Cause and effect

 

 

Germany’s traditionally pro-Israeli stance has been shifting, particularly since the 2014 Gaza campaign.

A growth in Germany’s Muslim population, not least through the acceptance of hundreds of thousands of refugees, may also have an effect, long term.

 

What is the cause of the violent and often murderous attacks on Jews in Israel and the West Bank at the moment?

Mark Urban tells us…

Isn’t the new Palestinian uprising, or intifada, fundamentally an upsurge of frustration with the hopelessness of it all?

Why oh why are the poor old Pals so frustrated?   There’s no peace in sight, and who is to blame for there being no peace in sight?

Hamas may have had a small role to play but the main blame can be laid at the door of the Israelis…in particular right wing Israelis…..a casual dismissal of their views by Urban…he doesn’t bother to explore what they think and the reasons for their approach….They’re just wrong and right wing.  Netanyahu also gets it in the neck as usual….here Urban blames him for the fall out with Obama….

Mr Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama are hardly on speaking terms after Israel’s abortive attempts to halt the Iran nuclear deal.

That could have been written…

Mr Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama are hardly on speaking terms after Obama’s failed attempt to rein in Iran’s nuclear ambitions leaving Iran, which wants to wipe Israel off the map, an ever more powerful influence in the region.

Urban lays most of the blame then for the failed peace talks with the Palestinians at the Israelis’ feet and the subsequent violence is their fault…but hang on…..Urban admits that…..

Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas, meanwhile, has focused efforts on taking Israel to the International Criminal Court for its 2014 campaign in Gaza, trying to halt settlement activity and drawing attention to what he characterises as Israeli attacks on Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem.

So Abbas has been ‘drawing attention to what he characterises as Israeli attacks on Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem’.

That kind of suggests that the real cause of this violence is Abbas…as Urban admits, or rather doesn’t admit, whilst giving us the facts that make it clear Abbas is to blame…..the uprising is in response to rumours of Israeli incursions at Muslim holy sites…

Violence between the two communities has spiralled since clashes erupted at a flashpoint Jerusalem holy site in mid-September.

They were fuelled by rumours among Palestinians that Israel was attempting to alter a long-standing religious arrangement governing the site.

Israel repeatedly dismissed the rumours as incitement.

Why does Urban not make an explicit statement blaming Abbas, and Hamas, for inciting the violence using lies and rumours to stir the trouble?

 

What is the most significant admission in Urban’s piece?  This is….

Germany’s traditionally pro-Israeli stance has been shifting, particularly since the 2014 Gaza campaign.

A growth in Germany’s Muslim population, not least through the acceptance of hundreds of thousands of refugees, may also have an effect, long term.

Jews will not even be safe in Israel because Muslims in Europe will gain enough power to bring in anti-Israel policies and all because Frau Merkel imported hundreds of thousands of Muslims…and the EU is even now negotiating with Turkey to allow easy access to Europe for Turkey’s 75 million Muslims.

How ironic…Jews once again on the run because of the Germans.

 

 

 

 

‘I could murder a Ukrainian!’

 

Just what is it that makes a Brit fight for Putin’s blitz on Ukraine?

Apparently it is zero hours contracts in Britain that drive the recruiting process…oh, that, Western aggression and the rise of the Far Right in Ukraine.

Ukraine conflict: The Brits fighting with pro-Russian rebels

His Manchester accent is unmistakable. His yearning for British food is too, as he declares that he “could murder a steak”.

So what has brought this man in his thirties, who claims to have served in the British army, to fight for the pro-Russian militia against Ukraine?

‘Western aggression’

The first reason appears to be his lack of prospects back home. He has not had a job since last December.

He claims zero-hour contracts, which allow firms to hire staff without any guarantee of work, forced him “to vote with his feet”.

But ideology also led him to travel more than 2,000 miles (3,200 km) to live off army rations, in a tent in a wood, by a stream, with a group of rebel soldiers, just north of the city of Debaltseve in rebel-held territory.

“I see this as more western imperial aggression towards Russia, to people who aren’t playing the western game”, he said.

He did not want us to show his face or use his name.

He says that after watching reports in the media about far right groups in Ukraine, he was inspired to join the rebels.

‘I’m not a terrorist’  [er… yes you are]

In reality, far-right groups in Ukraine enjoy minimal public backing.

 

So basically all those ideas that the BBC promotes, the horrors of the zero hours contract, the idea of western aggression and the rise of the far-right, are the motivators for joining up with the terrorists.

