINES…. JIHADI JOHN WAS RADICALISED BECAUSE HE WAS HARASSED BY BRITISH SECURITY SERVICES.
16.05 The Film Programme. FEATURED MOVIE…CATCH ME DADDY. A FILM ABOUT HONOUR KILLINGS IN THE PAKISTANI COMMUNITY IN YORKSHIRE.
Throughout the day a new series about the history of SAUDI ARABIA was constantly plugged.
And what delights tomorrow in the Afternoon Play. THE ROAD TO BANI WALID…. DR. SALEYHA AHSAN’S JOURNEY TO THE FRONT LINE IN LIBYA.
It’s relentless
I heard the Radio 4 play this afternoon, in the background – it was total rubbish. And as you say, the airwaves are full of alien accents and stories about stuff overseas of sod-all interest to us. Doesn’t the BBC have any filtering mechanism to keep this dross out – or is it a reverse filter designed to pull it in and bore us to tears ?
Undoubtedly it’s the latter. Radio drama is commissioned and the BBC gets exactly what it wants.
I record R4 plays to while away long journeys. Ten years ago I had a small but steady supply from R4. Today I’m lucky if I can find one play a month worth recording, so tediously ‘right on’ is its output.
Like its comedy output, Radio Four’s drama has fallen completely into the hands of the worst sort of Guardianistas for whom the message they want propagandised is of infinitely more importance than the quality of the work.
Indeed. No offence meant to Scots or Northerners – but I am also sick of “working class dramas” set OOP North – whiny accents and all, formulaic and deadly dull.
It has reached the stage where Radio 4 Extra is far better listening – because it broadcasts mostly the OLD stuff. But for some reason it pollutes itself with droning Arfa Smiff as a link man, and repeats of the dreadful Now Show and suchlike rubbish. Surely the BBC knows the demographics of the Radio 4 Extra audience – they love the old comedy programmes no matter how many times they are recycled, and they like genuinely witty new or recent comedy like Down the Line or Claire in the Community which often provide real belly-laughs. They do NOT like the canned laughter of crap like the Now Show.
“No offence meant to Scots or Northerners – but I am also sick of “working class dramas” set OOP North – whiny accents and all, formulaic and deadly dull. ”
I’m from t’North and I’m sick of them as well – have been for some time. They pander to the worst kind of Professional Northerner.
I DO like this cartoon though (hope the link works):
I’m a bit late in posting about this, since it was on the Today programme this morning as I was heading to work.
Did anyone catch the piece about the Brit awards from a beeboid called Natalie Jamieson? It was irritatingly agenda driven, as she kept asking all and sundry the big question on all our lips – why are there so few ‘minorities’ represented at the awards? Is this not a terrible injustice? It produced a belly laugh from me as the well known BAME artist Lionel Ritchie said he didn’t think it was relevant and then the winning singer Sam Smith told her he thought the question was cr*p. Hahahaha!
Just heard Jon Snow try to get some words of condemnation out of Jihadi Johns bezzie…Asim Quereshi.
A meteoric rise to fame from the love child of La-di-Da Gunner Graham, and a bearded lady…and the lefty media better not be paying this taqqiya tosspot a rial.
But of course the quango charity and advocacy groups from Blears and Warsi will be paying him grandly.
Still-even when Snow gives Jihadi Johns mate open goals and gentle lobs, the oaf still manages to offend even Snow…the bloke simply refuses to condemn anything that a Guardian reader might require. No “religion of peace” stuff here-the smiling face of jihadi supremacy.
Usual liberal/Islamist alliance of common cause (aka useful idiots)
Mohammed “J.J.” Emwazi grew up in Queens Park, West London. Some dozy journo photo’d the house he grew up in, looks very much like a North West Council housing. Since “JJ” was six at the time of arrival, he isn’t “English”, he’s a Kuwaiti.
An enquiring journalist might ask who his parents from Kuwait were and how come they were allocated a West London council house? I thought Kuwaitis were all oil billionaires.
But we no longer have journalists with integrity, just greasy pole climbers in a deeply corrupted mainstream activist media. The BBC ‘s near monopoly of news employment has a large element of blame for the political corruption of the mainstream media.
