I’m not sure what’s happened to Alan (Maybe the TV liecensing people took him to their dungeon) and I don’t have the admin rights to remove the old pinned thread, but here’s a new one for all your BBC bias needs.
Open Thread – 12/12/17
Bookmark the permalink.
Allahu Akbar!!!! Death to the infidels!!
Giving you all much love this Christmas. Stay safe….Keep away from the Xmas markets 🙂
Mad Mo
TTP: Some related gallows humour. Some kernels of truth in it as well!
0. Islam asks you to have zero thought about it’s origins and practices. And make zero comparisons with successful cultures.
1. Islam asks for one simple thing. Islam asks for everything – finance, religion, police, morals, schools, law, food, science, clothes, art and your body to be Islamic.
2. Islam only has two problems – Muhammed and Mohammed. Once the first problem has been solved then the second one can be solved easily.
3. Islam offers three things. In the Koran it offers Peace, War and then a Continuation of War. In your life Islam wants you to subjugate yourself, subjugate your family and then subjugate everyone else.
Please let Roy Moore win in Alabama. It will be worth it just to hear the sneering Beeb have to begrudgingly report on it.
What do the Left really have to offer? We can all see how spectacularly open borders and multiculturalism have failed. The only way they get away with it is by controlling the narrative, shutting down any opposition and making it illegal to ‘hate’ what they have done. Relentless knife crime, rape gangs, the constant threat of terrorism, and the terrible, terrible fear of how this is all going to turn out in the future – what is there to not hate? Without character assassination, name calling and no platforming they have nothing left.
And no free speech, how terrible is that? The ‘progressives’ – typified by the BBC – have moved us back to the Dark Ages where blasphemy charges would destroy you. At least back then there was a single God to believe in. Now we have the nihilistic cult of multiculturalism, which through believing in everything believes in nothing. It’s not exactly a creed you would die for.
“If I should die today on this foreign land,
There is a part of France that is forever multicultural!
That believed in nothing,
And never offended anyone!”
Beeb Bro
Nobody hates like a Leftie. You know the type. The type that believes we should all love and support each other come what may. It’s called immaturity. An inability to see humanity as it is. They need only examine their own thinking to find that none of us loves the whole of mankind. It’s the impossible dream that if taken to extreme leads to insanity.
“we should all love and support each other ” unless your Jewish,
“we should all love and support each other ” unless your Jewish,
Or you are indigenous, white, male, straight, healthy,middle aged, successful, wealthy, patriotic, proud, have views opposing the far left and eat (non halal
) meat and celebrate the true meaning of Christmas. The list is non exhaustive please feel free to add to it…..
Dysto
As far as I am concerned everyone is entitled to follow their own perfectly natural instincts regarding love and hate. The Left seem to think that it’s possible to ban hate when all we can do in reality is to try to protect ourselves from the implications of hate which of course Lefties forbid us to do because then we are racists. They need to go through the process of growing up which in a lot of them seems to be delayed. As a youngster I went though the same agonies but after half a century I realised nothing has changed except their methods of brainwashing. Brainwashing vs Human Nature. Where would you put your money?
Can’t wait for bbc fake news gurus such as Nick Robbo, Rob Burley, Huw, James O’Brien, etc think of this from one who may be their next boss. Apparently*
https://order-order.com/2017/12/12/bbc-hypes-gloomy-brexit-report-by-eu-funded-think-tank/
*Good chance. BBC top name. Correct hue. Thick. Bent as a 9€ note… just needs the snip and a frock.
Guest,
I too noticed this, especially on Guido’s site (but posted it on the old weekend thread).
It was a good read and interesting to see where this American lot got their funding from – who knew???
It was disgraceful the way Kamel whatshisname reported and moulded it to their own ends!
Abosolute bias by omission and many other things!! They are the pits!
So now I have to put this in the current thread too
Thanks for that Lucy, it acted as a reminder to send my cousin the US best wishes. I knew it was coming soon but for got to check the date.
I seem to have been inundated today with political figures telling me just why President Trump shouldn’t be allowed into Blighty. On the Toady prog’ this morning I heard a sneering John Humphrys interviewing an ex British ambassador to the US and some pain in the arse Labour politician. There was pretty much a consensus view that Trump was an absolute blighter of the first order but some slight discord about allowing him here. Of course it was the lefty who wanted him banned. The ambassador, while agreeing that Trump was a brute, a racist and a supremacist, etc, thought (somewhat reluctantly) that he should be allowed. Big of him!
The BBC are scurrying around creating the impression that the majority in this country have a profound dislike of the president. I think this couldn’t be further from the truth. Most ordinary people understand his concern about Islam and only wish that we had leaders with similar opinions and backbone…unlike our pathetic, appeasing PM.
Most of us aren’t like Owen Jones, Sadiq Khan and Jeremy Corbyn. Most of us are reasonable. We don’t threaten disruption and mayhem when we don’t get our own way. We’re adults.
Later we had the patron saint of sanctimoniousness on, Vince Cable, to shove his aged oar into the debate. “Ban him” he said, to no-one’s surprise. Not very liberal, Vince!
I find this virtue signalling intolerance and narrow mindedness absolutely extraordinary. This lot would clamber over each other to show how much they “loathe Trump” for his “bigotry”, but constantly squeal about allowing (reformed??) ISIS terrorists “back home.”
Hundreds of mad Muzzies who’ve spent years murdering people coming back to Britain and into a neighbourhood near you.
What could possibly go wrong?
Two terror attacks in NYC this year(how lucky the pipe bomb failed) certainly makes Donald Trump look correct about his Muslim ban.
Wild – Every time The Don posts a tweet that sends the ‘liberal’ media into a frenzy of mockery, he’s proved right by events shortly after. Sweden; UK; Travel restrictions on muslims…
Meanwhile Trump is feted in other countries that welcome him with open arms.
Why is UK the only country to be so sniffy, at the cost of trade deals and other benefits accruing from a state visit?
I suggest a few reasons, there are others: 1) we have the beeb and their ilk poisoning the minds of the masses; 2) we have a strong Remoaner lobby who don’t want lucrative trade deals with the US to succeed so Brexit fails. 3) we have a liberal / left domination over attitudes and policies. 4) we are in the grip of a strange kind of snobbery: dahling, he’s so vulgaire, not one of us at all, have you seen his hair, and he eats McDonalds and KFCs. (Of course if he were a leftie, the latter would be trumpeted as evidence that he’s a ‘man of the people’.) etc.
Missed one
5) education run by trots and lefties,people not allowed to think or question things.
Yes Peter, the list goes on and on…
It is really a very serious matter this insane behaviour towards an American President. It is going to backfire badly on us. The one thing the flyover people cannot accept is an open act of disrespect towards a President of the USA.
I am sure President Trump is well briefed on our attitudes or at least the attitudes of our so called elites and opinion formers. He is an astute tactician and will use their hostility to his and his country’s maximum advantage when the time is right. Contrast the French who as always understand realpolitik .Also the old east of Europe.
Nato is completely dependent on the USA . Reality here and it is about time our stupid elite understood this. The President will not come if the current hostility continues. Now the new US embassy is opening soon and should be opened by a President . If President Trump declines to do so because of the idiocy of the progressives and the threat of real disorder then he will make maximum capital out of it and you can be sure that attitudes to us in say Iowa, Nebraska, Georgia and the rest will alter possibly bring us to the lowest point in US- GB relations for 200 years .
