Treat all as equal citizens. An extra layer of unelected people who purport to represent communities aggregated by faith is a recipe for disaster.  Douglas Murray

Alvin Hall has presented a programme looking at the history of Black music in the USA…the politics and economics of the music industry.

It is definitely worth a listen.  However it does have a narrative that Hall shoehorns in regardless of the facts…..‘cultural theft’, ‘pillaging Black music’, ‘minstrelsy’ are some phrases that give a clue to the line he takes.

The USA was practically an apartheid State right up until the late 60’s, there is no doubt that that held back some musicians and Black music businesses….amongst others.

But that is not the whole picture, but it is a picture that Hall wants to present, that Blacks were controlled and exploited by Whites, and he does so despite at the same time giving us facts that contradict that narrative.

He blames racism for Blues musicians and singers not getting their rightful dues….but goes onto say that it was the Black middle class that thought Blues was below them and not something they wanted to be associated with.

He tells us that White companies just weren’t interested in Black Music…but then contradicts that….and  tells of Black music companies and radio stations that exploited Blacks.

He tells us that Whitney Houston and Michael Jackson sold out…they were compromised,  ‘whitewashed’….they weren’t authentically ‘Black’…..so highly successful…and yet Hall can’t really accept that.

He tells us that Hip hop was born from the ghetto, the ghetto that the Black Middle class left behind them….and all that was left for the remaining inhabitants was drugs, drink and crime, which they put into their music….Hip hop and Rap.

But then he tells us that it is the White folks buying the records that are  forcing and encouraging Blacks to become ‘Minstrels’, stereotypes of Black people…it is the fault of the Rap record buying public (66% white) who are to blame for ‘Gangsta Rap’…..the Whites enjoying the ‘thrill of the alien culture’.

He puts the case that success comes at a terrible price…selling their soul…and once again it is the whites who are manipulating and controlling Blacks.

Hall doesn’t seem to like success unless it is ‘authentically Black‘……and even when it is ‘Authentically Black‘ as in Rap, he claims that is just an unwelcome stereotype.

The final ironic statement about that very definitely Black music, Rap and Hip Hop, was this….

‘Now this is unacceptable…this is not who we are.’

But it is, it is the voice of the ghetto, the street wise Black, the poor and forgotten Black.

So  back to the Blues, back to Rock, back to the start of Hip Hop…where the Black ‘elite’ again and again refused to accept ‘authentic’ Black culture and music.

Isn’t Hip Hop and Rap exactly what Alvin Hall was demanding….not the compromised ‘pop’ of Jackson and Houston but the genuine Black sound like the ‘grunting James Brown’?

It seems neither the ‘White’ corporations (like the Japanese owned Sony) who give the Black artists access to massive markets, nor the Black artists themselves, can meet the very particular and exacting standards set by Alvin Hall for what passes for Black music and success.

Hall’s approach, as I judge it,  is somewhat dangerous….feeding the grievance industry with more myths of white oppression that seems likely to generate that level of anger and distrust in  Black youths that could later translate into something more radical.  It is a narrative that without careful handling is just ammunition to the ‘race hustlers’ in communities who incite racial tension for their own ends.

What will they hear when they listen to Hall?  Will it be the nuances, the double backs, the contradictions, or the easy, inflammatory rhetoric about Blacks being oppressed and exploited?

A good story misjudged in the telling because the presenter has his own line to push.

That is a rough summary of the programmes….but listen to them and decide for yourself if Hall pushes his own narrative regardless of many contradictions to it.

What follows is a longer, more detailed look at what was said on the programmes.

But first this:

Race Hustling

Some people try to explain why Asians, and Asian-Americans, succeed so well in education and in the economy by some special characteristics that they have. That may be true, but their success may also be due to what they do not have — namely “leaders” who tell them that the deck is so stacked against them that they cannot rise, or at least not without depending on “leaders.”

Young men — and many others — have learned all too well the lessons taught by race hustlers, in their social version of the laws of aerodynamics, which said that they could not rise.

And again, a plea to ignore a certain type of self selected ‘Community leader’:

Arab-Americans must embrace success over victimhood

Commissars of Arab-American political correctness want the community powerless

The soul of the Arab-American community is currently being pulled in two separate directions simultaneously.

