Yearly Archives: 2017

The BBC have nowt to say about Scottish ‘Nationalism’, it supports [as does Corbyn] IRA nationalist terrorism as well as Muslim supremacist terror, it is also remarkably accommodating when reporting on Catalonian asperations towards independence…you won’t find any sly allusions to Fascism, the Far-Right, or Nazis in this report unlike any the BBC files on UKIP…and not a murmur about concentration camps or ethnic cleansing that the BBC so often slips into its reporting about ‘Right-wing’ ‘independence activists’.  What does a Catalonian ‘Fascist’ look like through the BBC lens?…

For Adrià Alsina Leal, professor of journalism and communications at the Central University of Catalonia and a Catalan independence activist, “solidarity is welcome from wherever it comes”.

Ah..an ‘independence activist’…sounds rather benign and left-wing doesn’t it?  Not an ignorant, white, working class little Catalonian then with a hint of the Nazi about him? [Wonder how the BBC would react if Catalan wanted to secede from the EU…bit of a conflict there at the BBC editorial meeting]  The BBC of course likes regions splitting off from the national as it breaks apart the nation state and makes the smaller independent regions then dependent, ironically, on the EU….The SNP a case in point…desperate to leave the oppressions suffered under Westminster for the sunny uplands of the EU superstate.

As for terrorism…well the real victims could well be Muslims…perhaps it is us that drives them to take up terrorism as a response….we must stop all this anti-terrorism activity…it just upsets the terrorists and makes them more terroristy….

Human rights activist Josep Maria Royo’s immediate response to the violence in Barcelona was to go on social media in an effort to calm people down.

“People were sharing images of their crime which showed children, blood, injured people,” he said.

“It’s easy to spread a message of hate against the Islamic population. We must stop these expressions of hate.”

While this was a moment for giving support to the victims, there had to be a rethink on how to combat terrorism, he said.

Mass surveillance and intensive use of the military and the police did not work, he argued. Instead, “human rights, tolerance and democracy” should be promoted.

“We are a city with a large number of immigrants, a city that wants to welcome refugees, a city that wants to offer a different model of response in the event of terrorism,” said Luca. “Now is a moment to think different.”

Sweet.  Bonkers, mad, suicidal… but so sweet.

Why was Spain attacked?  No idea…why was it Barcelona then?….

Why did they attack Barcelona, I asked.

“Because Barcelona is always in the papers,” she said. “When you’re a terrorist, no-one will pay attention if you attack a little village lost in the middle of nowhere, yes? But attack Barcelona and everyone is going to read about it.”

Hmmm…but again why Spain at all?

The Spectator points the way…..

If foreign policy isn’t to blame, could it be social deprivation, the other favourite excuse trotted out by apologists whenever there’s an Islamist attack in Europe?

For 700 years the Iberian peninsula belonged to Islam [after Muslims invaded] until the Reconquista drove out the last of the Muslim invaders in 1492.

This still rankles in the Islamic world with some scholars regarding 1492 as the year that Muslim influence began it inexorable decline. Osama Bin Laden made frequent references to the ‘tragedy of Andalusia’, and Al Qaeda justified the 2004 train bombings in Madrid that killed 191 people by saying ‘this is only part of the settlement of old scores with Crusader Spain’.

All this talk of ‘Crusaders’ and ‘invaders’ ignores one crucial historical fact. Who invaded who first? 1492 wasn’t about Christian imperialism, it was a reconquest of land subjugated by the Muslim invaders of seven hundred years earlier. But the Islamists never let the truth get in the way of a good Jihad.

Only one issue…the article fails to spell out fully that once a land is invaded by Muslims and held by them that land is forever considered ‘Muslim’. Hence Spain is still ‘Muslim’ and they have that duty to recapture it…hence no matter how you appease them they will still come….just as it is a Muslim’s duty to spread Islam and win converts in any land they are in and to, once they have sufficient numbers, make Islam the dominant religion and political ideology.

Learn this lesson or weep like a woman for what you could not, would not, defend as a man…..so un-PC on so many levels that.

The BBC’s Sarah Brett labelled Breitbart a Far-Right organisation saying its main followers were white supremacists.  Whilst this may be the orthodox BBC liberal’s view, not only is it not true but even the BBC probably thinks Brett went too far in openly expressing such views as its usual description now is that Breitbart is ‘ultra-conservative’.  Oddly dubious Muslim groups like the MCB, Cage, Mend or MPACUK are never described in such terms and in fact are treated with a grovelling reverence, their every word repeated with a degree of respect never given to respectable parties like UKIP or even the ultra mainstream Tories.

