On time and for your attention – a brand new Open Thread for the weekend. This is where you detail the bias. I also wanted to thank those who came along for the BBC Question Time live chat last. The system seemed to work ok and so I hope many more will click the link, register, and join in the fun and games next week.
WEEKEND OPEN THREAD
Bookmark the permalink.
PLO to end historic Israeli security agreement
Leaving aside that this is a threat made many times before, a certain piece of vital information seems to be missing in the following sentence The PLO is the representative body for Palestinians and its decisions are binding for the Palestinian Authority.
Who are the heads of the PLO; the Palestinian Authority that is apparently subordinate to it and Fatah the largest faction in the PLO and in the Palestinian Authority? Only one head: Mahmud Abbas. So the PLO, led by Abbas instructs the PA, led by Abbas to stop cooperation. He in turn will order Fatah, led by Abbas to stop.
Elder of Ziyon gives more background information than the BBC ever will. Political Pallywood in “decision” to stop security coordination with Israel.
On the graphic level look at the photograph the BBC used to illustrate Palestinian and Israeli security cooperation. Would that be the appropriate caption you would pick?
This Climate Change organisation are having a London protest march soon.
Note how receptive they are not to debate! Debate = Spam !
http://campaigncc.org/climateforum
–Posts seeking to cast doubt on the reality or seriousness of climate change will be treated as spam–.
..
Good spot DS. Campaign Against Climate Change. And the promotion of de-forestation and burning of wood, promoting “biofuels”.
And check out their staff role call. Barely a scientist to be seen, just professional (and voluntary) troughers and air-heads.
Their ‘spam warning’ sums up these stateist fascists: “Don’t trouble us with inconvenient contributions which may force people to think fully for themselves, or which may cast doubt on ‘the reality or seriousness of climate change.”
We live in a twisted world. These new age AGW religionists are adopting similar methods to Islam. Followers, especially the young, are shielded from thought, discouraged from enquiry, encouraged in insular fascism. No room for doubters or sceptics, in other words, no room for science reason and rational discourse.
And what is George Monbiots’s current position on nuclear, AGW etc? The problem with these vocal enviro-activists, is that every time the state sponsored alarmist scientists have their work taken to pieces, they have to shift their position to maintain their jobs.
We live in strange times. Fascists running Unite Against Fascism and Eco-loons campaigning against human welfare – they must have psychological malfunctions, or just old fashioned religious pig-thickery.
Exactly!
They want ‘Free Speech’ but not for those who objectively disagree with them.
BBC-NUJ will be pleased:
– a speeding up of mass immigration & colonisation of Britain from Asia and Africa, via European Union-
“New migrant flood on way:
Outrage after EU warns Britain to prepare for more foreigners.
“Britain could be forced to accept a new surge of migrants under Brussels plans to set up refugee processing centres in Africa and the Middle East.”
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/562452/Fury-new-EU-migrant-plan-UK-forced-accept-more-foreigners
LBC: 10:30am Sir Andrew Green of migration watch was asked about the bBC and he stated that the entire news establishment of the bBC is pro immigration. He said they are very selective about the news items they pick to give a VERY BIASED view of the immigration news.
“BBC asks YouTube to take down ‘India’s Daughter’ for copyright violation”
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/bbc-asks-youtube-to-take-down-india-s-daughter-for-copyright-violation/article1-1323715.aspx?
Three versions on Hillary Clinton and her e-mails-
1.) Pamela Geller-
“Guess who else was on Clinton’s private at-home server”
– See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/03/guess-who-else-was-on-clintons-private-at-home-server.html/#sthash.ATsrwBcY.dpuf
2.) ‘Fox News’-
“Emails show Clinton aides running interference during Benghazi attack”
By Catherine Herridge.
(inc 3 min video clip.)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/07/emails-show-clinton-aides-running-interference-during-benghazi-attack/
3.) BBC-Democrat-
“‘Emailgate’ shows Hillary what lies ahead”
By Beeboid Jon (‘don’t mention Benghazi, 2012’) Sopel.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31759586
Well… the deluded argument that the election is a stark choice between the Tories and a nightmare Labour government has been blown out of the water by Lord Baker this morning:
Lord Baker: Conservative-Labour coalition may be needed
Only proves what was obvious all along – the LibLabCon are all identical little piggies from the same sow’s litter. Shouldn’t be hard agreeing a coalition when they already agree on Europe, immigration, political correctness, etc., etc..
The Beeb are beside themselves at the prospect of the Tories delivering another 30% for the ‘progressive’ line. Common Purpose will surely see it as a landmark success.
Vote UKIP – you know you should.
Essexman will be pleased , if it means they dont put an extra tuppence on the rates.
That comment from Lord Baker ,total fantasy , almost as fantasy as Ukip holding the” Balance of Power ” in May . The kippers can`t support Millipeed /SNP, as they don`t want a referendum on the EU ever.So the 3 MP`s will have to support the Conservatives in an EU referendum , so we ask why vote Ukip , as only the Conservatives will hold a referendum . The only other fly in the ointment is the electorate might vote to Stay In anyhow . Its not a shoo in, we would vote to leave the EU.
3 MP’s Essex Man? Care to justify that prediction?
I don’t think even the most blinkered beeboid is expecting that result.
The return of the days of National Government (1931, 1935) under MacDonald and Baldwin.
The Tories AND Labour got us here.
When someone smacks you in the mouth says they won’t do it again then smacks you in the mouth and says they won’t do it again then smacks you in the….well you get the idea.
How many times do you keep getting smacked until permeates that they will just carry on smacking you in the mouth.
People really need to get it in to their grey matters that voting for the three main parties means the same as it always has. THEY WILL NOT CHANGE. THINGS WILL NOT CHANGE! PERIOD.
Vote UKIP. Vote SNP. Vote Plaid Cymru. Vote Green (you’d be barking mad but still…) but don’t believe anymore promises from those who won’t deliver and don’t want to. It just can’t go on… surely.
While immigration and Islam destroy our history, the EU-BBC-LibLabCon ‘elite’ destroy our culture and freedom. It’s a perfect marriage for them and a further step down the road to the socialist/globalist ‘paradise’ they have planned for the rest us.
Even Trevor Phillips, former equality and human rights chief has recognised the madness of the programme being forced on us:
‘attempts to stop prejudice instead encouraged abuse and endangered lives as well as contributed to the rise of parties like Ukip’.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2983851/We-wrong-try-ban-racism-existence-says-former-equality-chief.html
By the way, Trevor, it didn’t just ‘endanger’ lives. Don’t it just go to show that you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone? Vote UKIP.
