BBC in its’ happy place – being the official spokesman for tha Islamic Hamas Terrorist gang as it mourns for maybe 6 killed by the IDF in Qatar – which harboured them . Meanwhile the President of Israel is visiting Britain to give moral support to the Jewish British. We can guess what attitude the BbC is going to take to him . If you still have a TV licence – please dump it . By the way – please don’t use the M word on this site . The word ‘muppet’ is now covered by s4A public order act – so using ‘muppet’ in any context may result in a visit from ‘plod ‘ – a word which may also be an offence ….
Midweek 10th September 2025
Bookmark the permalink.
Lucy, that video does not make sense. No shots were fired. Where was the gunman?
In the video from Lucy there is a single shot and then the speaker’s head moves to the side.
a_s, no, no gunshot and you could not see Kirk’s head move. Too far away.
On the TOADY Prog they said there were screams, people running, throwing themselves to the ground. None of which is apparent in Lucy’s video clip.
Starmer “at it” there … he would *not* say the same outside the chamber – what a c…
It is indeed Starmer who is the principle liar and it is a disgrace that such a stuffed suit with no morals whatsoever and zero qualifications to make the idiotic nonsense he mouths on a daily basis. He has no authority and is nothing but a joke. A very bad joke for this country.
As Richard Pinder revealed, strange that the Royal family from QE11 down have had cancer diagnoses and several have been hospitalized for treatment.
Timeline to the Death of the Queen: Censored by a DSMA-Notice, but revealed in America by Gptchatly, Boris Johnson, Gyles Brandreth and Lady Colin Campbell.
*Wednesday 20th October 2021, The Queen was admitted to King Edward VII’s Hospital for tests after she complained to her doctor about pain, whereupon she was diagnosed with heart issues and Myeloma, a bone marrow cancer.
*Wednesday 15th December 2021, The Queen was vaccinated for a third time with the Pfizer jab.
*Thursday 3rd February 2022, The Queen was admitted to King Edward VII’s Hospital for health checks on her skin, heart issues and Myeloma, a bone marrow cancer.
*Sunday 20th February 2022, The Queen caught Covid, saying that the virus left her “very tired and exhausted”.
*Monday 21st February 2022, The Queen was vaccinated for a fourth time with the Pfizer jab.
*Thursday 21st April 2022, The Queen was vaccinated for a fifth time with the Pfizer jab.
*Tuesday 6th September 2022, The Queen refused advice to wear gloves to hide the bruise, in which a patch had appeared on her right hand, revealed in her last ever photograph.
*Thursday 8th September 2022, The Queen died at 3.10pm. Dr Douglas Glass certified the late monarch’s cause of death as “old age”. “Old age” on the Death Certificate prevented an autopsy to find the precise underlying cause of death. However, Professor Angus Dalgleish, established that mRNA jabs are causing an explosion of B-Cell cancers, and that after her death at Balmoral Castle, the Queens body was transported to the Palace of Holyroodhouse, Edinburgh, where a post-mortem examination was conducted by Sir Hugh Thomas, which found that the Queen died of Myeloma, a B-Cell Bone Marrow cancer.
So the PM misleading parliament.
Give him some mRNA covid boosters.
Naturally the obscene BBC give the Kirk story their spin.
Quote: “To call him a firebrand would be somewhat understating the case.” In other words, he was an extremist who sort of had it coming.
In fact, I’ve listened to some of his college debates and was always struck by a few points:
His calm, reasonable and fact-based arguments.
The vicious ferocity of many of his student interlocuters
Kirk’s courage in facing up to the snarling entitled little monsters.
And his cool politeness in responding to them.
Beyond a Firebrand? You little weasel, Mike Wendling of the BBC, whoever you are.
One thing is sure, this latest outrage will further galvanise Trump to double down on the issue of free speech on campuses.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt
The alleged killer has been apprehended. Looks like a middle-aged white man.
The latest I have heard is that he is in a critical condition
Yes, I saw that too & I’m sorry I rushed to post. I read at first that he had been killed. I do hope he survives.
