Well, for once I really quite enjoyed listening to the BBC Today programme on Radio 4 this morning. Having ensured I watched the 2nd Presidential debate first, and knowing that Trump had steam rollered Clinton, I was ready to observe how the BBC would report this.
US presidential debate: Trump launches ferocious attack on Clintons
Oh wow, how very dare he!!! You could tell instantly that he had done well as the BBC kept wondering why he had not actually stood down from the Presidential race? According to the BBC, Clinton had not “landed a killer blow” on Trump and he was “down but not out” When you translate this it means…Trump won.
But the pussified BBC can’t bring themselves to say this so instead they continue their busted narrative. Meanwhile, here’s a great Trump quip to enjoy…
I didn’t watch the debate however SKY headline was ‘Trump vows to jail Clinton’ of course no quote was forthcoming as I knew it wouldn’t. He stated that he would setup an enquiry into her emails and as in the above video intimates she should be in prison. That is a far cry from ‘vowing to jail Clinton’.
Is it wrong to hope though?
I quite liked the bit when she walked over to those (what looked like 12 judges) behind Trump! She gave me the impression that she was appealing to at least one of them for leniency! (She probably knows every one of them anyway)
In fact, I thought I saw a badge on the blonde juror which said “Vote for lover-boy Bill” maybe that’s why she couldn’t look Mrs Clinton in the eye!!
More ‘it’s what we would like to claim he meant’ ‘reporting’ from the truthiness, enhanced narrative, interpreting eventsMSM
After the debate the bbc has a republican who hates trump in the studio unlike channel 4 who had a pro trump republican.
After the election, if Trump wins, a lot of RINO politicians are going to look very stupid as they have to suck up to him.
John McCain, who failed as a Presidential candidate, served in the US Navy, has been married three times, and once called his wife a c*** in a public argument, yet purports to be shocked, shocked I tell you, by Trump’s ribald comments in a private conversation eleven years ago.
Hypocrites like McCain are the people who lose elections for the Republicans, not Trump. The Republican establishment hate Trump because he is the people’s choice, he doesn’t need them or their oh so PC policies. He said build a wall, he said keep muslims out, and his numbers soared and he won the nomination. He’s saying what establishment politicians do not dare to say, but it is what real people think.
Here’s hoping for a Trump victory, and for Bill and Hillary Clinton to spend the rest of their crooked lives where they belong, in gaol.
The BBC are still gutted about Brexit,I would find it hilarious if Trump wins,Beboids will be in meltdown,that would be a joy to watch.
Wish the UK had Trump to organise our Military!
And didn’t he make Mrs Clinton look a paler shade of white when he mentioned hubby committing “fleshings” with other females!
They are not the only ones who have been crushed by Brexit. The German media are desperately clutching at straws in the form of the High Court case to get a vote in parliament to overturn the referendum result. A supposedly serious programme spent 10 mins interviewing the fantasists behind the action. The main mover, Marcus J. Ball, seems to some kind of phone-app developer and self-publicist. The Germans seemed to be labouring under the misconception that Brexiteer politicians were also being sued for “lying” about the amount of cash the British pay to the EU. What complete and utter drivel!. At least they played the famous clip of a crest-fallen Dimblebore conceding defeat. What joy!
Of course the Germans are distraught. Little real understanding of Anglo Saxon democracy – a trait they share with the French- and a justified fear that our example will embolden the Visegrad group to defy German will.
The Germans also know that with Britain gone, they will have to pay for the EU all by themselves. Shame.
Not least as Trump was in full support of the UK whatever the outcome and said Brexit wouldn’t be a problem for their trade relations, unlike Obama and Clinton who tried to shame and bully the people into betraying their instincts. The BBC still thinks it can subvert the result hence why they wanted May as prime minister (though thankfully she seems of much sterner stuff than they assumed) and why they want Clinton to win. The fact they’re both women and it fits their misandristic narrative is a bonus, of course they don’t treat the likes of La Pen with the sane reverence because liberalism has no consistency other than the hatred of the no-longer-existent European patriarchy and the belief that victimhood supercedes achievement.