Trevor Phillips has done OK out of the race industry.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1257990/Equality-boss-Trevor-Phillips-told-MPs-justify-112-000-salary.html
Philips has been making odd noises for a while, but that total capitulation is remarkable, coming from the most patronising individual ever to lecture us. He seems to concede just about everything on the politics, but there’s no acknowledgement that he created a section of society obsessed with the politics of envy.
The programme airs on March 19th; only one party is going to benefit from such candour.
It appears that the government (sorry, us plebs) has paid Mr Phillips in excess of £1million to spend the best part of a lifetime working out the benefit of the Enlightenment, free speech and free association. An expensive training course indeed. And he has now concluded that what he has been doing (i.e. ‘race baiting’) was wrong. (To confused lefties: ‘wrong’ is another opposite of ‘right’).
The sad thing is, Mr Phillips could have learned this in his own time, with a few brief conversations with a sample, say, of posters on this site. This would have (i) cost taxpayers less, (ii) prevented the immeasurable cultural and educational damage wrought by multi-culti indoctrination, (iii) allowed Mr Phillips to have followed a different path in life which may have been productive and of social benefit.
I guess the penny has dropped now with Mr Phillips, but he can not know the damage he and his industry have caused, and continue to cause. (For instance, Darren Wilson, who tackled a criminal, but must be evil because he is white and the criminal [Michael Brown] is black.)
Race baiting is a real money spinner.
An excellent post which sums up the problem very well.
For more on how this all began, see “Anti-Racism: A Mania Exposed” by Russell Lewis, Quartet Books, 1988.
“[Lewis] ends his book by insisting that tolerance will never be born of legislation or activism but will flow naturally from the depoliticizing of education and local government, the deregulation of the marketplace and the phasing out of institutions with a vested interest in racial strife.”
By coincidence I have that book in my collection
Christ Almighty, I’m just listening to the News Quiz. Are those shills as thick as they sound or do you think they just do anything for money? Incidentally, does anybody find them, er, funny?
Yes, Lord, it is dreadful really. I avoided it on Friday evening then stupidly listened from 12:30 today.
There were one or two funny moments but more relentless propaganda on various Left metropolitan elite subjects: the attacks on Farage and UKIP are of course standard; one of the (non-British) Sandi Toksvig’s unfunny quips today was that the antiquated plumbing in the Palace of Westminster was good in that it did at least reflect the place’s antiquated attitudes to gender equality and ETHNIC DIVERSITY. The audience loved it.
Woman raped as she waits for bus. Police are looking for an Asian with receding hair. Could be Chinese? Can the public be given a clearer description- rapists should be caught. Unless they belong to the very protected people.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-31778850
Maybe another case of ITMA – it’s those ‘men’ again.
Asian, they say. Those pesky Bhutanese, Mongolians and Laotians causing mayhem again.
Re. the ongoing destruction of ancient Assyrian artifacts by muslims in Iraq;
It is hardly surprising that ordinary, peace loving muslims have been forced to take extreme action against these 3,000 year old remains. They have been driven to this by social injustice and state persecution of muslims by the Assyrian Empire.
Lack of employment opportunities and social depravation caused by the illegal, apartheid regime of Assyrian leader Tiglath-Pileser the first, has led to many young muslims feeling excluded from Assyrian society. As a result of this oppression, many have turned to violence as a last resort. Frankly these ancient monuments had it coming.
The action of this minority has nothing whatsoever to do with true islam.
I think of it as a Turner Prize entry.
To deconstruct the oppressive past of patrilinear hegemony, and-in a real sense-providing a creative destructive workshop that invites us all to reflect on the iconographic relevance of Barney Rubble to the interfaith dialogue in its essential pedagogical expression.
Guess that ISIS are running out of stones to chuck at women as they are placed neck high in safe spaces for the Islamic artistes to explore the frailties of Galens medical description of the human head.
They do seem to be specialising in cranial/throat surgery…of if only we`d allow them all the HSE training to develop their shaving and surgical techniques in better conditions than a sandpit in the heat.
Bloody Tories stop them coming don`t they?…philistines.
Can we expect Jeremy Vine to invite one of his favourites, Margaret Hodge, to give her opinion on tax avoidance and ten-year old directors of companies?
All day long I have been hearing the weather report(s) for the U.K. from several media outlets. The West has been given a cloudy day with the occasional sunny spells. Well, when one reviews the satellite picture on a regular basis, the West has been carpeted not with cloud but with clear blue skies (with a bit of sea fog lapping a few costal patches) which started at 7.00am and is still continuing and will till sunset. Now I know that Climate is not weather, but Jesus, if they cannot even report the actual weather correctly how do they expect us to believe they can forecast “Climate Change”? The Met Office, not fit for purpose?
I live in the west and the sun has been ‘blazing’ all day. Must be climate change or whatever they’re calling it nowadays. 😉
What changed British eating habits?
Find out how immigration provided us with more choice when dining out
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02l4g51?intc_type=promo&intc_location=news&intc_campaign=timeshift&intc_linkname=bbcfour__factual_vidclip2
Typical BBC promotion of immigration, and ‘diversity’, the fact that it’s a lie seems not to concern them!
The reality is that foreign travel is what changed British eating habits, plus greater affluence, and availability of ingredients.
The oldest Indian restaurant Veeraswamys opened in 1926 well before any meaningful kind of immigration. Before that though employees of the East India company had brought Indian dishes back to Britain. Rice pudding for example is really Rasmallai.
Before that the first recorded Indian restaurant opened in 1809 the Hindostanee Coffee House.
“But Britons already had a taste for curry. A handful of coffee houses served curries alongside their usual fare, and in the gracious homes of returnees, ladies attempted to recreate dishes and condiments their families enjoyed on the sub-continent. ”
“Some wrote out their own recipes; others may have used one of the many editions of Hannah Glasse’s The Art of Cookery, first published in 1747, which contained recipes for curries and pilaus.”
So over 250 years ago British housewives were preparing their own Indian food when there was no immigration !
You wouldn’t mind so much but those quotes contradicting the BBC immigration story come from a different BBC page !
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8370054.stm
Rather than write a huge long piece suffice to say that other foreign food made its way into British menus in the same way long before the mass immigration even began.
Yes, I agree, but even if the lying BBC’s claim were to be true, it would still not, per se, justify immigration on the scale that the British people have been forced to accept, and some of the practices from the Indian subcontinent which go with it.