An irony that the Democrats relentlessly demand gun control but are more often the ones to use guns to kill off their opponents.
The BBC seem unconcerned about who did it or why Kirk was shot…just that he was a Trump supporter….the Lefty Mike Wendling slipping in, in his opinion, the negatives…
‘….Charlie Kirk is one of the biggest conservative influencers in the US today.
To call him a firebrand would be somewhat understating the case…Kirk’s evangelical Christian religion and family and he’s seen as both the future of conservative activism and a highly polarising figure.’
I’ve seen plenty of Kirk videos and never once considered him a ‘firebrand’…always polite, reasoned and open to debate. Calling him a ‘firebrand’ is clearly meant to portray him as some kind of swivel-eyed fanatic.
Some might say it is the demonising of the Right[and Whites] by the likes of the BBC that gives licence to the Left to use extreme violence against those portrayed again and again as a ‘threat to democracy’…modern day Hitlers…just look at Farage…even today called ‘Hitler’ by a Labour MP….such rhetoric encourages violence….and Farage has frequently been the victim….as has Trump of course.
And ‘polarising’? Hmmm…he has his views and someone else has a different view….how is that ‘polarising’? It’s just normal…but of course Wendling doesn’t like Kirk’s views and so he presents them as extreme and beyond the pale. Usual BBC contempt, disdain and hate….as shown in another report which attacks US veterans who criticise Islam and who are employed in Gaza as security for the food distribution…
‘Anti-Islamic US biker gang members run security at deadly Gaza aid sites’
Funny how the BBC will take a view on this but won’t call Hamas ‘terrorists’. Pretty telling about the BBC mindset I’d say.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2zy4l8jgeo
I didn’t read the comments in this video as I know how sick the people are who comment on such events.
Kirk dead according to some reports. While nowhere near enough, it’s a tiny bit gratifying to see the suspect being dragged away by security, his trousers around his ankles, as the crowd scream at him, “How dare you! Monster” (below).
The killer and whoever may have been behind him (half the Democrat Party, at least indirectly, at least in spirit) are about to feel the full force of MAGA fury.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15086031/Charlie-Kirk-shooter-Utah-arrested-crowd-screams.html
It says
“Charlie Kirk shooter still on the loose after video shows elderly man being dragged away by cops”
So who is this “elderly man” they are dragging away?
I know – doesn’t make sense. Presumably just sloppy journalism in the heat of the moment.
Picture of suspected shooter being detained on the ground:
https://www.rifttv.com/breaking-suspect-detained-after-charlie-kirk-shot-in-neck-at-utah-valley-university-campus-event/
Now there are reports that Charlie Kirk is dead:
https://www.rifttv.com/charlie-kirk-dies-after-neck-wound-at-utah-university-event/
GB new consistently reporting the guy first detained
was NOT the shooter
Charlie Kirk, that ‘polarising firebrand’, is dead. The BBC and all the lefty media got their man…so to speak. Shame about his wife and two little kids.
What’s curious is that there is absolutely no comment on the BBC about the killer…who has been identified by others as a likely registered Democrat…there’s absolutely no comment about the likely motivation for the murder….no mention of terrorism or ideology.
Can’t imagine it would be the same if a Democrat ‘influencer’ had been murdered. The BBC would be all over it and examining every angle, searching out the darkest corners of the killer’s mind and life…and of course would be blaming Trump. But so far zero interest in the killer from the BBC. Even if the killer hadn’t been identified there would still be loads of airtime devoted to exploring likely motives and who was to blame for inciting them….but not here. Odd huh?
“the killer” “who has been identified by others as a likely registered Democrat”
GBnews is consistently reporting that no killer has been identified or detained
Thy have said the shooting distance was about 180m
How many years did we have to put up with the Leftoid mantra that the threat to the country is from the Far Right, and that the Tories uniquely were sleazy and in it for themselves?
While the Left were ‘progressive’ and peaceful.
