For those who are still interested – or addicted to ‘celebrity ‘ – it’s the ‘Oscar’s’. With the BBC enabled to cite the ritual condemnation by luvvies of President Trump for finally taking of Iran…
Start the Week 16th March 2026
Bookmark the permalink.
I am RTG. The BBC are extremely wasteful in hiring and the salaries they pay. The BBC are pro-Labour, anti-Israel and along with the rest of the MSM, anti-Reform. The BBC are yet to appoint a new Director-General at a, no doubt, vast salary. The BBC should be closed down. The demands for an ever-increasing Licence Fee are a disgrace! Oh, and another thing the BBC are pro-Palestinian.
Up2
I reckon Nandy /hermon /TTK will put funding of the BBC into general taxation – saying it’s only ‘a few pee ‘ on council budgets and ‘those with the broadest shoulders ‘ should pay their bit …
After all – the Marxists will do all they can to protest their broadcaster … as for DG – I reckon lenny Henry or that coloured girl flo Benjamin . Can’t be a whitee …
They are teaching this to kids. I wish I was a wealthy woman. There must be grounds for legal case here since they are THE public broadcaster. Deliberately deceiving children.
An unusual source of bias.
Which may mostly be of interest to rugby fans.
Watched Rugby Special, BBC2 . France 48 England 46.
Now various online sources talk about several key points.
1. Kicking away possession when in the lead just before half time and the end
2. The Ellis Genge yellow card and penalty try
3. A penalty awarded to England but then rescinded during play.
4. A try by Chessum where instead of scoring as near to the posts as possible he touched down as soon as he got over the line. This made the conversion kick much harder and indeed it was missed. The two points thus lost was the difference in the final score.
Now the programme has as its main reviewers a Scot and. Welshman. Neither of whose nationalities had a direct bearing on the outcome ( unlike Ireland, France, and England).
What we got was a pathetic half-hearted review of what
everyone else regards as the key points listed above.
1.was hardly mentioned
2. they seemed to agree with the yellow card but we’re pretty much silent on the penalty try. Where, for example, actually was the ball in the maul? If you don’t know, then how can you know a try would have been scored? Not mentioned.
3. The ref called Penalty advantage for a deliberate knock-on by France. England played accordingly. But then he changed his mind to an accidental knock-on which is not classed as a penalty. England had no time to adjust their play and had kicked a speculative grubber, as you might with a penalty advantage. It was unsuccessful, France got the ball and quickly scored. The BBC gave this knock-on and reg change of mind almost no review at all.
4. Amazingly the studio experts thought Chessum had done no wrong, giving him the benefit of the doubt that as a forward he was so happy to score that everything else can be forgiven. Yet watching the footage shows that Chessum clearly looked to see that no-one was near him….and he still went for a showboating touchdown instead of running nearer to the posts.
So all in all in my submission, a very anti-English biased and highly selective approach to the key talking points of the match.
Sluff – I can beat you with an alternative – whilst listening to 5 live footy coverage – the commentator said that a player prepared for the game by ‘reading the Koran’ which gave him‘calmness and strength ‘ – I was shocked by this because I didn’t realise footy players could read …
At least he didn’t need to rape a 13 year old whitee girl to relax before playing …