Oh but hang on the BBC reporter denies that there is a Far-Right surge in the Ukraine…’In reality, far-right groups in Ukraine enjoy minimal public backing.’

Hmmmm…..obviously he hasn’t been reading the BBC’s own propaganda on this…

Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict

Ukraine: The far-right groups patrolling Kiev

Ukraine crisis: Is conflict fuelling far-right threat?

Torch-lit far-right march in Ukraine

Ukraine crisis: Far-right ‘show of strength’ in Kiev

 

So once again the BBC’s misleading reporting can be linked to the ‘radicalisation’ of terrorists…this time recruited by the old enemy….the reborn Soviet Union.  Ah the glorious BBC spreading harmony, social cohesion and a civil society.

 

 

 

 

 

The Price of Appeasement

 

The Danegeld (/ˈdeɪn.ɡɛld/; “Danish tax”, literally “Dane tribute”) was a tax raised to pay tribute to the Viking raiders to save a land from being ravaged.

 

We know that the BBC hides political and social messages within its programming, not just shamelessly distorting its news reporting to bring us a carefully shaped narrative but selecting the subject matter of its documentaries, historical dramas and, well, just about any programme you care to mention from comedy to children’s programming, in order to reflect the message of the day that the BBC thinks the viewers and listeners need to learn….their views being a result of ignorance and prejudice and a bigoted misunderstanding of the world.

We know that Roger Harrabin, that Rasputin-like figure who will go down in history, along with his colleague, climate activist Dr Joe Smith, as one of the most corrupting influences upon the climate change debate, engineered the infamous seminars at the BBC in order to pressure BBC bosses, editors, producers and programme commissioners to adulterate their programmes with climate change propaganda.

We know that BBC programming has been hugely distorted to provide us with a very misleading picture of the Muslim community, their views and Islam itself…the latest being ‘Nadiya’s’ win on the GBBO which has been a triumph for the BBC’s multicultural propaganda unit….but which displays everything that is wrong with the BBC’s approach and their own misunderstanding of why people criticise Islam.  The BBC thinks if only we could get to see that a Muslim, like Nadiya in a headscarf, can be a nice person then we will therefore conclude that Islam must be nice too.   If Nadiya is so proud of being a Muslim, and is obviously devout, headscarf and all, then ask her some questions about that…does she think apostates should be killed, adulterers lashed or possibly stoned to death, gay people killed, criminals have their hands and feet chopped off, does she think women are inferior to men, that Muslims can take slaves and four wives, that Muslims shouldn’t make friends with unbelievers, that Muslims must fight the unbeliever until Islam reigns supreme as ordered by the Korn, that those who oppose Islam should be crucified and have their hands and feet cut off as ordered by the Koran, does she believe in democracy, freedom of speech, or does she think Muslims should live under Sharia law in a caliphate, British first or Muslim first?

“Hijab is not a fashion accessory or a headdress. It is an act of worship and obedience to God’s command,” wrote Fatima Barkatulla, a London-based lecturer in Islamic thought, on Facebook.

“And we worship and obey God on his terms, not our terms.”

Does Nadiya agree with those Islamic principles?  If so how does the fact that she can make cakes and drink tea alone make her ‘British’?

Cameron raised that very subject in a speech in June this year…

Only if we are clear about this threat and its causes can we tackle it. The cause is ideological. It is an Islamist extremist ideology one that says the West is bad and democracy is wrong that women are inferior, that homosexuality is evil. It says religious doctrine trumps the rule of law and Caliphate trumps nation state and it justifies violence in asserting itself and achieving its aims.

The question is: how do people arrive at this worldview?

They arrive at that worldview because that is Islam, taught to them from the day of their birth.

Of course it’s not just climate change and Islam that get the BBC makeover, immigration does too as the BBC tries to either promote it as a huge benefit to the nation or engineer unthinking sympathy for migrants with endless sad tales and photographs of children and women rather than the hordes of men that in reality make up the bulk of the immigrants.

Today we had a programme that indulged itself with the usual BBC riffs.…apparently the Roman Empire has lessons for us today, there are parallels with events today, it illustrates problems with the government’s prevention of terrorism policies and raises questions about drones killing British (LOL) citizens in Syria….and all sorts of parallels that reflect our attitudes towards immigration….when they say ‘our’ they mean you and me, the unthinking prejudiced mob.   And oh yes…why did Miliband lose the election?  It was the fault of the evil right-wing press and their wicked portrayal of Miliband as a dork who couldn’t eat a sandwich without cocking it up.  Not his crazy policies and stupid headline grabbing stunts such as the Edstone then?

