All Yours
Start the Week 9 September 2019
Bookmark the permalink.
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
- Guest Who Dec 22, 23:11
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
There might be a smidge of irony here. https://x.com/rrrrnessa/status/1870495794236977278?s=61 You people are deeply, dangerously unwell and evil. The majority of… - JohnC Dec 22, 22:54
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
I always go to the user reviews then sorth them by date so you get the ones after the initial… - BRISSLES Dec 22, 22:49
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
Also a non white detective in new season of Death in Paradise. The diversity directive that has infected the drama… - JohnC Dec 22, 22:44
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
Children among dozens killed in Israeli strikes, Gaza officials say https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz9g4yl8j17o Here’s a new low: The BBC went from telling… - Deborah Dec 22, 22:22
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
I used to be a Covid numbers junky, from watching Valance asking for the next slide please to still regularly… - StewGreen Dec 22, 22:14
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
BBC presenters “we are IMPARTIAL IMPARTIAL IMPARTIAL” BBC presenter Paul Lewis Money tweets An interesting list of broadly good things… - Deborah Dec 22, 22:12
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
I am reading John C’s first post, and I am watching Wolf Hall at the same time. Cromwell’s daughter has… - wwfc Dec 22, 22:11
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you all https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7_F9wr-xnA&list=PLgo9WexfEcK2ZmqGd_-MR8aRDoWIz4CRC&ab_channel=RichardProulx-Topic - non-licence payer Dec 22, 21:37
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
When will the bBC wake up to the fact that their preferred Government and government is driving the UK into… - JohnC Dec 22, 21:36
Start the Christmas Week 23rd December 2024
And here I am : Christmas No. 1 !!!. Well, Christmas Eve at least if Fed is still sober enough…
Categories
agw anti-American anti-conservative anti-Israel anti Israel. pro Palestinian Antisemitism BBC - sickeningly biased at all times. BBC agenda BBC bias bbc bias and balance. bbc bias by omission BBC censorship BBC Question Time BBC selectivity bias Biased BBC climate change dhimmis general thread immigration Islam israel Mark Mardell obama obama bias Obamalove open thread pro-labour pro-palestinian pro EU pro Hamas pro Islam pro Labour bias pro Obama PRO OBAMA AT ALL COSTS. pro Obama BBC agenda question time question time live Richard Black save gordon. USA politics US economy US News US politics US presidential elections
Starkey HAS TO REMIND the R4 hacks on Toady, that parliament derives its power FROM THE PEOPLE, and is warning against parliament and what it is doing -‘deadly, deadly dangerous’.
I heard him eloquently reminding that labourite baroness on the power of the people and it was a joy to listen to common sense. What it did bring home is the utter disgraceful state of the opposition benches. And these scum are called honorable. What a joke.
It’s a mystery.
Well, GW, it sort of depends what suits the moment. Remember that O’Brien told Winston that two plus two might equal four in some circumstances, as well as three or five or any other number if it suited the Party.
On the one hand, we’re told there are multiple genders, a dozen, 72, 100 or any number you like, providing you don’t insist on a simple hetero-binary distinction.
On the other hand, the binary logic has its uses when there’s a particular agenda to be pushed. So, for instance, if Bruce Jenner wants to be Caitlin Jenner, Vanity Fair’s “Woman of the Year” [sic] not too many moons ago and the Gold medal winner in the Men’s Decathlon at the 1976 Olympics, then the logic is, “not man = woman”, i.e. he must be regarded as a woman if he says he’s not a man.
Likewise, Bradley Manning can become ‘Chelsea’ Manning and must not be misgendered. So, ok, if we accept that Manning is “not man”, by what non-binary logic can (s)he be a woman? The multi-gender pseudo-logic dictates that “not man” does NOT equate to “woman”, just as “not woman” cannot equate to “man”.
A sane Country … where a man called Stormzy who shouts out the name of his beloved “Oh Jeremy” and refuses to turn up to sing for his beloved is said to be the equal of Beethoven.
A sane Country where the wrong words can get you arrested or lose you your job from ASDA, just using a comedians views on a religion that is so sensitive it demands a word is created to stop any criticism, but will not create other words for other religions.
A sane Country where beating a drum and rubbing your crotch at Notting Hill with the police joining in is deemed as worthy as ballroom dancing and a symphony of Beethoven.
A sane Country the genital mutilation of girls is said to evil but the police cannot arrest anyone because that would be more evil and yet children as young as 4 are told they can have their genitals removed as a trans gender on the NHS so they can be who they really are even though they have no idea who that is yet.
A sane Country that has a border to protect by its Government but lets 66 migrants sail freely onto its shores then classes them as undocumented without worrying that criminals would do this very thing to escape jail in Iran.
AN INSANE COUNTRY …
An insane Country ….
It is parliament that has attempted, under Bercow, to become the dominant political institution -which will tell the PM what he can and cannot do in future.
It is now up to the people to cut the parliament back down to size, and remind MPs that they are the SERVANTS of the people, not their masters. The sight of some MPs drunk on power is not a pleasant one. They know they’re being televised, so play up to the cameras to earn their little place in history.
I look at the Blackfords and listen to the Grieves of this world, and I realise the extent of their corrosive fanaticism, visible and audible to all. Whereas the former is clearly a rabble-rouser, the latter is more dangerous – knowledgeable, a good speaker, couching his treachery in reasonable- sounding demands, while actually trying to undermine the Executive and the nation, in order -presumably -for us (and prospective employers) to see what a big shot and clever lawyer he is. The Rebels have suddenly discovered ‘THE LAW’, but that will be the case only for as long as it suits them. And they will be making it up as they go along, and simply shoving it through parliament with the connivance of he speaker, a law every day or two if necessary to achieve their objectives.