How’s that “national treasure” working out for you, Mr Cameron? And what is the source of funding of the repulsive anti-British “CAGE”? And why does anyone give them a second of airtime? A mental health referral seems more appropriate, clearly delusional.
I’m horrified to ‘learn’ from the BBC that ‘controversial’ Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was responsible for the ‘abuse’ of 63 people at Stoke Mandeville Hospital
Apparently she wanted a ‘celebrity’ to lead fund-raising for the NHS so she elevated an unknown dance hall owner from Leeds into an untouchable ‘national treasure’.
“Savile met Margaret Thatcher, then prime minister, to discuss the funding of Stoke Mandeville’s spinal injuries unit in 1980 – and in the same year was appointed to oversee fundraising and rebuilding of the unit.
Lead investigator Dr Johnstone said supervision of Savile at this time was “absent” and – with “statutory functions… in the hands of a celebrity fundraiser” – government and NHS “lost control” of the project.”
In still to be released news, ‘Thatcher’ button-holed the then Director General of the BBC and told him in no uncertain terms that as a reward for Savile’s work as a volunteer she expected the BBC to provide Savile with the opportunity to grope young women and children as part of peak-time entertainment on Thursdays and Saturdays. At no time did the BBC carry out any checks on Savile or question his activities on their premises as he had been given a gold-plated pass by ‘milk-snatcher Thatcher’.
In other news, the Casey report has been buried, even though the ‘guilty’ are still alive and in many cases still holding on to their jobs.
The BBC said, ‘we are just the messenger, we have no agenda or wish to shape the national narrative’.
From the Guardian;
“Savile’s association with Stoke Mandeville dates back to 1969, when he began work as a volunteer porter and starstruck managers gave him unrestricted access to the hospital grounds. The DJ immediately “caused annoyance and distress” to junior staff because of his constant sexual innuendo, the report found, but he was feted by senior managers.
From the Daily Record
On one night in the 1970s, a night porter saw Savile wheeling the dead body of a child into the morgue…Evidence from Savile’s victims at Stoke Mandeville suggest his shocking behaviour was an “open secret” as early as 1973 after he started working at the Buckinghamshire hospital as a voluntary porter “with no checks, monitoring or supervision in place”.
I don’t recall Maggie Thatcher having any influence back in 1969 ? Wilson was still in power, Ted Heath did not win until 1970 – and Mrs Thatcher was small fry, Parliamentary Secretary level, even then.
It is disgusting for anyone at the BBC to try to smear Mrs T over Savile. It was the hospitals and the BBC – and some police – who were close up to this evil man, who KNEW about the accusations against him.
What was all that stuff from Norman Smith scoffing at the Tories failure to hit its immigration targets(PM , 5.15 or so earlier?).
His lamentable efforts to make political points from the Tories failures was so synthetic and contrived-clearly Norm and the BBC demand MORE immigrants, not less.
So why the faux-outrage at the Tories and their leaky borders?
Well at least we know that immigration is NOT the Lefts major gripe-getting Labour back and the Tories embarrassed is THE major plan for the Left.
Immigration is just a measure of their virtue-and their efforts to “make cheap political populist points” out of highlighted excess migrants here-only shows how venal, bankrupt and opportunist Norm and his fellow agitprop arseholes are.
Has the BBC a knitting pattern for Jihadi Johns balaclava?…reckon that I1ve got some way to go before I`m as valued and appreciated by ISIS as the BBC seem to be.
Traitors.
The only comments I have heard on INBBC today about Islamofascist barbarian beheader,
Mohammed Emwazi, have been empathetic ones, on the lines of:
‘ he’s alienated, and it’s Britain’s fault for his evil extreme violence, not Islam’s.’
INBBC = CAGE.
“Jihadi John: We’ll feel closure when there’s a bullet between his eyes,’ says murdered British aid worker’s daughter”
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jihadi-john-well-feel-closure-5238959?