Bernard Cornwell has admitted that the BBC chose to turn his books into a television production because The Last Kingdom had ‘interesting echoes of today’

Author whose novels about King Alfred have been adapted for TV says his work deals with themes of nationhood and immigration under current debate.

The BBC was inspired to make a lavish new series about King Alfred the Great because of current debates about immigration and nationhood, according to the author of the historical drama.

The Last Kingdom is based on the novels of Bernard Cornwell about how King Alfred became the first king of the Anglo-Saxons and created England.

Cornwell said the BBC was interested in the story because it had echoes of today.

“That’s why they [the BBC] picked it”, he said. “I do see something modern in it – that we are all immigrants. The Saxons are immigrants – according to the British, the Celts, they have stolen the land they have. The first shield wall battle which Uhtred takes part in is [for the Saxons] against the Welsh.

“The Saxons were very successful colonisers, and neighbours, then the Danes, the Normans, the Huguenots, you name it … right through to this century, we are all immigrants.

That has long been the BBC narrative, ‘we’re all immigrants’. A completely false and deliberately misleading rewriting of history.   The BBC has worked hard to try and dismantle Britain and to destroy the British and English identity.  This is the nation-hating, border-hating, Britain-hating BBC at work.  A hugely damaging exercise in ethnic cleansing in effect, an attempt to wipe out any notion of an English or British identity, to destroy a feeling of unity and belonging, an attempt make you confused and rootless, vulnerable to the BBC’s message and a new identity as a ‘citizen of the world’.

The final message from the programme mentioned above was that they wanted people to think differently about their certainties, to sow doubt in their minds about their ideas of themselves in order to change things.

Who can doubt that that is precisely what the BBC sets out to do, to spread doubt and confusion based upon the BBC’s unique view of history that maligns all that is British and makes victims of the rest of the world to whom we now owe a debt in some shape or form.

Cornwell is of course living an immigrant’s life in America with his American wife and is immensely rich and so will hardly suffer the consequences of mass immigration however bad they may be.  He will always have medical treatment, a job, schools for his children or grandchildren, a home to live in and the ability to escape if necessary.  Not so those whom he, and the BBC, would impose immigration upon.

Cornwell thinks ‘The Last Kingdom’ tells us some truths about Britain today…well yes it just might….the most important lesson is that the problem with Danegeld is that the Danes kept coming back for  more.  Appeasing the invaders doesn’t pay off.  One day you have to stand up to them and take back your country……

Rudyard Kipling, much hated by the Left, spells it out……

Dane-Geld

A.D. 980-1016

 

It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation
  To call upon a neighbour and to say: --
"We invaded you last night--we are quite prepared to fight,
  Unless you pay us cash to go away."

And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
  And the people who ask it explain
That you've only to pay 'em the Dane-geld
  And then  you'll get rid of the Dane!

It is always a temptation for a rich and lazy nation,
  To puff and look important and to say: --
"Though we know we should defeat you, we have not the time to meet you.
  We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
  But we've  proved it again and  again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
  You never get rid of the Dane.

It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
  For fear they should succumb and go astray;
So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
  You will find it better policy to say: --

"We never pay any-one Dane-geld,
  No matter how trifling the cost;
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
  And the nation that pays it is lost!"

The Disabbeard

 

Remember when the BBC insisted that a Syrian ‘fighter’ was definitely not a Jihadi on the run…the BBC knew this because ‘his identity is unusually well documented…He says that he was a Free Syrian Army commander, and that before the civil war he worked as a plasterer in his home city of Aleppo..’

Ah yes, that well known seal of authenticity….’He says….’

Here he is…fighter and ‘migrant’…

One version of a photo of an alleged IS militant - really a former Free Syrian Army commander - claiming asylum in Europe. The Facebook user who posted one of the most viral versions of these photos has since apologised

 

 

 

What reminded me of this story?  A tale from the Mail about the Jihadi Hipsters trying to dodge Putin’s wrath by shaving off their face fungus…

A close shave? Terrified jihadists leave their BEARDS on the battlefield as they shave their faces and dress as women to flee Syria

ISIS fighters are reportedly shaving their beards and dressing up as women in order to flee Syria, in the wake of Russia stepping up its military campaign in support of President Bashar al-Assad.

Pictures said to have been taken near Aleppo last week shows mounds of what looks like cut off facial hair, alongside discarded packets of razors. 

In order to cross the border to Turkey undetected, ISIS jihadists are said to be shaving and disguising themselves in niqabs – a veil covering all but the eyes worn by some muslim women.