Mrs May has already proved to be weak on our vital interests vis a vis the USA. The rest Corbyn , Cable etc are viscerally anti American and positively dangerous ,
We are in for a shock . A common language can be a disadvantage and our continual insults and slights will be readily understood even in the smallest town in the Mid West. The President is secure with his base and knows it.
As Brexit looks increasingly ominous it is not in our interest to lose the good will of the USA and in particular it’s people .
The dislike of the President is now beyond reason or salvation. The elite is invested in it to a degree that is not rational. The USA is a democracy and a free country and the world needs it to be respected and treated fairly. I doubt the Chinese or the Russian or the Indians would dream of behaving as we apparently will if the visit goes ahead. It is more a measure of how far we have sunk into mediocrity than anything else. We need to be taught a harsh lesson and I hope the President does so
Maybe we need a mass email and twitter response to Donald to let him know a lot of Brits are on his side?
Dave S
Good post.
Britain is in a tough place at the moment. In the EU, but outside the EU for all purposes. Paying more to the EU but no voice within. Internationally, it is no man’s land. To other nations, it indicates a leadership that is incompetent.
At this juncture, to offend a hyper-power, is stupid beyond measure. Even Russia and China, no friends of America, pay great heed to the USA, and take care not to offend it. America is too big and too powerful, to play silly buggers with. But here we go with T May , the BBC and the rest of the idiot lefty media, tweaking America’s tail, when all Pres Trump is pointing out that we have a serious problem in Britain. SERIOUS. If nothing is done in the next few years, Britain will be an Islamic country in 30 to 40 years.
Finish. END. Goodbye Western civilisation.
As Pres Trump has stated , America will not defend a country that does want to defend itself.
Oh, the irony! If Brexit continues to ‘progress’ as it has been, the Leavers will soon be demanding a 2nd Referendum and the Remainers will be campaigning against it. Strange times, but hardly a surprise – maybe, just maybe, Theresa May is some kind of tactical genius who is running rings around us all ?
hillbear, your last line did make me laugh!
“maybe, just maybe, Theresa May is some kind of tactical genius who is running rings around us all ?”
It really is amazing
The Elite managed to run a referendum on the EU
whilst
spending our money to threaten us with their leaflet
choosing the positive question
holding the status quo ( and lying that there position would be one)
choosing the official opposition and side lining the main protagonists
threatened us
with financial meltdown
ww3
massive job losses
public services breaking down
using every instrument of the state to pimp on their behalf with lies and outrageous fabrications
lining up every living prime minister , president of the USA and pretty much every head of state bar putin to tell us staying in would be best for everyone
insult everyone who wanted to leave as a thick racist bigot
and have the mouthpiece BBC run coverage and hit pieces for them
and still only get 48% of the vote in a contest so one sided it made the USSR’s elections look honest
and they still cant figure out what actual public opinion is, or that the great british public is a damned sight smarter than they would really like it to be.
Kaiser
Despite HM Government official booklet “Why the Government believes that voting to remain in the European Union is the best decision for the UK.”
We voted OUT on 23 June 2016.
If Mrs May stuck to the choice that won the day, and David Davis stuck to the motto of his old regiment ‘Who Dares Wins’.
The Tory party would have a huge majority in the next election.
The BBC ‘reality’ check mentions stop and search without touching upon the real elephant in the room. Black people are more likely to be stopped and searched, but they are also more likely to be stabbed to death – how many this year? Of course that somewhat urgent reality is ignored because that might be ‘offensive.’ Would you rather be wrongly stopped and searched if it meant you had less chance of being murdered? A trillion wrong searches would be worth it if they saved a single life; of course over the years hundreds would be saved.
‘Reality check’ which totally ignores reality. Vintage BBC.
it only a shame its not lots of islamist stabbing each other on a regular basis.
Perhaps they can explain why “innocent” people dont move away from this level of violence, surely you would do you utmost??
Me I paid a large extra premium for a much smaller house somewhere much nicer
List of Killings in the Name of Islam: Last 30 Days
Killed k/Injured i Country(Date)
1 k/0 i Somalia(2017.12.11)
0 k/3 i USA(2017.12.11)
2 k/0 i Cameroon(2017.12.11)
4 k/12 i Nigeria(2017.12.11)
6 k/0 i Mali(2017.12.11)
2 k/1 i India(2017.12.11)
1 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.11)
10 k/0 i Nigeria(2017.12.10)
2 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.12.09)
1 k/0 i Pakistan(2017.12.09)
2 k/0 i Nigeria(2017.12.09)
3 k/2 i Afghanistan(2017.12.09)
1 k/13 i Iraq(2017.12.09)
2 k/7 i Iraq(2017.12.09)
1 k/8 i Afghanistan(2017.12.08)
7 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.08)
4 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.08)
3 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.12.08)
14 k/53 i DRC(2017.12.07)
5 k/8 i Iraq(2017.12.06)
1 k/0 i Pakistan(2017.12.06)
1 k/0 i Myanmar(2017.12.05)
8 k/16 i Syria(2017.12.05)
6 k/8 i Pakistan(2017.12.05)
5 k/4 i Iraq(2017.12.05)
6 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.05)
1 k/0 i Yemen(2017.12.05)
15 k/0 i Nigeria(2017.12.05)
1 k/0 i Yemen(2017.12.04)
1 k/2 i India(2017.12.04)
2 k/7 i Syria(2017.12.04)
70 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.04)
3 k/1 i Iraq(2017.12.03)
3 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.03)
6 k/13 i Afghanistan(2017.12.03)
3 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.03)
2 k/7 i Philippines(2017.12.03)
1 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.12.02)
1 k/0 i Yemen(2017.12.02)
2 k/10 i Afghanistan(2017.12.02)
15 k/53 i Nigeria(2017.12.02)
80 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.02)
60 k/0 i Iraq(2017.12.02)
25 k/33 i Iraq(2017.12.01)
2 k/0 i Somalia(2017.12.01)
1 k/7 i Iraq(2017.12.01)
9 k/37 i Pakistan(2017.12.01)
10 k/0 i Syria(2017.12.01)
1 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.12.01)
1 k/2 i Pakistan(2017.12.01)
2 k/2 i Nigeria(2017.11.30)
1 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.30)
2 k/0 i India(2017.11.30)
3 k/9 i Pakistan(2017.11.30)
1 k/0 i Israel(2017.11.30)
4 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.11.30)
5 k/1 i Pakistan(2017.11.30)
40 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.29)
14 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.29)
5 k/0 i Nigeria(2017.11.29)
5 k/12 i Yemen(2017.11.29)
2 k/4 i Pakistan(2017.11.29)
340 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.29)
1 k/0 i Syria(2017.11.29)
2 k/3 i Kenya(2017.11.28)
2 k/6 i Iraq(2017.11.28)
8 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.11.28)
12 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.11.27)
11 k/31 i Iraq(2017.11.27)
1 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.11.27)
1 k/2 i Iraq(2017.11.27)