Time for the people to lay down some firm boundaries as parliament gets much to big for its boots, acting not for them, but for its own vanity.
BREXIT IS THE BALL!
Bercow Prorogued!
Brexit … the idea that others do not agree with you is so wrong and should be stopped.. …..
There are so many different versions of Hell arnt there?
The latest one is to spend eternity listening to traitor MPs telling Bercow how great he is .
I thought I’d wake up, turn on the TV and find the traitors still pouring joke praise on him . I bet he is watching the DVD for the umpteenth time …
More important news – the chancellor has announced duty free will return – because of Brexit …..
It reminds me of the old joke about the narcissist. In conversation he suddenly stops and says:
” That’s enough about me. Let’s talk about you, tell me how great do you think I am?”
John Bercow .. FOR DEMOCRACY! FOR FREEDOM! FOR THE FREEBIES!
Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources
Amount of donation, or nature and value if donation in kind: Two tickets for a football match on 20 September 2018, with associated hospitality; total value £340
Amount of donation, or nature and value if donation in kind: Two tickets for a football match on 4 November 2018, with associated hospitality; total value £440
Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: two tickets to attend the ATP World Tour Finals on Sunday 11 November 2018, total value £144
#Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: two tickets to attend the ATP World Tour Finals on Wednesday 14 November 2018, and associated hospitality, estimated total value £244
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/10040/john_bercow/buckingham#register
I’d like to see the personal and business phone records, texts, emails and other communications to and from messrs Hammond, Grieve, Clark, Adonis, Robbins et al. from the past three years.
I’ll bet they would reveal their treachery and be enough to have them prosecuted and jailed. In Belmarsh prison.
I’ll also bet that GCHQ has a copy of all of them. Perhaps Prime Minister Johnson should be demanding access to them.
Reference CAS-5589433-20BM52
Thank you for contacting us regarding the ‘Anti-natalists: The people who want you to stop having babies’ article published on the BBC News website.
I understand you feel the article should make reference to ‘genocide’.
This article aimed to explain who anti-natalists are and what their ideas are by speaking to some anti-natalists.
The article does explain that ‘no-one in their online communities is threatening murder or violence’ and not ‘all anti-natalists hate children.’
BBC News always aims to report accurately and impartially and use terms when contextually relevant and appropriate.
We do value your feedback. All complaints are sent to senior management and in this case BBC News Editors every morning, and I’ve provided your comments on our audience feedback report.
These reports are among the most widely read sources of feedback within the BBC and help inform both current and future reporting.
Thank you again for taking the time to contact us.
Kind regards
BBC Complaints Team
http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints
NB This is sent from an outgoing account only which is not monitored. You cannot reply to this email address but if necessary please contact us via our webform quoting any case number we provided.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-49298720
#grabspopcorn
“Newly erected poster of Ursula Von der Leyen in Brussels reads: “‘In fair free elections, the power of the people, determines the people in power”
1. She didn’t stand in a fair/free election – she was the EU’s only candidate
2. Doesn’t this feel a bit North Korea? ????????????”
First it’s the posters. Then it’s the statues. Then it’s mandatory to have the leader’s picture on the wall in every house, workplace and office.
Then come the songs in praise of the great leader, that must be sung in every school and workplace each morning. Followed by the joyless EU anthem.
In every French classroom from Monday 2nd September 2019 compulsory to have an eu flag alongside the French one.
NATO MYTH …
UK NOT IMPORTANT TO EU MYTH …
EU PEASE IN OUR TIME …
EUROPE HAS SPACE …
Reporters ambushed Dominic Cummings today about Brexit:
“What’s your next move?”
“You guys need to get out of London. Don’t talk to people who are rich Remainers”
“Will Britain leave the EU on time?”
“Sure”
Cummings tells it like it is.
Fatty Boultons face. A picture.
Brilliant.
As the BBC keep on repeating Bercow’s claim that this year prorogation is longer than standard – here again the table presented by “sciencefiles.org”:
https://i2.wp.com/sciencefiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Prorogation-length-1900-2019.png?fit=1188%2C742
So I thought I’d try and find another source and discovered this in the HoP Library. They bend the truth to suit their purpose:
“Prorogation is the mechanism by which parliamentary sessions are ended. On 28 August 2019, it was announced that Parliament would be prorogued no later than 12 September 2019. It was confirmed on 9 September that Parliament would be prorogued later that day, bringing an end to the current 2017¬-19 session which started in June 2017. The new parliamentary session is to begin 34 calendar days later on 14 October 2019.
Based on data since 1900, excluding first sessions of new parliaments (ie. those following general elections):
• The number of calendar days between the end of the 2017-19 session and the start of 2019 session would be the largest since 1930.***
• From 1900 until 1930, it was not unusual for there to be lengthy breaks between sessions, a mean average of about 72 calendar days. The median average was 54 calendar days.
• Since 1930, the mean average has been about 5 calendar days, a median average of about 9 calendar days.
• Since 1999, the mean average has been about 8 calendar days. The median average is around 5 calendar days.”
*** That is simply untrue: Parliament would have been absent from mid-September to early October during the three-week party conference season anyway – AS PLANNED AND AS HAPPENS EVERY YEAR.
Seems to me the length of prorogation is absolutely average?