Fleeing the battle: This photo allegedly shows the cut-off beards of ISIS fighters who are said to be shaving and donning women's clothing in order to cross the border to Turkey 

Not saying of course that our plasterer turned Syrian freedom fighter was a jihadi but why did he shave off his beard as he slipped into Europe…indeed why did he grow one…beards being a very definite recognition feature of a Jihadi?

BBC BOSS ACCUSES BBC OF BIAS

Seen this?

The former chairman of the BBC has attacked the corporation over its reporting of the recent spate of Arab terrorist attacks in Israel. Lord Michael Grade, a member of the House of Lords for the Conservative Party, claimed the BBC had failed to show “impartiality,” and focused his fierce criticism in particular on a recent report by BBC correspondent Orla Guerin, which he said promoted an “equivalence” between Palestinian terrorists and their victims.

Anti-Israeli bias is a CORE BBC value, in my view. We have shown it time after time and Grade is only saying the obvious.

Doomed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7RIgs3eygo

 

 

The BBC reported enthusiastically from north of the border as the chippy wee lassy marshalled the troops at the SNP conference….was interested to hear from wee lassy that Cameron has not respected the views of the Scottish people…unlike the wee lassy who of course fully respects and embraces their desire not to have an independent Scotland.  Jim Naughtie said nothing.

Didn’t hear much about this from the BBC…..

Culture secretary: BBC is out of touch, failing viewers and not reflective of Scotland

THE BBC fails to satisfy audiences and doesn’t reflect Scotland, the culture secretary said yesterday.

During a debate on BBC charter renewal, Fiona Hyslop called for a “a bold and radical alternative to the out of touch structure and decision making of the BBC”.

There were also calls for Scotland to be given control of broadcasting, as well as the creation of a Scottish Six O’Clock News.

Former culture minister Linda Fabiani said: “Of course Scotland should control its own broadcasting, of course Scotland should be an independent nation.

“We have to move forward in every way we possibly can to get Scotland to achieve that independence and broadcasting is crucial to that, we recognised that in 2007 when we became a minority government.”

“Scotland needs a better service from the BBC, Scotland demands a better service from the BBC and Scotland must have a better service from the BBC.”

East Dunbartonshire MP John Nicolson, a former BBC presenter, said the once-a-decade charter renewal process was a “golden opportunity…to change the BBC”, adding: “We have a chance to shape it, and we’re demanding some changes.

“We want to see the full devolution of broadcasting to Scotland, we need more investment, we need more jobs, we need a separate Scottish six o’clock news.”

Edinburgh activist Doug Thomson said the BBC was at the heart of much of civic life, but “in recent times the Beeb has lost its way” and remained “London-centric, metropolitan and lacking in accountability to the people of Scotland”.

He said: “The BBC isn’t broken but it isn’t fit for purpose, and instead needs to be rehabilitated. It is time for Scotland to have full control over broadcasting.”

 

National socialists in charge of the national broadcaster…..great….what can we expect?  All those years of Scottish suffering under the foreign yoke…only to be reborn….has a familiar ring to it…..

 

 

 

 

The things they say

 

Always interesting what BBC presenters let slip….

Last week Peter Allen apologised profusely to a Labour MP for having the rudeness to ask him questions about Corbyn’s policy on Trident….so awkward for the MP to have to deal with that apparently.

Yesterday we had Jim Naughtie tell us that there is a problem with Saudia Arabia ‘whose culture is so controversial’.  Hmmm, what ‘culture’ would that be?  Not the same culture that the Saudis export to the UK as they fund mosques, Islamic educational centres and buy up universities, not to mention currying favour with the high and mighty as they fund sports and buy arms.  Curious that that same ‘controversial culture’ in the UK gets protected status from the BBC.

On Tuesday we had Adrian Chiles discussing paedophilia.  He brought us an interview with an American who says he has paedophile tendencies but has never acted upon them.  We had a therapist who thought all that paedophiles needed was a bit of love and understanding, and opposed to her was Jim Gamble, ex-head of CEOPs, who took a much harder line.  Chiles didn’t seem to like Gamble’s approach and thought he was ‘condemning’ paedophiles when we should perhaps be treating or dealing with it through therapy.

The listeners didn’t seem to agree (37:40) emailing in saying that the BBC is part of the grooming process and that paedophiles should have a lethal injection, jump off a tall building or be chemically castrated.  Chiles tells Gamble that ‘from you’re tone you’re kind of encouraging views like these…the lethal injection, chemical castration and jumping off high buildings.’