One is optimistic and uplifting. It wants to assert its full rights as citizens, engage the system, and enthusiastically embrace what the United States has to offer.

The other is bitter and enraged. It celebrates and revels in Arab-American marginalization and self-marginalization. It lashes out at any Arab-American who successfully engages mainstream American society and consciously seeks to suppress the community’s maturation and empowerment.

The commissars can then assume the authority of victimhood, and pretend to speak on behalf of a supposedly besieged and beleaguered people who have no other voice but their shrill cries of rage.

And then there is this from the BBC:

Who Sold The Soul? (part 1 of 3)

Jazz, Blues, Rhythm and Blues, Rock ‘n’ Roll, Soul, Funk and Hip-Hop; there’s no question African American musical creativity has fuelled the modern music industry. But faced with racism and cultural theft for decades, African-American musicians, DJs, businessmen and women have struggled to have any real control or ownership in the business.

‘Cultural Theft’…and later ‘Pillaging Black music’...are somewhat negative terms from the BBC and illustrate the attitude that Blacks should have a unique and defined culture based on skin colour…. the cross cultural fertilization so beloved of the BBC is now branded ‘cultural theft’….. now it seems that only Blacks can play Black music…whatever ‘Black Music’ is….and of course there is no ‘theft’ of White culture going the other way.

Cultural and racial apartheid from the BBC?

As you can see from Alvin’s photo he dresses in traditional Zulu garb…Alvin is no sell out.

This is a programme which takes us on a journey through Black Music history in the USA…..guided by one Alvin Hall…..I like Alvin but he’s not averse to his own bit of ‘race hustling‘….and has been there and done it before on the BBC’s dollar….if I remember correctly it was his programme’s about Alistair Cooke where he plugged Obama’s case just before the US elections:

‘Obama is bright, intelligent, articulate and persuasive.

Barack encountered people who no matter what he did, no matter how well he spoke, no matter how much he showed he was willing to compromise and work together with them ‘They’ were not going to work with him, and ‘They’ were determined ‘They’ were going to defeat him.

For me this election on this day is very much about America giving him a chance to realise that promise.’

You can’t tell from the photo above but Hall has a bit of a chip on his shoulder.

There is absolutely no doubt that racism was rampant in a lot of the US and that that held back Black musicians and singers……but there is also the fact that White groups were just as likely to be ignored and cold shouldered…..it wasn’t the colour of their skin but the colour of money that interested the Music moguls…if they could make money out of you they’d rip you off just as much if you were White as Black….how many stories have you heard of bands being ignored (The Beatles were famously turned down) or when signed up, ripped off with contracts that just about paid them a living wage when they were selling millions of records.

Russell Brennan tells us:

After 25 years in the music business, I’ve probably seen it all when it comes to musicians being ripped off – by managers, labels, promoters, venues, websites and assorted other characters. I’ve also been ripped off myself a few times as well before I wised up to things.

Alvin Hall on the other hand seems to believe that such behaviour was all down to racism.

But Halls’ approach is odd….he gives us facts that contradict or undermine his claims but goes on to ignore them as he continues to spin his narrative…that Black musicians were completely shut out of the industry by White owned or run companies….and that was a policy based upon race….and Blacks were shut out of actually owning and running music businesses not just from reaping the rewards as musicians and singers…..really?…

• Motown Record Corporation…recording company founded by Berry Gordy, Jr., in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., in January 1959 that became one of the most successful black-owned businesses and one of the most influential independent record companies in American history.

That’s a narrative that didn’t tell the whole story…and is certainly far from the truth now….Black people are highly successful in all sphere’s of life…from entertainment, to business to politics….Halls’ approach seems to want to sideline all that success, though he knows it’s there,  in order to peddle his own narrative of Blacks being eternal victims battling against the prejudice and control of Whites.

Not a message destined to serve the ‘Black Community’ well….if only because it is not completely true…..

Janet Jackson is among the top in Black star power when it comes to record deals, album sales and concert ticket numbers. When the pop superstar signed her contract with Virgin Records in March 1991, it was the largest recording contract in history, at $32 million.

