“It certainly appears to be the case that the British only sit up and take notice when they are bombed into it”
Corbyn gave his speech today re-opening the election campaign with a promise to change British foreign policy at the ‘request’ of some ‘non-Muslim’ Muslim terrorists and linking it to home grown terrorism.
Corbyn has done an enormous u-turn after decades of cosying up to terrorists, along with McDonnell, honouring IRA dead, opposing just about every piece of anti-terrorist legislation going through Parliament, demanding the abolition of the British Army, seeking unilateral nuclear disarmament, demanding Britain make an immediate and unconditional withdrawal from Northern Ireland [a thing worth fighting for he thought], all that is now forgotten as he tells us that the terrorists must never prevail and that bombs and mass murder are terrible things.
Terrorism is so last week…until June 9.
Not so long ago he was insisting, much like the BBC’s Mark Easton, that perhaps Muslim terrorists weren’t so bad after all…maybe quite heroic in their way…
There are an awful lot of contradictions surrounding how we decide who is a good fighter and who is a terrorist; who is struggling for liberation and who is a terrorist. There was a time when people involved in Umkhonto we Sizwe in South Africa were known as terrorists; they were later welcomed to this country as freedom fighters. Things can turn full circle.
He also wants to negotiate with them [something he denied in the interview below with Andrew Neil]….and yet they will never prevail…
Jeremy Corbyn says there could be benefits to opening diplomatic back-channels with Isis
The BBC never noticed this U-turn, somewhat more significant than May’s social care cap retreat, and in the analysis post-speech on the radio and in print didn’t think it relevant to mention Corbyn’s past comments on terror and his links to organisations that supported it such as the paper ‘Labour Briefing’…on which Corbyn was one of the editors…
According to an authoritative parliamentary reference work, Mr Corbyn was general secretary of the editorial board. He wrote the front-page story in the same issue of Briefing.
“It certainly appears to be the case that the British only sit up and take notice when they are bombed into it”
Perhaps the sentiment expressed in that paper concerning the ‘audacity’ of the terrorists might explain the BBC’s attitude today…
The same edition of Briefing, for December 1984, carried a reader’s letter praising the “audacity” of the IRA attack and stating: “What do you call four dead Tories? A start.”
The BBC said Corbyn’s statement on foreign polcy, connecting it to Manchester, was ‘bold and audacious’.…but then again the BBC has peddled the same line for nearly 15 years giving credibility and support to the terrorists’ narrative… thus contributing to the radicalisation and terrorism that occurs as a result of that false narrative. Manchester? The BBC’s toxic coverage of the Middle East has consequences. Manchester was just one of them.
Most people I imagine would just think Corbyn had confirmed what they knew already…that he supported terrorism and was quite prepared to surrender in the face of it…the BBC thought otherwise preferring not to mention Corbyn’s past support for terrorists of all sorts, Muslim included, as he told the British people that he totally and unreservedly condemned such terrorism…it was terrible and traumatic…the terrorists will never cow us, never prevail….
In the past few days, we have all perhaps thought a bit more about our country, our communities and our people. The people we have lost to atrocious violence or who have suffered grievous injury, so many of them heart-breakingly young .
Terrorists and their atrocious acts of cruelty and depravity will never divide us and will never prevail.
Over recent years, the threat of terrorism has continued to grow. You deserve to know what a Labour Government will do to keep you and your family safe. Our approach will involve change at home and change abroad.
Many experts, including professionals in our intelligence and security services have pointed to the connections between wars our government has supported or fought in other countries, such as Libya, and terrorism here at home.
That assessment in no way reduces the guilt of those who attack our children. Those terrorists will forever be reviled and implacably held to account for their actions.
Protecting this country requires us to be both strong against terrorism and strong against the causes of terrorism. The blame is with the terrorists, but if we are to protect our people we must be honest about what threatens our security.
We must support our Armed Services, Foreign Office and International Development professionals, engaging with the world in a way that reduces conflict and builds peace and security.
Our government is not chosen at an autocrats’ whim or by religious decree and [is] never cowed by a terrorist’s bomb.Let’s have our arguments without impugning anyone’s patriotism and without diluting the unity with which we stand against terror.
Corbyn lied throughout the speech and lied throughout his interview with Andrew Neil….Corbyn says he wants multilateral nuclear disarmament..that’s a lie…as the BBC could have told us today as they did in April….
Mr Corbyn is the first Labour leader to support unilateral nuclear disarmament since Michael Foot in 1983 – a stance which puts him at odds with the bulk of his party.
Neil missed a trick in the interview as he pressed Corbyn on Trident…he didn’t ask Corbyn if the missiles would ever be used, despite what the Party as a whole said, as Corbyn himself has said he would never press the button…or indeed that Corbyn wanted nuclear missiles with no nuclear warheads…a vast waste of money….