The BBC undermined its own claims yesterday as it fielded a media expert on the BBC news channel [not sure who he was as only saw last bit…1400 ish] who told us that Breitbart wasn’t about partisan reporting, it wasn’t an issue of neutrality…Breitbart was reporting what other news organisations don’t, or won’t, report…such as on immigration and Islam.  He also gave us a clue as to why the BBC doesn’t like Breitbart.  Not only does it reveal to the world facts the BBC would like kept hidden it is also in the top 30 of news providers on Facebook and something like 63rd in the US traffic ratings, which the commentator said made it a ‘leviathan’….with bigger reach than the BBC…75th in the US.

No wonder the BBC works so hard to malign this political rival just as it tried to destroy Murdoch and News Iinternational.

Good of the BBC to police the airwaves and decide who we can watch or listen to.

No irony that on the day we had the Islamic terror attacks in Spain the BBC were trying to tell us that Islamic extremists were ‘brainwashed’ victims and that we should be welcoming them into Europe…and they say Trump is a supporter of extremism!?

The Brainwashed teens fleeing to Europe

Identifying the worst affected is difficult enough. Treating them, stopping the nightmares and repairing the trauma will be costly and time-consuming. They have missed so much proper schooling that finding them jobs will be hard. And returning them to their faith, one that isn’t polluted by jihadist ideology, needs perseverance.

That might be enough to save them, to bring them back into their societies, to help Iraq and Syria rebuild. Treating those who have suffered and escaped to the West might stop them becoming criminals, or worse.

But all of that will be difficult and unpopular. And perhaps those experts of division and destruction, IS, always knew this.
After all, who would want to help a boy who wanted to be a suicide bomber?

Poor lads.  Hmmm….wonder who they killed, raped and tortured whilst in Syria and Iraq.  Don’t ask…it would be Islamophobic to ask if they have committed any warcrimes in the name of Allah.

On a similar note Bob Nelson in the comments notes that the BBC has failed to mention that the Antifa attackers both in Charlottesville and Boston were thought to have had acid in their arsenal of weapons that they used to shut down free speech…no irony that a free speech rally is silenced by their intimidation and violence or threat of….

From the Telegraph:

American police had feared radical bands of counter-protesters were adding acid to their arsenal of extreme violence as they tried to disrupt far Right rallies and protests.

As free speech campaigners and counter-protesters gathered in Boston for the latest potential flashpoint on Saturday, officers said they were worried militants were armed with acid.

“We think it’s what they had in Charlottesville,” said one policeman, dressed all in black and equipped with a body camera, referring to violence last weekend in Virginia. “They are using hydrochloric acid or battery acid.

From the BBC:

…………………………………………………

Remember this is the BBC that only last week or so were giving a huge amount of coverage to criminal moped gangs throwing acid at people…but if it’s done in a ‘good cause’ it seems the BBC look the other way. [The BBC did of course blame the Tories for the rise in acid attacks ‘since 2010’.]

Freedom of speech or freedom to throw acid in people’s faces…which one do you think a BBC journalist should be supporting if they are to support anything?

At the moment it looks like they support acid throwing left-wing terrorists….they accuse Trump of being a white supremacist because he was ‘silent’ about the KKK etc [except of course he wasn’t…he just denounced all violence at Charlottesville]…thus by the same standard the BBC’s silence on the acid means they condone such behaviour and support the terrorists.

When it was announced Big Ben was being silenced for four years I thought it was a story about James Chapman…perhaps he’d been neutered until Brexit was over and his madness suppressed.  Apparently though Big Ben is a big clock not a big cock.  Just why does the BBC give him so much airtime and his ravings so much coverage and credence?  Instead of telling us the very, very significant news that most poeple want to get on with Brexit and want a ‘hard Brexit’, ie Brexit, they preferred to report thaat there was a new political party being set up…to oppose Brexit …by our friend Chopper Chappers.

Also…

Project Fear continues courtesy of the BBC

And

Balance, Brexit and the BBC

And…the orchestrated BBC/Times pro-EU anti-Brexit hit job usng Chapman as the lethal weapon….

