3 Responses to Midweek 18th February 2026

  1. JohnC says:
    February 18, 2026 at 4:37 am

    Me again !

       0 likes

    • JohnC says:
      February 18, 2026 at 5:03 am

      Oops – it timed out before I could finish my actual post edit !.

      Unfortunately I lost a lot of typing about how AI misled me as to the reasons the BBC do not report Rupert Lowes rape-gang inquiry. It told me they could not because of ‘legal reasons’ as they would have to verify every statement themselves is it is a ‘private, independent investigation inquiry’.

      So instead I got it to list other ‘private, independent investigation inquries’. Lo and behold:

      ‘The Cass Review (2020–2024)’

      ‘This has received massive, consistent coverage from the BBC across all platforms, including BBC Newsnight and BBC Radio 4.’
      ‘The BBC has reported on the review’s “landmark” status, its findings of “remarkably weak” evidence for medical interventions in children, and the subsequent NHS policy changes.’

      ‘The Alexis Jay Report (Rotherham, 2014)’
      ‘The BBC provided in-depth reporting on this investigation, describing it as a revelation of abuse on an “unprecedented scale”.’
      ‘Over the last decade, the BBC has continued to follow up on the report’s legacy, including the 10th-anniversary reflections from Professor Alexis Jay in 2024.’

      This is what AI says about their reporting of the Ruper Lowe Inquiry:
      ‘The BBC’s primary coverage focused on a Parliamentary Standards investigation into the funding of the inquiry rather than the content of the hearings.’
      ‘The BBC later issued an apology to Lowe for certain inaccuracies in their initial reporting of the standards probe’
      ‘Critics, including some public figures, have accused the BBC of failing to cover the actual evidence presented during the inquiry’s hearings in early 2026.’

      And that’s it. They hate Lowe and are desperate to protect Starmer as he is heavily involved in why we are here and the BBC want to protect him at this time when he is on the ropes. So they simply don’t report it.

      So much for their impartiality mandate. Where are you OFCOM ?.

      I also learned more about how you cannot trust AI. You have to know exactly what you want it to tell you and pin it down to a specific question – otherwise you just get Leftist political rhetoric – usually from the BBC itself.

         0 likes

  2. JohnC says:
    February 18, 2026 at 5:12 am

    ‘Ros Atkins on…unanswered Andrew questions’
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cpqw2p1z19vo

    As I’m sure we all know, the Andrew farce is primarily driven by the Leftist agenda to get rid of the Royals. We can’t be proper little socialists with a King or Queen. We need a big-brother in charge who has the power to get rid of those nasty people who do not conform. Like the Nazis (National Socialists) did but they are sure next time it will be different. They still haven’t realised how absolute power corrupts absolutely – especially if you are nasty, virtue-signalling hypocrite who lies at the drop of a hat. As Starmer is trying his hardest to demonstrate.

    Andrew of course will not be the last. They will be watching for their chance to destroy the next one. And that’s what I noticed for this article:

    ‘And questions have also been mounting over the way Buckingham Palace has responded to the various accusations against the King’s brother.’

    Perhaps the response should have been ‘Show me the evidence for your accusations’. But of course that is exactly what the BBC want.

    This is how it starts. Drip, drip, drip. The BBC play the long game.

    I didn’t watch the video as I absolutely cannot bear Ros Atkins voice and biased-BBC presentation style. He belongs on Panorama. Let me know if he says anything interesting.

    I’m no fan of the Royal family – but their greatest role is as a head of government who do not get there through greed for power and ambition. I reckon Starmer really wants that role – just as Blair did.

       0 likes

Leave a Reply