“Our mission continues to be to provide information that can be trusted”
If some of the people who pay your wages think you have failed in that ambition, if they think you are a source of disinformation and spin, using your tax funding to undermine your competitors, in the meantime giving yourself a fat living because you think you are worth it, if some of the people think you stifle debate, and demonise those who disagree with your Guardian reader political views, that you are a propaganda channel for the public sector middle class Left, do you give those people the option not to pay for your content, or do you send them to prision if they refuse?
The looting of the public purse in the NHS, universities, and the BBC, reminds me ( in a minor way), of the looting of the public assets of Russia after the fall of the USSR.
NHS managers first, then the BBC paying non-entities with media studies degrees, outrageous six figure salaries, and now university VC’s – all of them think they are worth it.
I don’t know much at all about this woman and care even less but from what I’ve read, maybe she should change her name to jobsworth. As in it would be more than my job’s worth to actually try to change the far-left bbc’s bias.
Well the hellish job is going to be 340k. Which is a lot, but…..
“That is a huge salary, though it is worth noting that American counterparts in charge of organisations of comparable size would be paid several multiples of that.”
But of course there is no comparable news organisation in the US like the Beeb, so her chances of getting a $1m+ job in the US is probably about zero.
“Unfortunately, the sorry financial state of much modern media means that editors’ time is increasingly spent doing less fun things, like begging advertisers for money, or sacking people.”
Well the Beeb gets £3.4bn from the UK public, so hardly in dire straits nor does the advertising reference apply. Sacking people, hopefully she will do a lot of that.
“I don’t know and haven’t asked, but I would suspect that at times, at least a third of the job involves justifying decisions, often taken by people several rungs beneath you.”
All you need to know in the first sentence, he DOES NOT KNOW!!!!
Then there is a section about Brexit coverage and impartiality, well the proof of the pudding is in the eating and we know the majority commentators. panellists, are Remainers, so nice try…..
And then there is the budget squeeze poor Frau Unsworth will have to contend with:
“Aside from all these daily traumas, the financial challenge is immense: about £80m has to be saved from BBC News, and quickly too.
I spoke to one final round candidate this week about how these savings would be found. I asked if the best route to £80m was salami slicing (ie taking out a proportion from several different bits) or big, symbolic, chunky cuts, like losing particular programmes, or even channels.
Their response was: the trouble is, even after you do both – ie cut lots of big stuff and salami slice – you still get nowhere near the £80m.”
Now £80m sounds a lot, but what isnt mentioned is the overall budget, so impossible to say if 80m is 1% or 10%, so in effect a meaningless number. And if you (really) make cuts how can you not reduce the budget significantly!!!! For starters I suggest pension off John Humphrey’s and close down BBC Pidgin.
No other organisation comes close to the Biased BBC for the lack of interest they show in their viewer’s perspective, they get to impose their political views on the world with no checks and balances, especially not viewing statistics, costs, revenues or any of the real world problems that a senior exec at any other media organisation faces.
Basically, Franny’s job comes down to keeping Labour and Hamas happy and exposing the ‘extreme right wing’ (that means everyone else).
9 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
ZephirJan 3, 06:53 New Year 2025 If this all seems odd, then consider how Britain actually records people who come in and out of the country.…
ZephirJan 3, 06:49 New Year 2025 “We have no idea how many people are living in Britain. More recently, NHS records found there to be 63…
tomoJan 3, 04:42 New Year 2025 Thanks Stew I didn’t look very far for provenance on the fathead plod. Wiltshire police – seems like about one…
tomoJan 3, 00:29 New Year 2025 [img]https://i.ibb.co/PtqLP4F/Gg-UAwfc-WYAAWAN0.jpg[/img]
tomoJan 2, 23:52 New Year 2025 Zephir iirc Mike Benz has said that Jimmy Whales’ s Wikipedia has a big team of spooks working it from…
ZephirJan 2, 23:36 New Year 2025 ” ‘Wikipedia is as biased as the BBC’: How the Left took over the platform Wikipedia has long been accused…
StewGreenJan 2, 22:57 New Year 2025 It’s predictable that video is at least 2.5 years old Same video in July 2022 https://x.com/mlke27048/status/1549677890983313410 “Another vital crime solved.…
StewGreenJan 2, 22:48 New Year 2025 I mentioned to RatioWatch about how almost all tweets from UK Labour top figures like Miliband and Starmer etc, get…
StewGreenJan 2, 22:43 New Year 2025 Rufus have we given up on the biasedBBC DOT org domain ? Google sill refers to some old pages, but…
StewGreenJan 2, 22:41 New Year 2025 It’s a pity that people’s comments from this morning were lost. In the past I have recovered missing such data…
“Our mission continues to be to provide information that can be trusted”
If some of the people who pay your wages think you have failed in that ambition, if they think you are a source of disinformation and spin, using your tax funding to undermine your competitors, in the meantime giving yourself a fat living because you think you are worth it, if some of the people think you stifle debate, and demonise those who disagree with your Guardian reader political views, that you are a propaganda channel for the public sector middle class Left, do you give those people the option not to pay for your content, or do you send them to prision if they refuse?
