National Action against er…National Action

 

 

Hurrah!!!! says the BBC….‘more white supremacist nazi racist scumbags that we can report on and use to neutralise the lies about Muslims who are only driven to violence by the cruel, bigoted and oppressive white society they are forced to endure in subjugation.’

Hmmm…who are the proscribed organisations in the UK?

From the Home Office…

PROSCRIBED TERRORIST ORGANISATIONS

71 international terrorist organisations are proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000.

Of those 71…er…National Action is the first right-wing organisation to be proscribed.  The rest?  Left-wing and of course the vast majority, Muslim.  And yet all we hear from the BBC is a constant drumbeat about the threat of the Far-Right.

The real threat is not white supremacists but Muslim supremacists [not all violent..in fact the non-violent cultural jihadists are the most dangerous] and their useful idiots in the Media who promote them and their narratives.

 

 

V for Victory in Europe

 

 

 

 

 

Watch the above video in which Varoufakis describes the mechanisms and attitudes by which the EU attempts to run Europe, to rein in recalcitrant states and how it negotiates change and upheaval.  He notes that they are totally unconcerned with ‘economics’…as we know the EU is a political project that must ‘succeed’ regardless of cost…much like the USSR….they are quite prepared to see countries ruined if it keeps them inside the EU and under its control….it has so much political capital tied up in the project that it cannot turn back whatever happens.

Varoufakis states that to deal with the EU you need sensible proposals and a big deterrent for when they try to crush you.  Sound familiar?  Such as ‘No deal is better than a bad deal’…but that is something the BBC thinks is madness…and yet it is our biggest card….apart from how much we choose to pay them…and Mishal Hussain this morning was relentlessly suggesting that we must pay up now, presumably whatever asked, in order to ‘move things along’.

Varoufakis also stated that disunity brings defeat and ‘insiders’ [EU collaborators] undermine the government’s negotiating position.  So why does the BBC do everything in its power to sow dissent and disuntiy and to constantly prop up the Remainders who are trying to undermine Brexit?  The BBC is doing massive damage to our negotiating position as it continues to promote the idea that Brexit will never happen and that the EU need not take negotiations seriously.

Everything Varoufakis says indicates why the EU should be torn apart and consigned to the history bin.  Co-operation yes, subjugation no.

 

T’error

 

The evidence shows that Cage is a pro-terrorist group

All the evidence shows that Cage is a pro-terrorist group, not a human rights group as Oborne appears to think. Its history of support for terrorists should have closed the argument on them some time ago.

 

The Sunday Times reported that ‘Britain’s counter-terrorism regulator has been accused of a schoolboy error by contacting an Islamist organistaion shunned by government.’

What was that organisation?  Cage.  One of the BBC’s favourite goto Muslim organisations when they need credible, authentic Muslim voices to tell us why Muslims, ‘beautiful young men’, become radicalised….the BBC giving Cage a big platform to peddle their views and a legitimacy that money can’t buy.

You may remember that one of the ‘everyday’, ordinary Muslims in the BBC’s ‘Muslims like us’ wore a sweatshirt adorned with the Cage logo….no surprise then that he was in fact a hardcore fundamentalist himself, one that slipped under the radar as people concentrated on Abdul Haqq, a prominent and well known radical…..most of the rest of the house inhabitants weren’t actually far behind when the superficial westernisation rubbed off and their true views and attitudes about Britain and the West were expressed.

The problem is that the BBC did not make a ‘schoolboy error’, it knows full well the true views of these people in Cage and yet continues to promote them as a voice of reason and moderation.  Then again the BBC’s Mark Easton did claim that Muslim extremists will one day be considered worthy enough to stand alongside Churchill, Ghandi and Mandela….maybe that was a slip of the tongue and he actually meant Stalin, Hitler and Muhammed.

 

 

 

Future Imperfect

 

The BBC announced this morning that the ‘research group’ British Future had discovered that Leave voters want immigration to increase, all except for very low skilled workers.

Now British Future is not a ‘research group’, it is a pro-immigration lobby group and this latest discovery is in fact a rehash of the same poll from last year which makes the result somewhat suspicious as you may ask how can it be so very nearly exactly the same…and who can believe that Brexit voters want an increase in migration of even highly skilled migrants….only as last resort would they accept such a thing.

Disturbing to find that this left-wing group has joined forces with the highly dubious ‘Hope not Hate’ to lobby and ‘advise’ government on immigration policy…if this latest report is anything to go by you wouldn’t trust either of them to produce much in the way of truthful analysis…

The government should do more to engage the public in decision-making on immigration. The National Conversation Immigration, coordinated by British Future and Hope not Hate, offers a model of how to do this, hosting 120 meetings in 60 locations in every nation and region of the UK, and reporting its findings to the Home Affairs Committee Immigration Inquiry. An annual ‘Migration Day’ report to Parliament by the Home Secretary could also serve as a focal point for greater engagement, transparency and accountability.