3 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.27)
3 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.26)
98 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.26)
1 k/0 i Pakistan(2017.11.26)
4 k/6 i Nigeria(2017.11.25)
6 k/17 i Pakistan(2017.11.25)
1 k/0 i India(2017.11.25)
3 k/3 i Somalia(2017.11.24)
4 k/21 i Mali(2017.11.24)
311 k/128 i Egypt(2017.11.24)
1 k/9 i Pakistan(2017.11.24)
3 k/6 i Pakistan(2017.11.24)
8 k/4 i Syria(2017.11.24)
2 k/4 i Iraq(2017.11.24)
1 k/ i Mali(2017.11.24)
8 k/15 i Afghanistan(2017.11.23)
2 k/10 i Syria(2017.11.23)
7 k/0 i Nigeria(2017.11.23)
1 k/3 i Iraq(2017.11.23)
73 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.22)
1 k/2 i India(2017.11.22)
1 k/0 i Georgia(2017.11.22)
1 k/1 i Thailand(2017.11.21)
3 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.21)
1 k/2 i Iraq(2017.11.21)
58 k/29 i Nigeria(2017.11.21)
32 k/80 i Iraq(2017.11.21)
8 k/0 i Syria(2017.11.20)
6 k/44 i Syria(2017.11.20)
3 k/3 i Cameroon(2017.11.20)
6 k/0 i Nigeria(2017.11.19)
1 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.11.18)
2 k/4 i Nigeria(2017.11.18)
1 k/15 i Syria(2017.11.18)
2 k/4 i Iraq(2017.11.18)
6 k/8 i Afghanistan(2017.11.18)
1 k/1 i India(2017.11.17)
26 k/30 i Syria(2017.11.17)
2 k/1 i Iraq(2017.11.17)
0 k/3 i Kenya(2017.11.17)
20 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.16)
14 k/18 i Afghanistan(2017.11.16)
6 k/45 i Syria(2017.11.16)
2 k/7 i Iraq(2017.11.15)
45 k/0 i Nigeria(2017.11.15)
3 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.15)
14 k/29 i Nigeria(2017.11.15)
2 k/16 i Syria(2017.11.15)
3 k/0 i Iraq(2017.11.15)
1 k/5 i Syria(2017.11.14)
6 k/17 i Yemen(2017.11.14)
23 k/16 i Afghanistan(2017.11.14)
1 k/0 i Afghanistan(2017.11.14)
2 k/0 i Nigeria(2017.11.13)
18 k/1 i Afghanistan(2017.11.13)
2 k/4 i Afghanistan(2017.11.13)
4 k/20 i CAR(2017.11.12)
5 k/7 i Iraq(2017.11.12)
Mark
Any chance of publishing a similar list of killings in the name of Christianity over the same 30 days. Then put the two side by side. It should be quite an interesting little exercise and kind of put things into perspective.
The information you seek is easy to supply:
Number of people killed worldwide in the name of Christianity in the last 30 days : 0
Number of people killed worldwide in the name of Christianity in the last year: 0
Number of people killed worldwide in the name of Christianity in the last 100 years: 0
The point being that that would be completely antithetical to Christian teaching, whereas in islamic teaching, killing in the name of islam is endorsed. It really is as simple as that. We are fortunate that most muslims do not follow their religion closely.
These figures will generally be an underestimation related only to notable incidents that make headline news.
Anyone else notice the Labour/Liberal bias by this BBC news introduction:
Where on earth is the BLUE?
Inflation up – as expected – because of brexit – effect on markets ( not a lot) . Al beeb interviews people in the street “ ooh isnt it terrible – price of sprouts – economic beeboid talking to us like we a special needs 5 year old . Turned off then . Where is there quality tv news .
Fedup2
Sort of round the clock Cbeebies for dunces innit?
Yep libnews media banging on about inflation today.
– A few months ago libnews was campaigning for a rise in the “Living Wage”,
did they think that was not going to feed thru into inflation ?
They do a vox pop ..you know where you record 100 voices and play back the 5 that suit your narrative.
eg. “Yeh everythings recently gone up
, why they put up everything at the same time ?
Xmas you dimwit
… everything goes up Xmas, it did last year, and it will next year….that’ commerce
Looks again as if the bBC are being economic with information AGAIN. https://order-order.com/2017/12/12/bbc-hypes-gloomy-brexit-report-by-eu-funded-think-tank/#disqus_thread the report by the RAND corp does NOT have a scenario of the UK with FTAs. Also the report is paid for by the EU, something the bBC deliberately failed to mention.
@FB look up the thread 10 posts above @GuestWho already mentioned it.
Noticed that Eddie Mairs Newsbeat earlier seemed awful sniffy about the influence of Facebook.
Maybe taking away from the BBCs monocultural diet of Islam, diversity in all shades between Eurovisual Fascism and Eurovision Communism. If only some nice Labour combo, with maybe an Amber Rudd to sit on a cabinet of national Salvation could shut SMS down and direct all new messaging to the BBC fact checkers at your local school eh? Imagine…..
liberals are more upset when a tree is cut down than a baby being killed
Seemingly saying a principle is more important than one person
… hence to them Weinstein is super important, cos the principle is sexual abuse at work.
.. Yet when it comes to rape gangs ..they dismiss the individual cases , cos they refuse to recognise that there is a principle.
..That inside a particular culture people will think they can treat women like dirt, and others in their community will rally round and protect them instead of stopping them and cooperating with the law.
… The can’t question “the big man ” cultural behaviour.
I’m surprised they haven’t introduced a BBC version of Facebook
On Beebbook all discussion would be allowed as long as it supported libmob worldview.
Note the BBC used to have discussion forums, but had to shut them down,
cos most of the opinions posted were against the libmob worldview.
Can somebody tell me why, in particular from the Left, media political commentators are allowed to say what they want, and I quote from Kevin Maguire, Daily Mirror.
‘Objectively Donald Trump is a liar, he’a lying racist, sexual racist predator and now a pervert.’ Sky Press Preview.
I am no lawyer, but even I know that this is defamation against the person. Why isn’t Maguire being sued, why isn’t Sky being sued?
Anybody know because I for one cannot understand it.
Free speech is only allowed if it comes from the Left.
wronged
Perhaps the answer to that one is that the Left are largely a bunch of hysterical zombies and the Right are largely a bunch of stoics. Unfortunately for us, irrespective of which government we vote into power, the zombies control most of the mass media. That gives them a big advantage and allows them to push their agenda unhindered.
If you want to hear a man speak: watch this.
I just wish that we had someone of this calibre with the same kind or influence over here.
3:30 minutes in Bannon says
Ethnonatinalism has got nothing to do with it folks ..(points at media)
cos the #1 beneficiary of controlling immigration is black and Hispanic workers
4:50m..Limit legal immigration so that kids coming up thru the STEM programs
to get the high technology jobs
..that how the black and Hispanic get these great middle class jobs
..they can’t compete the entire world unfairly in their own country ..it’s NOT right
5:30 lowest black unemployment in 17 years, lowest Hispanic unemployment in 17years
I think someone said that Bannon, was the type of guy who brings a flamethrower to a knife fight.
Bannon scares the progressives and you can see why. He is all about securing the President’s base and having his back and if it means taking on the MSM and the rest even the Republicans then so be it. He knows just what to say to the deplorables and note that he uses that slur as a rallying cry.
He also understands that to appeal to the old virtues of nation and loyalty to the struggles and sacrifices of past generations is a powerful rallying cry.