Explosive stuff from @jameschappers. And a great #WeekinWestminster debut by @SamCoatesTimes. Tune in 11am @BBCRadio4. https://t.co/ocLgIj21L9

— Paul Waugh (@paulwaugh) July 1, 2017

Guido takes a look at Chapman’s descent into anti-Brexit lunacy aided no doubt by the BBC’s enouragement and seal of approval.

 

If there’s one cliché question that people associate with media training, it’s this one: “When did you stop beating your wife?”

It’s offered as an example of an (almost) impossible question to answer well, since most people will look guilty when they deny the charge. Imagine, for example, that Senator Smith answers the question by saying:

“I’m offended by that. I never beat my wife, and how dare you suggest that.”

The banner headline will inevitably be dreadful, something like:

“SENATOR SMITH: ‘I NEVER BEAT MY WIFE’”

The rather hopeless Emma Barnett who bluffs and blusters her way through interviews, getting lucky sometimes as a politician self-implodes due to a failure to prepare rather than her skill as an interviewer [she failed to really skewer Shadow International Trade minister Bill Esterson on the customs union even though as Guido says ‘He is completely clueless, completely out of his depth, unable to answer the simplest of questions, scrabbling about looking at his notes, completely unfit for the job.’  She knew she had something but got overexcited at the smell of blood and couldn’t think it through and formulate the killer question…still, Esterson helped her out going over the cliff edge without being pushed] , asks if Trump is racist or is he just trying to appeal to his Base?…his ‘Base’ who according to the BBC are racist being apparently all white and working class.  So Trump is either a racist or a supporter of racists…and therefore racist.   Hmmm…isn’t that in fact racism from the BBC?, the same racism it displays here in the UK towards Leave voters who are all tarred with the same ‘racist’ brush merely because they are white.  Naturally the picture is far more complicated than the BBC wants you to know…voters for Trump and Leave were a very mixed bag politically, socially and racially.

Did the BBC ask if Obama was an Islamist, or even a Muslim, when he, not just said there might be two sides to any story, but actually supported the one side that was doing the violence when he said ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam’…what by saying the Islamists are Muslims doing Allah’s work?  Clearly they were…read the Koran.

Then we have the BBC itself eihter sayng there is no blame for Muslim terrorism or that the West’s behaviour drove Muslims to act in this way…Muslims, Muslims acting out the violence not just standersby, are the real victims here…

Mark Mardell famously denied that Major Nidal Hassan murdered 13 fellow soldiers in the name of Islam,  that the murders were rather a  ‘senseless tragedy’…

‘The alleged murderer was clearly a Muslim, but there is very little to suggest that he adhered to a hard-line interpretation of his religion or that he had political or religious motives.

Still, searching for patterns and for answers is part of what it is to be human. I loathe cliche, but perhaps, for once, this is a “senseless tragedy”, devoid of deeper meaning.’

Justin Webb & Co on the Today show insisted that all the evidence pointed towards the Boston bombing being done by white supremacists when there was no evidence of that at all…just the BBC covering up for Islam.

Then we have Tim Wilcox making excuses for the murder of Jews in Europe by Muslims….Israel commits such bad war ciimes against the Palestinians that Jews around the world must expect revenge attacks on them….

Remember Jeremy Bowen claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood were moderates?….’The country’s only properly organised mass political movement outside the ruling party is the Muslim Brotherhood, and it would do very well in any free election.  Unlike the jihadis, it does not believe it is at war with the West. It is conservative, moderate and non-violent. But it is highly critical of Western policy in the Middle East. ’

Remember Mark Easton favourably comparing Muslim extremists with Churchill, Mandela and Ghandi?….’There is, it seems to me, an inherent contradiction between banning orders and the core British value that one should be tolerant of different viewpoints.  History tells us that the development of new ideas of governance and government require people to think radically. Extreme views are necessary to test the wisdom of the mainstream.

Remember Hugh Sykes telling us that Cologne was a Far Right conspiracy?….‘There are conspiracy theories in the air that the New Year’s Eve attackers were encouraged to make sexual approaches to German women, told that it was the normal thing to do on New Year’s Eve. If true, they may have fallen into a well-laid trap.’

Remember the BBC report that said Cologne was an IS conspiracy? …’Some analysts have suggested that IS has encouraged a link between refugees and terrorism in order to foster hostility to refugees in Europe, although it is not known if the latest attack was carried out in co-ordination with the IS leadership in Iraq and Syria.’