Won’t hear BBC “admitting” this though.
The BBC’s Toady presenters must be tone-deaf. It would have been better if they hadn’t replayed the Opposition singing “anthems” in HoC last night (no doubt that will be repeated throughout the day – how appalling …)
While looking for the prorogation terms I found this, Guy Verhofstadt on twitter: “John #Bercow is a driven speaker and gifted orator but above all the keeper of the great British parliamentary tradition. I would love if we could welcome him in the European Commission or European Parliament”
Says it all really …
The blog on which I found it cheered me up a bit though…
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/09/john-bercows-nauseating-farewell/
Could the following be the new Parliament?
1. 43 MPs to represent each County in England and Wales.
2. All could be seated in a shipping container.
3. Parliament could be transported out of London and around the UK on the back of a lorry to meet the electorate.
4. Dominic Cummings as Speaker.
5. All to be in place by November 1st this year.
Not too much to ask?
More positive economic news following on from yesterday
Guido reports pay increases are up by 4% average – ahead of inflation .
Whilst all that remainer wind has been wasted the economy is ticking along …….despite brexit .
Fedup2
Al Beeb have now reported the good news with the Brexit ‘rider’ quote…………..
“Brexit uncertainty undoubtedly has sapped firms’ enthusiasm for hiring new workers, but sharply rising unit labour costs also are playing a role.”
Their ‘researchers’ must look at the posts on this site to gather their news ?
Watching Blackford last night
The right honourable member for Greggs kept banging on about ‘material change’ – the only ‘material change’ that fat c*nt needs is waist 54 trousers instead of 50.
“…the honourable member for Greggs” and “…only “material change” that fat Cxxx needs is a waist 54 trousers instead of 50.”
Thanks for that, it made me chuckle!
Blimey, I’m just glad he doesn’t wear a kilt…
Hefty curry and a few pints of heavy, and Scotland could have its own SR.N4
BBC Radio 5 Live, this morning.
Nicky Campbell must read this website as today he went through his usual rants then (I’ve never heard this happen before ) mockingly pressed some button or other and this happened;
A BBC ADVERTISEMENT (A THREAT ACTUALLY):
“paperless ways on how to buy your next TV licence. Its real easy to do it. Email us, write us, phone us, in fact everything can be done form your favourite armchair. Immediately etc etc”
BBC CODE: we can follow your every move electronically so you had better buy our licence or else.
I was paraphrasing sadly as the add was too long to remember for my brain.
But Campbell was in a very surely mood just afore he gave us the BBC above add.
Boris?
Swinson wants officially to cancel Brexit alltogether, I see.
Treacherous hag.
I understands she leads a party with ‘Democrats’ in its name.
Must be illiterate.
Suppose that will earn her a lengthy interview with beeb R4 news at 10pm tonight. They gave Dominic Grieve one last night, and I thought it was never-ending: The Dominic Grieve Show on R4. After that, they managed to squeeze N Zahawi in for the Tories, for a few minutes, but he sounded ineffectual after the combative Grieve. Anyhow, R4 made sure he had to be cut short.
Every Labour MP must be agonising something rotten just now knowing that the clock is unavoidably ticking down to the day of their departure and a return to a proper job. Especially the northern MPs. They will simply get obliterated. I’ve never known my family to be so angry at the lies of the remain MPs and those who assist them in their resistance of a GE. The dam will burst though. Soon rather than later. It must do.
So what is Boris’s big plan? Media are speculating non stop.
I could be wrong, but I see Boris still supporting a watered down Treezer deal.
For the next couple of weeks he bashes Labour for blocking an election and trying to delay Brexit. Then wham, EU agrees to a Treezer deal with Boris and we Brexit in name only presented, however, as a victory for Boris, getting us out for Halloween. Boris goes on to win the General Election as the peoples PM.
Farage will continue to fight for a real Brexit.
UKIP will fight for immigration control and be blasted by everyone.
It’s quite possible, but he must know that if he did that the Tories would be decimated in the subsequent election. He really has no option but to leave on no deal if he can find a way to do it. Though still the BBC pretends there are no loopholes by which he can.
Meantime, I read that No 10 fully expects an attempt to revoke Article 50 when Parliament returns. Are MPs really so oblivious to public sentiment as to try? On current evidence I’d say they are.
They just don’t care anymore. In this country we have no consequences for actions. Anarchy!
Seeing as the whole basis of QI is that what we have been told, quite likely by the BBC, is wrong shouldn’t the BBC be ashamed?
In the Telegraph this morning William Hague writes that it is a disgrace that Boris expelled the 21 Tory rebels. He goes on to say that the Tory party has always been a broad church and accommodated dissenting views, that these rebels are honourable men and women who have done great service to the party and country. It astonishes me that the Tory power brokers like Hague still don’t get it. The party that got 9% of the vote in the Euro elections in May is a dead duck. The only way it can survive is to deliver as a minimum a decent Brexit that Nigel Farage will at least conceed is much better than the May WA, even if he isn’t enthused about it. Of course the closer they get to an endorsement from Nigel the better things will be for them.
Tories like Hague are completely out of touch with the public and with most Tory party members. The public and Tory membership not only want a decent Brexit , but as the Brexit blockers in the liberal establishment continue their childish games , they want the establishment to be replaced by a more nationalistic one. The liberals across all parties have had all their cover stripped away by the Brexit struggle , we can see them to be anti British internationalist and we want rid of them. If you are a Tory MP, ordinary member or a grandee like Hague , join the revolution or face the consequences. It is the only way the Tory party can survive. I also think that a lot of Labour MPs should heed that advice because their cover has been blown as well and their constituents realise the MPs and Labour has not been representing their interests.