Yep, Janet Jackson…a victim of cultural theft and exploitation.

Richard D. Parsons is Chairman of the Board of Citigroup Inc., effective February 23, 2009. Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) is the 8th largest company in the U.S.

Prior to joining Citi, Mr. Parsons served in the positions of President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman at Time Warner, whose businesses include filmed entertainment, interactive services, television networks, cable systems and publishing. From May 2002 to December 2007, Mr. Parsons served as Time Warner’s Chief Executive Officer. He became Chairman of the Board in May 2003.

This is Richard D. Parsons….

‘Time Warner’…one of those evil 6 big companies controlling and stealing black music.

Or how about a Hollywood exec?…..

Hollywood studio executive DeVon Franklin, who nurtured a lifelong fascination with the entertainment industry into a successful career in the film business. Franklin, the vice president of production for Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures, made his mark as one of the youngest executives in the industry, as well as being among the most accomplished movie executives of color.

Or Will Smith, that unknown, struggling Black actor:

Will Smith investigated the marketplace before he started his movie career, analyzing the top-grossing movies and developing a strategy. It is a lesson for every business.

Will Smith is the most successful actor of his generation, grossing in excess of $4 billion for his movies — but it is his business acumen that got him there. It wasn’t luck or charm, although he certainly possesses considerable charm. There’s a bigger story here.

Note….he didn’t ask for special favours or treatment…he made his own ‘luck’.

And what about this guy?:

I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man.   (Thanks to David P. for that)

Hall is going down a well trodden path bemoaning the ‘political economics of Black Music’…..from 1999:

Political Economy Of Black Music

The six major record firms have a colonial-like relationship with the black Rhythm Nation of America that produces hip hop and other forms of black music.

Despite the names of a few big money makers rap, like most black music, is under the corporate control of whites and purchased mostly by white youths.

Hall asks….

Why is it that Black people make all this music but have no control? [But is that true?]

He tells us….Blacks are comfortable with white control…they have sold out presumably.

Hall is taking up the racist message from that article from 1999:

‘The black elite’s world view has been built on a white, bourgeois Victorian model of comportment that  internalized white beliefs about blacks and race. Gaines noted that although the black elite was outraged at whites’ lucrative expropriations of black culture…,” they “extolled Victorian and European cultural ideals and looked with disapproval, if not covert and guilty pleasure, upon such emergent black cultural forms as ragtime, blues [and] jazz…”‘

Which is odd because he also claims criticism of Blues was based on race…but it seems to have been more about culture, class and taste….the Black Middle Class and professionals looked down on the lower class Blacks and their ‘Blues’ music.

He claims that it is racism of the music companies that stopped those companies from investing in Black music…but quotes a company response at the time……

‘We do not think there is a market for Black artists.’

Is that a racial thing or just a belief that there was no market for that type of music?

A similar tale could be told by many a newcomer to a market…..

The inventor of the now Black and Decker Workmate.…..he failed to persuade any companies to invest in it.

Black & Decker did not think that the average DIY enthusiast would need such a big device, while tool company Stanley told him the bench’s success would be measured ‘in dozens rather than hundreds’.

Or Dyson:

Partly supported by his wife’s salary as an art teacher, and after five years and many prototypes, Dyson launched the “G-Force” cleaner in 1983. However, no manufacturer or distributor would handle his product in the UK, as it would disturb the valuable market for replacement dust bags, so Dyson launched it in Japan through catalogue sales.

Eventually of course if they’d believed there was a market the companies would have jumped aboard, as indeed they did……

…as Hall tells us later….saying that Whites eventually saw it as a potential business…..they saw gold in dem der hills (quoting)…..Why did they succeed?…..The white people were looking at it solely as a business whilst Blacks were looking at it as a social improvement project….which is why the Black music ‘businesses’ failed.

Nowt to do with race then.

Then we hear that White run companies took advantage by recording that black music….by producing what black consumers wanted….shocking…Tescos sells food…exploiting what consumers want and need.

Hall still presses on with the idea that companies weren’t interested in Black music…and even if they were, like Paramount, they had a separate ‘Black Music’ division….does he mean like BBC 1Xtra?  Sure the companies had ‘divisions’ for all sorts of things.