Trump didn’t cheerlead or excuse white supremacists, he just said there was violence on all sides, as there was, and that the Media should make note of that.

What is happening is that the violent left are claiming the moral high ground and saying their attacks are justifiable in a fight against ‘Fascism’…and yet they are the true Fascists whose real purpose is to silence all opponents by fear, violence or the indirect method of bullying government, companies [such as internet providers], academia and the media into only accepting one narrative as ‘acceptable’…..all else must be silenced.

Unfortunately it seems to be working to a massive extent and the left wing extremists have a stranglehold on the Establishment which dares not oppose them even slightly for fear of being called racist and a supporter of Fascism and white supremacy.

It should be the BBC’s duty to stand up to such people…and yet it supports them and spreads their narrative…see above video with Emma Barnett…who ‘as a Jew’ should know better as she gives support to people who are the most anti-Semitic…left-wing and Muslim extremists, whereas bad old Trump supports Israel to the hilt.

Big Brother wants to know all about you…..the BBC’s collection of personal information as you register for the iPlayers was passed off as a an attractive positive that meant they could personalise and tailor their service to you and your watching habits.  Of course it was mainly a means to try and force you to sign up to the licence fee had you not done so but it does have its potential for the gathering of personal information about you and it seems the BBC want to go even further…..From the Telegraph….

Future BBC iPlayer could tell who is in the room and notice when the children have gone to bed

The BBC is developing a new version of the iPlayer that harnesses artificial intelligence, with the potential for your television to ‘spy’ on the household and tell who is in a room.

As part of the corporation’s quest to “personalise” its services, it has joined forces with Microsoft to build an experimental version of iPlayer.

The prototype uses voice recognition technology, allowing users to talk to their television. When a user says, ‘Show me something funny,’ it presents a list of comedy programmes. It responds to the question, ‘What’s going on in the world?’ by automatically playing the BBC News channel.

Cyrus Saihan, the BBC’s head of digital partnerships, distribution and business development, outlined his vision of the service’s future when the technology has caught up.

“There could be interesting scenarios in a typical family setting,” he said.

“Just by listening to the voices in the room, your TV could automatically detect when there are multiple people in the living room, and serve up a personalised mix of content relevant to all of you in the room.

From the BBC:

BBC experiments with voiceprints

There could be interesting scenarios in a typical family setting too. Just by listening to the voices in the room, your TV could automatically detect when there are multiple people in the living room, and serve up a personalised mix of content relevant to all of you in the room. When your children leave the room to go to bed, BBC iPlayer might hear that the children are no longer there and then suggest a different selection of content for you and your partner. All of this personalisation could happen without anyone having to press a button, sign in and out or change user profiles.

Here you go, a new Open Thread. The BBC disgusts me at the best of times BUT last night (Friday) on it’s 10PM BBC1 news, it chose to entirely ignore the Jihad killings in Finland. What an abhorrence of a broadcaster.

The Left’s intention is to destroy the Western world and remake it as utopian multicultural paradise.  What the Left seems to miss is that the West is, for all its faults, the best of all possible worlds and that when they destroy it the world doesn’t get better it gets much, much worse and descends into third world squalor, poverty and violence as those wonderful multicultural Western paradises turn out to have become the realms of warlords, criminal gangs and tyrants, Somalia writ large….and with no West to help ‘police’ the world, to spread and encourage democracy, the whole world gets even darker.

Who are the real fascists…those who defend Western values creating an environment where free speech, tolerance, and human rights are developed and preserved, acting as a beacon for the whole world or those on the Left whose anti-Western rhetoric mirrors that used by the Nazis?….

If enough Americans can be persuaded of all of that — that America is inherently racist, that America is and has been a lie — then it’s over. That is the objective, and we are in the midst of it. Sometimes you’re so close to the forest you don’t see the trees. That’s what we are in the midst of here: An ongoing effort to erase America by discrediting the entire premise of our culture, our history, our founding. The objective is to create in as many American minds as possible that America as founded is not worth defending. Serious times.