Our useless media and even more useless politicians have not got a clue as to what is about to come . Let them rant all they want at the President of the USA . Nobody is going to care soon and nobody is going to even listen . Newsnight and the Guardian can froth all they want. In the USA who gives a damn .
Me I would recall my ambassador if I was the President and put May in her place along with the rest.
Even more remarkable, I think, is his speech in the last few days to the African American entrepreneurs conference https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXrfO89R78s His breadth of vision is remarkable (as also that the speech was made with hardly a reference to notes). Incidentally, You Tube cuts the video at about 33 mins, and the applause sounds strangely muted – a big contrast to the live Facebook recording!
Apropos nothing in particular, but why do TV chefs shake pans rather than use a spoon? Week after week I watch as half the contents of their pans stay stubbornly in the same place all for want of a good stir!
James Martin, (historically?), excelled himself on Saturday by dumping sugar into a pan to make lemon curd and then did the same trick with some fruit. How come it didn’t ‘catch’ on the bottom and burn? I guess it’s similar to Jamie Oliver throwing pinches of salt into a pan from a height of four foot, theatre not technique. Goodness what method Nigella uses as she flirts with the camera most of the time. Keith Floyd had enough sense to tell his cameraman where to point.
Ah, Keith Floyd! They would never broadcast him now. “While that’s cooking I’ll just have a quick slurp.”
Repost : London McGroom/Rape gang
‘grooming gang’ exposed as police warn abuse happening across Britain
Exclusive: Four teenage girls have so far reported being raped among 30 potential victims
Via Lucy P
\\Ms Hillier said although older men are involved, the boys used as a “hook” are of a similar age to the teenage victims.//
“There are no known common racial or religious characteristics with the Newham case and officials have warned that focusing on one kind of perpetrator will cause abuse to be missed.”
Then for some strange reason the Independent article illustrates the story with a picture of 12 Muslims from one of the Newcastle cases.
And then dozens of nutters have used that Newcastle photo to tweet about the London story.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/london-grooming-gang-new-exposed-found-police-warning-children-abuse-girls-uk-newham-stratford-a8099346.html
Great to hear on Look North this evening, “The Great Muslim Pantomine” is on in Bradford soon.
I do hope the tickets won’t all be snapped up before I try and get mine, I should so hate to miss it.
Oh no you wouldn’t ……..!
By the way, what is it? Mohammed and the Beanstalk, or Little Red Riding Hijab?
Aladdin, surely? Think of the savings on costumes.
With forty thieves? Surely not!
It was on ITV calendar as well, long feature.
This will be the same thing North West (blessed be the prophet) was giving free advertising to last week. https://www.facebook.com/BBCCulture/videos/1555071821243692/ Watch out! He’s behind you!
“There are no known common racial or religious characteristics…
“It’s important to understand there is a real diversity between victims, perpetrators and how grooming happens,”…
As a minor footnote to the grooming and rape gangs epidemic, here’s the insane James O’Brien: ” I don’t really care what colour a child abuser is – I know it’s a very unfashionable position to take – any more than I care what colour a victim of child abuse is. ”
So out of touch are these leftie liberal beeboids that he actually thinks he’s making a brave, ‘unfashionable’ statement. Oh no James, you’re statement is extremely fashionable indeed. A brave unfashionable statement would be: ‘I do care about the colour and the religion of the abusers, and until society cares too, the abuse will continue on an industrial scale.’
http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/james-obrien/james-obrien-on-newcastle-grooming-gang/
vlad
Has Al Beeb covered it yet ?
The reason he doesn’t “care” about what “colour” a child abuser nor the abused child is, is because to do so completely runs against everything political correctness dictates the multicultural society to be.
To care (i.e. notice) is the equivalent to creatures like O’Brien of blasphemy in the Middle Ages: utterly beyond the pale.
“Political correctness is a war on noticing.” Steve Sailer.
James O’Brien and his ilk are our enemies in this war.
“There are none so blind as those who will not see?”
O Brien is a coward at heart. They all are and are terrified that we will realise this and laugh .
Vlad
You have summed it up in a few pictures – the BBC won’t show these – However they will make a big deal about one white perverted medic and have no issue showing his face.
It is a lie of omission – a practice that The BBC use to its full extent
“It is a lie of omission – a practice that The BBC use to its full extent”
Some would say that the BBC scum is simply preparing for the time when England will be subject to the Qur’an therefore a change of passport photo will be necessary!
We get a sneak preview of what some of those new English citizens look like in the above photos!
Stop what you are doing Lincolnshire Police need your help
Today they release info :
When did it happen ..like 5 minutes ago ?
#1 Why would you wait 3weeks ?
#2 The world is full of strange people ..occasionally mad people should at you, once someone threw a deas bird at me from a moving car.
3 weeks ago I stopped my bike cos someone threw a sandwich roll at me from a car on a dual high speed carriageway
… so far I never thought to call the cops ….
http://www.lincolnshirelive.co.uk/news/lincoln-news/shameful-stupid-hate-crime-person-908652
Stew – Was it a bacon sandwich? In which case they could be banged up for life.
Vlad,
It’s only 15 years prison for bacon crimes.
At least, that’s what the bloke in the USA got for putting some streaky near a mosk.
“Police”? There are no police in the Former UK, not any more…
Goaty,
There are police. It’s just that they have been re-assigned to harassing resistors of Islam.
You mean the anti insurrection force ?
The force that allow certain groups — like travellers and Antifa — to run amok but arrest middle class people who withhold the council tax or police precept out of protest .
“Donald Tusk calls Brexit talks a furious race against time”
“The UK and the EU face a “furious race against time” to finalise Brexit talks before March 2019, the head of the European Council says.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42322187
What happens if we do run out of time ?
Bonkers Barnier already announced today that a trade deal was impossible before March 19.
There is a simple reason for that, it doesn’t exist except in the feeble mind of the beeboid.
What does he care? He’s got his pension coming, done his bit for the European projet, and won’t suffer like the little people from any economic mismangement.
Taffy – I think with Sharia and her Remain chums currentl leading us it has become a “furious race against common sense”A race which she seems to be winning.
As for “running out of time” – These bastards always seem to have plenty of time when it comes to ignoring democracy – in fact I would say too much.
Will it be a white Christmas?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/features/42171476
Are they being a tad bit racist ?
My taxi driver was a shy, chubby lad from Afghanistan. He had been driven out of his country by the Taliban, forced to come to the UK some years ago. Who does he blame for the Taliban returning in Afghanistan? The yanks of course(!)
I asked him why, when the US had spent so much, in time, money and lives getting rid of the Taliban. He replied with total confidence, because the Americans are arming the Taliban. He didn’t know why, but was 100% sure of it.
What chance do we in the West stand, when Muslims blame the West for the problem Islam is creating and we are the ones who are having to deal with it?
scribblingscribe
“The dog that bites the hand that feeds it”
We shouldn’t have fed it. We shouldn’t later have kicked it. We shouldn’t now let it follow us home.
scribe,
What I would like to see is everybody with a twitter account posting that clip onto each and every bBC tweet about how racist the British are. Let’s play the bBc at its own game, with a world wide audience the message will be sent that even after 10 years of living in the West Muslims given shelter in the West paid for by the tax payers are stull fucking intolerant bastards.