Put simply, and in a suitably ‘non-racist’ way: just because I like pizza and macaroni doesn’t mean I want mafiosi in the UK.
Aye, I’ve seen Mexican food on sale for 30 years. But you don’t see too many swarthy chaps in Sombreros sitting by the roadside.
More Islamic ‘diversity’ in its Labour Party, for INBBC to publicise, or not?
“Rising star of Labour who claims to support women’s rights is accused of having two wives and asking an imam to spin off a supposed Islamic divorce”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2983378/Rising-star-Labour-claims-support-women-s-rights-accused-having-two-wives-asking-imam-spin-supposed-Islamic-divorce.html#ixzz3TiNvXIhX
Once the three “missing” scholgirls want to come back “home”, will the authorities keep an eye on them? I predict that they will all come back pegnant and rely on the NHS to help them bring up their (not as yet but potentialy future haters of the west) offspring.
And the father will have a right to reside here. Oh, the irony…
and a central London residence, if he plays his cards right.
Just been told that Michael Dobbs has a Lecture about the BBC on BBC 4 from 8pm tomorrow (Sunday).
I am told he has accused the BBC of organisational and intellectual arrogance. He says about the BBC, that it ‘seemed more like a private fiefdom than a public service’ and ‘There is a real danger of the BBC being brought low by a hundred headlines’ and by ‘millions that have been spent on redundancies and failures’ and he also accused the BBC of a Left-wing bias. But this may be edited out of the lecture to make time for Lord Hall to make a contribution.
If the BBc are airing it , i doubt they come out of it with anything other than glory.
BBC R4
‘Does Feminism Make Men Grow Beards’
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02lgvm0
Aaaaaaaaaaargh…….get me outta here!!
..
DS You beat me to it.
Picture the scene. A brief glance in the mirror reveals the stubble’s showing. The razor’s in the mug at the side of the sink. Untouched for 5 days. Should I shave? Should I grow? Maybe part shave for mutton chops, or a goatee maybe? Nah, f&^k it. I’ll give it another two seconds thought in a couple of days.
Where do they get this shit from? Beard growing in men induced
by feminism? The only response men have to feminism may require a sick bag. I can safely say that feminism has never come into play when it comes to my razor use or non-use.
Well duh!
Of COURSE the rise of Feminism threatens blokes into growing beards.
Note the surfeit of beards in Saudi, Pakistan and Yemen.
Bloody feminists cowing the testosterone-loaded lads of ISIS.
That said-they do dress up as women alot, work in lingerie shops in malls and refure women the right to work there as well…and the Koran is quite keen on them popping boys cherries….
No doubt More Or Less will give us the stats…
I myself reckon that the soppy feminism of Islam was first shown by Al Salad( Uni of BinBagdaddy!), to be less of an issue if you hennae`d your beard, or wore flares or platform heels…which is why so many Mozzas do same in Longsight Market?
A new book is about to be released, and somehow I don’t think we will see or hear it being reviewed on the BBC unless it is unavoidable!
The Man Behind The Mask by Francis Beckett, David Hencke and Nick Kochan, published by John Blake Publishing on March 19 at £20
It concerns the money making activities of Tony BLiar after he left office in 2007.
What is of the greatest interest to me, is the phenomenal amount of money being paid to him by Muslim countries, in the region of tens of millions of pounds a year.
For some time now I have believed that this money was a reward/bribe for his promotion of Islam and the mass immigration of Muslims into the UK. Also for the use of Britains armed forces to remove those heads of states his sponsors didn’t like, such as Saddam Hussein, and because they couldn’t afford a war against Iran, the sanctions and isolation.
It really is a shocking series of revelation. £27 million from the Emir of Kuwait??
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2983669/The-insatiable-greed-Blair-Inc.html
BBC ticks some boxes with this one.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-31779773
Corporate control? Tick. Gender baiting? Tick. Bigger government? Tick. More bureaucrats? Tick. More penalties for wealth creators? Tick. Perfect BBC fasco-leftard article subject.
Companies are to be forced to group their employees according to gender, for central state monitoring. Divide and Rule the human tax cattle. If you think today’s Tories aren’t authoritarian socialists with blue rosettes, then think again.
Scrap the Telly tax. No morals, no humanity, no impartiality, no future.
As regarding Male primacy in employment, the wealth creating sector has four problems (1) Males create far more jobs than females (2) Males employ themselves more in self employment than females (3) Mass immigration is overwhelmingly Male (4) The state employees twice as many females than male parasites, this is reflected by the Union membership. The Unions representing state employees have a socially engineered electoral system where two of every three candidate are chosen from a women only list, the third candidate can be a Man, but not from a men only list, as this is regarded as SEXIST.
I suggest mass sackings of state employees, a clamp down on immigration, sterilisation of women with jobs and a male only tax on job creation. This would help create the loony dream world of the lefties.
Blimey Richard. Has your team lost today or something?
Sorry for not drawing attention to The “restless bishop” Nick Baines on his little blog last month.
https://nickbaines.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/dresden/#comments
Fresh out of wet hand wringing on “Thought For Today” he had a go at the Mail for attacking the Arch bish over his Dresden comments. I wonder when he is going to show Adolf with another friend, the Mufti of Jerusalem, the man who helped form 3 SS Divisions, and hated Jews as we’ve seen before.
http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Mufti-Haj-Amin-al-Husseini-1.jpg
He must be so intelligent, being so aware of history so that he can join up the old dots, Daily Mail – Lord Rothermere – Hitler. I wonder when he is going to show us another set of relationships on his little blog ?
BBC main 5 o’clock News BBC 1.
Yet again a Beeboid rattles out the meme “..WHITE police officer Darren Wilson shot dead unarmed BLACK teenager Michael Brown..” The BBC will not let it lie.
The truth is out there, but the BBC actively hide it from the british public, for to expose the truth would expose the BBC staff and News editorial team for the race baiters that they are and the contribution they continually make to division in society based on spurious human differences, including the events in Ferguson following the (legitimate and lawful) shooting of Michael Brown.
“….violent adult criminal shot by the police officer whose life he threatened shortly after committing a violent crime…”
Fixed it for you BBC, no charge. And I didn’t need to bring skin colour into it.
what! … who? … THIS … erm … “gentle giant”
The quality isn’t great…. it looks like the old guy tripped on a tile and fell on to Michael’s fist?
Same anger management classes as Jihadi John?
Clearly not working.
More money please for the liberals and pimps of crime talkups, like in schools and probation…and less talk of immigration and Islam please.
Only upsets them you know.