I just mention this as within a few days ‘three pads’ Rayner has been shown for what she is, and over in the USA Charlie Kirk has been assassinated, and Peter Mandelson is on the verge of his THIRD resignation, the first of which was over a £373000 interest free loan to buy a house. What is it with high ranking Labour ministers and houses?
The sheer hypocrisy of the Far Left will not go un-noticed by readers. But may not be spotted by the BBC.
I really wish these events would bring people to their senses But I know it won’t. The world we live in now is infested with ignorant mixed up people who have no epathy or human spirit.
Look at this sick comment in the Daily Mail
“They are saying that Charlie was about to blow the lid on the Ep. Stein F. iLes, so the pre. sid. ent took him out. ”
I really get so tired of these lunatics
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15085923/Charlie-Kirk-Utah-shooting-neck-tributes-Trump.html
Who is “they”? A bloke at the pub. Or more likely, a bloke at the BBC?
Probably voices in his head
BBC London supports the Underground train drivers reducing their working hours.
They found a small fabric company that works four days a week and then commented on other companies with a four day week, all in a major feature.
Presumably this is a less than subtle message to BBC managers from the newsroom. Still, judging by the ‘quality’ of journalism, if BBC news were to ‘work’ as much as a four day week that would represent a significant increase in output.
I’me with Dan Wootton : the reaction of the BBC is to add their own comment which has no place whatsoever in their article:
‘Trump has stirred controversy for regularly blaming the “radical left” for the country’s deepening political divisions – with critics arguing that his rhetoric has incited violence against his political opponents.’
So the BBC are telling us that this assasination is Trumps fault because he has made the Left hate the Right so much. If that apalling ‘opinion’ had any truth at all, it would be the Right murdering the Left.
You can be sure all of those ‘critics’ are more Democrats who the BBC run to every time they want a quote.
They also make a big point of telling us this – even with video of it:
‘Republican Congresswoman Lauren Boebert had called for a prayer to be read out loud for Kirk, saying “silent prayers get silent results”.
Several Democrats then shouted in response “What about the kids in Colarado”? in reference to a high school shooting that took place on the same day.’
The BBC don’t mention anything else. So I checked. They are actually comparing 3 injured children shot by another child in a school with this cynical political assasination. And we are not told anything about the children involved so it’s highly likely it was more black-on-black violence. Something the MSM never report.
Lying activist scum. All of them. You can be sure the BBC staff are glad Kirk is dead. But not as happy as they would have been if Trump’s assination attempt was successful.
Note how THAT story has been buried without any satisfactory explanation.
Let’s see if this attack is ever labelled as political terrorism by the BBC. Because that is what it is. They are quick to put the label on the Right. I am 100% they will not except maybe in quotation marks if Trump says it – and it will not be mentioned anywhere else.
This is the Left showing what they really are.
The only disinformation is that emanating from the putrid swamp that is the EU.
National TV Awards
“The nation has spoken…
@GaryLineker
is TV Presenter of the Year! ”
… https://x.com/OfficialNTAs/status/1965868170931220581
\\ he won because he called jews “rats”. This is where the UK is in 2025. //
ITV have just recruited LIneker
so giving him an award generates PR for his new ITV shows
The ‘judge’ who allowed the release of the Charlotte train stabber, despite multiple previous offences.
DEI is a wonderful thing.
Is she related to David Lammy?
An amusing video of David Starkey denouncing Angela Rayner as a tax avoider:
What sort of political pygmy would choose Rayner to be a deputy PM?
Re. Charlie Kirk. I was worrying if or when someone would have a go at Nigel Farage
The shot suggests a professional hit man. Thinking as I am typing, I was going to say I don’t think the Democrats care too much one way or another about Farage. But then I thought about WEF and similar.
Scrobs has just invented a new way to read any Beeboid reporting when one of their own, i.e. far-left, writes any story about their pinups – in this case, Mandy…
Just read their articles from back to front, (no, not in the biblical sense), and try it on this piece hastily cubicalised by the Sith Floor for a kidult to type into it’s electronic Filofax…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy9jqn0vyjo
There!