I note that yesterdays reasonably good economic news was relegated to a brief mention on the News at One and not mentioned at all on the News at Six. Dearest Faizal must have been lying down in a darkened room.
Double – Indeed, this whole episode has shown the voting public who’s who in the zoo, and when the time comes, we shall remember them.
Astonishing how many ‘Conservatives’ turned out to be anything but conservative.
As for ‘reasonably good economic news’, Barry, beeb managed to place that quite far down the rankings in later TV news bulletins. Now if Labour had managed that…
The BBC had the excuse for that on today’s Good Morning Scotland. All these PPI claims gave the plebs one-off money to spend. Yes, really. OK, they didn’t say “plebs”, but that was the inference.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations-and-statements/category-3/proposed-changes-bbc-iplayer?
Recently had a convo with an excitable Remainer about BBC programming, specifically transparency, editorial integrity and trust.
They started firing links at me. All iPlayer and staff tweets.
The convo stopped when I pointed out that I was unable to view the iPlayer programmes and two of the staff accounts cited had blocked me for asking questions they did not feel like pursuing.
The not only create and live in their bubble, they guard it fiercely.
How that is a viable state media model, I am unclear.
You watch the BBC now drop Sir Geoffrey Boycott from Test Match
coverage on the radio. I expect he will be replaced by some women
who ticks all the right boxes, as one by one the male presenters
and reporters are being replaced by women. So it’s now more
than 80% female presentation on news programmes. BIG BROTHER ,be he a he a she, or an it ,at the BBC must of had an
orgasm when hearing what Sir Geoff said to one of his many
women liberal bigot presenters.”.
“Good on you Sir Geoff” I say. And if the BBC go after you. There
will be MILLIONS of us , sticking up for you!!!!!!!!
I commented on Sunday, during the game that Geoff was noticeable by his absence these days. His appearances seem to be limited/closely controlled too just one or two a day, whereas Ebony Raining-Brent seems to get at least two stints a session.
I think I was trolled by a Pikey claiming it was due to his other ‘media commitments’ and nothing to do with some conspiracy theory regarding Al-Beebs diversity and women only agenda,
If the world’s greatest Yorkshire-man gets grief over his appearance on Toady, and there are ramifications for his already limited TMS appearances, cant he just state that any views ‘are my own’ ala Gary the crisp salesman’ Lineaker’, after all the jug-eared one has been getting away with spouting his undemocratic remain nonsense for years.
I watched University Challenge last night and if I am not much mistaken, one team member was a transgender person ( I am a middle aged woman from the West Country so a bit slow on the uptake in these matters, i am happy to be corrected. I called the other half in for a second opinion, I shan’t repeat his comment). What was very noticeable though was the ratio of close-ups the person got compared to the other contestants, about three to one. I was left feeling that some sort of point was being made, I’ll be bumswizzled if I know what though!
I agree Daphne .. I like UC but you have to be aware of the sly manipulation they use to get us to accept “genderism”. Every week I always scrutinise the contestants as I know they will be pushing the “gender issue” and in some instances it is difficult but you begin to see that “things just aren’t as they appear” I agree that the amount of camera time showing an obvious trans is completely over the top. Why??? do they do this ?? Can somebody tell me what I am missing in this current media propaganda?
Hello OC…i can only think that, given the broadcaster’s apparent view that most of the public are thick bigots who would be shocked and disgusted at the very idea of a transgender person, it is a form of aversion therapy…i.e,”if we bombard them with enough images, they will eventually accept it”. Again, I am possibly showing my ignorance but if someone has a genuine medical need to change gender, you would think that , having gone through that, they would rather then go about their business and live their life with no special attentions of any kind?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49645338
Parliament has officially been suspended for five weeks, with MPs not due back until 14 October.
Amid unprecedented scenes in the Commons, some MPs protested against the suspension with signs saying “silenced” while shouting: “Shame on you.
Silenced ??? Silenced ?? What rubbish. We have heard nothing but your anti democratic crap for 3 years + and what about the 17.4 million you utter cretinous traitors !! They really are something else. Just scum. Utter scum. And amazingly BBC have a HYS open , here’s a quick sample in the top 10.
So they’ve refused to listen to 17.4m people. Have handcuffed the PM during negotiations and have refused to let the people have their say with an election…. and then they hold up banners saying “Silenced”!
Hypocrite much? The absolute gall of these people!
Last nights fake protest by the remain Parliament was childish and pathetic. “Silenced”, I wish! all we’ve heard for the past 3 yrs is noise from these people. They have the cheek to complain about proroging Parliament & democracy when they’ve effectively prorogued the electorate since June 2016 and denied democracy. Whenever the election is they will be wiped out and they know it
…………………………………………….
Meanwhile. Out in the REAL WORLD … Boris’s ratings continue to rise !! BBC must be completely perplexed.
I’m totally befuddled by the Labour position. They today say on News front page what they would campaign for; yet when twice offered their chance (the second time last night) turn away.
They wave ‘silenced’ placards whilst spurning the chance to invoke their policies.
BBC Online News:
“”Tracking down a UK paedophile on the run in Bulgaria””
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-49639764/tracking-down-a-uk-paedophile-on-the-run-in-bulgaria
Our money would’ve been spent far better going to Rotherham and a host of other towns.
They’d have been better talking to the next Speaker.