Lies, Damned Lies and BBC History

 

The Left has spent decades trying to rewrite history to present Britain and the West as the most evil and immoral societies on earth, savagely exploiting and oppressing the charming, peaceful and innocent brown skinned people who otherwise populate the rest of the globe in harmonious cow-like amiableness.

The BBC has been party to this massive deception and attempt to revise the truth in favour a narrative that suits its own agenda that seeks to blame Britain for everything bad in the world and thus provide an excuse for the attempts to undermine and destroy British society, culture, military, economic and political power.  Support for evermore extreme devolution and the splitting up of the United Kingdom is one aspect of this attempt to dismantle ‘Great Britain’, the collusion, collaboration with and selling out to, the European Union is of course just another part of this….as is open borders and the importation of millions of people who have no respect for, or loyalty to, Britain. They’re here for the money….but the BBC and the EU know the real purpose of this policy…to dilute the British population and make any vote such as another EU referendum dependent on the decisions of the new ‘citizens’…and they are fully expected to vote, when they get the chance, for the EU.  It is in effect a form of ethnic cleansing deliberately forced upon us by the EU….it’s politics and demographics not economics.

The BBC’s coverage of Partition is a classic example of its blame game as the Mail reports…

From the BBC school of history… why everything is Britain’s fault: CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews last night’s TV

Everything is your fault. But there’s no need to say sorry, because the BBC is busy apologising on your behalf.

Barely a week goes by without its guilt-ridden liberals blaming Britain for all the world’s woes. Self-loathing is their hobby — it makes them feel better.

Film-maker Gurinder Chadha, brought up in Southall, London, was at pains throughout India’s Partition: The Forgotten Story (BBC2) to emphasise that Britain alone was responsible for millions of deaths and decades of conflict following the separation of Pakistan in 1947.

She returned to this theme repeatedly, even though all her evidence contradicted the claim. Whenever the facts indicated that the sundering of India was due to ego clashes between its leaders or the aftermath of World War II, Gurinder nodded grimly and blamed Britain.

She especially accused Sir Winston Churchill, who she said despised Hindus. He was the epitome of the British Establishment, she sneered — though anyone who knows the first thing about Churchill will realise he was an outsider in every society.

The British Raj deliberately promoted hatred between Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus, she claimed, in a policy of ‘divide and rule’. But to prove her point she travelled to Delhi and Calcutta, two of the most multi-cultural cities on Earth — a living legacy of British policies for a united India.

Unforgiveably, she claimed that when rioting broke out in Calcutta in 1946, the British government could have stopped the violence ‘like that’ — snapping her fingers. The hundreds of deaths were ‘a real victory for Divide and Rule’, she jeered

Who is really to blame for the violence in India during Partition?  Muslims.  Muslims demanded their own state and thus created the situation that led to the ethnic cleansing and mass murder.  Muslim separatism.  The BBC is quick to talk of ‘White Separatists’ but doesn’t use the same language for Muslims who even in Britain demand separate rules and special treatment for themselves.

Here is a perfect example of why everything that goes wrong in a post colonial country is not Britain’s fault in the slightest…from the Spectator….Rhodesia is destroyed by Black gangsters….the BBC would of course find a way of pinning the blame on Britain….

The rule of law is disappearing in Africa

Since Independence in 1980, it was the commercial farmers who drove economic growth with output rising on average by 15 per cent per annum during the first 18 years. Increasingly they were being joined by black farmers and by 1997 some 1200 of the 6,000 farmers that existed at Independence in 1980, were black. They employed a third of the national workforce, enjoyed no subsidies of any kind and generated half our exports. 60 per cent of local industry was dependent on them for markets or raw material.

They were recognised as being among the most productive farmers in the world, holding world records in yields and advanced conservation techniques.

Zimbabwe was totally self-sufficient in almost all foodstuffs at prices that were the envy of our neighbours.

Then they made a mistake – they voted for the opposition in 2000 and the gates of hell opened. In the next five years the infrastructure built up and paid for by the farmers was destroyed. 25,000 tractors of 75 horse power or more were stolen. 300,000 hectares of irrigation were destroyed, the equipment from transformers to pumps to pipelines, torn up and sold for scrap. Three million beef cattle and hundreds of thousands of other animals including wild animals were slaughtered for consumption. 23,000 homesteads and 350,000 staff houses were taken and in most cases burnt or vandalised. Farm buildings worth hundreds of millions were destroyed. 10,000 farm dams, built by the farmers themselves, were left full and idle, many breaching when no maintenance was carried out.