Interesting that he, clearly a Muslim, accuses the old white man of paedophilia. Remind me, who’s prophet consummated his ‘marriage’ to a six year old when she was 9?
Dystopian – the ‘thighing’ fun started before 9, actually when she was 6 years old.
“According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was six years old until she reached nine years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith, which was quoted earlier, mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of nine (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89). Therefore, Muslim scholars collectively agree, by virtue of divine example, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.
According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size and age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her. Imagine a man of fifty-one removing the clothes of a six-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs? Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of nine. Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, the question forwarded to the committee by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar). The inquirer asked the following:‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers – may Allah be pleased with her?’After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age. That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers’” (Fatwa No. 31409).Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. These countries are notoriously known for this evil practice. There are many more such evil practices like altamatu’a bil almufakhaza (pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs), altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir). These are all different styles practiced on the female child by placing the male erected penis in different parts of the child’s body for getting sexual pleasure…
A QUOTATION FROM MY NEW BOOK THE CHILD BRIDE AND THE OLD MAN OF ARABIA, ”
http://www.publishamerica.net/product47237.html
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Aisha
http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/prepubescent.htm
Still say that horrible “Nye” woman will convert to Islam soon!
Our breakfast TV news today was reluctant to admit the New York subway pipe bomb suspect (a Bangladeshi, pictured with a somewhat charred stomach) just might have been a terrorist. ‘His wife claims he’s innocent!’ a newsreader reassured us.
Well, I believe her. I mean, who hasn’t exploded after a good curry? You enjoy a chicken vindaloo with pilau rice and an onion bhaji. You leave the restaurant and – boom! Fragments of smoked intestines and blackened poppadums are scattered all over the car park of the Star of Bengal. It happens all the time.
Thank goodness we have responsible-minded media who make sure we proles don’t panic needlessly.
After every single act of murder or terror, they will wheel out a parent / friend / neighbour / imam, to say the perpetrator was a good person / innocent / wouldn’t hurt a fly…
Why do they even bother?
Missed opportunities on Toady this morning.
Humphries was interviewing an as usual incoherent Angela Rayner, Labour Education spokesperson.
Has he been told to go gently? Her diatribe had more logic holes than my dad’s old string vest but she was allowed to get away with everything.
Such as the slogans ‘cradle to grave education free at the point of delivery’, ‘a National Education Service’ (like the NHS god forbid). It os stated that social mobility problems startbfrom the age of 2, so is a problem to be fixed.
One simple question. What about the parents? Do they have a role at all? Any responsibilities?
Or are we heading for a Brave New World where Mcdonnell et al take children from parents by the state, put them in baby factories and presumably then educate them to be told what socialism to think?
Only 2/10 for Humphries. A chilling view of the future and he let her off scot free.
I take it she was doing her “ grandmother at 22 routine “ dumb tart.
Sluff, I thought the The Humph gave Angela Rayner quite a hard time, especially on the widening social-mobility gap under Labour from 1997-2010.
However, he did not ask the three killer questions:
1. Is it that all you are saying is that you want the Government merely to throw more taxpayer money at the Dept for Education without any clear specific aims or objectives,
2. If the extra money does not achieve results will you change direction and cut the budget (Rayner was suggesting giving brand new teachers extra money to teach in sink schools – great way imv to achieve massive loss of newly qualified teachers while not helping kids) and,
3. Will you reintroduce Technical, Secondary Modern & Grammar Schools because that was a proven way of achieving the best social mobility we have ever seen in the UK?
That in my opinion is without doubt the responsible fact (What about the parents?) for many of the problems with Education-we expect far too much from the School-Parenting should not expect the school to take the part of the parent. The parent has equally if not more responsibility for their childs education as much as the school. My wife and I did not expect our childrens school to teach our children how to behave in front of adults, to treat their teachers other than with respect was as they say a ‘given’, how to behave at the dining table, how to dress corectly and how to do many other things when mixing in society. Of we like they didn’t have dubious pleasures of Smart Phones and the controlling evil of Facebook. Can’t believe in senior school some students are allowed their mobile phones in the classroom-mand. Yes Sluff it scares one now with grandchildren as to what their future will offer, nothing like ours that is for certain. The evil of the world has got a grip on what good there was and is strangling it.
Biased BBC carefully ignoring the fact that both poles are experiencing record cold and record ice this year. Every couple of years the Antartcic stations have to be relocated because of the danger of being crushed by tons of ice, but they never mention global warming when they remember to report that!!
It’s not that long since they were telling us that snow in the UK was history too and the only way children would experience it was by reading about it in books !
VX asks what happened to Alan to start a new open thread (Alan appears a day later). But that got me thinking – what has happened to David Vance, he used to start the new open threads – but the last thread he opened was over a month ago November 6, 2017. Maybe he is taking a well earned rest, or maybe he is passing the baton on to Alan (and VX) to keep this site going?
He seems to do a live discussion over Periscope/Twitter a couple of nights a week.
R4 This morning – woman (think from Ofsted) discussing report on schools..obviously nervous about saying the wrong things but apparently there are issues with faith schools…and illegal school – Jewish, Christian, Muslim….some of the worrying things they have found are children being taught that women must submit to their husband for sex, misogyny and violence towards women…Funny I am pretty sure these are some of the findings mainly in Islamic schools…No discussion on relative findings between the different faith schools and how according to Ofsted they are “spreading beliefs that clash with British values”.
Somewhere I see a huge elephant in the classroom….
No you’ve got it all wrong ..inspectors should not look at that, they should be looking over there at BME rights and racism
People like Ms Haque are the biggest problems in this world. They assume all BAME people need their help and are not capable of dealing with issues themselves. Everyone regardless of race creed and colour should be treated fairly..and in the UK it is now white working class kids(boys mainly) that trail behind not BAME.
Will she push for them? I doubt it very much…She would qualify as Quentin Letts calls them in his quite funny and realistic book – a patronising Bast..d
One of he kin has done an article about why Oftsed should keep their noses out of the child-hijab issue
It’s got open comments.
https://schoolsweek.co.uk/hijabs-are-none-of-ofsteds-business/
The Ofted report is now out see Telegraph
2014 …. “In biology, evolution is not what we (Islamic Teachings) believe”@0:58 {bbc.co.uk – 09Jun2014 – From the section Education }
Michael Gove on extremism in schools: ‘We have to act’
“It is important that no-one allows concern about these finding to become a pretext for criticism of Islam itself,” he added.
– this was in 2014 – have things changed or been forgotten?
“It is important that no-one allows concern about these finding to become a pretext for criticism of Islam itself,”
Why not?
Because we have a word that will stop you questioning things …
0. Islam asks you to have zero thought about it’s origins and practices. And make zero comparisons with successful cultures.
But head teachers see fit to call a young mother in to warn her that she was taking her daughter to a country that practiced FGM when she asked for permission to take her daughter to …… ISRAEL !
http://netanyalynette.blogspot.co.il/2017/12/fgm-and-israel.html
Remarkable that after such a short time he was considered for James Harding’s role. But then James was a broadcast newb too, and did such a great job. What with the fake news initiative and all.
Speaking of which, another BBC high profile star, Kamal, was also in the frame. Shame about that awkward Guido story.
Quite the collection thou have there, Lord Hall.