DS,
Pity is was not, “”Tracking down a UK paedophile on the run in Pakistan”” some years back………….
Isn’t Tommy Robinson out of prison tomorrow?
I wonder what kind of press coverage he’ll get? I wonder if the racist far-left bbc collective will even acknowledge his release?
I wonder how Julian Assange is holding up? I’d think physically and mentally he must be in poor health.
I reckon the MSM will follow him and try to hound him. They are at a loose end for news at the moment, they don’t want to cover Corbyn at the TUC too closely as it may put the labour electorate off hearing too much about what they have I store for the unfortunate voters.
Jeremy Vine – What Makes Us Human with Neil Oliver sounds remarkably like Jordan Peterson’s philosophy.
Be responsible, bear a load!
Well I never!
Singing the Red Flag in the Commons.
Should be singeing…
GWF – Blatant and without embarrassment.
Maybe they’d be happier in Beijing, where they could join in with other red flags? Even Moscow’s given up on the idea, I was about to suggest them.
We’d be happy to be rid!
Yes that should impress the millions of freed up East European guest workers Remainers favour over Britons so much
Treating that hole with the disrespect it deserves . Just think – not so long ago a copper had his life taken for them .
“Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer…”
You really couldn’t make it up.
Yellowhammer.
This was produced assuming the worst happened. The worst case scenario.
It was ‘gamed’ to see what should be done to mitigate extreme and unlikely possibilities.
A sensible precaution to look at any future dangers and to then make sure we will have strategies to prevent or manage any event, however unlikely.
The opposition have taken this to mean that everything in this report, all the worst possible outcomes, will all happen and nothing will be done to counter this.
Funny how they will believe this report as gospel.
If you done the same type of extreme risk assessment for yourself you would never step outside.
You would never cross the road because you could be killed by a speeding lorry.
You could be struck by a meteorite and killed.
You could be stabbed (actually, not at all so unlikely, especially in londonistan)
In short, anything could happen and can sound as bad as you want it to.
You can avoid being run over by a lorry by looking left and right before crossing the road and can keep safe by taking precautions.
The remainers believe yellowhammer will all take place and regard it as a blueprint in the same way as they use 1984 as their manifesto.
Just like the Armageddon predicted by the remainers if we voted to leave the eu in 2016.
Of course, it didn’t happen.
It was more like the opposite happened.
This remark from Laura K is interesting. Does she know something that we don’t know?
‘And some of those tactics have been, at least temporarily, destructive, with a voluntary surrender of his own majority. (Interestingly, there’s a whisper that a way back could soon emerge for some of the 21 MPs who were booted out.)’
link here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49643343
GWF
I doubt that she knows that much . If Boris was dying in that ditch those traitors would bury him after emptying his pockets .
Maybe the coming party conference will let some light in . I know they tend to be very controlled these days but I’m sure there’ll be fun and games .
I was pondering the effect of the traitor MPs being deprived of the oxygen of publicity and maybe having to go visit the place which voted for them .
Some of them might know is as their ‘ constituency ‘ – some remainers going back to brexit majorities might get a shock . Hopefully .
I think it must be exciting, exhilarating even, to be part of Prime Minister Johnson’s team. Knowing you’re one of the good guys, finally helping to do something good and proper for our country.
If I was younger I think I might have pestered them to let me join in. It’s the first time in literally decades when people are focused on achieving a worthwhile thing, all the while fighting and defeating the wicked ones.
I woke this morning to the dulcet tones of Mark Sowatka speaking on the Today programme and likening Boris to Trump. Just been watching Julia Hartley Brewer on Talk Radio on You Tube talking with Dromey ….who likened Boris to Trump. I presume people talk of little else in Left wing circles.
However doesn’t either of them know how popular Trump must be in some circles in America, that is the circles I would assume were Labour strongholds in this country. Might both Dromey and Sowatka actually be promoting Boris without meaning to?
I heard JHB’s interview with Dromey this morning. Listening to his righteous indignation when he accused her of impugning MPs’ integrity was hilarious. “Darn right I am”, she said. Puffed-up self-important turd that he is.
You wouldn’t have got the BBC challenging him as robustly.
Perhaps JHB should have asked Mr Harperson about his views on PIE and his wife’s view on sex with children but there again not many in both traitorous Houses are bothered about rape gangs all over the country, so nothing to see here move along.
Deborah
I suppose mr dromey – ( real name -John eugene Joseph dromey )said he will vote for his wife as speaker . Funny isn’t it -wiki says one of their unknown number of homes is in Suffolk – not very near to eithers’ constituency …now back to singing the Red Flag…
In my opinion, Mr and Mrs Dromey-Harman are bad people.
People should be regularly reminded of their past misdeeds.
The racist far-left bbc won’t care about any of this because they swim in the same foul smelling swamp.
Border Force taxi service going strong.
https://news.sky.com/story/migrant-boats-spotted-in-channel-as-turkey-warns-it-cant-cope-with-migration-crisis-11806293
22 so far, believed to be from Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Philippines. More en route.
Off topic, as is my wont, I thought some of us who don’t have a TV licence and perhaps rely on YouTube and Amazon prime for entertainment, would be interested in a couple of series I have found worth the time to watch:
On YouTube: TRAVELER, one word. Eight episodes. It’s better than average, certainly head and shoulders above anything the racist far-left bbc collective had on offer. I stuck with it to the end of all eight episodes. Unfortunately, it ends on a cliffhanger but the US TV stations must have decided not to make any more.