63 likes
The BBC is the epitome of the middle class Left in this Country, in its greed, in its intolerance, and its sheer abuse of power. Scrap it.
73 likes
Despite Brexit:
http://tradingaswdr.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/next.html
“A modest 57% rise in January for new BBC News boss Fran Unsworth, who will be paid the same as James Harding – £340k”
Liberals, eh? Maybe Mrs. May should petition Lord Hall Hall?
http://tradingaswdr.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/its-fran.html
Sounds a keeper.
37 likes
The looting of the public purse in the NHS, universities, and the BBC, reminds me ( in a minor way), of the looting of the public assets of Russia after the fall of the USSR.
NHS managers first, then the BBC paying non-entities with media studies degrees, outrageous six figure salaries, and now university VC’s – all of them think they are worth it.
They are not.
20 likes
I don’t know much at all about this woman and care even less but from what I’ve read, maybe she should change her name to jobsworth. As in it would be more than my job’s worth to actually try to change the far-left bbc’s bias.
32 likes
Fran Un(new)s Worth(y)?
23 likes
There is an interesting article which gives some incite into life in the hive on the Beeb website
Fran Unsworth’s hellish new job
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-42365957
Well the hellish job is going to be 340k. Which is a lot, but…..
“That is a huge salary, though it is worth noting that American counterparts in charge of organisations of comparable size would be paid several multiples of that.”
But of course there is no comparable news organisation in the US like the Beeb, so her chances of getting a $1m+ job in the US is probably about zero.
“Unfortunately, the sorry financial state of much modern media means that editors’ time is increasingly spent doing less fun things, like begging advertisers for money, or sacking people.”
Well the Beeb gets £3.4bn from the UK public, so hardly in dire straits nor does the advertising reference apply. Sacking people, hopefully she will do a lot of that.
“I don’t know and haven’t asked, but I would suspect that at times, at least a third of the job involves justifying decisions, often taken by people several rungs beneath you.”
All you need to know in the first sentence, he DOES NOT KNOW!!!!
Then there is a section about Brexit coverage and impartiality, well the proof of the pudding is in the eating and we know the majority commentators. panellists, are Remainers, so nice try…..
And then there is the budget squeeze poor Frau Unsworth will have to contend with:
“Aside from all these daily traumas, the financial challenge is immense: about £80m has to be saved from BBC News, and quickly too.
I spoke to one final round candidate this week about how these savings would be found. I asked if the best route to £80m was salami slicing (ie taking out a proportion from several different bits) or big, symbolic, chunky cuts, like losing particular programmes, or even channels.
Their response was: the trouble is, even after you do both – ie cut lots of big stuff and salami slice – you still get nowhere near the £80m.”
Now £80m sounds a lot, but what isnt mentioned is the overall budget, so impossible to say if 80m is 1% or 10%, so in effect a meaningless number. And if you (really) make cuts how can you not reduce the budget significantly!!!! For starters I suggest pension off John Humphrey’s and close down BBC Pidgin.
4 likes
No other organisation comes close to the Biased BBC for the lack of interest they show in their viewer’s perspective, they get to impose their political views on the world with no checks and balances, especially not viewing statistics, costs, revenues or any of the real world problems that a senior exec at any other media organisation faces.
Basically, Franny’s job comes down to keeping Labour and Hamas happy and exposing the ‘extreme right wing’ (that means everyone else).
9 likes