The whole piece takes on a really sinister, unpleasant tone, as Joe and Joan Public are reminded immediately that Mandy had to resign twice because of serious irregularities that any 1950s London film gangster would marvel at! The rotten deals which were going on are given just a few sparse words…
I guess that it might be easier to read any of their poor output while sitting upside down, but don’t want to give good chums here any ideas…
Charlie Kirk at the Oxford Union
Rest in peace Charlie Kirk .atlas – il glad you put up the impressive Oxford union piece up . He reflected the common sense of the majority and became an enemy of the Left .
I was thinking of the hate of the Left wing – the media – the likes of `comrade Robinson at the BBC – or the Far Left MP – John McDonald at the TUC yesterday calling Farage a Hitler ..
Personally – and I know -in the circumstances it might not be the thing to say – but im really surprised there is not more political violence here . The way those on the Left behave and speak it seems inevitable to me .
As I say RIP rest in God .
And again Charlie Kirk at the Oxford Union
Dr Gavin Ashenden, ex Bishop and ex Chaplain to the Queen, gives a moving tribute to Charlie Kirk.
“There was something about Jesus about him”.
Amen.
Sad isnt it ? – to read awful comments on X celebrating the execution of a man expressing his views . Some ive seen would easily get a 5 plod visit and punishment through process – the very thing Mr Kirk campaigned against
Fed:
You have to remember that the Left are the good people. It’s all right when they do it.
TOADY Watch #1 – and she is a toadie, as Megyn Kelly says …
Sarah Smith, BBC Hard Leftie and the daughter of a previous Labour leader claimed that a Democrat had been attacked in the USA, as JustRemainIn Webb claimed later, anyone hear about that? The Democrats did not make a fuss about it!
Regarding the Charlie Kirk assasination, It’s been reported the man they first arrested was not the shooter. They arrested a second suspect who has now been released. The hunt continues.
Mandelson, one of the architects of the Iraq war.
Best pal of a convicted peodo,
Sir Kier Starmer is the worst PM ever.
The Charlie Kirk assasination has switched a switch in me. I’m no longer going to sit back and let the violent and lunatic left find outlets via any source I come across. That includes social media and anyone in my social circle. I am so angry.
Me too.
In an article which should be full of condemnation of the violent and intolerant Left, here’s what the BBC write about the man they assasinated with political terrorism:
First a clear suggestion they did not shoot him because of his political beliefs:
‘The leader of their movement, regardless of the ultimate motive behind his killing, will now be viewed as a martyr for the cause.’
Next a hint it was his own fault:
‘Kirk, in the past, had warned of what he said was the threat of violence from his critics – of which he had many, given his provocative style of conservativism. ‘
Then an attempt to slur his character and infer he deserved it:
‘He was an advocate of gun rights and conservative values, an outspoken critic of transgender rights, and a staunch, unapologetic Donald Trump supporter.’
Then they try to infer Republicans are just as bad with:
‘Earlier this year two Democratic state legislators in Minnesota were shot in their homes – with one dying from her wounds.’
They actually bill that one higher than the attempted assasination of Trump.
But I checked those ‘democrat’ killings out and they were nothing like the others at all. It was not a ‘Left vs Right’ murder – he was a devout Christian who was against abortion. It was the Democrat policy he hated. Nothing to do with Left and Right.
As expected, the BBC don’t go anywhere near pointing out who are doing the assasinations. They generalise is as:
‘Violence begets violence. Increasingly divisive rhetoric, fuelled by social media echo chambers and easy access to firearms, leads to raw nerves and a heightened potential for bloodshed.’
Absolute bullshit. It’s not the ‘rhetoric’ causing the violence, it’s the constant anti-Right propaganda and rhetoric being pushed on us all by the Left who have infested all the aparatus of state needed to do it. Even this article is attempting to infer it’s Trumps fault – as the BBC also did for the brutal murder of the Ukranian girl.