On Amazon: Gogol. Yes, it’s loosely based on Nickolai Gogol. I’ve watched the first episode – in Russian with English subtitles – and I’ve enjoyed it a lot. Obviously, I’ll have to see if the quality of storyline holds my attention but I’m looking forward to watching episode two tonight.
Jack Ryan on amazon is surprisingly good too- I almost started binge watching it – a find replacement for all things BBC . Dump your TV licence ….please …( the TV bods still write to me telling me I’m on a ‘kill’ list or similar ) … see what too much jack Ryan does ?
I see that fount of all wisdom and unbiased opinion that is Polly Toynbee advises us, in the event of a no-deal Brexit, to vote for Jeremy in his role as final arbiter of political acumen and probity.
Then again, it was in the Guardian – not least because it’s the only organ of pleasure left to her – so it might have been tongue in cheek, so to speak.
I forgot to report earlier that I listened to Toady this morning and heard the interview with the author of some childrens book(?). Cult followers were apparently let in to Waterstones to purchase said book and midnight in the midst of wild hoops of delight and cheering when the doors opened. From what I can gather in the interview between the author and the bee cult follower, it is a sort of modern day 1984 but which applies to the US in that the women are treated as mere ‘childbearers’. The author was asked about Brexit, curiously, but despite being an American and clearly a ‘man hater’, had an opinion. That it was wrong and would be different if only women ruled the World. Like Sweden I guess. Off.
As an afterthought I don’t think a comparison could be genuinely made with 1984 as that author was, (as I recall), non-discriminatory in the war the current females are waging against men. Ah well, perhaps the book related to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States after all…………….
G It was Margaret Atwood , a Canadian author of The Handmaids Tale. It’s not a children’s book. She wrote it in 1984, I read it and was quite a good read and has been made into two series which I enjoyed watching, However they have now made a 3rd series and she has written another book.(1 series and 1 book too many) why do they always flog a good thing. In 1984 it was a different world but now as she is a raving Democrat she has suddenly discovered it could be a Trumpian dystopia.Idiot woman, when I read it I instantly thought this is a description of life under ISIS.Women kept as slaves, made to reproduce, kept down without having any say in their lives and made to wear uniform and capes and hats so they could only see in front of them…hmm maybe not only ISIS but most of the middle east. I’m afraid she is just a hate merchant.
Radio 4 brief news bulletin at 16:00 today Tuesday.
(1) British White nationalist sentenced to 18 years in prison for attack on a Bulgarian and advocating attacks on Muslims, in the immediate aftermath of the Christchurch (NZ) atrocity.
(2) Boris, Brexit, talks with Arlene Foster leader of the DUP, etc.
(3) Renewed IRA attacks on police officers in NI, in Creggan area.
(4) Blood test that picks up cells indicative of prostate cancer, making invasive surgery less likely.
An interesting running order. What do people here think about the relative importance of these stories? My order might have been (2) – (3) – (1) – (4) or maybe (3) – (2) – (1) – (4) but I don’t think I would have put the BBC’s first item (1) first … though I’m not surprised that this one was given prominence.
Yes, interesting that the judge was so keen to label it a terrorist incident, given the number of ‘diverse’ attacks we’ve had that were quickly labelled as due to mental health issues. It’s pathetic.
Further to Guest Who’s post about this yesterday – now we hear Lord James is being threatened.
‘Hero of Brexit’ Lord James of Blackheath Threatened over EU Defence Union
Secret Party Political Pact of Silence on Defence Reveals Itself
The abusive responses Lord James received from Lord Blunkett and Lord Robertson in the House of Lords were mild compared to more recent communications.
Since then, other Lordly colleagues have begun demanding he resign immediately and have advised him he can expect a visit from the police for breach of the Official Secrets Act.
Lord James has had the bravery to lift the lid on a policy no-one else in the political establishment wants to discuss. He needs widespread public support.
The conspiracy of silence continues.
Messrs Blunkett and Robertson, a couple of the usual suspects.
Island this brave Gentleman (there are few about nowadays) says what a lot of us fear. Now he faces being drummed out of the Lords. Here is an open letter of support. Both his address and the reply below are REALLY worth reading.
Dear Lord James of Blackheath,
Firstly may I congratulate you on this speech you made in the House of Lords on Friday last.
To remind everyone, here is the main body of your speech:
“My Lords, a week ago, I wrote a letter to the Lord Speaker in which I suggested that in certain circumstances which might occur, such as this morning, the entire House of Lords is ineligible to sit. I do not intend to pursue this point, but I want to explain why it occurs. I think it is important to us.
If the Lisbon treaty is allowed to stand and is not wiped away at midnight on 31 October, we are all, every single man jack of us, in breach of our oath on joining this House because we have allowed the omniscience of Parliament to be reduced by the elimination of the veto which was standing in our benefit until the Lisbon treaty. That has far-reaching consequences which go way beyond us and reach into the Palace and the Crown itself. We need to be aware of those implications. If I am right on that assertion—I have taken it to the Table Office and asked it to think about it, so there must be some professional opinions around—then we would be ineligible to sit today, and it would mean that this Bill cannot pass the House. I am not pursuing that.
What I am going to say is that I think the basis on which we are going forward from here is wrong because we have a situation in which we are facing a choice between remain, the no-go solution and, as came very much into focus in the latter stages of yesterday, the possible resurrection of the May deal. The May deal and remain both carry the same consequence that they would still leave us in breach of our oath. We need to have our oaths restored to us, which would happen if at midnight on 31 October if the Lisbon treaty was wiped away.