Black lives matter. Hands up don’t shoot. Forward to Diane Abbot , the BBC and the rent a crowd race baiters who are organizing their national demo with NUJ support
It turns out Michael Brown’s last words on earth weren’t “Don’t shoot me” but “What the f**k are you going to do about it?”
A commentator put, much better than me, that the BBC was like a psychopath. It wants to be seen as benign and friendly but behind the front its manipulative, greedy, self-serving and with no empathy with any one else…particularly those it pretends to serve.
That is a superb simile.
And like a psychopath sooner or later it will destroy everything good it encounters.
Islamic State destroys 2,000-year-old city of Hatra
“Closely after their destruction of Nimrud and of the Mosul museum artefacts.
Clearly the Islamic State is determined to leave nothing un-Islamic in their domains.
They want to create ruin and destruction of non-Muslim installations, because …
the Qur’an holds up ruins as the signs of Allah’s wrath upon the disbelievers:”
R Spencer
http://www.torontosun.com/2015/03/07/islamic-state-militants-raze-iraqs-ancient-hatra-city-government
or erm … BBC … now there is a black market for antiquities, as erm … “militant” people found in Timbuktu, or erm … “extremists”
did by blowing up Buddha statues?
Quran? … Islam? … mandated texts? nothing Islamic at all then?
repeated all through history by Islam?
…. Hello anyone home BBC?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-31660944
Isis seem to be doing this not only because it is part of their belief system and I accept their description of themselves as devout Muslims, but deliberately so as to demonstrate to us in the West that Isis will destroy every vestige of the past. If Islam took Europe we would be faced with the destruction , and it would be total , of our culture. No more Salisbury Cathedral, no more Stonehenge, No more Mozart and Bach and no more Durer.
Every time in history it pays to take aggressors and destroyers at their word. With Isis it is them or us and we need to understand this. That soldier who died this week fighting against them understood what our media and elites do not. Either you do or do not and most simply do not.
This is the start of a clash of civilisations and the outcome is uncertain. Isis understand this and if we wish to survive so should we.
It would be preferable if we could reason away the clash of cultures but we can’t. This is the way the world works and always has. Reality.
It’s not the start of a clash of civilisations. It’s been going on for centuries.
Islamic armies conquered the Middle East and swept through North Africa before over running Spain. From there they invaded France. They were finally stopped at the Battle of Poitiers in 732.
Islamic forces also attacked Euope from the East. Vienna was beseiged and close to collapse until the muslim forces were defeated outside the city in 1683.
Conquered peoples were either forced to convert to Islam or live as second class citizens (dhimmi) after surrendering to islamic domination.
The BBC would probably tell us it had nothing to do with islam.
Neither did the atrocities in Bulgaria in 1876 and Armenia in 1915.
Not many even know of the Bulgarian Uprising (of which the Batak Massacre was a part). Mass be-headings, women and children especially, mass rape, skewering… yep, the usual. Just surprised ISIS haven’t skewered anyone yet.
This is an interesting article about Islam and the West, written by an Egyptian Muslim who apostasized.
http://www.nocompulsion.com/a-warning-to-the-west-a-voice-from-the-heart-of-the-islamic-world/
There are some shocking revelations in it; for example in Egypt the day after 911 – all public transport was free; restaurants gave free meals and sweets; cinemas and gardens offered free entry and the radio stations played “happy, victory songs.”
Booker, rightly, giving the BBC another panning on its climate change stance.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11456612/BBCs-climate-change-stance-in-brazen-defiance-of-the-law.html
Supplementary.
Christopher BOOKER’s piece in ‘ Sunday Telegraph’ (£)-
“BBC’s climate change stance in brazen defiance of the law.
“When it comes to climate change, the BBC’s coverage is quite deliberately one-sided.”
Christopher BOOKER’s opening paragraph –
“Next January will see the 10th anniversary of one of the most curious episodes in the history of the BBC. At a ‘secret seminar’, many of its most senior executives met with a roomful of invited outsiders to agree on a new policy that was in flagrant breach of its Charter. They agreed that, when it came to climate change, the BBC’s coverage should now be quite deliberately one-sided, in direct contravention of its statutory obligation that ‘controversial subjects’ must be ‘treated with due accuracy and impartiality’. Anything that contradicted the party line, from climate science to wind farms, could be ignored.”
BREAKING…
Boko haram announces it’s joining Islamic State. http://bbc.in/190wpQ4
A few weeks ago R4 PM told us it was “hard to work out what Boko haram’s aims were”.
Um, make everyone submit to the will of allah maybe?
Hands up if you remember the non reporting of the muslim demo in Downing Street on 8/2/2015. Now some will recall I made a complaint on 10/2 & received a template reply @the 19th. I then had a sense of humour failure and re-complained. Today I had this
Thank you for taking time to contact us again recently. We had referred your complaint to the relevant staff and are normally able to investigate and reply to most complaints at this stage (which is stage 1b of the complaints process) within 20 working days of receipt, or around four weeks. However this is to inform you that we believe it may now take longer than 20 working days before you receive our reply.
We apologise for this and have brought the matter to the attention of the relevant staff again. The delay in answering may be due to their unavailability or other production commitments. We therefore ask you not to contact us further in the meantime. If however it does prove necessary to do so please use our webform at http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints or write to us, quoting the case reference number we have provided.
We aim to use your licence fee as efficiently as we can, so if you have complained about the same issues as others we will send our response to you and everyone. We may also not investigate or reply in great detail if a complaint doesn’t suggest a potential breach of BBC standards, or a significant issue of general importance. This is in line with the BBC Trust’s complaints procedures which you can read at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/governance/complaints_framework/
We appreciate your continuing patience in waiting for a response and will reply as soon as possible.
Kind regards
BBC Complaints team
So how difficult is it to explain why it was decided not to cover this demonstration?
I complained also and got the same template reply.
It seems two years is about the time required to exhaust the complaints process. Even if the complaint is upheld; partially upheld or completely misinterpreted about what you are complaining, the issue has become history by default in this period.
If a tree falls in the forest and no one reported it has it fallen at all? If it is reported two years after the event will anyone remember.
Good luck with your complaint. I submitted one today about a wrongly captioned photograph that was also irrelevant to the content. Uncoordinated BBC Let’s see who wins the race to oblivion.
Following on from this. I submitted a petition of 780 names to the BBC by registered mail. Change BBC boilerplate on Gaza casualties to reflect disputed figures Some of you may have signed it. It was delivered as registered mail on 12th February 2015. The form letter from BBC Complaints team – Audience Services, dated 26th February (i.e. 14 days later) acknowledging receipt arrived (Israel) today.