After 10 years, Zimbabwe crashed. By 2008, our inflation was doubling prices every three hours, three quarters of our population was on food aid, nearly all food was being imported and employment had crashed to just 10 per cent of all adults – 70 per cent in the Civil Service. The great majority of the farms taken over by force were derelict and abandoned – a third of our banks went into liquidation. We had 150,000 cases of cholera, 60,000 cases of tuberculosis and 50 000 cases of malaria. One third of our population had fled the country and another 3 million had died of causes from malnutrition to starvation and exposure.

At a meeting in Harare in early August, Mr. Mugabe stated quite clearly, that the persons responsible for the murder of white Zimbabwean farmers during the land invasions would ‘never be prosecuted’. Tens of thousands of people who were members of Zapu and lived in the south west of the country were murdered, beaten, raped, tortured and harassed between 1983 and 1987 during a campaign that Mr. Mugabe named ‘Gukurahundi’ or the storm that ‘washes clean’. Over a million-people fled the genocide and moved to South Africa and Botswana. Not a single person has been prosecuted for any of these crimes.

During the campaign that Mr. Mugabe called ‘Murambatsvina’, which roughly translates as getting rid of the ‘rubbish’, another 1.2 million people were displaced in 2005, this time from informal settlements around the towns, and dumped in the bush hundreds of kilometres from town in the middle of winter. Thousands died of exposure and hunger. Their only crime was to vote against the Zanu PF Party of Mr. Mugabe.

We have recorded over 700 murders of MDC leaders and the numbers imprisoned and beaten or tortured must run into thousands. So many have been hospitalised that we have an organisation that is solely dedicated to helping these victims with medical expenses.

 

GENDER WARS…

Whilst the BBC is hostile to any war on radical Islam, there IS at least one war front that it fully endorses. I refer to the war on gender. Yes, the BBC is an advocate of seeking to remove the idea of boys and girls being dfferent to each other. John Lewis are the latest coroporation to pander to this mental aberration and the Today programme had one of the “gender erasure” advocates on this morning around 6.45am to reinforce the idea that boys and girls should be genderless. Incredible really but it’s what passes for normal in the halls of the BBC,

Interesting Times

 

 

The R4 paper review this morning headlined with the pro-Remain Sunday Times own headline ‘scoop’ that May is being forced to do a deal with the EU on the ‘divorce bill’ and that she will keep it secret until after the Tory conference….unless it is headlined in the Sunday Times…

Sunday Times front page 3 September 2017

 

Hmmm…the BBC that is working closely with the pro-Remain Times promoting anti-Brexit stories promotes an anti-Brexit story in the Sunday Times this morning.

Curiously this week we had Emma Barnett interview the now pro-EU Iain Duncan-Smith who told us he wasn’t here to talk anyone down but May’s ‘failure’ in the election [where she got the highest number of votes for a Tory government for decades] meant she would have to go cap in hand to the EU, her weakened position undermining her negotiating power….it would cost us a huge amount of money.  This is also a line that Barnett was pushing hard in an ‘interview’ that was intent only on creating a negative impression of anything that May had done or said. IDS also blamed the voters for voting stupidly.  No doubt we will see the Osborne Evening Standard plough the same furrow with sensationalist headlines about a weak May failing on Brexit…and thus maybe we should just surrender and get back into the EU fold.

Note also how Barnett and Co got May’s position as leader entirley wrong, telling us how she was likely to fall at any moment…despite all the sensible talk being of her surviving as the Tories wouldn’t risk an election which Corbyn could well win…and just who would take over as leader?  When May announced she would stay to fight another election the BBC were aghast and were working hard to try and portray this as a flip-flop when they knew it wasn’t…all she had said before was that she would stay as long as the Party wanted her, she said nothing about leaving at a certain date.  Th BBC has kept up a constant drumbeat of suggestion that the Tories are about to oust May in a leadership contest and yet there was absolutely no chance of that happening…the BBC is not bringing us news but is trying to make the news by interfering in politics, shaping it to suit their own agenda.  Who did they bring on immediately to criticise May on her announcement?  Cameron’s pro-Remain, ex-BBC media spinner, Craig Oliver, who laid into May….why?  Who the f**k is he?  He’s a backroom PR boy with nothing to do with the Tories other than once having been employed by the lefty Cameron as a sop to the BBC…why is he thought a credible voice to talk about May?

 

Something 9f an irony that Barnett, and the rest of the BBC, is constantly trying to unseat May when in 2015 she moaned that women weren’t at the top of politics and business.…then agan what’s new?  The BBC spent years trying to unseat Thatcher and the rest of the time rubbishing her legacy.  Perhaps like the Labour Party they prefer women quiet and obedient or they get sacked.