Here’s the story…
Nigel Farage backs Australian-style immigration curbs
UKIP would restrict migrants over the age of 45 from coming to the UK, Nigel Farage has said.
He told LBC Radio his party would adopt “sensible” measures to control unskilled migration based on an Australian-points based system.
Those with criminal records and life-threatening illnesses would be barred.
Has Farage done a U-turn on UKIP immigration policy with his new fangled Aussie points system?
Strange if he had…because that was a BBC report from July 2014. Sounds rermarkably like his immigration policy announced today.…so not a U-turn and not ‘Making it up’ as he goes along as a BBC sub-heading suggests.
Odd that dropping the 50,000 cap is a U-turn when the Australian points system would have limited immigration to 27,000…and UKIP would still allow up to 50,000 migrants to come here…
UKIP would cut the numbers allowed into the UK to work but would not set an annual target, Nigel Farage said.
The party wants immigration to return to “normal” levels, said Mr Farage, with between 20,000 and 50,000 migrants given work permits.
Mr Farage said that under the Australian-style points-based visa system he wants to see, 27,000 people would have qualified to come to work in the UK last year.
A very curious ‘U-Turn’!
The BBC says this today…
A UKIP spokesman said last week work-related immigration should be capped at 50,000 a year.
But in fact this is what UKIP actually said…as linked to by that BBC report…
…within the points based system UKIP commits to bringing UK net migration down to 50,000 people a year for employment.
Ah so hang on….around 50,000 people based on a points system…em…how different is that to what Farage said in his speech today and in 2014? No difference.
Listening to the BBC reports of this on the radio and I had the distinct impression that the BBC was trying to make out that Farage had abandoned his immigration control policies and had essentially joined the ranks of Cameron and Miliband…and therefore anyone thinking of voting for UKIP on the basis of their immigration policies would be wasting their vote.
The Telegraph, not a friend of UKIP, confirms that line of attack, if somewhat less subtly…
Is Nigel Farage just like all the others?
Ukip voters must be looking at this U-turn and wondering if Mr Farage is any different from Miliband or Cameron
Whilst you expect the Torygraph to adopt a partisan line and do what it can to undermine UKIP the BBC is supposed to be above such things…the whole reaosn for the BBC is to stand aside, apart from the fray, and deliver the unvarnished truth to the Public so that they can make genuinely informed decisions on the best available information.
If the BBC cannot deliver that truth then its whole existence must be brought into question. What is the point of the BBC if it acts in the same way as all the other broadcasters and news providers who have their own agendas?
There is no point, at least as a public service funded at the pont of a gun, so to speak.
How can the licence be justified if the BBC fails to fulfill its most basic purpose, its whole Raison d’être?