I see the bBC has given up trying to lie for Allah now it just openily reports on the progress of its terrorist friends:
Inside Gaza’s tunnels, militants get ready for the next war
In an olive grove close to houses in the southern Gaza Strip, the earth slides open smoothly, revealing a sight to terrify Israel. A deep pit containing a 120mm (4in) mortar tube, and three fighters from the militant group – Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Fully armed and in combat fatigues, the men are all wearing head torches. They move quickly, in well-drilled movements, loading and unloading the tube from a stack of mortars at the back of their position. This is a show of readiness, a show of strength, for the next war with Israel. Viewed as a terrorist group in the West, Islamic Jihad is committed to Israel’s destruction.
The bBC reports from inside Gaza about how
TerroristsMilitants are building a network of tunnels , bunkers and missile positions out of reinforced concrete in which to restart a war with…Israel.Yup the same bBC which only yesterday lamented the West for forgetting about the poor people of Gaza in helping them rebuild after Israel knocked them into the stone age.
Gaza resident: ‘Everyone has forgotten us’
Caught in a wasteland: Gaza six months after the ceasefire
Six months after a ceasefire was declared between the Israeli military and Hamas tens of thousands of people still have no shelter and lack electricity and water.
There is so much information here that the BBC couldn’t find in July last year. Who knows maybe they might draw some conclusions as Shuja’iyya suffered destruction because of the tunnels build under it OR Israel is correct in demanding supervison to ensure cement for rebuilding homes is not used to rebuild fortifications OR even that if mortars are fired from Gaza then Israel might be pissed off enough to fire back?
Some ‘minor’ criticisms (video).
What is this site to terrify Israel? (0:45) Does Israel look terrified or simply determined?
The Israeli Commander didn’t want to be identified (1:36). Sommerville up to that point had spoken to and filmed dozens of men in facemasks, without comment. Perhaps the officer had not received permission to identify himself?
The Islamic Jihad fighters look so pretty and distinctive in their neat uniforms yet the BBC didn’t succeed in filming one of them in July. Could that be because they they took them off (BTW a war crime) last war?
What did you achieve apart from more than 2,000 Gazans dead, women and children?(2:41). This could be understood that all the dead were women and children instead of disproportionately younfg men of combat age. Someone who had watched BBC coverage could easily make that mistake because somehow the BBC didn’t film a single military casualty.
The Jihadist was given the last word. He is “still able to say no to the occupation” (3:00). Perhaps Sommerville wasn’t aware that every Israeli, military or civilian had left Gaza in 2005? Or perhaps, in the same way the BBC somehow missed all the activities of the report during the war they see an occupation all around them?
I see that IS have turned their attention to the destruction of ancient monuments. Iconic statues over a thousand years old, reduced to rubble in a matter of minutes by these vile brutes. They’re also building huge pyres of books; ancient manuscripts and religious texts, considered precious by many, smouldering. Burning books!
Now when did that happen before?
But piss on a Koran and you risk getting your head cut off.
I’m all Islamed out.
I’m afraid we’ve barely gotten started. you’re going to be hearing alot more over the next five years. especially when the terrorist attacks ramp up again.
OK, BBC-NUJ: when’s your next walk-out in worktime at W1A in support of the activities of your political chums at Islamic Al Jazeera, owned by Emirate of Qatar?:-
“AL JAZEERA JOURNOS ARRESTED FOR BUZZING EIFFEL TOWER WITH DRONES”
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/02/26/al-jazeera-journos-arrested-for-buzzing-eiffel-tower-with-drones/?
Here we go Jihadi Johns profile….The number w1061658 coincides with his student I.D. number at Westminster university….
https://plus.google.com/b/112399945515828046201/100020621883889036143/posts?pageId=112399945515828046201
Why the hell are we only just hearing about this young girl from Bristol who has been missing for a week? Could it be because all the media efforts were focused on the three Muslimas who bolted to the I.S.?
Well done Simon Kent!
Good Breibart article that illustrates “blue sky thinking” “joined-up governance” and the end of the “silo thinking” that treats our best loved, progressive and virtuous iconic public services as the seamless garment that it really is.