He then tells us that Dan Robey (who was Black) of Peacok Records punched Little Richard when he demanded more control……was he committing ‘cultural theft’ and ‘exploitation’ of Black Music?

But hey…it’s the Whites who were profiting from a music form created by Blacks, pillaging Black Music.

In this final part, Alvin looks at the 1980s and beyond….‘Empire State of Mind’

Beginning with the black pop of Michael Jackson, Prince and Whitney Houston the series concludes with the rise of hip-hop, today American’s most dominant form of popular music.

Well….Hip-hop…America’s most dominant form of popular music…really?   The illustration at the top of this post says different…Rock is by far the biggest music form.

Interesting also that they call it ‘Black pop’….because the programme itself complains bitterly that  it was anything but ‘Black’.

Some short examples of the thinking expressed in the programme……

Prince, Lionel Richie, Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston….all top of the charts in the 1980’s around the world….Accepted universally and very very successful…..but cultural sell outs.

The corporations at first refused to sign up Black musicians but then as they saw it made money they took over the small labels run by Blacks….that made it too hard to break into industry for new comers….[race or Capitalism?]

There were racial and cultural barriers….guess Hall thinks it was race.

We are told there is deep social and political ambivalence at way success was achieved…ie the Black artists ‘sold out’ compromising their ‘Blackness’ for success…..selling out their culture.

Whitney Houston’s pop…she was ‘white washed’.

Houston was not representative of authentic blackness…a victim of integration…anything to be more acceptable and successful.

A key issue is that to be more successful the characteristics of Black music had to be ironed out.[The complaint later is that the music is too ‘black’,  too stereotypical’]

Compare the immaculate and perfectly turned out Michael Jackson or Lionel Richie to the grunting James Brown who is ‘authentically Black’

To succeed there had to be compromises.

Hall highlights MTV famously refusing to show much black music for  many years. [but see what was slipped in later about Black companies]….and MTV says the explanation is that they were originally a rock channel..and few Black Rockers around then….and ironically, considering Hall’s disdain for Michael Jackson, it was his video on MTV that paved the way for other Black artists.

[Oh…and Christina Norman is black. She served as president of MTV from 2005 to 2008.]

The Black elite did not recognise the money making genius of its own culture.

Major record labels all White owned as well as the distribution networks that blocked Black success.

Hip hop is the biggest selling music genre….?

But Hip Hp was ignored by black record companies such as Motown…..Once integration began in the ’70’s the Black middle class left the ghettos and Hip Hop reflected the culture of the people left behind in those ghettos…..the crime, the drinking, the drugs…the Black middle class said ‘we don’t want this’…the same as they did for Blues for the same reasons.

Black radio companies wouldn’t play it either.

Then we are told…..the Music Industry is colourblind when it comes to making money [Bit of a turnaround in narrative]

Black owned music companies offered the worst contracts in the world.

Rockafella Records offered the worst deals they could…and took all the money.

Swatch sponsored the first Hip Hop tour.

66% of Hip Hop was bought by White youths.

They claim there was a conspiracy by Whites to shut down Rap…‘We can’t have this invasion of Black culture’…it scared White America….[but it seemed to have scared Black ‘middle America’ just as much].

However Black artists and companies made money….it began to rival Rock.

Black businessmen made a mint…by treating it as a business.

But a familiar thing happened…the Majors moved in and the big boys took over and successful Black labels were then owned by those Majors….[again race or just Capitalism at work?]

It is not progress for African Americans just because they make money…..again complaining about a lack of control and power….[but what of all those Black companies, highly successful Black companies Hall highlights?]

White companies are making money off Black stereotypes,  making money off Black deaths, making money from people selling drugs…what does that say about society…about the market that buys that music?

Are the musicians encouraged to say those things, locked into playing up to that ‘black’ stereotype?

[or is it reflecting social reality?]

A gratuitous mention of Trayvon Martin.

Rap is now ‘showtime’ we are told….like a Minstrel shows…where Whites come to thrill at the alien culture.

A Black commentator says of Rap and Hip Hop….

‘Now this is unacceptable…this is not who we are.’

So  back to the Blues, back to Rock, back to the start of Hip Hop…where the Black ‘elite’ again and again refused to accept ‘authentic’ Black culture and music.