The first person we need to be concerned about in that respect is Her Majesty because we have the power of government placed in our hands by the coronation oath which she swore never to diminish, but we have diminished it for her. In those circumstances, do the British public realise they are being asked to consider a situation which might create a position in which Her Majesty would consider it was essential for her to abdicate? If that occurred, would it ever be possible to resurrect the monarch because nobody else could swear the same coronation oath? Let us be realistic about this. My whole criticism of the situation of opposition to no-go at the moment is that we simply have not informed the British public of what is at stake. It goes way beyond this.
We have this wonderful paper called Yellowhammer, which tells us all the dreadful things that will happen if we do go no-go. My secretary has an alternative list that I have complied called the Black Vulture, which is my list of the things that people do not know about which will happen if we do not go no deal. The first is the hazard it creates for the Crown. The second is: will somebody please tell us the truth about the European defence union? This is by far the biggest issue facing the British public and they know nothing about it officially. Can we please have a proper account of what it entails? Is it really true that the Government have entered into private agreements with the European Community that they will, on completion of remain or whatever it is to be, transfer to the European Union in Brussels the entire control of our entire fighting forces, including all their equipment? [Laughter.] Noble Lords may jest, but it has been done and they should check it out. It is too important to ignore. We must know the truth of this. We must have it clear for the whole public to know. I believe it is true, and I think we should be told. I understand that it is intended that the oath of every serving member of our forces will be cancelled and they will be required to undertake a new oath of loyalty to Brussels. I understand that in recent months, we have had a series of people sent from our Armed Forces to create and install the command and control centres to be used for the control of our troops once we have ceased to have any control over their use, application or deployment. It goes beyond this. They are to take control of our intelligence services, the whole core of Five Eyes. They will have MI6 and the Cheltenham monitoring centre, and we will be completely excluded from it under the new arrangements and have no access either to the— (giving way to Lord Blunkett, Labour).”
(Link to this speech In context Individually – Citation: HL Deb, 6 September 2019, c1235)
Lord James – as I see it, your amendment was ‘dropped’. Now you mention that the House of Lords cannot sit due to their Oaths having been made to the Queen and this obviously conflicts with the Lisbon Treaty. This comment raised some eyebrows among people like myself who have become more acquainted with our Constitution.
The House of Lords has been conducting itself unlawfully since 2000 due to the enactment of House of Lords Act 1999. I can find nobody absolutely nobody that focuses on this crucial aspect of our constitutional betrayal. This makes all legislation passed since then, null and void and this includes the Lisbon Treaty. I believe that you are a lifetime peer yourself and due to this matter, you are unfortunately personally implicated too. This information is not readily available on the internet but I have the evidence if you so wish to view? Suffice to say many peers turned up for work after the Act was passed and found themselves unable to gain entry to the House. Perhaps this is not surprising because many Lords have no official email address like your good self or at that time, did not use the internet at all?
The following is a video that I have uploaded it onto my own YouTube channel just this morning.
Very factual and a sad indication on how low our Parliament has sunk?
The following video shows the timeline of the House of Lords being gradually ‘erased’ from the once all important role that the House used to have in British Society. As you are aware, the House was formed to provide the checks and balances to our ‘elected’ MPs. Unfortunately, the House of Lords is crammed full of political appointees from different political parties.
With regard to military matters, Dave Ellis, Carol Hellier and I orchestrated a very efficient campaign to notify the MPs that ‘we’ were planning to hand our military to Brussels. It is very clear to me that NATO is about to be disbanded which is not the government’s official narrative. I will leave this matter here for now.
Anyway, I’ve provided lots of information for you to ‘sink your teeth’ into. There are no real constitutional experts around IMHO.
Kind regards, Caroline Stephens
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49645498
Trump Dorian tweets: Weather staff ‘faced sacking threat’ over Alabama
FFS, they are still banging on about this. TDS and their agenda is so obvious – orange man baaad, blonde man baaaad, Brexit baaaad.
Give it a bloody rest! I suppose during the parliamentary shut down, they will be looking for other stupid titbits to drive us crazy. I do try to avoid Al Beeb, but its twin sister Sky is just as bad.
Fox website is also rubbish – resembles the Daily Mail Online!
Now there’s something they can go on about. And on…… and on….. and on……
Al Beeb “Brexit: PM insists deal is possible as he holds DUP talks”
Don’t waste your time Boris, just “hold talks ” with The Brexit Party.
Or you and your band of London Nincompoops Party are finished . They have been the laughing stock for over three years. Its The Brexit Party for me now, look how well they did in The EU Parliamentary Elections.
P.S.
Do I get a “knighthood” for this post ?
taffman
I watched many people say that they were finished with the Tories under May. Boris might be man of the moment, but he is too eager for a deal and might emerge with Treezer’s deal slightly tarted up.
So its the Brexit Party keeping a look out for UKIP
Taffman Earl of Splott? Baron Brynbuga or maybe Lord Pant Y Wacco ? 🙂
Call in Malcolm Tucker, he’ll sort it.
My theme for today is the treatment of Sir Geoff Boycott by the glorious BBC
me thinks they don’t like him
R4 5 pm news headline ‘there have been calls for Sir GB to be stripped of his Knighthood after he said I don’t give toss about domestic abuse’
Which is not what he said and it is typical BBC lying by omission and word play (who has made these calls..hmm let me guess..might it be the same woman who clearly hates him)
They set him up at 8,30 – had the women who hates him in on woman’s hour to denigrate him and then at 5 the announce a call to strip him of award
All I can say is Bas..ds….A complaint will be going in..