One hell of a satanic trident triune in a mass conspiracy against the nations white children.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/02/26/the-nhs-local-government-and-the-bbc-three-pillars-of-the-british-left-that-failed-to-stop-child-abuse/
The bbC’s so called defence experts talk shite by bigging up the TU95 Bear.
Russia’s Bear: The old-fashioned plane still thriving
The above is a bBC article on just how right the Russians got it when they built the TU95. Yes this master piece of Russian engineering is something we should all take note of. But here is what the bBC leave out of its pro-Socialist article :
1) Yes the TU95 first flew in Nov 1952, However the Boeing B52 first flew in April 1952.
2) The Tu95 has recently undergone an upgrade which will see it flying until 2020, however the B52 will remain flying until 2040.
3) 500 Tu95 were built, over 700 B52 were
4) The B52 is combat proven, the TU95 isn’t
5) The B52 vastly outperforms the TU95, and is older, yet to the bBC, the TU95 is the superior plane.
Even the RAF turned away from propeller bombers (Avro Lincoln was the last) and while the Russians were fielding the TU95 we were fielding the Victor, the Valiant and the Vulcan (The V bombers)
So why do the Russians still use the TU95, because for years they have had nothing else. Yes they had the Backfire, the Blackjack, the blinder. The thing is all of these have been unreliable. The TU95 is like the T34,T55 simple and easy to use. However it is obsolete as a warplane. It has the radar signature of a barn door and is only good for propaganda purposes …enter the bBC
Pounce,
A comprehensive and accurate post which proves you would make a far better Defence Correspondent for the BBC than their current crop. I stopped using the BBC as a source for defence matters when, as a pre-teenager mad on military aircraft, the BBC kept showing footage of the Nimrod AEW instead of the Nimrod MPA. A small spotterish point but an error that the likes of Raymond Baxter would never have made.
I assume one Eurofighter could take out a squadron of Bears without any trouble.
The Russians just like winding Nato up by flying close to our borders.
One Typhoon might indeed take out a flight of Bears if they all buzz along together, however I think you will find that obsolete though the Tu-95/Tu-142 is that numbers have a quality of their own. 30 or 40 Bears coming at different angles, with airborne jammers armed with long range cruise missiles would then be a different class of enemy, Hitler found out that the Tiger was bested by the T-34 and the Sherman though it was the better tank, The US were embarrassed by obsolete MiG -17s hacking down Thuds and F-4s .
If I was a betting man Putin might just pull this little trick, putting a large number of Bears around our shores at half hour intervals, I think you and others here might be worried to find that the present day RAF would be very had pressed to shadow all of them before running out of pilots and planes. Putin would have his revenge for sending 75 trainers to the Ukraine.The UK has become a paper tiger.
The main base for TU95 in the west of Russia is Engels , ( they have 20) they fly a leg which takes them up tans over Finland , Norway, Sweden, then they either fly down towards the north sea or head over Iceland. During that leg they are intercepted by Danish, Norwegian and English fighters
There is another leg which takes them across the baltics however as that space is much more contested , they use their Tu 160s .
Thie flights of the Tu 95 are not just the Uks problem but the whole of Northern Europes .
Also on the other side of the world Japan and the U.S. face similar issues
Whilst as it’s peacetime the Russians play by the rules and fly in international airspace ( note in a war situation all the Nordic countries would find their airspace full of Russian aircraft attacking them and through them to us) and we get plenty of warning as they fly round the North Cape and are greeted by the RNorAF F-16s. Putin could up the ante if he gives us a full effort rehearsal that quickly overwhelms our ability to shadow everything he can send, Cameron would be shown up big time if we had to resort to asking the 48th TFW at Lakenheath to help out guard our own airspace, Putin would enjoy that.
I think a Russian Bomber may accidentally lose a bomb over Cheltenham soon, but at least it will help UKIP, and free us all from the Liberal Fascist establishments use of mass Immigration, as a manufactured hypocritical reason to suppress our freedoms with snooping on our communications, as well as the use of Politically Correct “race repression” against the indigenous population.
They don’t mention the majority of Bears flying are new build, just copying the old design with added modern avionics , but like most media they just see props and think “old” . Turbo props have a role as short haul passenger planes, and the brand new A400M for Europe air forces. PS I believe the Bear could and did outrun a Nimrod.