Isn’t  Hip Hop and Rap exactly what Alvin Hall was demanding…authentic Black originated Music?

And yet ‘It’s not who we are!’

For a different slant on the music industry in the USA, or a small part of it here’s something from the Telegraph about ‘Muscle Shoals’, music ‘hit factory’….
Deep Soul
How Muscle Shoals became music’s most unlikely hit factory
By Mick Brown

There is no doubt in my mind that without the wilful assistance of the BBC, Miliband and Labour would not be as far ahead in the polls as they are. Naturally this may change but the BBC is remarkably accommodating to allowing Labour to set the daily political agenda and then reinforce it by parroting the crafted Labour soundbites …be it “Plan B” (now discarded) “Bedroom Tax” (no such thing) and more recently “Cost of living crisis”. Today sees an effort to add “childcare crunch” to the vocabulary and BBC trails the ramblings of Comrade Ed here. The BBC is working hard to return Labour to power in 2015 and the person who carries greatest culpability for this is …Cameron. He had a chance to really challenge the BBC and start a process of utter destruction of this malignant beast in our digital midst but he flunked it. And should Miliband stride into Downing Street in 2015, as the champagne corks at the BBC, he should reflect on his failure.

A new weeks dawns and I can see  new one of these is needed! Detail the bias as you see it here!

I heard about the Co-op bank fellow being filmed buying drugs…despite the Co-op coughing up the odd million to the Labour Party and many Labour MPs (Ed Balls for one) in its debt so to speak I didn’t think there would be much mileage in this from a BBC bias point of view.

I was wrong as Craig at Is the BBC biased? points out:

Bowdlerising ‘A Banker’s Tale’

Warning…graphic photos

We were told that Al Qaeda didn’t exist by the BBC….it was just a ‘nightmare’.

And now the BBC once again humbly lectures us through the good auspices of Will Self….they seem to like these dissolute ‘thinkers’.

Once again we are told something doesn’t exist.

Apparently the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

Self is talking about the fear of Islam in the UK of course.

We should embrace it and welcome change to our culture….to be the heirs, possessors and transmitters of a legacy that is ready and able to adapt.

Islam as we know is a religion of peace, tolerant, forgiving and merciful.

And….The problem with you lot, you lot who are critical of Islam and believe it to be a backward, homophobic, misogynist, violent, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian ideology is that you stink of ‘rank ignorance’.

That’s your problem….you’re pig ignorant.

Nothing to fear accept fear itself.

Curious that only a few weeks ago the BBC was pillorying the Republicans for trying to delay Obamacare for a year.

 From Mardell:

The Republicans have been accused of having Tea Party tantrums, they’ve been compared to people who want to burn the house down, suicide bombers, hostage takers and teenage drivers repeatedly taking a blind curve in the rain.

All these images of blackmail and mayhem come about because their strategy has brought the government to the brink of shutdown. What may happen at midnight on Monday is short of Armageddon, but it is not pretty.

Tea Party-backed members decided it would be a great idea to couple the vote to pay the government’s bills with one to gut President Obama’s healthcare legislation. Now it is linked to a similar idea that would delay “Obamacare” for a year.

They hoped that the Democrats would either blink or get the blame. It has never looked like a winning strategy.

Maybe they lost the battle…but could they win the war?

Now Mark Mardell tells us that:

‘Obamacare’ is in trouble – Obama is in trouble”

Mr Obama has been under fire in recent weeks as insurance companies cancelled millions of Americans’ medical insurance policies because they did not meet the stricter conditions of the healthcare overhaul.

That was despite the Democratic president’s promise that people would be able to keep their existing plans.

It has been a pretty dreadful week for President Barack Obama. Flapping around his head are a whole flock of chickens coming home to roost.

This is all about his greatest achievement – the law for which he will be remembered – the programme nicknamed for him, Obamacare.

Now his one historic achievement, the one big law he got through before he lost the House, is in grave danger. With it his whole reputation, his legacy.

The Telegraph investigates:

What Lonely Planet is the BBC on?

£100m loss on travel book deal as corporation’s executives ride the gravy train

And remember the BBC lost £100 million on its digital media intiative.

