“Our mission continues to be to provide information that can be trusted”
If some of the people who pay your wages think you have failed in that ambition, if they think you are a source of disinformation and spin, using your tax funding to undermine your competitors, in the meantime giving yourself a fat living because you think you are worth it, if some of the people think you stifle debate, and demonise those who disagree with your Guardian reader political views, that you are a propaganda channel for the public sector middle class Left, do you give those people the option not to pay for your content, or do you send them to prision if they refuse?
The looting of the public purse in the NHS, universities, and the BBC, reminds me ( in a minor way), of the looting of the public assets of Russia after the fall of the USSR.
NHS managers first, then the BBC paying non-entities with media studies degrees, outrageous six figure salaries, and now university VC’s – all of them think they are worth it.
I don’t know much at all about this woman and care even less but from what I’ve read, maybe she should change her name to jobsworth. As in it would be more than my job’s worth to actually try to change the far-left bbc’s bias.
Well the hellish job is going to be 340k. Which is a lot, but…..
“That is a huge salary, though it is worth noting that American counterparts in charge of organisations of comparable size would be paid several multiples of that.”
But of course there is no comparable news organisation in the US like the Beeb, so her chances of getting a $1m+ job in the US is probably about zero.
“Unfortunately, the sorry financial state of much modern media means that editors’ time is increasingly spent doing less fun things, like begging advertisers for money, or sacking people.”
Well the Beeb gets £3.4bn from the UK public, so hardly in dire straits nor does the advertising reference apply. Sacking people, hopefully she will do a lot of that.
“I don’t know and haven’t asked, but I would suspect that at times, at least a third of the job involves justifying decisions, often taken by people several rungs beneath you.”
All you need to know in the first sentence, he DOES NOT KNOW!!!!
Then there is a section about Brexit coverage and impartiality, well the proof of the pudding is in the eating and we know the majority commentators. panellists, are Remainers, so nice try…..
And then there is the budget squeeze poor Frau Unsworth will have to contend with:
“Aside from all these daily traumas, the financial challenge is immense: about £80m has to be saved from BBC News, and quickly too.
I spoke to one final round candidate this week about how these savings would be found. I asked if the best route to £80m was salami slicing (ie taking out a proportion from several different bits) or big, symbolic, chunky cuts, like losing particular programmes, or even channels.
Their response was: the trouble is, even after you do both – ie cut lots of big stuff and salami slice – you still get nowhere near the £80m.”
Now £80m sounds a lot, but what isnt mentioned is the overall budget, so impossible to say if 80m is 1% or 10%, so in effect a meaningless number. And if you (really) make cuts how can you not reduce the budget significantly!!!! For starters I suggest pension off John Humphrey’s and close down BBC Pidgin.
No other organisation comes close to the Biased BBC for the lack of interest they show in their viewer’s perspective, they get to impose their political views on the world with no checks and balances, especially not viewing statistics, costs, revenues or any of the real world problems that a senior exec at any other media organisation faces.
Basically, Franny’s job comes down to keeping Labour and Hamas happy and exposing the ‘extreme right wing’ (that means everyone else).
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
Richard PinderAug 26, 18:10 Midweek 26th August 2026 Harry and Meghan have arrived to live in Britain as private Royals living in active privacy. The couple´s children, Prince…
Fedup2Aug 26, 18:05 Midweek 26th August 2026 Judging by the images coming out of Nepal it looks like the ghurkas will be coming home – good luck…
Fedup2Aug 26, 18:04 Midweek 26th August 2026 I think the incident has been staged. – a plane landed in Birmingham and an unwanted family got off …
Ian RushlowAug 26, 18:02 Midweek 26th August 2026 1. Could Mars Inc., the makers of Maltesers, have some sort of legal case against this wimmin? Reputational damage, that…
DoublethinkerAug 26, 17:56 Midweek 26th August 2026 I was shopping in the nearest M&S food hall this morning and glanced at the newspaper stand . I was…
pugnaziousAug 26, 17:46 Midweek 26th August 2026 https://www.tiktok.com/@emily_peach__/video/7655106600121879829 Remarkable the hypocrisy that goes unnoticed at the BBC when it suits. A feminist poet on Woman’s Hour talking…
wwfcAug 26, 17:45 Midweek 26th August 2026 Never forgive never forget what they did ….. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQFBMEWNgA8
Ian RushlowAug 26, 17:38 Midweek 26th August 2026 Read his entry on Wikipedia to get a wider perspective on his involvement with the Labour Party and other ‘questionable’…
DoublethinkerAug 26, 17:36 Midweek 26th August 2026 There a growing pollution problem in our national parks. You can be out for it of fresh air when you…
pugnaziousAug 26, 17:26 Midweek 26th August 2026 This is what happens when you don’t shoot unarmed men in cars…. ‘Two police officers among seven killed in wrong-way…
“Our mission continues to be to provide information that can be trusted”
If some of the people who pay your wages think you have failed in that ambition, if they think you are a source of disinformation and spin, using your tax funding to undermine your competitors, in the meantime giving yourself a fat living because you think you are worth it, if some of the people think you stifle debate, and demonise those who disagree with your Guardian reader political views, that you are a propaganda channel for the public sector middle class Left, do you give those people the option not to pay for your content, or do you send them to prision if they refuse?