Will keep you posted.
Just watched ‘The Voice’
10 Coloured competitors – none of which competed against each other. 10 Coloured winners.
Chance in the real world 1 in 1024. (Actually less of course)
Chance on the BBC 99%
I didn’t watch the voice because it’s crap. However this week I’m off two see a few bands who have more talent in their little fingers than in the whole of the voice put together. They will play their own instruments live with songs that they wrote without the aid of autotune or backing tapes. Of course none of them in all probability be on the BBc
Does this sort of thing happen in the UK? If it did I know the BBC would investigate.
http://youtu.be/geZCsTezm_U
Cool! I’m starting to see the appeal of Islam.
You get several wives and a couple of houses all paid for by welfare benefits. If anyone criticises you, you can kill them. And you don’t have to shave in the morning.
What’s not to like?
plus you can stay in your pyjamas all day.
Which means you cannot be expected to do a job climbing ladders, so Mr Mo the window cleaner will never be heard of.
When you whip up hysteria, you get lynch mobs. Will the BBC apologise for their role?
Two Indian men lynched over sex assault claims
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-31762953
There’s a HYS on Immigration but its hidden at the bottom of the BBC news website Politics page (or use the above link). It’s still open. Have your say. I got a few comments in, one in reply to someone called Angelfish who thought that the rapes in Rotherham were nothing to do with ethnicty! Add your own please and show that we will argue with the dozy liberals everywhere and anywhere and we will not put up with their one sided sh*t any longer.
It’s still there ! And I posted a comment about the rise of rape gangs quoting bbc oxfords two current stories about them. I wonder if they will pull me for quoting off their own pages back at them ? Probably.
Wow, my comment that there rape gangs prowling in this country lasted all of 4 minutes, so even if you quote themselves back at them they pull it. fascists
Mine lasted less than a minute about ethnic rape/immigration/Labour collusion in Oxford, Rotherham and Bristol and it was pulled.
Keep plugging away.
Bbc oxford reports without comment or acknowledgement of their religion the finding guilty of yet more ‘ men’ on their manor :
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-31765083
We are truly blessed, especially the young country girls in Banbury with this ‘diversity’ . Any chance these scum could be sent back to the shit hole which spawned them to rot ?
Better if they were put in a hole than sent back to one, best use for them is fertiliser.
Just had a wee twitter surf before Shuteye.
Seems Ed was doing well on this TV debates thing, but then decided to come up with a cunning plan.
It will be interesting how the headlines tomorrow cover this… or the BBC even mentions it.
A universal lead balloon would take a leap of editorial integrity to ignore, but they do seem up to the challenge
The cunning plan being if he wins the election he will enshrine the TV debates in law and make them mandatory. Never mind how he is going to run the country ,no plans for that, oh no.
Don’t mention the economy……What an opportunistic little worm !
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-31786069?
It’s open for comments, currently.
Interesting how the BBC, so often on the news pulse that is twitter, seems unaware that Ed’s next big wheeze was not greeted by many political commentators as a smart play?
And now it’s not.
Seems the 9 to 5 rule applies at weekends.
Shame most wake up after the former and don’t get back after the latter.
Didn’t really help the comments ‘management’ much though.
Didn’t spot the BBC making a news story out of this: “Official figures show 187,370 Romanians and Bulgarians were given National Insurance numbers in 2014 after immigration rules were relaxed, up from 27,700 during the previous year.”
Why not??
Tim Stanley – reviewing papers for Mrs Vine on the News Channel – just noted that an apology was due to UKIP for being right, although he seemed ‘relaxed’ about it. Mrs Vine did some obfuscation about them being already here before the law change. Duh.. they came in anticipation… init?
The only story for the state broadcaster is: why the hell are these figures so low?
Dear Framer “Thank you for contacting us about BBC News. I understand you were concerned that BBC News did not cover increase in some Immigration from somewhere East of Dover.
I can appreciate that you felt this event should have been reported on so I’m sorry if you were disappointed with the lack of coverage.
We know that not everyone will agree with our choices on which stories to cover, and the prominence that we give to them. These are subjective decisions made by our news editors, and we accept that not everyone will think that we are correct on each occasion.
There are several factors that we take into consideration when deciding how to put together our news bulletins. For example, whether the story is new and requires immediate coverage, how unusual the story is, and how much national interest there is in the story.
However, we appreciate the feedback that our viewers and listeners give us when they feel a story has been overlooked or marginalised and I am grateful that you have taken the time to contact us regarding this matter.
Please be assured that I have included your complaint on our audience feedback report which is sent to news editors, programme producers and senior management each morning. These reports are among the most widely read sources of feedback in the BBC and ensures that your complaint has been seen by the right people quickly. This helps inform their decisions about current and future programmes.
Thanks again for getting in touch.” Probably. See I could get a job at BBc complaints. I used to work in a complaints section once you know.
…or to summarise;
“We chucked it in the bin. If you think anyone here at the BBC is going to waste their time listening to your clearly right wing, politically incorrect views; dream on sucker”!
Or even more succinctly:
Dear sir/madam
Thanks for your interesting comments.
Now kindly pi$$ off.
Kind regards
The beeb.
Farage should exploit this statement and expose the weak and impotent government that we have running this country, especially after the disgraceful rise in immigration following the promise to get the numbers down.
Notice how the massive rise in immigration figures went straight down the “memory hole” at the Beeb and the MSM? Why would that be? Who would gain if it lingered and was debated? Oh UKIP that’s right and we are not supposed to like and vote for them.
Like the Chilcott Enquiry. Don’t let the plebs read it. They might not do what they’re supposed to and accept our line.
Don’t just vote UKIP. Send them cash.
Obviously this country is deep in the $hit. We know it’s in the $hit and we know why it’s happened.
The pertinent question is now: can it be extricated from the $hit?
Do you/others think ukip itself can execute this task? Or is ukip a necessary but insufficient condition, ie the scale of the damage is so great that radical remedial remodelling is required?
Sadly, if you take a step back to get a wider historical perspective, the only thing likely to be ‘radically remodelled’ is us. The UK is like one of the stores that was looted in the frenzy a couple of years ago. The doors are open, there’s no security, might as well help yourself, lads. The only compensation is to know that the scoundrels who organised this wonderful ‘diversity and inclusion’ are likely to be included among the losers themselves.
I Can See Clearly Now
‘A couple of years ago’ the UK was invaded and the government was complicit – Simples !
I’m as pessimistic as the next man about a looming Islamised/balkanised/some other dystopian UK.