And remember it spent £1 billion moving house to Salford.

And remember that the running costs of Salford will be £120 million more than they would have been if they’d stayed put in London up until 2020 if I remember correctly.

Not  a bad use of Licence payer’s money…at least £300 million that could have been thrown away making interesting and entertaining programmes.

Speaking of which…..hasn’t been a thing on the BBC that has been worth watching for nearly a week….oh…except ancient repeats of Dad’s Army and the Likely Lads...which I can get on You Tube if I want them….and Top Gear’s getting long in the tooth…but I’ll give ’em Sherlock, that is good.

Bishop Hill tells us that:

Is that a shift in the climate change ground I feel? Japan has backed away from its renewables targets. Rich countries seem to be on the verge of reneging on their climate change promises to poor countries. The  Climate Change Committee is to undertake an inquiry into the scientific integrity of the Fifth Assessment Report. And they have invited Donna Laframboise (and to my certain knowledge some other sceptics) to give evidence.

It would be nice if the BBC had done their own examination of the science…instead of which we had Roger Harrabin and Co happily parroting the ‘science’ spoon fed to them by the IPCC as this post from October may remind you:

We Think, Therefore It Is

It is incredible to think that the only journalist with any integrity in the climate debate at the BBC is not Harrabin, Shukman or McGrath but Sheila Fogarty.

She has been the one asking the awkward questions about the much hyped ‘ocean warming’ explanation for the ‘pause’.

Harrabin et al should hang their heads in shame.

How the BBC turned a catastrophic crisis into a drama about global warming

• Listeners given a bogus message on Radio 4’s Today programme

Listeners to Radio 4’s Today programme were given an unmistakable but totally bogus message last week: that catastrophic storms such as Typhoon Haiyan are linked to global warming – and are set to increase.

The same claim, which has no scientific basis, was echoed by David Cameron, who said there was ‘growing evidence’ that warming was responsible for storms.

Interviewing Jim Yong Kim, president of the World Bank, presenter Evan Davis announced that climate change has made the Philippine islands ‘one of the most fragile parts of the planet’ and asked what would the world do if more frequent storms forced its population to abandon them.

‘That’s a great question,’ Kim replied. In his view, rising seas caused by global warming would make not just islands but the Thai capital Bangkok uninhabitable ‘within the next 20 to 30 years’.

The response of Davis – with the full weight and authority of the BBC’s morning news flagship behind him – was to muse: ‘If we don’t invest in the prevention of climate change, we’d better invest in border control.’

Just who has been feeding Evan Davis these lies, this bogus science?

Could it be English graduate and the BBC’s environmental analyst Roger Harrabin?

This year is likely to be among the top 10 warmest on record, according to the World Meteorological Organization.

It continues a pattern of high temperatures blamed directly on man-made climate change.

The president of the World Bank, Jim Yong Kim, told BBC News that warming could no longer be ignored.

He urged action to reduce emissions to minimise the likelihood of disasters like Typhoon Haiyan, which has claimed thousands of lives in the Philippines.

roger harrabin ‏@RHarrabin 11 Nov

Rising sea levels and warmer seas will create conditions for ever-stronger tropical storms. #TyphoonHaiyan http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes …

Should of course be a Pinnochio nose but a clown’s nose will have to do.

The BBC has spent a long time and invested much treasure in grooming Alistair Campbell and keeping him sweet.

As they say….keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

Such investment seems to have paid off with Campbell now back in the political game advising Miliband and saying things like this:

‘….whatever the criticisms of the BBC, it should be supported, remain central to our culture and having had the Murdochisation of the press we should resist the Foxisation of TV news…’

…as opposed to the Stalinisation of our TV news?

Nice to have ‘friends’ in high places who could potentially form part of the next government.

Campbell was speaking in his new role as visiting professor at Cambridge University (No really…that’s not a joke).

What is so funny is that he condemns the celebrity culture that has grown up in the Media…driven of course by the two spawn of the Devil…Murdoch and Dacre.

The funny bit is that he is only where he is now precisely because of his own ‘celebrity’…or notoriety….it can’t possibly be intellectual brilliance and original thought.

