Stoking racial tensions

 

Had to laugh as I listened to the BBC being outraged at what they allege is anti-White propaganda in South Africa as  PR company Bell Pottinger is accused of trying to encourage the idea that South Africa’s problems are due to the menace of supposed ‘White monopoly capital’ and is thus ‘stoking racial tensions.’

You have to laugh because the BBC itself is guilty of ‘stoking racial tensions’…anti-white and anti-Jewish.

There is a petition demanding Parliament discuss Bell Pottinger’s alleged actions...read the reasoning behind it and you can easily translate that into how the BBC’s own reports ‘stoke racial tensions’…..

Martin Peake’s petition‚ with about 10,450 signatures‚ is on the website‚ change.com.

In his petition Peake requests that former Bell Pottinger partner Victoria Geoghegan‚ who was directly involved in the campaign to blame tensions in South Africa on “white monopoly capital”‚ be indicted in The Hague.

Peake writes: “Bell Pottinger‚ a morally corrupt British company‚ has spent the last few years in a divisive campaign of racial and moral social decay that has left South Africa scarred‚ set back the lifeworks of great men like Nelson Mandela and Desmond Tutu‚ and resulted in the deaths of countless innocents as a result of their racially charged hatred. We demand a formal enquiry into this company‚ its directors and officers‚ and in particular Bell Pottinger’s senior Africa partner Victoria Geoghegan‚ and the indictment of these people at the ICC at the Hague.”

Peake‚ who said South Africa will always be home despite the fact he no longer lives there‚ said he is angry about Bell Pottinger’s campaign to use the term “white monopoly capital” and to blame problems on the country on elite groups of white people.

The BBC, which constantly tells us that the problem in the UK is the ‘monopoly’ of the ‘pale, male and stale’ in society and which encourages ethnic minorities to believe they are the victims of white oppression and racism…and that Brexit has encouraged this making Britain a ‘nastier more racist place’.  The BBC which encourages the world to think of itself as a victim of White Western imperialism and colonisation and wants Whites to admit their guilt and atone for it and as part of that they must be ethnically cleansed from the face of the earth by bringing in an endless stream of ‘brown people’ to interbreed and thus breed out ‘whiteness’….we know this was the Labour Party’s plan as Andrew Neather told us they wanted to ‘brown Britain’….a bombshell revelation that the BBC refused to report because of course it goes along with such a policy.  The same BBC that demonises Israel and invents Jewish war crimes and thus makes Jews a target all across the globe…the BBC telling us that in fact Jews should expect to get attacked because of the ‘crimes’ Israel commits in Gaza.

The BBC is a very dangerous left-wing mouthpiece pushing highly toxic and inflammatory narratives that are intended to stir up racial tensions and conflict.  Its support for Irish nationalist and Muslim terrorism, its support for black rioters, its support for anti-Israel terrorism, its support for the hard-left Corbyn whose support base has an underlying foundation of violence and intimidation as well as elements of anti-Semitism and his own open support for terrorists, shows us why the BBC is so dangerous as it not just fails to challenge these narratives but gives them almost unalloyed support.

As a black ‘diversity officer’ tells us that Whites should ‘geddit’ [ie be killed] people in Britain should wake up to what is going on and how that can only get worse as the  likes of the BBC recklessly incite anti-white racism and violence and encourage mass immigration of people who have no intention of integrating and being ‘British’.

 

 

 

Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Stoking racial tensions

  1. Grant says:

    The problems of RSA are purely down to corruption, criminality and misgovernance of the black African rulers. And it will only get worse.

       7 likes

  2. TigerOC says:

    Interesting misinformation all round.
    Some of South Africa’s richest companies are controlled by a few very wealthy men. The Oppenheimers (Harry before and after transition) was the power behind 2 of South Africa’s biggest companies; de Beers (diamond mining) and Anglo-American (vast range of companies but mainly gold and platinum).
    The economic pressures brought to bear on the RSA hurt these companies and they were major players in convincing de Klerk to negotiate with Mandela. In fact one of their leading facilitators who brokered the diamond deal with Russia was the lead facilitator for the eventual new constitution.
    Harry Oppenheimer was so confident of the success of the new South Africa that he moved de Beers HQ from Kimberley , where it was founded to Berne, Switzerland within months of Mandela coming to power.
    When Harry died the ANC were ecstatic at the prospect of the estate duties the government would get. Except Harry had moved all the his personal wealth out to Berne when he moved de Beers leaving only the value of his properties there which were estimated at £300m.
    So whilst these wealthy businessmen are very pragmatic about what is good for whole countries and their people this seldom matches their own personal opinion of the future there.
    So when you hear Branson prattling on watch what he does, not what he says.
    So whilst

       1 likes