Jeremy Corbyn: I would never use nuclear weapons if I were PM
Neil also failed to press Corbyn on his meetings with IRA memebers which he denied ever having done…Google and Guido very quickly proves otherwise…
Corbyn Lies: “I Never Met the IRA”
Neil’s interview otherwise was pretty rigorous and you could see Corbyn seething quietly as he was hung out to dry…..he’s a proven liar and a terrorist supporter. Shame that other than Neil the BBC reports on his speech seem to avoid contradicting or challenging anything he says…which you might think was important considering the claims he is making about the link between Iraq and terrorism and the consequences that flow from that…such as changing our foreign policy to suit those non-Muslim Muslim terrorists.
The narrative that he peddles, that our foreign policy is anti-Muslim and thus angers Muslims [though once they become ‘radical’ they suddenly lose their ‘Muslim’ status according to Corbyn’s law], is entirely false…Muslims in the UK have been ‘radicalising’ for decades and that the ‘radical’ Muslim, Osama Bin Laden, wanted to invade Iraq and topple Saddam himself…and yet that was a bad thing for the West to do….after years of being told we we wrong to support dictators. We topple one, one that Muslims wanted to beBBC toppled and they get angry and ‘radical’? The BBC sees no contradiction there. The foreign policy narrative is just a useful excuse, if it wasn’t that it would be some other….shame on the BBC for promoting such a deadly lie….make no mistake……22 people lie dead in Manchester because of it.
Why is it always Andrew Neil who does the due diligence and some proper journalism?
Oh dear….the BBC’s attempt to inform us on Corbyn’s policies, history and mindset in light of the interview?
General election 2017: Corbyn quizzed on Trident and IRA
Utterly hopeless…fails completely to question his answers giving us instead merely a list of questions that Neil asked and Corbyn’s reply…no analysis, no context, no contrast with Corbyn’s past statements and positions.
Considering this is supposed to be informing us so that we can make a decision on who to vote for it is far from being an indepth, intelligent and useful guide to Corbyn, his thinking and his politics ast and present…we have no idea that he is being evasive and is lying to us from this BBC report other than his refusal to sign off on Trident.
May is hung out to dry everyday with her past positions and statements compared with today’s. Corbyn does an enormous u-turn on terrorism and nothing from the BBC, Neil aside, May does a u-turn on social care and it is healdine news for days…and will be until election day as Labour try to capitalise on it and the BBC aid and abet…the News Quiz having much fun at May’s expense and hardly a thing about Corbbyn.
The entire MSM are deliberately living in denial. Mainstream articles after the Manchester atrocity barely mention ISIS left alone Muslims and Islam as the direct cause.
Andrew Neil deliberately let Corbyn off the hook last night. The main news story at the moment is the carnage that Islamic terrorists have caused in Manchester yet it wasn’t even mentioned.
All Andrew Neil had to do was ask Corbyn why he supported Hamas and Hezbollah and give the numerous examples of his meetings with them. Instead he said nothing – it was as if Manchester never happened.
Where were the questions about the millions of pounds that are now having to be spent to try and counter these scum and how that money could be better spent on the NHS or education?
We are walking straight towards the next suicide bomber with our eyes wide open and our arms open in welcome and no-one in the mainstream media, including Andrew Neil, has the courage to tell the truth.
Protecting this country requires us to be both strong against terrorism and strong against the causes of terrorism.
Aside from – and let’s be charitable here and say ‘inconsistencies and revisions’ in his position – he does not identify the causes of terrorism. Britain’s foreign policy can best be described as ‘Invade the World, Invite the World’ i.e. militarily interfere in other countries – particularly Middle Eastern and North African ones (oil and defence industry interests, acting as Saudi Arabia’s proxy in the Shia/Sunni schism with Iran) – whilst simultaneously importing vast numbers of people from those generally backward lands, some of whom are going to be pissed off (and if they aren’t already, the BBC will do its bit). It is not the case that Britain’s foreign policy causes terrorism at home, but it certainly fans the flames and our immigration policy brings it to our streets.
So corbyn the garden gnome and the BBC thinks the events in Manchester that where carried out by muslims and all the other similar acts of terrorism before it are as a result of British intervention overseas, If so it clearly shows that.