If Trump wins, then he MUST ban the BBC (and all who sail in her) from all government events, briefings, domestic and foreign visits, and so on. Only by such measures will the BBC learn its lesson.
If Trump wins he does not have to ban the BBC from events in the US. All he has to do is pick up the phone and tell the Appeaser that the game is changed and the BBC has to go – sell it off.
Never mind the BBC being gutted if Trump wins, what about Mrs Clinton! I bet her attorneys are in preparation as we speak – they also saw how pale she went when Trump threated to jai her if he wins! Bill? He’ll be ok – he always gets away with owt he tries – so no need!
Meanwhile, a BBC QT producer welcomes the audience his/her/its team have selected using all the editorial integrity the BBC is renowned for mustering…
‘Jaaaaasmine! Another has slipped through… release the hounds!’
Clearly a rigged audience – they’ve put Diane Abbott on the front row
Seriously, we now know that when the leftist media establishment demand a certain voting intention is ‘nasty’ or ‘deplorable’ then opinion polls lose 4% to 5% of people willing to own up to their true voting intention. There’s all to play for Donald.
Diane Abbott would be the front row!
Diane Abbott looks like she could be a front row forward for Wigan Warriors. To be fair, the prop would be a more suitable position.
The Liberal “elite” always claim the high moral ground. It’s not just that they have different policies, but that they always assume that their policies have a strong moral basis.
As you say, this message has made many voters a little ashamed of their beliefs, and unwilling to admit their real voting intentions.
It’s really time that that the sheer nastiness of the Left/Liberal establishment, represented above all by the BBC, was hammered into people’s consciousness.
Trump’s rise and rise in the US polls (and we hope, his forthcoming victory next month), has mystified and horrified the Left in politics and media on both sides of the pond.
It also shows how woefully out-of-touch with both reality and the public mood they are. Leftards really can’t conceive of the fact they might actually be WRONG. It’s always that they “didn’t get the message across”, “voters weren’t properly informed” (ie, we’re all too thick to understand what they, our intellectual superiors, are saying).
Beeboids are typical of the type, with their arrogance and bigotry constantly on show, incessantly peddling the same old lefty-liberal twaddle, even though their fellow travellers are the only ones still listening when they express their shock and horror over some innocuous statement that, after all, is just reflecting what the guy and girl in the street is saying anyway.
We are seeing the rise of the Right all over the World. Trump in the US. Duterte in the Philippines. Putin in Russia. The AfD in Germany. Austria about to have yet another presidential re-run, with a rightist candidate likely to win. The reason isn’t that we’ve all been suddenly converted to neo-nazism, but that that is what ordinary folks believe in. Normal life, safety for their families, jobs and housing and you can stuff your “diversity” and your multi-culti, alternative lifestyle, transgendering claptrap.
People are sick and tired of being told they should be ashamed of who they are and their history, of how they think and feel, and finally the people are getting their say.
It’s only a matter of time until some enterprising politician in the UK sees the yawning gap in the market and starts to appeal to the disaffected majority, instead of constantly pandering to the minorities.
And then we’ll see some fun.
Trump is not only likely to win, but likely to win by a margin not seen since Reagan’s second term.
The media has invested itself so heavily in a Clinton win that it is desperately trying to find anything, no natter how nebulous or dishonest, to end Trump’s momentum. That they honestly thought a single recording from a private conversation a decade ago would be more damaging than Clinton’s years of remorseless lies, pandering, hatred, entitlement, double standards and stupidity shows just how little respect they have for the intelligence and awareness of the people. Trump absolutely cleaned house last night and the liberals know it, yet they keep invoking Godwin’s law and the gender victim card as if it’s new and intelligent thought, rather than the discredited tropes of intellectually lazy Marxist backwash from deluded selective virtue signallers pathetically grasping at straws that it actually is.
“Leftards really can’t conceive of the fact they might actually be WRONG.”
There`s a lot of truth in this DavidA….the frustration of the left (and their resulting anger and self righteousness) is that their view of the world is flawed by its disregard for and denial of human nature.