US commentator Rush Limbaugh spells out who is the real threat to America whilst in Britain we have the BBC….The BBC which peddles its anti-Christian, anti-White, anti-Israel, anti-West, anti-Capitalism (except when the big companies support the EU or at least the freedom to import cheap wage slaves), pro-IRA, pro-Islamist terrorism, pro-Muslim, pro-EU, pro-the ‘West must pay for its sins’, pro-mass immigration and pro-climate change alarmism, is as much to blame for driving this narrative of destroying the West as the likes of Soros or Corbyn or indeed Ralph Miliband, the man who really did hate Britain and all it stood for…….

Friday on his nationally syndicated radio show, conservative talker Rush Limbaugh said given the state of affairs in the country, particularly in the wake of last week’s events in Charlottesville, VA, it could be said the country was on the cusp of a second civil war.

Limbaugh insisted much of the angst was being driven by forces from the outside wanting to see the United States cease being a “super powerful nation.”

Partial transcript as follows (courtesy of RushLimbaugh.com):

America is under attack from within. Our culture, our history, our founding are under the most direct assault I have seen in my life. And I’m sure it’s the same with you. We haven’t seen anything like this. You might even get away with saying that we are on the cusp of a second civil war. Some of you might say that we are already into it, that it has already begun. However you characterize it, though, we are under attack from within. And it’s being bought and paid for by people from outside America, in addition to inside.

I’m thinking of people like George Soros and any other number of international financiers whose objective it is to take the United States out and down as a superpower, to literally erase the United States as a powerful or super powerful nation.

Now, folks, in order to defend America, which I believe is incumbent upon all of us, in order to defend America, you have to begin knowing our history. If you’re gonna defend the United States of America, you have to know our history. You have to know the purpose of the United States of America. You have to know unequivocally and proudly the United States’ place in history. And that is why erasing and distorting our history is crucial for the left to succeed.

None of this that is happening on the left is random. None of the riots, none of the protests. They are not the result of the left being offended by individual acts. Antifa didn’t show up in Charlottesville because they found out something was going to happen that offended them. They showed up in Charlottesville to create mayhem and cause hell. They showed up in Ferguson, Missouri, to do the same thing.

They showed up in Baltimore to do the same thing — and wherever they show up today and tomorrow and next week, it’s by design, on purpose, has an objective and an agenda. And that agenda is to erase American history. That agenda is to distort, erase, and impugn our history. It is crucial if they are to succeed. Because, you see, if enough Americans can be persuaded that America, as founded, is unjust — if enough Americans can be persuaded that America as founded is inherently racist and immoral and illegitimate — then it will be all that much easier to erase America as founded.

The two go hand in hand, which is the objective of all of these groups on the left. Whatever they’re called and wherever they go and however they organize and whatever their day-to-day purpose, their objective is to erase the history of America. It’s to restate it, to recharacterize it in such a way as to convince a majority of Americans that their country is illegitimate and has been from the get-go — is unjust and racist and bigoted and has been from the get-go.

If enough Americans can be persuaded of all of that — that America is inherently racist, that America is and has been a lie — then it’s over. That is the objective, and we are in the midst of it. Sometimes you’re so close to the forest you don’t see the trees. That’s what we are in the midst of here: An ongoing effort to erase America by discrediting the entire premise of our culture, our history, our founding. The objective is to create in as many American minds as possible that America as founded is not worth defending. Serious times.

This is a very, very serious effort that is underway. Sadly, it has a lot of allies. It has a lot of people helping it that ought to be opposing it, but they are choosing what they think is the path of least resistance, which is defined by the media. You’ve got several Republicans who I believe are unwittingly participating in the effort to cast America as indefensible, particularly with Donald Trump as president. Trump as president is, in their view…

The attacks on Trump, the characterization of his presidency, is designed to show how really flawed America is. That somebody like this could be elected, that means it’s time to get rid of the Constitution. That means it’s time to get… Whatever made Trump possible, it’s time to change it and get rid of it. This is very, very serious stuff happening here, and it has the aid and support of the media, which means it has the aid and support of the worldwide left and the Democrat Party.

America’s profound morality, kindness, widespread prosperity, and design for equal opportunity should be self-evident. But that assumes that factual, historically accurate reporting in education is taking place, and we know that it isn’t. It is a shame and a near crime that the profound morality and greatness and kindness and widespread prosperity and equal opportunity that is America isn’t known. It is a crime that those characteristics of our country are in the process being recast and erased. We are getting hysterically inaccurate reporting.