#1 The garden gnome has never read peadophile mohammad’s unholy quran. and,
#2 If the garden gnome corbyn ever did read the quran then he would learn that Manchester and every act of terrorism like it is now according to corbyn’s delusions the result of British intervention overseas but part of the 1400 year muslim fight for the universal global caliphate. Be it imported muslims the home grown muslims or worst of all the British born converts who should be charged with treason
So if corbyn [aided and abetted by the treasonious BBC] does make it into No 10 Downing street would you feel safe in the UK with corbyn as prime minister, I for one wouldnt. Sorry corbyn supporters, beebiods, guardianistas, leftards and luvvies but hear in the real world your delusions do not fit in with the experince of those of us who actually live in the real world and those of us who unlike you beeboids, guardianistas, leftards, luvvies can actually think for ourselves
I cannot see anything on the BBC News website about the lies re IRA that Corbyn told in the interview with Neil. Why? But the BBC are giving prominence to a further Labour shake of the money tree “Labour promises flexible train tickets and money for grassroots football“
First a bit of KGM to the lady parts on Ch4, and now this?
https://order-order.com/2017/05/27/iain-dale-reads-guidos-corbyn-ira-list-diane-abbott/
But she does seem to have a hide that is amazingly thick.
As well.
You always know when the BBC are reduced to a salvaging role for the dead Left when their “flagship interviews” on their own political vehicles like Andrew Neil get hardly any follow up or coverage. Corbyns appalling performance on last nights showcase for him only shows how reduced the expectations, how debauched the BBC; and how aimless and futile the progressives are. If THIS is their thick as shit leader and lead dreamer-we have nothing to fear.
My problem comes with the stonewalling lies and insouciance, how lacking iin moral fibre and principle our so called political commentators are.
The all know Corbyns past-from Brexit to Israel, America and the IRA, Syrian IS and the Queen.
And to be fair, were he to honestly admit all this-then at least he`d have some self-respect.
But no-like all Commies and fifth columnists-the shameless lies and stonewalls in the face of all evidence only shows the base nature of spineless gauleiters like Corbyn and Abbott.
Worthless dregs of the socialist slop bucket, But no analysis or confrontations from the BBC.
Because Corbyn is only a left lying zombie like they are.
Having grown up with the threat of IRA terrorism I instinctively know that Corbyn has a life long hatred for the British State – he won’t even mouth the National Anthem. But i do realise that people forget . They forget about what the IRA did to people in support of their dream of a united ireland . And al beeb chooses to as well.
On Election Day if Labour get anything like the feared 40 per cent of seats then the British electorate will deserve all that they get from him . But I actually think when it comes down to it people will see sense . Right ?
The tories could have released a manifesto equalling the diaries of Anne frank and the Beeb would still have ripped it to pieces. Keunsberg and the gang were like Baying wolves that day with edited footage of them going after mp’s and organised protests outside with the ringleaders telling them when and where to start shouting. There main target is brexit and they will sell their souls to stop it. And it’s been like that everyday since. The labour manifesto is being ignored even their flagships of privatisation are uncosted and nobody is digging into it. Brillo is the only one to do so. With a light grilling of Barry gardener on daily politics last week revealing it to be pie in the sky but no front page headlines or round the clock coverage just constant Tory attacks.
Yesterday I noticed a big change and not just the Beeb but sky and others as wellas wel. Both were out in force from 7am going big on corbyns speech. The speech was leaked the day before but there was very little criticism of it with lots of leading questions being asked of various representatives in that square, but a little digging on google these were not ordinary representatives but political activists and labour wonks all singing from the same hymn sheet. Friday was going to be corbyns day and nothing or no one was going to stop it.it just stank of collusion with all networks as it was corbyns turn for the Brillo treatment that day it seems they were doing their best to sanitise him and not mention his ira Hamas and hezbolah connections. May has been out of the country at the g7 in Sicily but the coverage we did get was of trump smears and attacks on May but very little or no footage of her. Sky had Beth rigby breathlessly running after tusk asking him would he deal with jezza if he got in and when she got the answer she wanted ran away smiling. This pro Corbyn coverage ran until midnight and as mentioned above no remarks or questioning on his Brillo interview
Lbc this morning had Andrew castle doing his level best to big up Corbyn and telling us he was prime ministerial in his speech yesterday but zero mention of the Brillo interview. He came a cropper when talking to Kim Howells who blamed Manchester on Islam and basically said jezza was an idiot. It was when Howells brought up the ira castle ended the chat saying he had ran out of Time with nearly 3 hours to go. The ira jezza connection is verboten. When he came back he went straight into the prime ministerial crap again but again came a cropper when a telegraph journo who was doing the papers rubbished jezzas speech. Cue another ad break and changed the subject. For a so called journo he just wasn’t listening. He had an agenda and was sticking to it. When that failed he just went to trump bashing. I’ve been out all day so I don’t know what the rest are like or if the sanitise Corbyn campaign is continuing. It’s sickening to watch and listen to and with Katie Hopkins getting sacked yesterday the left are on a high but the big massive hairy dirty mammoth in the room is not going away and all the tea lights and hugs in the world will not stop that.