This constant negative propaganda against Trump and Israel by the BBC and the rest of the MSM is the problem. Their hands are soaked in blood.
You can see the BBC wants to throw ‘ far right ‘ at Charlie Kirk … I don’t know if they ve done it yet – so far it is ‘right ‘ or ‘conservative ‘. ….
Fed, yes that was the epithet used on the TOADY Prog this a.m.. Far Right … Far Right … Far Right.
Up2 – im glad I missed it as I an intransit back to Blighty for a couple of weeks ….
Perhaps im guilty of mimicking those who use terms like ‘far right ‘ – a term for ever questioned on this site .
The assumption is that it is a negative – a short hand for people who care for their country first – not invaders in whatever form .
I’ve been looking at various comments on the like of X or the DT – so many with various axes to grind – like the BBC … You – one – shouid maybe be more straining about saying anything – for instance about gun crime in the States – the constitution which Charlie Kirk supported so much . But as I write i sort of recognise that maybe I am wrong and maybe free speech should be the supreme outcome …
It’s one of the many BBC ways of lying without lying : I call it the lie by association.
Talk about something using the bad words then immediately mention the person you want to be associated with those words while they are still fresh in the mind of the reader.
BBC use similar MO with crafting web content… time & time again in the page layout.
Chancy – don’t worry – you only have to fight section 139? Malicious communications act and section 4A public order act .
Why not join the Free Speech Union – my free speech insurance – @£30 a year …
The long piece JD Vance has written on X is quite something . And I worry for other defenders of freedom like our own people .
Left wing politicians will be noticeably quiet now – although the Marxists will be quietly celebrating ….
..I think the FBI will have trouble finding the sniper – roof top single shot at a distance and on target ….
Chancy – i was trying to go to sleep last night but couldn’t stay away from X when there was reporting that he had survived to the hospital . But not to be . I hope there will not be reprisals …and perhaps the Left will moderate their language a bit – John McDonald – here – has already been picked up on calling Farage Hitler – a fascist – he is old enough to bet better .
I guess they’ll be no apology from him ….
That’d be the McDonald that got fired by Ken Livingston for being catastrophically ignorant and incompetent.
I’ve followed him on the PACAC Select Committee – superannuated, shallow, sloganeering troughing twerp – often (always?) says just enough to make it seem he’s paying attention but never, ever follows up or really rocks the boat – comfortably drifting towards his pension, never challenges public servants.
@Chancy
Me too !
There’s a new hijab wearing presence in our local surgery. A small village in West Wales. I gave her the shock of her life earlier. She tapped on the door and the Pakistani(?) Gp said, “come in”. In she came bearing two mugs, presumably coffee. I said to her in Arabic, “with sugar and milk”……………….
I now expect arrest.
Priceless – I was inclined to say when you are in a hole don’t dig no more …fancy having that thing as an on screen commentator – but at least in the US he can say it …
In other news
A huge investment by the pharma group ‘merke’? Has been cancelled in the UK site ing ‘adverse business environment ‘
Can you blame them ? I think that’s too big investment ( growth ) losses in a week Rachel …
The MD of any company thinking of investing in the UK would surely be fired by his shareholders.
The fight goes on – Michael deacon in the DT on the BBC bias toward reform – yes really
START All this week, the BBC has been repeatedly accused of bias in its coverage of Reform. Nothing unusual about that, you might think. But you’d be wrong.
Because right now, the BBC isn’t being accused of bias against Reform – it’s being accused of bias towards it.
You may be thinking: “What? The BBC? Biased towards Reform? What planet are these lunatics on?” I’m afraid I don’t know the answer to that particular question. But I do know that this belief, however gibberingly unhinged it may seem to the rest of us, is gaining serious traction on the centre-Left. And I think I know how it began.