There is a limit to co-operation between people….because, in general, people are fundamentally individualist in nature and will in most circumstances operate to preserve themselves, their family, their locality…..at a push, their tribe or ethnic group.
People can and do co-operate in completing tasks, but this is usually reinforced by individual reward.
What the left demands is commitment to a politics that fetishizes class based envy, suppresses individual humanity, strengthens the collective at the expense of individual interests whilst aggrandising and enriching a leadership cadre.
Socialist societies have all failed because ultimately, no matter how much indoctrination, brutality and murder is used against people, human nature will out. Individual resistance will coalesce around family, local tribal or ethnic interest.
Whoever the left hates is whoever has the power to resist its collectivising intention.
It is for this reason that every leftist government eventually ends up with repression and murder. Their system does not work, and the only way they can impose it is through terror. When Churchill spoke of a “Socialist Gestapo” in 1945, he wasn’t joking. The only way socialism can ever be imposed is by a gestapo.
I thought Farage did.
This is the headlines on the Facebook page of the most trusted, professional, impartial news broadcaster in the world:
BBC News
After their second TV debate, who’s in with a sniff of becoming president?
If lightening the mood, I doubt they are likely to go with ‘who is standing strong to become president?’
Perhaps it’s too much to hope for that Trump wins next month. The combined forces of the liberal left (government, media, culture) are all now embarked on Total War against Trump because getting Queen Hillary to her appointment with the Washington Throne is now all that matters to them.
Trump put on a decent show last night. Not amazing. It was okay. He needs to go further and harder next time. This is America’s last chance to defenestrate the progressive mafia from their vice-like grip on media, education and government. It’s now or never – but the next few days and weeks are going to get very messy.
The BBC will be there, of course, to lead the charge against Trump. They know the game is almost up, even as they weep into their skinny lattes over Brexit, they now daren’t admit to themselves the horrible truth that maybe…just maybe…the American electorate might do the unthinkable and elect Trump into the Oval Office.
If it happens? Well, that’s almost too much to hope for.
The world has turned in our favour whatever happens now . The elite’s distortion of reality and of what used to be called liberalism is finished.
It will take time and maybe Trump will lose but the world according to that unholy alliance of the Goldman Sachs and Merkels of this world and the so called opinion formers at the BBC/ media elites is over.
It’s times like this that I miss the input of Scotty/Zero/Kookychoo/Man-had-a-crap-on-the-omnibus. I wonder what he/she/it thinks of Trump?
I missed them too
but i promise I’ll aim better next time 🙂
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04bdp1b
Interesting logic from an unexpected source.
The bigger problem here is that the TV news media in general sing from the same song sheet as the BBC. The Trump coverage is broadly similar across the board. When it comes down to reporting any political news that contains viewpoints that do not chime with their world view there is an immediate retreat into their neo-liberal, we are the righteous and anyone with a different opinion is a Nazi mind-set. It’s a pity they don’t get out more.
I woke up this morning and checked the BBC website to see what had happened. The BBC suggested that it had been a draw, therefore I immediately knew that Trump had wiped the floor with her. Something that was confirmed when I watched the whole thing for myself.
It is with enormous sadness that I notice that The Telegraph openly supports Clinton and daily smears Trump. As in the Brexit vote, They are all in it together: One whopper of a 1984 style open borders world government. What is left to read or watch?
“What is left to read or watch?”
This site Matahari, this site. 😉
What is the definition of an ‘uneducated voter’.
I first noticed the phrase in a BBC article relating to Trump’s victories in the primaries, I heard it today on one of the BBC’s Clinton’s political broadcasts, the BBC call it news. some ‘expert’ was waffling on about Trump’s ‘uneducated voters’.
An ‘uneducated voter’ is someone who didn’t go the college, is on minimum wage, sees no chance of owning his own home or having the money to help his kids go to University and better themselves. He is a loser and therefore to be ignored as his comments and views are of no value. He’s just rebelled in the UK and the Philippines…
Al Beeb considers ‘brexiteers’ as uneducated . It tried to ‘educate’ us to vote correctly before the referendum . But it failed miserably .
