8 Responses to Midweek 17th December 2025

  1. Up2snuff says:

    In the words of Isaiah: “Here am I send me to the top pf the Thread” although Isaiah did not have to battle the BBC. Hopefully the BBC will fight the President Trump lawsuit and it will bring the BBC down. The BBC is really nasty and vicious in pursuing people in the UK who do not want to watch TV. The BBC are anti-Israel, anti-President Trump, anti-Nigel Farage and Reform. The BBC are greedy for money and waste it sending the Montacutie to Israel where she will no doubt try to harm Bibi Netanyahu. The BBC are beyond redemption. Defund the BBC if you haven’t cancelled you TellyTax already!

       4 likes

    • Pete says:

      I hope Trump is relentless in his battle with the dreadful bbc. The longer it goes on the better, it will totally undermine how the biased bbc try to set the agenda for everything they do..
      You never know, it might even make them ensure the news is impartial ?

         4 likes

      • vlad says:

        There’s no such thing as impartial news. From the very choice of what constitutes news, to the importance it’s given and the treatment it gets, there will be bias. And there will be bias in what’s not reported.

        I just want the right kind of bias, i.e. reflecting national interest, not the liberal globalist agenda inimical to the UK.

           1 likes

  2. harry142857 says:

    Starmer even getting battered on the BBC.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yx03zplkdo#comments

    How is Keir Starmer getting on with his pledges to deliver change?

       0 likes

  3. pugnazious says:

    TELEMMGLPICT000453698020_17659194905010_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8.jpeg?imwidth=960&imdensity=2

    One can only hope….but then again it is practically a Putin mouthpiece given its avowed intent to destabilise US politics and unseat a US President….not to mention its close ties to Labour which is determined to keep the BBC in existence as its Party propaganda outlet…laughably claiming….

    ‘ I [Lisa Nandy] believe the BBC, alongside the NHS, is one of the two most important institutions in our country. While one is fundamental to the health of our people, the other is fundamental to the health of our democracy.’

    And as the BBC’s Katie Razzall says…

    ‘We know this Labour government backs the BBC.’

    The BBC is a dying institution that far from being fundamental to the health of our democracy is more akin to the grim reaper as it divides and destabilises, whipping up hate and anger as it sets race against race and supports Islamist terrorism and supremacy.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/britains-story-the-next-chapter-the-bbc-royal-charter-review-green-paper-and-public-consultation/britains-story-the-next-chapter-bbc-royal-charter-review-green-paper-and-public-consultation#:~:text=The%20Charter%20Review%20is%20a,Charter%20will%20be%20carefully%20considered.

       1 likes

  4. pugnazious says:

    Listening to the BBC news bulletins and you’d never know there was a real scandal…

    ‘BBC says it will defend Trump defamation lawsuit over Panorama speech edit’

    Bit of a ‘speech edit’ but the bulletins went no further not elaborating in what that edit was nor the intent behind it, nor the effect on perceptions.

    If this had been, say a GB News issue, the BBC bulletin would expand fully on what the edit actually was and why it was so ‘scandalous’…but here…not so much….let’s brush over it and move on.

    This is a very telling comment by Katie Razzall[BBC] in her long article on why Trump suing the BBC is so unfair….

    ‘I watched the documentary. I viewed it as an assessment of the approach taken by Trump’s most fervent supporters and whether claims about him, including about 6 January, have dented their admiration.’

    Sooo…she is basically admitting the programme edited the film in order to make a fantasy ‘reality’ that BBC programme makers believed was in the minds of radical extremist Trump supporters.
    Instead of reporting what he actually said they’ve just invented something to suit their own agenda….Trump has some radical supporters…this is what they want to do and so we, at the BBC, believe this is what they heard.

    That’s a very dangerous and slippery slope isn’t it?…and, one might think, a very unsound basis for a legal defence….and naturally Razzall dismisses Trump’s case as ‘lawfare’…
    ie he has no real basis for a case…it’s all rubbish, the BBC is innocent….

    ‘The point about “lawfare”, as it is often termed, is that it is less about the outcome and more about the toll it takes to fight.’

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2przgvdyeo

       3 likes

  5. vlad says:

    The Aussie PM and the BBC are delighted to heap praise on a ‘hero’ of the Bondi Beach attack.

    I wonder if they’d have been so enthusiastic if he’d been called, say, Crocodile Dundee instead of Ahmed al Ahmed.

    Subtext: See? They’re not all bad.

    And the BBC are delighted to elaborate: “The fruit shop owner, who was born and raised in Syria…”
    See? Immigrants are good!

    Note: The BBC are calling it a “gun attack”. Not a terrorist attack, and most definitely not an islamist attack. No, it’s them guns wot are to blame. More gun control, that’s what we need.

    And, incredibly, in a speech after the attack, Albanese warned of the ‘far right’ threat — yet wouldn’t say the words ‘Islamic extremism’.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg13z47vpdo

       2 likes

Leave a Reply