The BBC is the epitome of the middle class Left in this Country, in its greed, in its intolerance, and its sheer abuse of power. Scrap it.
Despite Brexit:
http://tradingaswdr.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/next.html
“A modest 57% rise in January for new BBC News boss Fran Unsworth, who will be paid the same as James Harding – £340k”
Liberals, eh? Maybe Mrs. May should petition Lord Hall Hall?
http://tradingaswdr.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/its-fran.html
Sounds a keeper.
The looting of the public purse in the NHS, universities, and the BBC, reminds me ( in a minor way), of the looting of the public assets of Russia after the fall of the USSR.
NHS managers first, then the BBC paying non-entities with media studies degrees, outrageous six figure salaries, and now university VC’s – all of them think they are worth it.
They are not.
I don’t know much at all about this woman and care even less but from what I’ve read, maybe she should change her name to jobsworth. As in it would be more than my job’s worth to actually try to change the far-left bbc’s bias.
Fran Un(new)s Worth(y)?
There is an interesting article which gives some incite into life in the hive on the Beeb website
Fran Unsworth’s hellish new job
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-42365957
Well the hellish job is going to be 340k. Which is a lot, but…..
“That is a huge salary, though it is worth noting that American counterparts in charge of organisations of comparable size would be paid several multiples of that.”
But of course there is no comparable news organisation in the US like the Beeb, so her chances of getting a $1m+ job in the US is probably about zero.
“Unfortunately, the sorry financial state of much modern media means that editors’ time is increasingly spent doing less fun things, like begging advertisers for money, or sacking people.”
Well the Beeb gets £3.4bn from the UK public, so hardly in dire straits nor does the advertising reference apply. Sacking people, hopefully she will do a lot of that.
“I don’t know and haven’t asked, but I would suspect that at times, at least a third of the job involves justifying decisions, often taken by people several rungs beneath you.”
All you need to know in the first sentence, he DOES NOT KNOW!!!!
Then there is a section about Brexit coverage and impartiality, well the proof of the pudding is in the eating and we know the majority commentators. panellists, are Remainers, so nice try…..
And then there is the budget squeeze poor Frau Unsworth will have to contend with:
“Aside from all these daily traumas, the financial challenge is immense: about £80m has to be saved from BBC News, and quickly too.
I spoke to one final round candidate this week about how these savings would be found. I asked if the best route to £80m was salami slicing (ie taking out a proportion from several different bits) or big, symbolic, chunky cuts, like losing particular programmes, or even channels.
Their response was: the trouble is, even after you do both – ie cut lots of big stuff and salami slice – you still get nowhere near the £80m.”
Now £80m sounds a lot, but what isnt mentioned is the overall budget, so impossible to say if 80m is 1% or 10%, so in effect a meaningless number. And if you (really) make cuts how can you not reduce the budget significantly!!!! For starters I suggest pension off John Humphrey’s and close down BBC Pidgin.
No other organisation comes close to the Biased BBC for the lack of interest they show in their viewer’s perspective, they get to impose their political views on the world with no checks and balances, especially not viewing statistics, costs, revenues or any of the real world problems that a senior exec at any other media organisation faces.
Basically, Franny’s job comes down to keeping Labour and Hamas happy and exposing the ‘extreme right wing’ (that means everyone else).