The last bear was built in 1994. Yes they are currently getting overhauled , however they are refurbishing them in small numbers. ( this months airforce monthy has a really good article on the Russia bomber fleet.)
Beeboids are politically complicit with CAGE on Islamofascist Mohammed Emwazi,
not politically exposing CAGE, as ‘Daily Mail’ rightly does here:-
“The Jihadi John apologists:
“Islamic campaigner who today defended ISIS executioner as a ‘beautiful, kind young man’ was filmed calling for jihad outside U.S Embassy.
“Asim Qureshi helped name his friend Mohammed Emwazi as Jihadi John.
“Mr Qureshi said that MI5 had harassed Emwazi and help radicalise him.
“Campaigner was tearful as he described him as ‘extremely kind and gentle.’
“He added that ‘the man I knew would never hurt a single person.’
“‘When are we going to finally learn that when we treat people as if they’re outsiders they will look for belonging elsewhere.’
“Comments caused fury from people who believe MI5 were doing their job.
“CAGE broadcast was on Sky News for 58 minutes without interruption and the BBC showed it for 52 minutes.”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2970521/Outrage-group-blames-MI5-radicalising-extremely-kind-Jihadi-John-fled-Syria-kill-people-ISIS.html#ixzz3St3MnaJv
Stephen Glover in the Mail trashes the BBC’s warped coverage of its own survey of Muslim attitudes. eg – how would we feel if over a quarter of the population was “sympathetic” to the blowing up of Parliament ?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2969623/Their-survey-British-Muslims-delighted-BBC-fact-contains-profoundly-chilling-findings-says-STEPHEN-GLOVER.html
FFS – excuse my French – the BBC NHS News Channel has just broadcast a report from Wyre Davis on how a judge has dismissed the case against President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner. They held off reporting the murder of the Jewish prosecutor, the allegations against Fernandez de Kirchner and the protests by 400,000 people; yet we get this puff-piece as soon as they can spin something positive. The TV report was only the positive stuff; very little background.
Argentina: President Cristina Fernandez case dismissed
So much for Mohammed Emwazi’s University of Westminster, as confirmed by ‘Daily Mail’ not INBBC–
“Jihadi John’s old university was a ‘hotbed of radicalism where students celebrated 9/11’, claims ex-pupil – and hate preacher was even due to speak there TONIGHT ”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2970443/Jihadi-John-s-old-university-hotbed-radicalism-students-celebrated-9-11-claims-ex-pupil-hate-preacher-speak-TONIGHT.html
Oh dear, found out already, the desperate lefty lies just get more shallow by the day…appease, appease.
No wonder they hate the Daily Mail, do the liberals really believe that someone who can cut someone’s head off is a thoroughly decent chap….FUCK OFF BBC WE CAN SEE THROUGH YOU.
Islamofascist supremo Mohammed Emwazi’s journey from University of Westminster to Mosul-
“Islamic State jihadis destroy 3,000-year-old artworks in Mosul museum”
Islamic State jihadis destroy 3,000-year-old artworks in Mosul museum
Do Beeboids know, or care about this?:-
“EU is being promoted in skewed history lessons:
Academics warn teachers are promoting a ‘soft push’ for further European integration in British classrooms”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2969665/EU-promoted-skewed-history-lessons-Academics-warn-teachers-promoting-soft-push-European-integration-British-classrooms.html
I have just started watching the ten o’clock news. I am speechless! Jihadi John, apparently we radicalized him, its all our fault! Such a nice beautiful person!
My boot wanted to go through my tv screen with lucy mannings face on it so much!!!!
Please someone! Calm me down!!!
Breeeeathe….!
This story was just a distraction from the immigration figures; 640,000 foreigners in last year – that’s just the ones they know about. Mark Reckless will be on Question Time shortly to cheer you up!
Reckless is a Conservative , he & Carswell are only “On loan” to Ukip , they will return to the fold sooner than you think .
CCHQ paying you overtime?