However, the path there I doubt will be a linear one. The point of no return/critical mass will likely disrupt, albeit not derail, the project.
In other words, once it is clear to all and sundry that the future is f&cked, and that no politician will arrest the decline, then all bets are off.
At that point you enter the realms of paramilitary groups/political assassinations/militarised public spaces etc.
The social contract is hanging by a thread. If it is fully severed, brave is he who will predict the outcome.
UKIP are the only viable political alternative at present. The political establishment have been lucky that the peoples anger (such as it is) has been by supporting this relatively new party, who did extremely well in the EU elections, and have not gone to an extremist party like the BNP. Though the establishment were given a broadside warning when Bronze and Griffin became MEP’s and still the establishment didn’t listen.
The FN are doing well in France and the SNP (a nationalist party lets not forget but with Scottish “added sanctimony”) have cleaned up in north of the border.
Clearly the punters have had enough of the liberal hypocrites that inhabit politics here and abroad. They are clinging by their fingers but surprisingly they have very strong digits and have a great champion (in the UK at least) in the BBC who are at the other end of the feasting table, but at the same table none the less, whilst the proles are looking at the window at the feast that they have paid for and are excluded from.
Checkpoints, peace walls, police “protected by troops in support of their duties.” Welcome to future mainland UK created by an arrogant and actually none too bright political elite who simply wouldn’t listen to the people who didn’t want mass immigration, foreign wars and democracy handed over to an unelected foreign bureaucrats. Anyone remember the Portuguese EU minister TELLING the UK what is must and must not accept as far as immigration in this country?
UKIP aren’t the answer. But when all the sums don’t add up from the entrenched political establishment a party that got the figures more or less in the right ball park well yes I’ll go with them because there is nothing else viable.
Don’t believe, and I’m sure anyone reading this won’t, what Caroline Flint said on the Marr Showand she seems to reflect the LAB/CON establishment that there is “only a choice between us and the Tories.” What arrogance. It can be anyone WE, you know Caroline the f**king people choose.
We have to deny these people power or become a another mix of Lebanon and third world nation combined. Its that simple.
Nigel Farage said that he didn’t care that the UK would be less affluent outside the EU. He said that there was more to nationhood than money. He’s right.
I want to be shot of the likes of Vaz, Abbott, Blair, Burnham, Blears and all those other greedy buggers too many to mention and the education hypocrites like Blair, Abbott (her again), Thornberry, Harman etc who destroy our childrens’ education but protect their own. And all the Tories who won’t fight for Grammar schools and wont stop immigration even though its breaking our country. I could go on…
Deny them power. Its all they crave and nothing else matters
Notice how the BBC slip in the old ‘cuts’ line at the bottom…
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31785922
It’s time they stopped using the pro-Islamic euphemisms such as ‘radicals’ and ‘militant’. They are extremists.
They never use the term ‘radical’ to refer to members of the far-Right. It’s always ‘extremist’.
It’s time they stopped using the pro-Islamic euphemisms such as ‘radicals’ and ‘militant’. They are extremists.
No they’re not! They are simply Muslims doing what their religion commands them to do!
You see ISIS cleaning out a territory of people who they don’t like, but all the surrounding countries such as Iran and Saudi cleaned their countries out long ago, and their laws are no different to those of ISIS.
The sooner people recognise that Islam is a violent totalitarian religion the better. Just because a few are prepared to carry out atrocities does not make them extremists when the great majority of Muslims support and understand their actions.
Whilst I don’t like the tone of your voice, on this occasion I would agree. Still, my comment does highlight the BBC’s double standards in applying terms to different groups.
Next time you comment with me do so in a civil manner, please.
The tone of my voice? On an internet forum?
You do realise that 80% of the meaning when we speak is carried in intonation, and in body language? What is left is just the words.
I’m unsure as to which part of the blog you take exception to, and I feel you’re reading something into it which isn’t there and wasn’t intended.
This is interesting, from… The Guardian:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/08/bbc-whistleblowers-jimmy-savile
Many quotable sections. It is rather clear that the BBC doesn’t take well to criticism and does bear grudges. Just the kind of entity you want as an unaccountable law unto its secretive self.
“The BBC press office bridled when I described Jones and MacKean as “whistleblowers”. As the Pollard review of the Savile scandal had concluded that BBC management had acted in “good faith”, I must not call them that.”
Looking at the comments, the BBC Press Office is doing more than bridling. Nick better watch his back, too.
Meanwhile, in the spirit of balance, from the other end of the press gallery…
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2984616/Anger-BBC-scraps-interview-called-chief-quit-513-000-second-job-scandal-hit-HSBC.html
Again interesting.
As senior folk ducking opportunities to be popped in the spotlight can be a reason to weigh in, it seems that when BBC market rates do it, there are many sound reasons…
“Last night the BBC declined to say why the interview with Mr Mason-Mahon was not broadcast…
‘Like every news organisation we don’t use every interview we conduct.’
‘It is simply wrong to suggest that we would not broadcast an interview due to it criticising someone associated with the BBC.’
That last… really persuasive. Maybe a dainty foot was stamped too?
Good spot by Guest who. Must read article not least because the author Nick Cohen is very left wing. He concludes,
“The power of hierarchies is hard to break. But if you want to fight fraud in the City or the rape of children, it has to be broken. A start can be made by insisting that everyone from John Humphrys in the morning to Evan Davis at night tells the truth about the purge of the BBC’s truth tellers”.
Even the liberal left are starting to feel uncomfortable with the Stalinst information police at the BBC and say its power should be diminished.
Yes, relevant title to that ‘Guardian-Observer’ article by Nick Cohen-
“The sinister treatment of dissent at the BBC.”
“The whistleblowers who broke the Jimmy Savile story have seen their careers nosedive while executives protect their own status.”
Luckily another from the Graun had gone for a more supportive stance:
@guardian Forget the TV election rows – the BBC’s future is the real debate http://t.co/Oy910FCYRh
Yes, all else pales in face of the BBC’s future.
Significant article on:
CAGE, Amnesty, and ‘political left-Islamic’ alliance,
-which Beeboids may think is not about them-
“The Ballad of Jihadi John-
Terror, Apologists, and the Vindication of Gita Sahgal.”
http://jacobinism.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-ballad-of-jihadi-john.html
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/03/06/islamist-sympathiser-launches-muslim-manifesto-in-british-parliament/
Uh Oh! … something else, another box ticked, for Cameron and co to lie about later … Now where s the OICs Tory Warsi in all of this
Ah … there she is …
“highly praised by the parliamentarians in attendance, including Baroness Warsi who said that the “Muslim Manifesto is something you can take to your election candidates”.
hmmm a “call-to-action” for parliamentarians, “pinpointing key issues of high importance to the Muslim community”
gets erm … better?