Pure Multiculturalism.
Ethnicity over ability.
He popped up on Celebrity Bargain Hunt or whatever it’s called the other night.
Celebrity? The bBbc term for anyone employed by them.
The other ‘celebrity’ was Grace Dent. Unsurprisingly she too is an ex-Independent journalist, the bBbc obviously keen to transfer its appeal and success onscreen, spotting public opinion and trends with their usual agility, their finger-on-the-pulse observational skills as they meet the demands of their viewers as perceived by them.
What is their budget spent on when most of their programmes are as cheap and worthless, who could they sell this to, as slurry like this?
Grace Dent is the gurning lefty with the regional accent.
Anti Trump/Brexit/Britain
Nothing this shitehouse has ever said is remotely amusing.
A natural for the BBC.
BBC presenter uses the BBC to promote the BBC and himself with BBC money when he should be reporting about the world and not themselves and the BBC.
This is query for you movie buffs out there. I haven’t been paying attention much to the new wave of films from the stars war franchise except to note that the BBC always seems to headline the movies with pictures of a young black man as a star trooper or a young white female as a star trooper. Is this another example of diversity and white man ethnocide?
Pure coincidence.
#MoreEqualThan
Well, that just about explains everything that is wrong with Channel 4: it is run by and for the ‘enlightened’ elite who have usurped power in this country.
Look at the advice Mr Lee Jasper gives her. Fuck me!
Then take a look at his wiki, it’s a different world, separate and definitely not equal. He’s a beauty.
Broad
I have never seen star wars not heard the smug radio stuff of the same name ( heard reports though)
Star Wars, the original trilogy, are great films as they are basically westerns in space, good triumphing over evil, white hat/ black hat, simple. Plenty of action and an easy plot aimed at kids and dads. Which is why they couldn’t leave it alone.
A lack of creativity, financial greed and self-conscious political posturing has ruined this ‘franchise’ for those of us who saw the originals on release or through pirated VHS and is part of an ongoing campaign which the bBbc so selflessly helps by using our money to promote it. The sycophantic bBbc actively promote and support what are, despite the obvious virtue signalling, nothing more than money making ventures by Weinsteins-in-waiting.
Indiana Jones, Ghostbusters, they even ballsed up the Bourne movies with no 4, have all been ‘rebooted’. The Italian Job, Get Carter, Ben Hur, have been fubar’d and the list just keeps growing, even including proper westerns like True Grit and 3:10 to Yuma. All because unneeded agendas and intrusive politicking have to be inserted, increasingly clumsily and unable to mask the opportunism of the studios as they exploit the achingly liberal youth and chattering classes.
I honestly can’t remember the last time I went to the cinema or really even noticed the release of a supposed blockbuster despite the hype and my obvious need to be culturally and ethically rebooted myself. I wonder if Steven Seagal is on Movies for Men tonight?
Rich – have to say you are mostly right, most Hollywood output nowadays is for children. But the True Grit remake was a very decent film (I’m a fan of westerns obviously). Excellently shot, good performances and a good script, and attention to detail historically. It’s true that top drawer American actors are in the main insufferable rich lefty luvvies (like Matt Damon). – but they take the job seriously. And there is nuance, which is generally absent from British dramas, especially any outputs by the BBC which by default equals marxist propaganda.
Here’s a scene with the great line : ‘Though you are very young and sick and unattractive to boot’.
Ok Imay,
I was looking for examples of remakes that weren’t as good as the original, or perhaps more unnecessarily complicated is more like it, and this popped into my head as the snakebite and loss of arm and bitterness at the end all seemed as bit superfluous and contrived. I agree it’s not actually bad although Matt Damon, great in the Bourne movies, doesn’t really convince me and I think the forced realism makes it a bit dull in parts, but I see your point, fair enough.
I don’t think it’s the politics of the actors that annoy me when they’re acting, it’s more that when they are so obviously acting, or pompously attempting to demonstrate their art whilst hopelessly miscast to suit an agenda, so many of the simple pleasures derived from watching a film are sacrificed and become lost just to make a point. Innocent escapism just can’t be allowed.
As for westerns, Open Range with Duvall and Costner is a proper old school modern belter and far better than the Magnificent Seven remake, not even Denzel Washington could save that one for me – there were more boxes ticked than bullets fired.
Why youngsters vote for Corbyn…
That is such an un-Liberal image – uggghhh, I’m off to a Safe Space!
Vlad
It’s enough to make a muzzieman go stiff with rage.
Socialism will always turn into Communism which follows its course and that will put it all into the hands of Mr Putin!
The goal of socialism is communism.
Vladimir Lenin
How you know the BBC really hates Donald Trump:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/
(See caption, third item on right hand side of ‘Morning brief’ bar – be quick, it gets taken down around noon.)
Biased BBC protecting the EU once again –
Guido : Junker facing criminal investigation : https://order-order.com/2017/12/13/juncker-facing-criminal-probe-wiretapping-scandal/
BBC Europe website : Warmer Arctic is the “new normal” : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world/europe
beat me to it lojo
The BBC on its News Homepage demands more penises on television, in particular erect penises with condoms on them in readiness for penetrative sex. They have the headline in their Must See news section:
BBC News Headline: Why doesn’t anyone wear condoms on TV?
Click on the headline & the BBC asks: When was the last time you saw someone wear a condom on TV?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/health-42334158/hannah-witton-why-doesn-t-anyone-wear-condoms-on-tv
What a perverted bunch these BBC feckers are.
Cali
I’ve seen enough pricks on the television to last me a lifetime. Enough is enough and Brexit means Brexit. Good to see Mr Wanker has some shit flying his way at last.
“When was the last time you saw someone wear a condom on TV?”
They could always repeat this clip from Naked Gun.
Nigel on Treezer the Appeaser
Worth watching
Farage needs to stopping wasting wind and get back into the fight.
Main news last night Tuesday 13th was of the plight of people in the Congo-surely the main news should be about us here in the UK-sorry about the Congo but Government however must resist the call to send money out to this utterly decadent nation-private donations are up to those that want to, but not public tax money. A close family relation spent years in the Congo and other African countries endeavouring to help sort out the way the population could avert starvation-he worked tirelessly to encourage the governments to provide fresh water,set up irrigation plants that would enable the cultivation of such naturally agricultural rich countries-but those in charge would rather feather their own nests and allow their people to remain with the lowest of living standards and now consequently into starvation. These bastards are wicked and I have sadly seen first hand when in Ghana some thirty years ago. Completely corrupt and utterly untrustworthy in the main. They will keep taking and encourage their populace to immigrate to the West. Beware.
Tarien,
Encouraging them to go a west where tolerance and Christian decency is seen by them as a weakness to be exploited. It’s a selfish, uncaring and intolerant attitude already taking root, increasingly detrimental to the structure of our society, and its spread and nurture is being enabled in part by the stupidity and anti-Christian/ anti-British narrative of the bBbc.
Emma Barnett trying to cover herself against
“This morning we have heard a lot of Leave voices on Radio and now we start with another one Lord Lawson”
First she interviews Lawson then takes the peg off her nose, and interviews her friends MP about the abuse MPs get on Twitter.
A quick check shows many of her lefty listeners replying to that Lawson interview by referring to him with derogatory namecalling : “swivel eyes loon”, “denier”, “senile”
Here’s that interview after Lawson.