We have been in the midst of hysterically inaccurate education for generations. America is unique. America copied no other country. Every other country was a copycat of others, with governments that denied individual freedom, denied opportunity, denied sovereignty. That’s what was copied. Tyranny was copied, nation to nation, people to people. That is the history of humanity: Living in tyranny, living under authoritarianism, living in poverty, living in sickness — until the United States came along, which copied nothing.

The United States and its founders rejected all of that tyranny, oppression, poverty. In America, the individual was the supreme power. That is being erased under the premise that the individual is corrupt. The individual is likely a racist or a transphobe or a homophobe or some other ill-prepared sack of humanity, and so we need to overcome the corruption that is the individual, that incomparable embrace of humanity that is the United States of America.

There’s no place on this planet that human beings would rather be than the United States of America. And yet people born and raised in this country have been persuaded that America is a sinkhole, a hellhole, a sewer, a garbage dump, or a dungeon, and they’re in the process of actually creating all of that — under the guise that civil rights, equality, and liberty. The incomparable embrace of humanity that is the United States is under attack. Leftists, Democrats seek control over 100% of the population. They accomplish this with lies, such as the Affordable Health Care Act.

They accomplish it with one lie after another. The lies being told today are the lies designed to convince people their country is not worth maintaining as it is, their country is not worth maintaining as founded because it was founded as racist, sexist, bigoted, homophobic (you know the drill), immoral and illegitimate. Ignorant people will not remain free for very long. The media is working on a path parallel with school systems to actively and passively distort information to wipe out from the vestiges of our history and our memory any collection of stories that testify to the greatness of America and her people.

Sarah Brett on 5 Live asserted as fact that Breitbart was a Far-Right publication and that its readership was mainly white supremacists.  Perhaps Breitbart should get the lawyers in.

The BBC has also been snearing at Trump all day for his latest comments about the destruction or removal of Confederate statues…

US President Donald Trump has denounced the removal of “beautiful” Confederate statues amid a heated national debate about US race relations.

“Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments,” he tweeted.

“You can’t change history, but you can learn from it,” he continued.

Mr Trump drew outrage by defending organisers of a white supremacist rally that left a woman dead and dozens hurt.

Did Trump ‘defend the organisers of a white supremacist rally’ or did he correctly point out that there was violence on both sides?….and it is only the violence from the Right that the BBC et al focus on and denounce.

As for tearing down statues of Confederates because they fought to keep slavery going…on that logic Mount Rushmore would have to be blown up as two of its Presidential heads were slave owners…George Washington and Thomas Jefferson….founding fathers of the nation…they’ll have to go!….

CNN has published a hitlist…don’t see Mount Rushmore on it oddly enough….

Hit List: CNN Publishes Map of Confederate Monuments in U.S.

I can see a time when most decent folk in the US will become sick of being called racist just because of the colour of their skin and looking on as the liberal establishment seems intent on wiping out white people and their culture…they will become ‘radicalised’.

The so-called rise of the Far-Right is in fact the fault, ironically, of the self-same liberal establishment that so hates it…the liberal policies that are forced upon everyone using the threat of being publicly labelled a racist are themselves so extreme that it forces people nto the streets to protest and oppose them.

The German reaction is particularly strong – they know what they're talking about. https://t.co/OlySc6mhCs

— Katty Kay (@KattyKayBBC) August 16, 2017

Shouldn’t the Far-Left also be confronted?…surely Germany knows all about them as well having been under the communist jackboot for half a century, never mind all those millions imprisoned, tortured and killed by Socialists across the world.  Maybe that’s just too sophisticated an argument for poor old Katty Kay to get her little head around….best stick to ‘overheated rhetoric and oversimplification’ as well as an egregious display of liberal sanctimony for the benefit of her pals in order to burnish her oh so liberal credentials.

Remarkable hypocrisy as always from the BBC and its fellow travellers as they attack Trump for not singling out extremists on the Right for condemnation..he chose instead, quite rightly, to condemn all those who were violent in Charlottesville.  Seems the BBC [h/t Guest Who] thinks he is wrong…they are obviously quite happy to ignore left-wing violence…

My take after returning from a few weeks away. America – diminished and dismissed – BBC News https://t.co/RMGQjbSwKV

— Katty Kay (@KattyKayBBC) August 16, 2017

The BBC brings on dyed-in-the-wool anti-Trump voices to give us a balanced and impartial comment on events in America, such as a Demcorat ex-Mayor of Charlottesville…wonder what he would say.  The BBC totally fails to bring any perspective or context to the attacks on Trump…such as the fact that it was the hard left Antifa extremists who instigated the violence…they came well prepared and armed….wearing helmets, masks, carrying sticks, mace, pepper spray and tasers…they threw balloons full of urine, paint and mace at the people in the march.