Three months ago, we reported that BBC executives had held talks about how to win over Reform-voting viewers. To prevent them from deserting the broadcaster, the executives vowed to ensure that the views of this increasingly sizeable demographic were better represented in news coverage.
perfectly reasonable plan. Unfortunately for the BBC, it has backfired. People who loathe Reform seem to have convinced themselves that our national broadcaster has suddenly been taken over by the Nigel Farage fan club.
Take Alastair Campbell, the Blairite spin doctor turned champion of probity in public life. At the weekend, he complained that a BBC report on the Reform party conference was “like a press handout” from Reform itself. He then described a second BBC report as “another lively shiny press release from the Beeb Reform media machine.”
He wasn’t alone. The historian William Dalrymple – who, like Mr Campbell, happens to present a podcast for Gary Lineker’s Goalhanger productions – claimed, in all apparent seriousness, that BBC News “is now running a full-blown recruitment campaign for Reform”. More bizarrely still, he accused the BBC’s political editor, Chris Mason, of displaying “breathless enthusiasm for Farage”.
Meanwhile, the Labour peer George Foulkes used an appearance on BBC News to scold it for supposedly not “giving equal challenge and equal questioning to people like Nigel Farage as you’re doing to people in the Labour party”.
And if you think all that sounds mad, wait till you hear what the Lib Dems have done. They’ve launched a campaign called “Balance the BBC”, calling on the broadcaster to give Reform less coverage – because the current amount “is dangerous and it has to stop”. Sir Ed Davey, the Lib Dems’ leader, fumed: “The BBC are constantly fawning over Farage’s every move.”
I promise: every single one of the above quotes is genuine. It boggles the mind. Frankly, all I can say is that if the BBC is indeed biased towards Reform, it does a tremendously effective job of concealing it. From its coverage of immigration, asylum hotels, the EU, Gaza and trans ideology, I would never have guessed it was staffed by a gang of ardent Faragists.
Yet that, it would seem, is what many on the modern Left have come to believe. God only knows what goes on inside these people’s heads.
Do they suppose that BBC staff have deliberately cultivated the impression that they’re all metropolitan liberal elitists – as a cunning way to disguise the fact that they’re actually Brexit-loving social conservatives? Do they imagine that the Newsnight team spent the summer decking every lamp post in Islington with the St George’s flag? Do they suspect that, any day now, the BBC will announce that Britain’s entry for Eurovision 2026 is to be sung by Dame Andrea Jenkyns?
What makes such paranoia all the more absurd is that, little more than a year ago, the BBC was forced to apologise for describing Reform as “far-Right.” Perhaps the Lib Dems think this description was meant as a compliment.
At any rate, the whole business has left me in the unusual position of feeling sorry for BBC bosses. By trying to win back Reform voters, they’re in danger of losing the so-called “Sensibles” – who are, of course, the type of people who normally defend the BBC from the slightest criticism. Which means the BBC is trapped. It can’t win.
Unless, I suppose, it splits BBC News into two separate channels. On one, Reform will be given a fair hearing – while, on the other, co-hosts Alastair Campbell and Sir Ed Davey will explain why a Reform government will kill your kitten, ban Glastonbury and deport Paddington. It’s the only way to keep these people happy. And only their fellow cranks need watch.ENDS
standard left farce practice bias but accuse others of it …
The likes of mad al Campbell has comments on this – adding to the likelihood of political violence here …
I’ve put a separate thread for Charlie Kirk . Just to mark the passing …. It being 9/11 – intolerance and evil is pretty fashionable in 2025 …
Don’t worry where you put comments .. it does not matter .
Mandy’s gone. Ha bloody ha. Hopefully Starmfuhrer next. 🤞
Blimey looby – TTK has been full some in praise of two allies in two weeks and they’ve both gone by the following weekend .
When Mandy was appointed the word ‘incredible ‘ floated by – so much deceit – so much corruption – yet TTK gave him a key job …
Will President Trump call off the State Visit – in all the circumstances ? Im guessing not ….
But that TTK judgement / weakness really is there for all to see – the permanent look of a rabbit caught in headlights …
In the BBC coverage of Kirk’s murder, they make sure to display this message prominently: “Kirk’s final X post called for murder of Ukrainian refugee to be ‘politicized’ “.
