Midweek 6th August 2025

By | |

The latest BBC scandal – top presenter charged with Rape x2…… “

we’ve long had free speech in this country – but this is where it ends … “

Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Midweek 6th August 2025

  1. Scroblene says:
    August 5, 2025 at 9:07 pm

    …and I was only checking my emails – honest…

       2 likes

  3. Fedup2 says:
    August 5, 2025 at 9:45 pm

    Alison Pearson carrying the conscience of Britain —-from the DT …

    STARTS was having coffee in the garden with John, the lovely man who comes to help me with all the jobs I can’t manage (a temperamental pond pump and rampant blanket weed among them), when conversation turned to John’s concern for his daughter.
    Kirstie’s journey to college takes her past a former RAF base now occupied by illegal migrants who crossed the Channel in small boats. Their ranks have swollen recently to several hundred as the Government struggles to fulfil its promise to empty asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. Not by deporting the legions of undocumented young males from Africa and the Middle East – of course not, silly! – but by secretly redistributing a majority of those migrants from hotels into HMOs (houses in multiple occupation) and military facilities, presumably in the hope that the public will be less likely to notice and kick off.
    But girls like Kirstie cannot fail to notice. Not when the foreign males who leer and hiss at them, as if they were living in Egypt not Essex, now outnumber the population of their village. Not when it is girls who were born here who are advised to change their behaviour to accommodate the culture of the new arrivals by being less provocative, and walking a different way to school.
    Lately John, like a lot of fathers I suspect, has started fearing the worst. “We were talking in the pub the other night and we decided that, in the end, it’s men like us who will have to go down and defend our southern border,” he said to me that day in the garden.
    The bees went about their buzzy business in the hollyhocks, there was a gentle trickle of water in the pond, its pump just mended by this good and reliable man. It was a quintessential English summer’s day, temperate and benign as the people of these islands tend to be until roused, yet there we were, drinking our coffee and picturing thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of Johns, the backbone of our country, the sturdy yeomen who have always come to the rescue in centuries past, marching to the beaches of Kent to protect us against invasion. To protect their women and children.
    That may sound alarmist, apocalyptic even, but is it really? When men like John are discussing in Wetherspoons what normal people can clearly see is a national emergency, no online Starmer-Stasi snoopers can stop them much, though a panic-stricken, authoritarian government would like to shut down free speech.
    Things that we would once have thought unimaginable, indeed completely bonkers, now feel like weekly, almost hourly, occurrences. Over 25,000 migrants, mostly young males, have already broken into Britain this year (49 per cent more than at the same point last year), and the nation that launched the D-Day landings against a mighty foe is now reliant on a spell of bad weather to keep the numbers down. Or on the latest doomed government “one-in-one-out” scheme, beginning today, in which France generously allows herself to be bribed at British taxpayers’ expense to take back maybe one of the 700 migrants who make the crossing in a single day, only to send the UK a substitute asylum seeker. Probably not a brain surgeon, to take a wild guess.
    Not only will such a tiny chance of being deported fail to act as a deterrent, it allows Labour to slyly open up a legal route into the UK while pretending it’s a benefit to us.
    What would those who gave their lives in 1944 think of us – from Operation Overlord to Operation Over-Run in 80 years?
    Since the 2015-2016 New Years’s Eve celebrations in Cologne, when around 1,200 women were raped or sexually assaulted by gangs of foreign men, I have warned repeatedly of the consequences of admitting young males from backward, misogynist cultures into a liberal, Western society. Naturally, telling the truth got me called “racist” and I earned a coveted place on an Islamophobia list.
    But the pretence that a farmer from Afghanistan suddenly turns into Hugh Grant the minute his trainers hit the shingle at Dover was always a progressive fantasy. Sex-starved lads raised to regard women as livestock (Afghan women are no longer allowed to speak outside the home let alone go to school) are poor candidates for integration. They were always going to take gross liberties with our liberty. And so here we are.
    In leafy Nuneaton, a 12-year-old girl was allegedly raped by two Afghan asylum seekers. Despite Warwickshire Police’s best (make that worst) attempts to conceal their identity, Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was charged last week with rape, while Mohammad Kabir, 23, was charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape. The police explained they did not wish to reveal the suspects’ immigration status for fear of exacerbating our old friend “community tensions”. In this case, community tensions is code for furious parents who strangely don’t want their daughters abducted, their innocence torn from them by barbarians who shouldn’t be here in the first place.
    In another incident on July 13, a Sudanese man who was living in a three-star asylum hotel in the upmarket Cheshire suburb of Wilmslow allegedly tried to lure away a girl aged 10 while she was with her father.
    Epping, meanwhile, has seen fierce protests after an Ethiopian, who had only come ashore eight days earlier and was being put up at the Bell Hotel, was charged with the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl.
    These alleged attacks are not an aberration; they are exactly what you would expect if you were to drop a gang of marauding vikings into a high-school prom at an all-girls’ school. That has, effectively, been the policy of successive British governments. Our political class prefers to burnish their reputation among “our international partners” by remaining in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), making deportations almost impossible, while young girls – catcalled, groped, raped, strangled, abducted – are just thought of as unfortunate collateral damage. If they think about them at all.