Notice the words she uses
There a are different types of bad-Tweet
Illegal – threatening violence etc.
Racist/Sexist –
Pure insulting
Harassment
Intimidation
…that last one is the one she focused on.
Now obviously the truth can be intimidating.
However its ironic that all the libmob tweets to Barnett re the Lawson interview were all designed to INTIMIDATE BBC from airing Lawson
Cos they typically said ‘That senile, swivel eyed loon is a Climate DENIER so shouldn’t be allowed on the BBC aireaves’
Asked if Tories get more abuse on Twitter, she declined to give stats, brushed it off with ..”it’s their demographic ”
Actually the Times gives numbers whic h amount to of those who replied its twice as many Tories who got “inapropriate behavior by opposition parties”.. ” stops short of naming Momentum ”
“The effect is that individuals are pressured to withdraw from debate”
…well that’s like the way they plea for Lawson to be banned from the airwaves.
Asked if Tories get more abuse on Twitter, she declined to give stats, brushed it off with ..”it’s their demographic ”
Actually the Times gives numbers whic h amount to of those who replied its twice as many Tories who got “inapropriate behavior by opposition parties”.. ” stops short of naming Momentum ”
“The effect is that individuals are pressured to withdraw from debate”
…well that’s like the way they plea for Lawson to be banned from the airwaves.
Austria news
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/12/12/veiled-muslims-leave-austria-niqab-ban/
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/12/12/austria-scrap-smoking-ban-bucking-western-trend/
Perverted BBC: Clitoris Street Art
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/item/08917f1e-e93c-4d3a-aa10-bbb29f0eaaf4
Tomasz frymorgen is the alleged author – is that one of those April fool jokes ? I feel sad that kids are being sexualised earlier and earlier. No wonder so many are apparently having mental issues as extreme as increased suicides and attempts .
Know them by what they choose to tweet
With the loss of Christianity the money making consumerist industry allied with the feminist movement are objectifying women down to their gonads and have persuaded the next generation of women to march for the rights of their gonads. If this is the future of western society maybe Islam might end up being the only opposition to such nonsense.
BOBOTC,
Have you seen what the Muslims actually worship? 5 times a day, facing the Kaaba in Mecca?
This is in the corner, they kiss it and touch it, bow to it and circumambulate it.
It’s basically a silver vagina-shaped casing for the black stone fragments which fell from the sky.
(Meteorite fragments) To the ancients. A goddess. (while they claim to be against idolatry)
http://www.crystalinks.com/blackstonemecca2.jpg
That’s what all the fuss is about. Vagina worship.
Religiously speaking it’s a prostitute goddess in the corner of the Kaaba, but she’s covered up so it’s ok.
Mohamed didn’t destroy her when he smashed all the other idols of the Kaaba. He fondled her. So his followers do the same. It’s ancient fertility worship.
And our government gives over public spaces to align with this worship. (facing Mecca)
Hi Lucy, Surely you can’t say Islam worships females and their genitalia? What you are referring to may have begun as a form of primitive female worship before Islam, but not afterwards under Sharia Law.
“Hi Lucy, Surely you can’t say Islam worships females and their genitalia? What you are referring to may have begun as a form of primitive female worship before Islam, but not afterwards under Sharia Law.”
The cult of islam is a curious hotch potch of half understood references to Judaism and Christianity, as well as the pre-islamic pagan religions of Arabia.
Thus, the symbol of islam is the crescent moon, which harks back to the moon goddesses worshipped in pre-islamic Mecca. These were the goddesses who were the subjects of the “Satanic verses”, which at first appeared to allow muslims to worship them as well as allah, until Mohammed (pbuh) reckoned he must have got his wires crossed, and it was actually Satan who told him that particular verse. Awkward.
Similarly, the muslim practise of worshipping a meteorite also predates islam, and is pagan in origin. Clearly, then, it should have no place in islam, but it seems that Mohammed (pbuh) liked to do it, so all other muslims have to do it too, for reasons I don’t suppose anyone can adequately explain.
It seems that when you base your religion on what voices claiming to be god tell a guy in a cave, weird things happen. Welcome to islam folks, we are going to see an awful lot more of it in years to come, courtesy of the left wing establishment. Thanks guys.
We see far too much of it already, there seems to be an item related to Islam on every views or current affairs programme the bBbc shits out and on some days it seeps into and stains the whole narrative without a true reflection of its wickedness and intolerance ever being presented.
I don’t care or need to hear about Islam as the bBbc sees it, never challenging its misogyny and intolerance, its bigotry and violent fanaticism, its hatred of arts and science and debate and progress.
The bBbc view of Islam is wrong, this religion offers nothing of any benefit at all to me or my country or my culture.
BOBOTC
Haven’t you noticed that Muslim men are obsessed with perverted sex even though they pretend not to be? They claim to hate gay sex too & they murder gay men but sex abuse of little boys is common in Islam. Look up Bacha bazi for an extreme example. They use boys then kill them later. Just as they punish women for the crime of being raped.
Making the ‘hajj’ to Mecca at least once in their lives is one of the ‘Five Pillars of Islam’ All Muslims are supposed to do it. The belief is that the stone was originally white in appearance and it has turned black from the sins of all the Muslims touching it over the years. It takes away sin. It is a god. [false]
The Islamic symbol isn’t the crescent moon alone but the star & crescent. That is the crescent moon in conjunction with Venus. (The morning star) The ancients didn’t know it was a planet. The Romans revered her too as Venus. Don’t we use the Roman name for the planet now? she was a goddess of victory, fertility, and even prostitution. Aphrodite to the Greeks. Temple prostitution was a VERY common practice in the ancient world. It’s not so much a matter of worshipping the human female form as it is about appeasing the goddess so you can get all the perverted sex you want.
It was perfect for Mohammed and his religion of plunder.
Hi Lucy, I am interested in the origins of Islam, but I think you need to be careful not to present arguments that can be used by feminists in support of Islam. Feminists can say look Islam worships the vagina – this is the religion for me. That is all fine in the west, but as soon as there is a Muslim majority Sharia Law has to be introduced. Islam already receives a lot of feminist support in the west, I am concerned you are giving them additional reasons to support Islam.
BOBTC,
Point taken. Though I wasn’t planning on going into the lioness’s den with this information.
Judging by their standards a lot of them might just be stupid enough to take on the worship of a prostitute goddess and call it liberation.
The true test of our arguments is not in here – but out there. This is just a very small blog with somewhat like minded individuals. At some point arguments have to be taken out of here if we wish to persuade others over to our point of view or to persuade others over what are the facts of the matter. Unfortunately many have been socialised into believing what they believe through the school and university systems and through main stream media bombardment. If you look at our politicians local and national – it does seem the battle has already been lost.
LucyPevensey
That video – were they maggots circling a turd?
Lucy, why is the bloke in the red tea towel on the right goosing the bloke in the gardening dressing gown?
And why does the bloke in the suit have his head in a bedpan?
Before you answer, please ask Bob the Builder about the crap pointing on that wall behind – it’s awful, and a bit of a throwback from the GLC Direct Works Department’s stuff. We want real craftmanship now, not the equivalent of flock wall-paper, or naff stone cladding! That place will never sell, y’know!
Maybe the BBC can tie it into a new Dr.Who series ….
