Last night, @realDonaldTrump sat down with @piersmorgan in an interview for ITV, discussing everything from feminism, to Brexit, to tweeting from his bed…
Did the interview make you see President Trump differently?
The question @EmmaBarnett is asking #EmmaBarnettShow pic.twitter.com/4kfpS5kL18
— BBC Radio 5 live (@bbc5live) January 29, 2018
Trump does an interview with ITV, much no doubt to the BBC’s chagrin…certainly the Guardian seemed somewhat sneery…
ITV Donald Trump interview watched by fewer than BBC news https://t.co/G3ZmUjZfDN
— Media Guardian (@mediaguardian) January 29, 2018
It was watched by 2.85 million more people than bought today’s Guardian. https://t.co/eSqO1T4ckl
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) January 29, 2018
Have to ask why Emma Barnett was so surprised at Trump’s performance and why she needed to ask if anyone’s perceptions of him had been changed because, as we’ve note before, Trump did plenty of interviews during the election in which he was coherent, moderate and intelligent, if the usual brash boaster. Did we hear any of this on the BBC? If the BBC ever did report on them such reports were drowned out by the tidal wave of reporting by itself that amounted to a sensationalist, sniping, smear campaign based more often than not on the salacious gossip and bought-in Democrat black-propaganda with reporters like Jon Sopel more intent on mocking and point scoring than relaying a true picture of what Trump was like and what his policies were.
The BBC failed to do its job and failed its viewers, they who pay those enormous wages, and why did this happen? Because the BBC was running a campaign to discredit, malign and demonise Trump. For all its apparent outrage at supposed Russian inteference in the US election the BBC itself shamelessly attempted to change the course of those elections by supporting Clinton and undermining Trump. Let’s see Mueller investigate the BBC’s interference and collusion with the Democrats….as well as it would seem the British intelligence services.
The BBC would never have been surprised at Trump’s performance on Piers Morgan if they had seen the previous interviews…which they have seen of course…they just chose deliberately not to report them in any meaningful way and instead chose to attack Trump and continue to do so to this day.
Here’s the interview transcript in the Spectator.
These are tweets that Donald Trump made last March:
(1) Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!
(2) Is it legal for a sitting President to be “wire tapping” a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!
(3) I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!
(4) How low has President Obama gone to tap my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!
The BBC’s man in America, Anthony Zurcher said that “There is scant evidence supporting these allegations” and tweeted his opinion that “We are witnessing the beginning of an epic case of water-muddying”
As of 30th January 2018, the BBC still has a March 2017 news story showing the BBC’s collusion with the Democrats by headlining the comments of Kevin Lewis. The memo is expected to prove the BBC headline to the story to be fake news based on a lie.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39168149
Also the Memo looks like it will force an investigation into the criminal actions of Britain’s Pro-EU Tory leadership and its support for Obama and the Democrats, by letting the Democrats use British intelligence agents to try and help crooked Hillary win against Trump, as well as getting MI6 to produce more doggy dossiers, this time blaming Russian interference rather than Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
https://action.larouchepac.com/trump_investigate_british_subversion?recruiter_id=48051
And, the said memo is to be released shortly: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-29/house-intelligence-committee-votes-release-surveillance-memo
Release the memo passed by Intel Committee, P Trump has 5 days to decide to release. Texted Emma Barnett to inform her of the memo – never mentioned on BBC but whole of USA is a buzz with it. Watch George Webb utube daily webcasts to be informed.
What about the moon landings, you forgot to mention the moon landings!
Yes, it’s remarkable the disconnect between the mention of the memo on Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, Jesse Waters etc and yet nothing on the Beeb.
How curious…
Scoop! Interesting the BBC has got quite excited by a leaked report it likes, from renowned impartial source Buzzfeed, when a massive survey it didn’t got deep sixed.
Editorial integrity probably.
Also in Buzzfeed…
…but less BBC.
“Jon Sopel more intent on mocking and point scoring than relaying a true picture of what Trump was like and what his policies were.”
Here Here…Like so much BBC so called news!!
Toady
I’ve cut down on al beeb and here for health reasons .but the last 15 minutes of toady had a bitter republican trying to flog his book about how bad President Trump is ( no challenge ) followed by a couple of those kidult unfunny comedians smuging with Humph over the house of expenses ranting today about the stupidity of the voter to vote .
Before for that Lord Judge lording it over parliamentary power and the chief got blimey plumber bloke ranting about remaining .now where’s that off switch?
Fedup2: I must have switched on the same time as you and heard the same trash. I understand your wish to switch off. Don’t. Develop the ‘cold and dispassionate’ feeling in your mind/heart and keep monitoring the enemy. It’s largely propaganda, and if we ever want to try and hold the BBC to account, we need to know what it’s up to.
From the start of listening, realise: it’s not news and comment; it’s a narrative they have chosen. Don’t expect anyone who’s written a pro-Trump book. Expect a plumber who thinks he knows his politics to pontificate; he spends most of his day with sewerage, and he will talk what he knows about. Expect any comedian to make jokes about Trump/Brexit; they all think they’re AWFULLY clever and original. Do you really think the BBC are going to bring on a comedian making jokes about Corbyn?!
We heard about Austria and Hungary meeting today, a vaguely ‘neutral’ report. We know that the BBC will be looking to report negatively on that meeting. Don’t expect anything else. But listen to WHAT they say and how it fits into their narrative.
You heard the pompous and unelected Lord Judge declare how ministers are ‘too powerful’ and parliament being ‘sovereign’.