The BBC tells us that Trump does not want to upset his ‘Base’ by denouncing Nazis, thus dismissing all those who vote for him as extremist racists…no such comments about those British politicians who turned a blind eye to events in Rotherham and Rochdale because they didn’t want to anger their ‘Base’…ie Muslim voters.  Similarly with terrorism….they refuse to denounce terrorism and the real roots of that terror, Islam, because they want the Muslim vote….case in point…

Sarah Champion forced out of Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet after warning Pakistani men are raping white girls

Trevor Phillips says about this….

“We shouldn’t have to have an argument about free speech, what this feels like is what we used to call democratic centralism in the Labour party, in other words Stalinism”.

But of course the likes of Corbyn, the Far Left and the BBC have no problem with Stalinism…just ‘fascism’.

Obama was the same as he refused to talk of Islamic terror in relation to, erm, Islamic terror, not only censoring his own speech but forcing the whole government to do so as well, scrubbing the word ‘Islamic’ from the record.

Then look at this speech following the murder of police officers by Blacks in Dallas…note how there is little condemnation of the killers and indeed there is excuses and explanation…..an astonishing amount of a speech about five murdered policemen devoted to explaining away their killers’ reasons…..

We’re here to honor the memory and mourn the loss of five fellow Americans, to grieve with their loved ones, to support this community, and pray for the wounded, and to try and find some meaning amidst our sorrow.

Like police officers across the country, these men and their families shared a commitment to something larger than themselves. They weren’t looking for their names to be up in lights……No. The reward comes in knowing that our entire way of life in America depends on the rule of law, that the maintenance of that law is a hard and daily labor, that in this country we don’t have soldiers in the streets or militias setting the rules.

Faced with this violence, we wonder if the divides of race in America can ever be bridged. We wonder if an African American community that feels unfairly targeted by police and police departments that feel unfairly maligned for doing their jobs, can ever understand each other’s experience.

I see people who mourn for the five officers we lost, but also weep for the families of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile. In this audience, I see what’s possible.

We also know that centuries of racial discrimination, of slavery, and subjugation, and Jim Crow; they didn’t simply vanish with the law against segregation. They didn’t necessarily stop when a Dr. King speech, or when the civil rights act or voting rights act were signed. Race relations have improved dramatically in my lifetime. Those who deny it are dishonoring the struggles that helped us achieve that progress. But we know…

But America, we know that bias remains. We know it, whether you are black, or white, or Hispanic, or Asian, or native American, or of Middle Eastern descent, we have all seen this bigotry in our own lives at some point. We’ve heard it at times in our own homes. If we’re honest, perhaps we’ve heard prejudice in our own heads and felt it in our own hearts. We know that. And while some suffer far more under racism’s burden, some feel to a far greater extent discrimination’s stain. Although most of us do our best to guard against it and teach our children better, none of us is entirely innocent. No institution is entirely immune, and that includes our police departments. We know this.

And so when African-Americans from all walks of life, from different communities across the country, voice a growing despair over what they perceive to be unequal treatment, when study after study shows that whites and people of color experience the criminal justice system differently. So that if you’re black, you’re more likely to be pulled over or searched or arrested; more likely to get longer sentences; more likely to get the death penalty for the same crime. When mothers and fathers raised their kids right, and have the talk about how to respond if stopped by a police officer — yes, sir; no, sir — but still fear that something terrible may happen when their child walks out the door; still fear that kids being stupid and not quite doing things right might end in tragedy.

When all this takes place, more than 50 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act, we cannot simply turn away and dismiss those in peaceful protest as troublemakers or paranoid.

Perhaps the BBC should take Obama’s advice and stop using ‘overheated rhetoric and oversimplification’ demonising all on the Right as the ‘enemy’ and failng to properly report on the issues….

With an open heart, we can abandon the overheated rhetoric and the oversimplification that reduces whole categories of our fellow Americans, not just opponents, but to enemies.