Will the mentally unstable BBC coverage of a 66 year old Norfolk man carry on for a 3rd or even 4th day ? The Starmer Regime must be grateful to be ignored for a while … still paying the TV Licence ? Please Don’t .
Weekend 21st February 2026
Bookmark the permalink.
In the absence of JohnC, I will go first.
Being first means winning!
Keir says we cannot win and must all fail for a level playing field.
Comrade hang your head in shame.
Isn’t two tier in Germany pretending to be Neville Chamberlain.
I appreciate some on this esteemed website are (UK) Republicans.
But I’m not one of them.
The BBC seem to have used the arrest of Andrew M-W to join the mob rule and lay in to the Monarchy in general. Major crisis blah blah.
Now Andrew may be, indeed probably is, thoroughly odious, morally dubious, and personally reprehensible.
He may be all of these things. But up till now he has not been charged with any crime, and certainly not guilty of any.
I thought we had an innocent until proved guilty process in this country,
Does this only apply to people we like? Or people when it suits the intelligentsia, Republicans, and the Left activist agenda?
The Andrew thing has also cast a light on the sadly worst excesses of the press, whose freedom I thoroughly support.
The photo of Andrew with red eyes in the back of a car has been given the most extraordinary and absurd interpretations.
For goodness sake. He was leaning back to avoid photographers. He was caught on film by chance with a camera which by virtue of the angles and the flash, gave him red eyes. He was probably knackered after spending a long Birthday with the plod. That’s it. No other insinuations are required.
Don’t for a moment get the idea I support the guy. I don’t but neither do I support groupthink, mob rule, the BBC, and the press when they over-reach.
In that regard the BBC is clearly biased. Which is why I am writing here.
Have a good weekend all.
https://x.com/sargon_of_akkad/status/2024924538593542500?s=61
The dirty tricks are being rolled out. Look at how extended from a credible claim Helena’s statement is: “accused of…”, “she viewed as…”
Right at the crunch point of an important election, like clockwork.
Like clockwork.
BBC local teatime news mentions the sentencing of a guy who committed terrible crimes at a Stamford old people’s home and worse.
They gave no background except for a photo … bit of a Welsh Choirboy look
.. Facebook shows discussions where people say they knew him or grew up with him in Leicester and say he was born there.
A video by a half black Leicester woman describes Joshua Kearney Springer as “a waste of a black man”
She says she knew him through the Leicester Catholic schools of St Paul’s and English Martyrs
.. https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2292169277912558
Andrew appears to be a pompous prat. (I haven’t met the man, so my views are based on how he is presented by the Press. As we know with Trump, the Press will find the worst in anyone if they are so inclined). I understand the Virginia Guiffre was 17 when that photo was taken. As I understand it, 16 is the age of consent in the UK and I understand the photo was taken in this country. Did Virgina think she was flown to the UK for her scintillating conversation?
The passing of trade secrets is another matter, and of course is what we have been told was why he was arrested. Neil Sean on YouTube claims that Andrew had offered to take himself to the Police Station. He didn’t need 7 cars to go to him for his arrest. He said it was all about the optics. Every time I hear a Labour politician state that what they are doing is because their thoughts are with the young women affected by Epstein, Prince Andrew, etc, I think ‘hypocrites’. These people seem incapable of thinking about the girls horrendously damaged by the rape gangs.
It is obvious that Andrew’s arrest is all about deflection. Steven Barrett suggests it is deflection from Mandelson. If that is the case it is as effective as most of Starmer’s decisions as far as I am concerned. Every time I hear suggestions of him passing on trade secrets, in my head I add ‘just like what Mandelson is said to have done’. And I learn tonight that there are 10 police forces investigating Andrew. That doesn’t sound like very joined up or cost effective investigations.
If the noise in the Press is loud concerning Andrew, I think we need to look elsewhere for the real story. For the sake of this site, I might suggest that we can be sure that the BBC won’t be looking anywhere else for what is going on and you can be sure the BBC will be following the government agenda.