Carterdaniel
Practically everywhere in Europe,the so-called representatives of the people do not represent, let alone share, the views of the people. 70% of the MPs in the British parliament are remainers. 80% of the German parliament are for the Willkommenskultur, while at least 60% of the population are against. The Austrian presidential referendum showed the same thing. The position of the old coalition parties and the media bore no relation to the wishes of the people.
But the malaise goes even deeper. It is not just that the politicians simply disagree with the views of their voters, they actually vehemently detest them as intellectually defective and,even worse, morally debased. Gordon Brown did good work by inadvertently revealing what he and the rest of the great and the good and the wise and the wonderful really think about “ordinary people”. While politicians despise the public, they also seem to fear them in equal measure. The German media is full of Merkel being booed at a Tag der deutschen Einheit celebration in Dresden. All kinds of measures will have to be taken to avoid “hate speech”, “the refined tone of political debate” must be restored, etc. The heat the German political class have been feeling from the social media since the “refugee crisis” seems to have unsettled them. They regurgitate the usual tosh about the Cox murder. Depictions of Merkel hanging from a lamppost have them hyperventilating, and visions of the French revolution are conjured up. They basically think the indigenous population are vicious, blood-thirsty animals who can be provoked to extreme violence by an ill-chosen word on Facebook. Bundespresident Gauck talks about “Dunkeldeutschland – those who oppose the Willkommenskultur are on the “dark side”, those who support him are “bathed in light”. Clinton talks about Trump supporters in the same way as “irredeemables”.
As if to underline your point, I have just heard Newsshite’s rectum-ripper-in-chief unctuously ask PJ O’Prick, renowned US commentator, if anyone in the US with a college degree would support Trump. “There are a few”. Why bother with universal suffrage? Maybe Evans should have 10,000 votes to reflect his superior intellect and moral rectitude.
The only way to redress this situation of a democratic deficit is The Harrogate Agenda.
Please google and sign up.
Trump was debating 3 opponents at the same time
It was a Clinton News Network CNN show after all
One moderator was so obviously biased there was a backlash on Twitter even from some Hillary Supporters
article : Moderator Martha Raddatz Gets BAD News After Being Unfair to Trump
This morning on the Today program, they are going with all guns on the instructions of the Democratic party, blaming Russia for hacking Democrat computers. They are completely uninterested in the compromising information found, sticking only to the Clinton line that a foreign power is attempting to influence the US election.
Well I got news for you Hilary, there really is, but its not Russia, it’s Saudi Arabia ! Who are of course backing the Clinton campaign.
Apparently Hillary is the victim and as Whoopi Goldberg is ”it’s not polite” to remind the Democratic Party the indiscretions of a former president and highlight Clinton and her party’s hypocrisy.
And calling Mr Clinton’s accusers ;Tramps’ ???????????????????
As the British Referendum, the US elections are shaping up to be simply a last minute, ‘reality check’ for the public. For once the Brits followed their instincts in the main, refusing to accept the ‘open borders’, corporate, Soros and the UN vision for the ‘Multicultural World they want. In the US, I see the Trump v Clinton pantomime as no different. I believe the US, already showing signs of decline, has, as the UK Referendum showed, the last chance to pull back from the brink. If the vote goes with Clinton, all is lost for the ordinary white US man and woman
As the British Referendum, the US elections are shaping up to be simply a last minute, ‘reality check’ for the public. For once the Brits followed their instincts in the main, refusing to accept the ‘open borders’, corporate, Soros and the UN vision for the ‘Multicultural’ World they (and they alone) want. In the US, I see the Trump v Clinton pantomime as no different. I believe the US, already showing signs of decline, has, as the UK Referendum showed, the last chance to pull back from the brink of surrender that will only benefit the few. If the vote goes with Clinton, all is lost for the ordinary white US man and woman. We are seeing the signs of what Clinton has in store for the US (and the World at large).
http://newobserveronline.com/clinton-wants-open-borders/