““Eliminate the root causes of institutional discrimination against Muslims” and
“introduce tougher legislation to prevent it”;
“Introduce more robust legislation to curb media hate campaigns against Muslims” and
“Acknowledge that the holy scripture of Muslims (the Qur’an) does not endorse terrorism and the murder of innocents.”
hmmm Azad Ali? the UAF one? the one on the Police/Muslim forum?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/andrew-gilligan/7908273/Police-Muslim-forum-headed-by-Islamic-extremist.html
https://twitter.com/hashtag/MuslimManifesto?src=hash
… folks don t bother looking on BBC News … it won t be there.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/03/uk-admirer-of-awlaki-who-called-for-killing-us-uk-troops-speaks-to-parliament
It was fascinating, but really quite painful, listening to Any Questions yesterday. The subject of prosecuting those who fail to report suspicions of grooming and rape was raised. Now, surely to God, we all know who and what we’re talking about here, don’t we? We’re discussing the horrors of Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford and I’m certain numerous other “enriched” shitholes throughout our once green and pleasant land. And we’re talking about one group of assailants, Muslim men. But… each and every one of the pc panellists gave tortuous arguments, avoiding any reference to Islam and the industrial scale rape of working class white girls. There seemed to be an entire herd of stampeding elephants in the room. It’s a miracle no one was trampled.
Unless these panellists are all deaf, dumb, blind, stupid, or had their heads stuck up the arse of the editor of The Guarduian for the past decade, they can’t possibly not know why this change in the law is being sought. And do you know what I find even more shocking? The audience loved them! An audience, as Jonathan Dimbleby constantly reminds us, who are “completely unselected ordinary members of the public.”
And if you believe that BBC audiences are “ordinary members of the public” then I’ve got a lovely little time share apartment in Syria you might be interested in…
If the BBC AQ audience was genuinely a random sample then this country is finished. Last week there was wild cheering for everything uttered by that idiot leader of the Green party. It had to be heard to be believed. I am actually reassured knowing that the audience is rigged in order to give the listener a deliberately distorted picture of where mainstream political opinion resides in this country.
The BBC no longer even bothers to make a pretence at being impartial because it knows none of the current political class has the balls to challenge it. This poll tax funded Marxist propaganda machine should be axed immediately.
Completely agreed. Even the BBC must realise these audiences aren’t in any way representative, so refusing to correct their makeup to more properly represent the country is tantamount to an admission.
As I said the other week, the BBC doesn’t even pretend any more. It is a political campaigning body, run on the proceeds of theft.
The Dimbleby saying “completely unselected ordinary members of the public. Hilarious. Excepting himself of course who was selected because of his father…How can we believe a word.
Spot on, Jeff. My thoughts exactly as I listened to that pile of evasive group think. The media and political class are inhabiting a different country, untroubled by empirical evidence.
Jeff…Really? Great!!
I’m interested as I’ve heard Syria’s an increasingly attractive destination for brits (well, brit passport holders at least).
‘The Big Question’ . A chosen audience anyone ?
Murnaghan; Sky News. Mark Reckless v Barbara Roche on illegal immigration.
Killer factoid; Murnaghan says it’s impossible to know how many are here, but studies show the country is supporting food for over seventy million.
Reckless just said that the Tory Nadhim Zahawi, who wants an amnesty for illegals, pulled out of the programme.
Today is International Women’s Day. You would have thought that the sisters at the BBC would have been all over this event like a rash. Not a bit of it if Radio Five “gets much worse” Live is anything to go by. Until 10.00 a.m. this morning the event was only briefly referred to in the news headlines. Why should the Station be bothered with such an event this weekend? After all we have fifty hours of wall to wall coverage of sport to entertain us: FA Cup, rugby, cricket, seat throwing from Birmingham (with the amount of coverage given to this event last night you would have thought it was a bigger threat to world security than the mad Mullahs of Iran) and titddly-winks (?) – I am sure there will be a live broadcast of this ancient and noble sport sometime over the weekend!! At ten o’clock this morning Pienaar’s “Labour Party” Politics did cover this event by way of an interview with the Conservative Leader of the House of Lords, but “Red” Pienaar simply used the occasion to point out that there were more women office holders in the Labour as opposed to the Conservative Party. He also broadcasted a clip where a young child was asked about female politicians, and he immediately said without prompting, ” Margaret Thatcher – she stole milk from the poor to give to the rich.” You could not make it up. Oh dear, the election campaign is well and truly under way.
The point I am leading up is that there was no mention made of the contentious issues of the sexual abuse of young white girls by Pakistani men, female genital mutilation, forced marriages and female slavery. Does anyone in the BBC care about the events in Rotherham and Oxfordshire? Oh silly me, I should have remembered that many Moslems (the wives vote according to their husbands’ instructions) vote for the Labour Party, as the latter is quite happy to turn a blind eye to these issues in order to win power at any costs, which is of critical importance at the moment in view of Labour’s dire electoral peospects in Scotland. Pass the sick bag!
It’s early yet; the Beeb will be on the case for sure. Sky just had Julie Bindel and Frances O’Grady ‘reviewing’ the papers. Very critical of plans to reduce company tax; they should be taxing more to fund rape crisis centres. Police have raided Leon Brittan’s homes again. The rape crisis centres are clearly for victims of hideously white males. At some point, I lost the will to live.
That quote about Margaret Thatcher reminded me of this clip – I think he is one of the very few comedians on the BBC who is genuinely funny. I was amazed that he was ever allowed back on the Beeb after this, let alone given a short series about Southern American music (well worth a watch if you can catch it).
Will Beeboids, as part of ‘Left-Islamic’ political alliance, oppose the following in run up to General Election?:-
‘Sunday Telegraph’ (£) – page 1 lead report-
“Extremism in Britain: Now the crackdown is launched.
“Ministers are planning a raft of new measures to help stem the tide of Islamic extremism and radicalisation.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11457174/Extremism-in-Britain-Now-the-crackdown-is-launched.html
It’s encouraging news, but will there really be a “fight back”? Or is it just some government spin to make us think something’s happening?
Time will tell I guess.