Your constant pro Tory posts are becoming boring, I’m voting for a change from the LabCon monopoly (two cheeks of the same arse) and voting UKIP, tactical voting is so yesterday.
Take note of tonight’s Thanet poll
UKIP 39%
Tory 27%
So are all those who think Ukip ,will form the next government , you all seem to want a Millipeed /SNP government , well that won`t benefit Ukip, because in the end the Consevatives will get back in, but after SNP /Labour have totally destroyed everything. Ukip will have between 0 & 3 seats , whatever you say , & no influence .
Who owns copyright to the name ‘Conservative’ is neither here nor there – but my understanding is that the Peter Bone/John Redwood/Owen Patterson faction believe in the same things as Nigel Farage. Aren’t they just staying in the Conservative party for now in the (forlorn) hope that they can take it over in a coup when Cameron fails to get a deal with Merkel?
On QT Reckless seemed to share the general puzzlement about why those “straight A” school girls went to Syria. They were “victims” of some sort. What dark forces could be at work? It’s all beyond my comprehension, he mused. Could it be they were “true believers” in the particular religion they were brought. up in? After all most religionists do believe unconditionally in their sacred texts as transmitted through their prophets from their Sky Fairy. But then we know there are no “true” Muslims in Syria as no “true” Muslim would commit a violent act. It’s all very confusing.
Cameron is a Careerist, he & May are only “On loan” to Politics, they have never been in the fold, but others could return the Tories to the fold if they lose the election, otherwise everyone else will go to UKIP, leaving only the toffee nosed careerists to hang on to a pro-EU Tory party, no different from the LibDems.
Jihadi John, the
Kuwaiti‘British’ ISIS murderer.Another day, another brutal Islamic killing.
Muslim assailants have hacked to death the noted writer and free thinker Avijit Roy with meat cleavers. His wife was critically injured.
Details here; http://wp.me/pCXJT-4p6
Roy was a high profile critic of Islamic extremism. Last year Islamists posted on Facebook “Roy lives in America and so, it is not possible to kill him right now. He will be murdered when he comes back to Bangladesh”.
I don’t see it on BBC.
The Killer Questions to ask all muslim apologists :
1. Do you condemn the beheadings by IS?
2. Do you condemn 9/11?
They cannot and will never answer ‘yes’.
..
Ch4 News “Cage” Extremists … Re Emwazi
BBC News “Cage” Extremists … Re Emwazi
A toss up who gives them the most airtime, and the lamest
interview.
I should imagine Al BBC with all the radio airtime
lavished on Asim Qureshi, John Snow did finally ask this scumbag
a challenging question, then let him spout more weasel words and ignore it.
Kay Burley, more balls than the entire BBC newsroom, when dealing
with the boss eyed beardy Islamoprick, no Moazzem Begg this time?
(BBC/Ch4 not a single vertebrae between them … Islamophile traitors all).
Asim Qureshi CAGE, the erm … independent advocacy group “empowering communities” (terror supporting snake oilers)
The Beeboids will be really pissed off when they see this!
http://order-order.com/2015/02/26/survation-farage-11-points-ahead-in-thanet/#disqus_thread
If Carlsberg made BBC News … hurrah for Rebelmedia
Islamo-Nazi s worse than the Nazi s
How thick is Rachel Reeves, who evidently ‘chose’ to be an MP. Arrogant thick leftard c*&t! Labour yobs and yobettes stuffed in QT audience again clapping at inane Reeves comments.
Reckless didn’t seem confident, but didn’t f&^k up, normalizing UKIP. QT is not the arena for in depth debate. Its a populist bun fight. Dimbleby really needs putting out to pasture. He simply doesn’t give a sh!t. And young people think ‘theres plenty of money to go around’. Schools must be teaching about the magic money tree and rights to free stuff in school now. Facepalm.
Dan Hannan on This Week, and Nat Ben re-run. Sure hope it doesn’t piss me off as much as QT.
Vote UKIP.
Compare and contrast
Security services to blame for not preventing the three girls leaving the country….
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31575908
and
Security services blamed for preventing Jihad John from travelling abroad
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31647271
Its all the fault of the security services – simples ?