He needs to go to Politics One and learn that parliament are ONLY REPRESENTATIVES of the people, who are sovereign. And when the people have held a referendum, THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN. This is DIRECT democracy, and we don’t need MPs or unelected Lords to meddle. But we know the beeb will always take an anti-people view.
So please, don’t be discouraged. Watch the enemy within. England expects.
i agree with you fakenewswatcher but it is so hard to listen and watch the bbias. i sat and thought about all the programs i used to listen to i wont go on about them you all know which ones, news programs, comedy etc. and realised i either cannot stand them anymore. it just makes my blood pressure too high. i thought about years ago when you could laugh at comedy and used to look forward to radio 4 comedy progs. but now all so called comedy on radio 4 is terrible, full of smug, lefty b””””””ds who think they are so funny as they pick up their inflated cheque at our expence. if they stopped the licence fee i would buy myself a bottle of champagne and celebrate, because sure as hell i wouldnt subscribe to watch or listen to the bias .
I think the point you and fakenewswatcher are discussing is crucial to us here. Like you, I’ve had to abandon the BBC. I can only take so much lying, obfuscation, spin and outright propaganda before it starts to make me very angry at having my picket picked by an organisation that is out to destroy Western civilisation.
Then again, I do take the point that we have to know our enemy, both to know what the cultural Marxists are up to and to be able to point out the bias to others who are, as yet, still being hoodwinked.
Choosing which you do is a very real dilemma.
‘Trump does an interview with ITV, much no doubt to the BBC’s chagrin’
I doubt it. Trump only does interviews with friendlies. Can’t imagine why.
‘Have to ask why Emma Barnett was so surprised at Trump’s performance and why she needed to ask if anyone’s perceptions of him had been changed ‘
Don’t see/hear any surprise myself, but presumably she asked because she’s presenting a phone-in show, and she’s invited listeners to phone in?
‘Trump did plenty of interviews during the election in which he was coherent, moderate and intelligent, if the usual brash boaster. Did we hear any of this on the BBC? ‘
Must be the first time those three words have been used to describe Trump, but if you didn’t see coverage of his interviews before, you really weren’t paying attention.
‘amounted to a sensationalist, sniping, smear campaign based more often than not on the salacious gossip and bought-in Democrat black-propaganda with reporters like Jon Sopel more intent on mocking and point scoring than relaying a true picture of what Trump was like and what his policies were.’
What can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
‘Let’s see Mueller investigate the BBC’s interference and collusion with the Democrats…’
He’s not, and he never will, nor is anyone else. In fact, I’ve never heard anyone ever suggest such a thing. Except you of course.
Here’s Trump being intelligent, moderate and coherent in that interview:
Transcript:
PM: Do you believe in climate change? Do you believe it exists?
DT: There is a cooling and there is a heating and I mean, look – it used to not be climate change. It used to be global warming. Right?
PM: Right.
DT: That wasn’t working too well, because it was getting too cold all over the place. The ice caps were going to melt, they were going to be gone by now, but now they’re setting records, so OK, they’re at a record level. There were so many thing happening, Piers. I’ll tell you what I believe in. I believe in clear air. I believe in crystal clear beautiful water. I believe in just having good cleanliness in all.
Here’s another beauty.
Are MORONS in charge? In a democracy, THE PEOPLE are sovereign. Parliament has DERIVED its sovereignty from them, only because it is impractical to hold a referendum every two minutes. They only represent us, we are NOT their subjects. This morning I discovered that Lord Judge (my, my, isn’t he grand, two ‘wows’ for the price of one) doesn’t even know the function of the executive.
Ministers, he declared on the bbc, were only administrators. Prattled on about the sovereignty of parliament, by which he meant his own UNELECTED self. Actually, ministers -appointed by the majority party/ies – run the show, buddy. They take EXECUTIVE decisions.
He really thought the likes of him run the show! Downboy…
And when the people speak, in a case of DIRECT democracy, we DON’T require parliament to ‘have a final look’ to see if they like it. That looks like a coup to me? Theirs is to implement the will of the people. It is also not to analyse LEAVE and decide it may mean this, it could be that, and what about the other? We don’t need BINO! They just need to get on and do it. Why do we have so many thickos , traitors and manipulators in parliament?
Now that the BBC are being forced into reporting on the Nunes memo it becomes the story according to the mad eyed Russiansunderthebed Democratic Representative Adam Schiff.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42868559
A piece of Shiff.
There’s one man who could’ve released the memo of course. POTUS.
We need the memos about the moon landings too.
Do ‘we’?
And is the moon you fave place for landings?
We’ve not really handled ourself well with Trump and the US in my opinion.
A jumped up little fool of a Mayor keen to do everything he can to dissuade Trump coming to the country and effectively sanctioning the riots in his city if he does.
A PM so desperate to virtue signal to an overly vocal minority that she’ll remonstrate a grown man like he’s some kind of child – he can tweet what the hell he wants.
A state media that embarrasses us at every turn with their hysterical bias and anti Trump narrative, yet expects the US to be impressed when they announce themselves “Laura Kuennssberg from the BBC” (looks around for anticipated reverence)
Creating an unhinged, anti Trump radicalised citizen that probably came the closest to assassinating the leader of the Free world.
All in all, and despite our efforts to get across that we aren’t all mental, you can totally understand the US being rather tired and exasperated with their pompous and arrogant allies on the other side of the Atlantic.
Says it all propaganda BBC interviewing Democratic Representative Adam Schiff about the FISA memo which only a few Democrats have chosen to read although plenty of time to do so. He has bought a fake memo – not read by anyone and no time to. He is on the list of corrupt politicians. BBC could have interviewed any senator especially those saying it should be seen by the public, but chose the slimeball instead.