Technically, that’s true but:
1) you would only post that right at the top of your reporting if you wanted to denigrate the man (“How callous of him to politicize such a hideous murder.”)
2) In context, it’s clear what he meant by ‘politicize’:
He wrote: “If we want things to change, it’s 100% necessary to politicize the senseless murder of Iryna Zarutska because it was politics that allowed a savage monster with 14 priors to be free on the streets to kill her…
I don’t like politicising situations, but it just necessitates it.”
Kirk was responding to all the liberal (leftist) media and politicians who were all squealing that the murder should not be ‘politicised’.
By which they meant it should not even be discussed (remember they did their best to quash the story altogether) and there should be no discussion about the causes of the murder and possible solutions in future.
In other words, shut up!
Kirk’s response was: DAMN RIGHT IT SHOULD BE POLITICISED, in the sense of publicised and discussed. Because it was lousy liberal policies that allowed the murderer to be on the loose in the first place.
Well bugger me (not literally) Mandy’s gone. Good riddance, hopefully TTK will follow, but somehow I don’t think he will. He has no radar, no shame and no conscience, then again so have the rest of them
If you ask me, the only thing most of our politicians are good for is Soylent Green.
I wouldn’t eat it!
Im always curious about the timing of ‘bad news ‘ was the Mandy fire ing – as a result of Charlie Kirk ? Was it because the Trump State visit is due ? Or is more stuff to come out across the weekend …
Anyway – no doubt the BBC will line up plenty of Blair appointed ex US ambo s to say what a ‘sad loss ‘ Mandy is – and the usual tune …
During all of this Elon musk has pledged a million dollars to put up artwork of the Ukrainian lady murdered by third world vermin last week . No doubt the judges who let me free will be very quiet …
The Daily Mail have locked down comment voting on Charlie Kirk article.
I also see they’e putting the drones in Poland “attack” in quotation marks….
Definitely not an attack and most likely a consequence of Ukraine GPS jamming.
But being used to bang the war drum : The EU REALLY want NATO involved. Their ‘coallition of the willing’ is just a token force so they can share the spoils.
Bad news – dame thornbury 🏴has withdrawn from the deputy leadership to the Marxist party – she needed 80 MPs to support her – did she get 1? Looks like the hugely inept Phillip Bridget son is gonna get the gig because she’s had the Marxist £100 haircut courtesy of expenses …
It seems that Lady Nugee is about as popular with her fellow Labour MPs as she is with the rest of us.
I was sent messages early this morning saying huge pressure being put on other candidates to ensure Bridget wins. I wait to hear from Ana Boulter on YouTube who has lots to say on Bridget. Particularly interesting is what she says about the care home where Bridget worked for her mother.
I was going to type more but fear the thought police would come knocking. Scary thing this control of free speech even though Sir Kier says we have free speech in this country.
I’ve always thought of Peter Mandelson a creep on a personal level, anyone who could actively work for and support Bliar has to be a suspect individual.
Probably in her past life. And this time around she gets to continue her unfinished business of conquering Europe and inflicting pain on its citizens.
“Leaked DOJ File, Charlie Kirk Killer Is Trans Radical Leftist Says Report”
If so, that’s a lot of trans violence in recent weeks. Almost as if there was something wrong with them mentally. But that can’t be right, cos the BBC tells us it’s just an alternative lifestyle choice, as valid as any other. In fact superior to boring old straight, – that’s so passe’ dahling.
sheesh…. the trannies aren’t helping themselves much… are they?
” Almost as if there was something wrong with them mentally. “???
There surely is.
I think the reason why there’s no civil war in the UK is because the Right are holding back from retaliating.
The left are consistently murdering and attacking normal people. The number of killings attributed to the left is ever increasing whereas the only one they can find to accuse the Right of is the murder of Jo Cox which, if I remember correctly, was by a Labour voter but he was called ‘Far Right’ because Cox was a lefty.