    When it was disclosed recently that a superinjunction had been taken out by the last Conservative government to cover up importing thousands of Afghans into the UK, following a leak of names, I was berated on X by former defence minister Ben Wallace for daring to suggest that that underhand humanitarian mission could raise the level of risk for British women and girls.
    Mr Wallace thought the noble purpose of extricating men who may (or may not) have aided our armed forces was what mattered. I disagreed, foreseeing ever more rapes and cultural disintegration. A fate also predicted with some urgency, I notice, by US vice president JD Vance who last week accused Europe of “engaging in civilisational suicide”.
    Coincidentally, a reader in Wiltshire got in touch to report how all those Afghans resettled in a local army camp are getting on. “It’s horrific, Allison,” she said. “The behaviour of the Afghans in Larkhill – loitering around children’s playgrounds, lads “messing” with girls on school buses, human faeces regularly found on dog walks in camp. The GP practice is closed to soldiers one day a week to allow the migrants exclusive access. The reception staff have been handed crib sheets on how to greet Afghans in their own language. They are incensed. ‘Why aren’t the immigrants given crib sheets on how to address us in our own language?’ ”
    My source says the Afghan families have been allocated most of the large houses, while soldiers who are entitled to bigger quarters are told “there isn’t a three-bed house in the whole of Wiltshire”. It’s no surprise to learn that “resentment is massive. The Afghans get free food – the truck goes round at least twice a day.
    “If you drive through the camp you’d think you were in Kabul – groups of several men walking ahead of the women all covered in head-to-toe niqabs. Since the news of the superinjunction broke, they’ve been put under curfew. All the lads were warned that if they spoke out they’d be put on a charge.”
    See how the state acts to cover up its crimes against the British people. Whether it’s silencing squaddies deprived of their rightful quarters or threatening with arrest those marvellous mums and grandmothers in raucously defiant pink who performed the Hokey-Cokey before staging a sit-in outside the Britannia Hotel asylum centre in Canary Wharf. It is politicians and senior civil servants who should be arrested, I reckon. They waste stupefying amounts of our money on people unlikely to ever make a net contribution to Britain and call it compassion. For whom? The National Audit Office has just predicted that, within 10 years, the cost of asylum accommodation will reach £15.3bn. It is intolerable. Imagine all the good such a sum could do to help struggling businesses and boost employment for our young people.
    Even when the popular sense of anger is palpable, as it is right now, the ability of our ruling class and much of the media to deny any adverse consequences of immigration is astonishing. I listened with mounting anger to Radio 4’s PM programme on Monday (Sorry, mea culpa. I know you’ve told me to ditch the BBC!) where a reporter was trying to discredit data which showed that 40 per cent of sexual crimes in London were committed by foreign nationals. That, he explained, was only because migrants tend to be younger, and young men are most likely to commit those offences. I’m sure that will be a huge comfort to the traumatised women.
    All credit to Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick for causing consternation among the Open Borders fanatics by making the link between out-of-control migration and soaring rape figures. Compare the response of our woefully weak Prime Minister who wants to “put pressure” on police chiefs to be “as transparent as possible” about the ethnic background and immigration status of those charged with crimes such as rape and sexual assault. Even though it is the Crown Prosecution Service, which Sir Keir Starmer once ran, that refuses to keep track of the number of sexual offences by asylum seekers. We know why, don’t we?
    Government sources said they hoped greater transparency would “help rebuild the public trust”. As if. That’s the same government which is mounting unprecedented and sinister surveillance to keep track of “anti-migrant” opinion. Fifty million people will shortly be helping the police with their enquiries.
    “If you come here illegally on a small boat you will face return,” Sir Keir Starmer warbled at migrants yesterday. Not, “You will be deported immediately” but “you will face return.” Or, let’s face it and far more likely, “You will be handed a free phone and free accommodation which we will pinch from a soldier’s family if we have to.”
    Compare with Greece, which has set up secure camps to detain all illegal migrants for three months, all of them denied the ability to claim asylum. Emergency legislation is allowing Greeks to circumvent the ECHR. Denmark, another ECHR member, has practically closed the borders and is using gated detention camps, some housing up to 2,000 migrants who are allowed out for just two hours a day and cannot work. If a government wants to put its citizens first, it can. Ours doesn’t.
    From now on, I suggest we put the blame for every rape, abduction and strangling by an illegal migrant squarely where it belongs – on the Government, Home Office civil servants and complicit media class.
    We don’t want a one-in-one-out scheme, thanks all the same. We want a 50,000-in-50,000-out scheme. We want Kirstie and every girl like her to be able to walk unmolested to school, not to be hissed at by men who lack all respect for our values and our women.
    If our leaders are too weak to act, lovely John and the yeomen of Britain will go to the border, and they will do what needs to be done.ENDS

    1.26 k comments at 10pm Tuesday night – with a lot of people predicting civil war ….

       7 likes

  4. Fedup2 says:
    August 5, 2025 at 10:44 pm

    Tommy Robinson – on X – says he has been charged with 2 offences under the censorship act – by the TTK stazi – aka – the metropolitan police … we need a new police ‘agency ‘,

       4 likes

  5. vlad says:
    August 5, 2025 at 10:56 pm

    I heard a good expression today : the Starmtroopers, said of the police. Seems apposite to the above post 🙂
    Let’s try and make it catch on.

       4 likes

  6. Nibor says:
    August 5, 2025 at 11:17 pm

    What do Stalin , Pol Pot , Putin , Luschenko , Ji of China , Mugabe , King Herod , Tamerlane the terrible and Attila the Hun all have in common ?

    They are all political personages that the BBC prefers to Nigel Farage .
    At least that is the impression you get listening to their so called comedies on Radio 4 .
    What a pity their so called comedians couldn`t sit with the cackling old hags near the guillotine at the time of The Terror .

       3 likes

Leave a Reply