Nadiya “the Doctor” Who can Tardis into Mecca with her Transgender-Apostate-Muslim-Non-Binary-Coloured-Gay sidekick and their pet pig Percy. Then the Tardis malfunctions due to a time distortion generated from a strange black rock that’s shaped like a ladies body part.
They must now escape, knowing that it’s the Haji with 14 million visitors and non-Muslims aren’t allowed in Mecca.
What will Nadia do? Will the sidekick wear the full face veil or learn the Shahadah in time to conform or will she say who she is, and stand her ground as a Transgender-Apostate-Muslim-Non-Binary-Coloured-Gay?
What about Percy the pig who was just reading the requirements for Halal?
Shurely it has to be Doctor ‘What’ now, Marky!
A TG fanatic from Troon,
Took another TG thing to his room,
They argued all night
As to who had the right,
And do what and do which and to whom.
(Bugger me, we used to sing the real men’s version back in the sixties after losing 53-3…)
A comparison of feminism … leading the way into space and beyond … or following other shouty people?
Space helmets off to the lady on the left. The one on the right looks like a right (lefty) c&%t.
Strange how they “accidentally” got an anti-Trump poster into the story !
More from the BBC: How to Masturbate – women talk about wanking:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/item/ef932792-17b5-4274-bba3-3452070c3e10
The BBC show you how to upskirt a woman with a very helpful action image:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/item/b74ccc91-a313-41d0-9b66-03e957a65e87
“Despite research showing that women masturbate as frequently as men, it’s still not a topic that all females openly discuss. ”
#1 Don’t believe their first point
#2 As to their second point
… masturbation is “still not a topic that” …I’ve ever heard MALES …”openly discuss. “
StewGreen
Mislabeled
It’s not Kevin , It’s Ivor Biggun and the Red-Nosed Burglars, also known as Doc Cox from the 80’s show That’s Life.
I suppose calling the majority of people in the bbc ‘masturbators’, instead of ‘wankers’, just doesn’t have the same ‘ring’…
(Plucked from Lefty Metaphors-R-Us, a pathetic panel game for twonks like Jeremy Hardy.)
BBC promotes sexting the sending of images of young females breasts and vaginas to their friends:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/item/4b4a5f83-d68d-4799-bcfc-e5d60780fd35
I’ve three daughters, is this the sort of shit that the bBbc thinks is ok for them to do? Throwing soft porn photos into the ether to raise awareness of what exactly, a manufactured mental issue to be cured by emotional self gratification.
Who thinks like this? The bBbc are helping to create a whole army of narcissistic, voyeuristic, irresponsible fuckwits but actually believe the opposite to be true, that they are in some way enlightened when really they’re just dangerous.
as petty much every set of “girlfreinds” ive ever known has fallen out badly about something usually trivial, this I would suggest is likely to comeback and bite them in the ass
I haven’t got kids but I am appalled at the state broadcasting s’ interpretation of “informing’ their public . I thought it was a wind up. So am I sexually repressed ? Out of touch ?( pun intended ). Surely sex education should be done under ‘controlled ‘ circumstance by parents or teachers not some self fucking website? Don’t pay the tv tax
“As a member of the BBC club, one of the hundreds of perk (singular intentional) from which I benefit is a free copy of Radio Times every week”(a small sub is taken off his wages)
Cost is a £4.50/£3 per month worker/pensioner in Salford
In London it’s 0003% of salary +42p admin ..ie £3.42 if you earn £1000/month.. it’s capped at £10
For that you get £1 meals and £1 drinks etc.
http://www.bbcclub.com/membership/member-benefits
Under the BBC 3 Amazing Humans News Section: The drag queen storyteller showing children it’s ok to be different
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/item/5f94d2ee-b8d5-4ae4-b3a4-7b1590779422
Once again the BBC promoting and glamorising all forms of sexual activity to children.
\\ Guido can disclose who’s in the final running to become the new Director of BBC News, replacing James Harding.
It’s understood the appointment could be announced as soon as this afternoon.
Here are the names in the frame…
Fran Unsworth: Thought to be favourite. Director of the World Service, with strong grasp of the impartiality rules, she is also Director of News and Current Affairs and sits on the BBC’s Executive Team. Safe pair of hands…
Jonathan Munro: Currently Head of Newsgathering and former ITV man. Was in charge of the infamous BBC election debate dubbed as having had ‘the most left-wing audience ever’ – even by lefties…
Kamal Ahmed: The BBC’s Economics Editor is a wildcard with no management experience.
** A big hand in yesterday’s project fear Rand Corporation story… **
Gavin Allen: Currently overseeing Today and the Ten and the World At One. Popular among the troops… //
https://order-order.com/2017/12/13/revealed-finalists-for-director-of-bbc-news/
I see on Breitbart that the Austrian ban on the Islamic veil is already delivering the goods, Muslims are packing up and leaving. So you can get rid of them by humane means. You don’t have to roll over and allow police officers to wear the veil like the CC of the West Midlands suggested a few months ago. At the time it was thought that he was referring to police women , but with painted finger nails , make up and high heels now de rigueur amongst the plods , he could have been anticipating a rash of transgenderism amongst his force. Anyway if veil bans can achieve so much what about banning barbaric Halal slaughter. That should have em leaving in droves and humanely to.
So all we have to do is ban the vile (I mean veil) and devout Muslims will leave?
And all we have to do is refuse to join the United States of Schulz and they will kick us out of the EU?
I’d be willing to take up both those offers. 😉
I use superlorin contraceptive implants to prevent unnecessary reproduction. Better than castration or spaying.
Suppose it could be added to certain human food prepared in a certain way.
Bingo. Population falls
https://uk.virbac.com/suprelorin
GWF
I hope you are not encouraging people to only have children if you can afford them are you? That issue is a ‘no no’ in the way ‘immigration’ has been for decades which has led to the mess we are in.
More Christmas Festivities from the BBC: Reindeer Breasts
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/item/9501cdb2-fedf-4d59-b439-460ed8e095fb
Scroll down the article and you will find the BBC promoting Reindeer Cock Socks as well.
Have a BBC Jerry “Corbyn” Christmas …. from the non-political and non-biased BBC!
BOBTC,
And they call Trump a misogynist?
Interesting quotes by James Harding of the BBC, and I’m sure there will be more to come:
Harding said in 2011 that he “[believes] in the state of Israel. I would have had a real problem if I had been coming to a paper with a history of being anti-Israel… We wrote an editorial called ‘In defence of Israel’ during the Gaza offensive, but we also reported on the use of white phosphorus, which was the Israelis breaking their own rules.”[18] He also said at this time that the BBC does not have “a pro-Israel newsroom and it has taken management to get some balance in there”. Accordingly, Harding found this “frustrating because, unlike The Times where you can just choose not to buy it, you have to pay for the BBC.”
Harding reaffirmed that the BBC should not avoid investigative journalism after controversies of recent years.
In some respects, the News part of the BBC fails to “punch our weight”, he believed.
I’m sure that when Harding does leave having been a critic of the corporation in the past, many juicy secrets will be revealed.
Pretty sure James’ reservations will be nicely overcome with his successor (h/t Stewgreen & Gudio):
https://order-order.com/2017/12/13/revealed-finalists-for-director-of-bbc-news/