They no longer report news they make it…
He did not day that, he said he did not give a toss about calls strip him of his knighthood (by a bunch of sexist harridans,..my addition)
Wireless keyboard needs new battery should check before posting ….
Apologies in advance for 3 tweets in a row, but, Piers (the remainer) nails it.
Then the usual lefty response which piers quite rightly points out is plain wrong ..it was Armageddon on a vote to leave, not leaving , just having the audacity to vote leave would be economic suicide we were told !!!
Pug I don’t know who this chap is or what spiked is but he seems quite moderate in his view of their parliament .
Whatever happens in the near future people in a decade or more from now will look at the kind of conduct last night and wonder what happened – a kind of group psychosis – mental issues?
Any Wiff of English Nationalism and it is crushed as far right . Yet those creatures welch nationalists and Scots nationalism basically have made the place a sick joke – aided and abetted by an abusive speaker ranting at politicians in public .
There may not be a General Election any time soon . Why should there be . ? The anti democratic
Grouping of parties can get what they want when they want it – as evidenced by the volume of ‘ urgent questions ‘ where Bercow has pulled some minister in to be toasted by unrestricted ‘ opposition ‘MPs
In the current circumstances brexit supporting MPsof any colour are under attack by all sides and might as well avoid the commons until we our out of the EU on 31 October .
I had a little look at Hansard on the ‘ fixed parliament bill ‘ as it went through the lords . It seems to have been ‘ rubber stamped ‘ without too much thought .
It demonstrates that the usual stuff thrown out whenever the legitimacy of the House of Lords just does not apply .
It does not ‘ refine ‘ bad law sent from the commons. 850 of them didn’t amend to to prevent a PM being unable to call an election .
It’s just a retirement home for Party Leaders favourite mates – no merit – again no democracy . The bubble doesn’t say anything because they all want to be in it one day
One thing has become abundantly clear from the whole Brexit debacle. The UK system of governance is no longer fit for purpose and needs completely overhauled. It is time for a written constitution – though how you get general agreement to anything in the current atmosphere I do not know.
As pointed out today by the organisation I was attending: we are not being governed by the government at the moment but by a bunch of MPs and a speaker who appear to have taken over the government
I do not recall the “Shower of Sh@t with Amusing Ties” party on the last general election ballot card but there they are…
Roland – I understand that Canada had constitutional problems about prorogation but it was a bit more ordered because Canada has a written constitution.
I’ve not had a chance to research but I may well do .
I can’t see British politicians being in an mood to change anything whilst they are making a nice living out of it .
Fed up
Check out Spiked. Long ago it was a Marxist outfit, but has morphed into a credible news sheet with excellent articles. Usually hostile to Trump but certainly in the conservative camp with its campaign for free speech. Highly critical of bogus reporting, especially our friends in the BBC
Fed up, you have hit on something that is concerning me a lot. That is, that due to the Fixed Term Parliament, the “rabble” can continue to control things on return in October. This vould go on for dome time. Even worse, could one of the rebel Tory’s start introducing a bill to lower the voting age, thereby handing militant “uneducated” potential voters to the remain side to help them over the line if a Lib Lab pact did eventually get a majority Noted at the election.
Does Boris resigning force an election, or could the “rabble” form a Government, change the rules, go for a second referendum or simply agree to revoke Article 50.
If so, the blame has to firmly go on the shoulders of Remainer Tory MPs who have continued to conspire against the will of the people. They alone will be responsible for the demise of their own Party if Brexit is not fulfilled. That’s Brexit, not BRINO!
Pug
Powerful stuff . But I fear that we ( people ) are stuck with the parliamentary situation for some time to come. I was going to say ‘ foreseeable future ‘ but that might only cover the next hour …
Yes, the Lunatics take over the asylum whenever they please.
Hugh being impartial.
Oh yes and a torturous but lovely 139 mile drive from Campbeltown to Glasgow with no chance of widening or straightening the narrow winding road without some serious explosives : check out the Rest and be Thankful, (maybe the IRA could take on the contract?)
The regular rock slides will block the road and involve a diversion of about 80 + miles along narower roads
Could always try the Galloway route of course. 20 miles vs 12 miles but probably cost more than HS2 with the need to upgrade roads to make either viable, needs to be wide enough to cater for drunk polish artic drivers travelling at 70 mph drinking peach schnapps whilst cooking breakfast on a primus stove and texting local prositiutes whilst watching porn DVDs and overtaking on the inside lane 6 inches behind any cars in the way
Or you could just take the ferry from Campbeltown to Ardrossan. It’s a nice sail, albeit it’s far too infrequent.
But the likelihood is that the Scottish end of any bridge to N.Ireland would be located at Portpatrick, not Campbeltown. Still far from ideal, of course, but apt to be much less onerous on drivers than the more northerly option.
Not that it will happen anyway.
Sykes is an idiot. The nearest motorway to Portpatrick (the M77) is around 75 miles (120 kilometres) away. And the nearest sustained stretch of dual carriageway is rather less than that. The point being not that the roads on the mainland side of the bridge are ideal but that, in true BBC style, Sykes can’t even get simple facts right.
Always the Twin Otter from Macrihanish airport and they used to land Galaxys at the USAF base there so no problem with moving cargo, one of the longest runways in Europe ….
used to give my Dad’s dobermann a nervous breakdown walking on the beach each time one landed,