Throughout history the left have been responsible for hundreds of millions of deaths. Russia, China and lots of other left wing Countries all killing their own populations and attacking other Countries. All the left have is Germany and their National SOCIALIST Party which they call Fascists but have more in common with the left.
When the Wall came down hundreds of thousands fled the left wing Countries to come to the Right wing West, none went the other way.
Aligned with the left are all their pets like the grooming gangs or those who kill just like that creature who slaughtered the beautiful Ukrainian girl sitting in front of it. They are all of the left.
The Right are a much more tolerant and nicer but there will come a tipping point when the Right will be pushed too far and when they retaliate the left will cower squealing in fear.
The left are excellent at hating. They control the msm, Courts, politics (until 2029) Schools and education, law and order, councils and most of the institutions but they are the minority.
They will lose.
I never thought GB would have a civil war but it’s looking increasingly likely. The only hope is Reform if they can neutralise the left and start common sense politics again.
They’re so hypocritical and two faced that if (when) they’re attacked they will demand that the ‘far right’ protect them.
Charlie Kirk: Bullets used in shooting were engraved with ‘transgender and antifascist ideology’
https://www.gbnews.com/news/us/charlie-kirk-suspect-manhunt-fbi-kash-patel
Presumably still in the magazine?
An actual bullet used trajectory would be erratic.
Seems… complicated.
Guest:
You can reliably assume that journalists know nothing about firearms. Any such carving would have had to be on the cartridge case, not the bullet.
GW,
Particularly if the round is passing through a window.
Just received my annual email from TV Licensing to declare I don’t need a TV Licence.
The process, tick boxes, get harder each time, they don’t make it easy.
Still – another £174.50 saved.
Why not just ignore it?
I think I get a letter, but can’t remember, as it’s so unimportant!
Luckily, the TV tax money I’ve saved pays for a month’s electricity, and that’s a life-saver for me at the moment!
The sums are identical, and outgoings are so much easier without funding the far-left organisations we have to endure in the UK., it sort of allows me to get my own back on that clown Milliband!
Oh the irony….the Dems release the Epstein birthday book trying to get at Trump but instead they do huge damage to one of their own here in the UK.
Still…there’s always Jeremy Bowen to help out and give Trump a good smearing as Bowen tells us Trump is a ‘loser’ who is getting played by Putin and Netanyahu and needs a good dose of realism…yeah…just subscribe to the BBC and get so much ‘realism’.
You couldn’t make it up….Rayner is taken out of the game and so the BBC immediately tries to take down Farage for Labour….
‘Farage faces questions over who funded £885,000 Clacton constituency home’
‘However, the BBC has examined French property and company records and has been unable to find evidence that Ferrari’s parents have the means to give their daughter a significant contribution towards the purchase of the home.’
The BBC has put an enormous amount of effort into what is clearly a political hatchet job.
Must be nice to have the national broadcaster doing your dirty work for you…Labour is very lucky to have them onside.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce845w70g0yo
Certainly the BBC is showing the sheer talent of the benches on display.
Odd the reaction of actual public.
Hmmmm….if you say so…
From the Jerusalem Post…
‘UK Labour MP’s office set ablaze, arsonist suspected to have been motivated by Gaza war’
Surely not? I mean….the BBC have an extensive report on this and not one mention of any Gaza connection.
How odd eh? None of that ‘threat to democracy’ outcry as MP’s are targeted with violence and intimidation….no..none of that. Just why would the BBC be so quiet about what is in all likelihood an attack on an MP by a pro-Hamas ‘terrorist’? No mention of any possible motivation for the attacks.
Remember the noise when ‘EDL’ grafitti appeared on mosques or other Muslim buildings….even though you might suspect many of those were ‘false flag’ attacks done by Muslims themselves.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp3qwpe93yzo
Being widely reported…just not on the BBC….
‘FBI release image of ‘person of interest’ after ammo found with ‘trans and antifascist messages’’