Caught this on one of Guido’s comments. Worth sharing.
https://a.disquscdn.com/get?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FB9zBRqQIEAAojOI.jpg&key=STT_fIiISXS_rFzOQIwjzg&w=600&h=320
url=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FB9zBRqQIEAAojOI.jpg&key=STT_fIiISXS_rFzOQIwjzg&w=600&h=320[/img]
“There is a small group of powerful people at the BBC who think it would have been better if the truth about Savile had never come out. And they aim to punish the reporters who revealed it.”
Said by a former BBC journalist, no less, and reported in their sister news organisation, the Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/08/bbc-whistleblowers-jimmy-savile?CMP=share_btn_tw
Has anyone seen the Muslim Manifesto?
British Muslims have presented a Manifesto to Parliament outlining thirty-three issues they want addressed by candidates for Parliament in the 2015 general election.
It would officially allow Sharia Law to operate in the United Kingdom and guarantee a very pro-muslim agenda in Britain.
Point 19 says, “Acknowledge that the holy scripture of Muslims (the Qur’an) does not endorse terrorism and the murder of innocents”.
Since sharia law does not view infidels, blasphemers, or those who oppose the will of allah as “innocent”, I presume it means that killing us would officially be OK.
Original here;
http://muslimmanifesto2015.com/draft-muslim-manifesto/
Critical analysis here;
http://wp.me/p3aBMK-fg
I noted it was introduced in a room in Parliament and attended by several MPs. Yes, it’s a declaration of sharia, but more significantly a message to candidates for Parliament in Muslim areas to find ways of agreeing with the demands…or you don’t get the votes (postal?). I believe it was presented by a known associate with Al Quieda, according to Guido, a fact which will not be missed in the mosques. Unlikely to be voted in by all, but a landmark in the evolving Islamic takeover. Of course it is racist to object to it.
I like the way there are a few liberal sounding clauses sprinkled in to make it sound nice and fluffy.
A light dusting of sugar on top of a very bitter cake.
There is no such nationality as ‘British Muslim’, you are either British or you are not. The additional identifier is only ever added to sow division and it is as relevant as saying British Chelsea fan or British sailing enthusiast. The ‘liberal’ left with the BBC as cheerleader in chief has championed this ridiculous notion with the destruction of our country and any of our values as their aim. Self loathing left wing champagne socialists the lot of them.
Consequences of the ‘diversified’ Britain which INBBC campaigns for.
‘Sunday Telegraph’ (£)-
“Battle-hardened and vengeful, 300 jihadists are back in Britain.
“Jihadists have returned to the UK in greater numbers than previously thought, heaping extra pressure on security services.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/11457140/Battle-hardened-and-vengeful-300-jihadists-are-back-in-Britain.html
I assume that Al bin to Eton Dave will give them a hearty welcome, and the Home Secretary who cannot let a Jihadist go will be wetting her knickers at so many virile ‘militants’ arriving in time for the election. Spineless politicians and a state media run by traitors.
Supplementary.
‘Jihadwatch’-
“UK: Admirer of Awlaki who called for killing US & UK troops speaks at Parliament.”
[Opening excerpt]:-
“He was warmly received. If anyone protested his appearance, it isn’t reported here. The shattered, staggering, dhimmi, subjugated UK is welcoming those who seek its ruin into the foremost corridors of power.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/03/uk-admirer-of-awlaki-who-called-for-killing-us-uk-troops-speaks-to-parliament
from earlier :-
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/03/06/islamist-sympathiser-launches-muslim-manifesto-in-british-parliament/
Uh Oh! … something else, another box ticked, for Cameron and co to lie about later … Now where s the OICs Tory Warsi in all of this
Ah … there she is …
“highly praised by the parliamentarians in attendance, including Baroness Warsi who said that the “Muslim Manifesto is something you can take to your election candidates”.
hmmm a “call-to-action” for parliamentarians, “pinpointing key issues of high importance to the Muslim community”
gets erm … better?
““Eliminate the root causes of institutional discrimination against Muslims” and
“introduce tougher legislation to prevent it”;
“Introduce more robust legislation to curb media hate campaigns against Muslims” and
“Acknowledge that”
hmmm Azad Ali? the UAF one? the one on the the holy scripture of Muslims (the Qur’an) does not endorse terrorism and the murder of innocents.Police/Muslim forum?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/andrew-gilligan/7908273/Police-Muslim-forum-headed-by-Islamic-extremist.html
PS 3 Questions …
Why is a so called …”religion” in Parliament pushing political aims for self privilege, against the rest of society? if that isn t a red flag what is.
Why is a clear aim of overt protection, over other erm “religious” communities, IN LAW even being entertained … that is in and of itself … discrimination.
If the Quran … “the scripture of Muslims does not endorse terrorism and the murder of innocents,”
then why does it need acknowledging? IN LAW?
Despite reams of factual evidence to the contrary?
A growing and dangerous escalation of just such terrorism and murder?
Justified by 1000s of mass murdering Muslims themselves as following their own scripture?
Showing more clearly than ever that Islam is an aggressive fascistic political ideology … with a wholly political totalitarian aim and motive …
That’s why they re in parliament, not with backsides aloft
recanting gibberish
Returning to the wonderful muslim manifesto launched at Westminster to a room full of Labour MPs, it appears the manifesto was launched by Azad Ali.
Ali has previously written of his “love” of Al-Qaeda terrorist Anwar Al-Awlaki and was suspended from his job at the Treasury after he attempted to justify the murder of British troops. He has also admitted attending speeches by Al-Qaeda hate preacher Abu Qatada.
Source. http://guyfawk.es/1ALQ7EP
Sun shining, having a go at the garden, kids not arguing, not watching or listening to any patronising BBC drivel, kettle on, occasionally looking at this fine website…. Lovely Sunday 🙂
Pissing down with rain, too wet to go in the garden, don’t have any kids but the rest is the same as yours!
Trying to mix chemicals on the kitchen table from crappy Google instructions and more bloody prayers in five minutes, kids making a racket in the cellar (thinking of letting them go), daughter locked in bedroom, son buggered off to Syria, wife chained to the stove for women’s day. God is Great!
Stand by for much wailing and gnashing of teeth at the Beeb. A great man of peace has died. Obituaries galore and Dave will have to go to the funeral.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/192270#.VPweyuFK_79
Good riddance to the evil old shiite.
Apologies – there are claims that he is not dead, but walking about.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/03/08/iran-supreme-leader-ayatollah-ali-khamenei-appears-in-public-amid-rumors-about/
Yes, certainly a wonderful inspiration to us all and a man who brought peace to so many in Iran and elsewhere.
For example he was responsible for bringing peace to these Iranians (after flogging them).
He will be in hell soon.