Gamble in no way suggested any such thing, he just took the view that paedophilia is a very serious crime (having obviously seen the end result as a police officer in CEOPs) and that such criminals should be locked up, and that those who view child sex images are just as guilty as those who actually abuse children.  Chiles didn’t seem to like that approach in the usual BBC way that refuses to condemn the real criminals and ends up instead condemning those who criticise the criminals (or terrorists)….it’s the same way the left tries to close down debate on immigration…if you’re not in favour of mass immigration you must be a Nazi in favour of gas chambers for Muslims is the usual allusion.  The BBC itself isn’t shy of using such extreme comparisons with its ‘Warning from History’ and constant sly suggestions that UKIP are really Nazis.

BBC presenters…they get more like C of E vicars every day….then again belief in the BBC is apparently a human right now….

Faith in BBC a ‘religious right’

BELIEF in the values of the BBC entitles an employee to the same protection at work as faith in Christianity, Islam and the world’s other leading religions, a review for the state equality quango has concluded.

Opponents of foxhunting — but not hunt supporters — are also entitled to the same protection in the workplace as religious believers, after a series of judgments by tribunals over the past decade.

Now the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is to consider recommending changes to the law later this year to counter such rulings and prevent religion and belief from being “trivialised”.

A belief that public service broadcasting has the higher purpose of promoting cultural interchange and social cohesion was found to be covered by the legislation.

Embedded image permalink

Just wondering how that works….if I work at ITV or Sky does that mean I can get time off to watch a bit of BBC, perhaps I can have a special BBC worship room built….with a wide screen TV, a nice comfy chair and a latte machine to indulge my proclivities.  Perhaps it will face Broadcasting House and five times a day Lord Hall will call ‘prayer time’ over the radio.

Hide and Sikh

 

Muslims attack a Sikh in Birmingham

 

The BBC has spent a good deal of time and effort trying to make us believe that Muslims around the world are under attack….despite it appearing to most people that it is Muslims around the world doing the attacking.

The Muslims, the BBC informs us, are victims of racism in the form of British foreign policy, Buddhists, Jews and pernicious Islamophobia based purely upon the colour of a Muslim’s skin…that colour apparently being ‘Islamic’ now that Islam is classed as a ‘race’.

When the figures for hate crimes were released last week who did the BBC concentrate on?  Muslims.  Here’s Adrian Chiles chatting away about how oppressed Muslims are in the UK. (11.07)

We know that the BBC hates Buddhists in Burma as they attack Muslims…the BBC is reluctant to point out that it is the Muslims who have been conducting a ‘Jihad’ for decades in Burma in an attempt to carve out a Muslim state for themselves ala Pakistan.

We know that the BBC hates Hindus in India, again they are the perpetrators of racist crimes against Muslims….never mind that Muslims have their own history of horrific violence against Sikhs and Hindus which continues to this day.

The BBC seems to be conducting its own Jihad against Hindus in India at the moment, particularly against the Prime Minister Narendra Modi as we’ve been pointing out on this site several times.

The BBC continues its attacks…..Here is a ‘report’ that seems more wishful thinking than based upon real events and analysis…Has Narendra Modi’s foreign policy bubble burst?  And the latest effort….A week of worrying about rising intolerance in India  but it’s only very near the bottom of a very long article that you get the truth...’Well, there certainly wasn’t a shortage of religious intolerance before Modi was elected…..It’s hard to be definitive about the issue of tolerance. Indian politics – especially those around communal tension – are complicated. ‘  The writer admits that much of the ‘worry’ is in fact drummed up by liberal writers and activists for their own political ends...’in fact online activists from opposition parties are driving this week’s trends…..The recent violent acts certainly give liberals the ammunition they need to get a conversation about intolerance trending.’

Which makes this rather curious…from Sunday Morning Live in which a Sikh commentator is removed from the show for protesting about the lack of coverage of anti-Sikh violence by Muslims in the Punjab……

 

 

Just why is the BBC so uninterested in violence by Muslims when it is so interested in how Jews deal with Muslims in the Middle East, how Buddhists deal with Muslims in Burma, how Hindus govern in India, or indeed how oppressed Muslims are in Britain?  Sikhs in the Punjab?  Who?

Just remember when the BBC bangs on about Israel and the ‘crimes’ done in its creation, that supposed Palestinian disaster, the Nakba, just remember that nearly one million people were killed in an attempt at ethnic cleansing when Muslims carved out Pakistan from Indian land.