Read his speech and you will see it is the same old tired, cliched rhetoric about Murdoch and Co that tumbles forth off the pages of the Guardian day in day out.

The same type of unoriginal, unprovoking trite stuff that Russell Brand(one of the ‘key voices of our age’) and Owen Jones have picked up from the ‘Idiots Guide to Social Revolution’ and ‘The Bluffer’s Communist Manifesto’.

The only people who would applaud this stuff are his fellow travellers and then only out of politeness.

Here are some ‘highlights’ from his speech…

“The Murdoch-Dacre Generation Has Had Its Day”

I loved being a journalist, and it is partly the journalist in me that hates what the Murdoch-Dacre leadership has done to British journalism and its reputation.

Presumably Campbell doesn’t agree with this assessment of his own journalistic morals:

No political journalist in my lifetime has treated politicians with such utter, total and complete contempt as Alastair Campbell did during his career for the Daily Mirror and Today newspaper (and later as a government adviser inside Downing Street). His personal conduct was far, far worse and more demeaning than any Daily Mail journalist.”

“bullying and lying his way across our political life”.”

 
Back to Campbell’s own world view:
One of the most powerful critiques of modern journalism came from The Guardian’s Nick Davies. In his book Flat Earth News, he detailed specific acts of press distortion, manipulation and lying. But more, he made a convincing analysis that the corporatisation of the media is what has led to its decline in trust and accuracy. He calls it a cancer and argues it is beyond cure. I hope he is wrong, [but one thing is clear]…..Those who have created the cancer cannot cure it. The Murdoch-Dacre generation of owners and executives, let alone the so-called regulators at the PCC, have failed, cannot change their ways, have had their day.

Not the BBC ‘Corporation’ then that has led to a decline in trust and accuracy…and democracy?

When I was a trainee, if you had asked me my ambition, I would have said “editor of the Mirror“. Not now. I would struggle with the overwhelming celebritisation of tabloid life.
Today, broadsheets and broadcasters also fear that if they fail to run big celebrity stories, they will get their balance wrong. So Michael Jackson’s court case got 50 times more TV coverage than events in Sudan, including both Darfur, where as many as 400,000 people died between, and as the trial started, the fighting in Eastern Sudan.
As veteran BBC war correspondent then MP Martin Bell said in 2004, “the culture of celebrity, like an army of ants, has colonized the news pages, both tabloid and broadsheet”.

Power – that is another answer to the question “why journalism?” It is bad when press power is abused, as it has been. But the press as a check on power is not a bad thing per se. What is bad is when the power of the press is such that politicians feel reluctant to challenge it, when deep down they know they should.

The papers are generous to the point of ridiculous with their favourites, or where their own interests are concerned, vicious and disproportionate about hobby horses or people who cross them. The same approach is moving into TV. Fox News. Fair and balanced my backside, and a good reason why whatever the criticisms of the BBC, it should be supported, remain central to our culture and having had the Murdochisation of the press, we should resist the Foxisation of TV news, which this government almost allowed, and certainly wanted to.

And for me, the real evil of narrow concentration of press ownership by a clutch of wealthy right-wing men, most of whom do not pay taxes here, is that it leads to a narrow set of values and interests within the news agenda.
I welcome the impact of social media in breaking open the agenda setting of a self-serving political and economic elite.

David Dimbleby agrees…but not on who the ‘evil’ ones are:

‘I’ll tell you…there is an argument for funding things that are outside the BBC so it doesn’t have this all-powerful position.  I’m not sure democracy is served by having an organisation so huge and powerful.’

Campbell finishes off with a contradictory plea to allow partisan, or non-objective reporting:

Alongside the myth of non interference we have the myth of press objectivity. It is possible to strive to be fair, neutral, impartial. But in every striving there are enormous cultural and specific judgements being made, and many of them are necessarily subjective.

So it is the ‘evil’ Murdoch and Dacre who have done so much damage to British journalism and its reputation and brought Society down along with it?

So that’ll be The Times and the Financial Times…and Sky…and the Daily mail which millions read…good to know what Campbell thinks of those readers.

Has he never watched TV?  The BBC, Channel 4…those so called bastions of quality entertainment and taste (well, the BBC at least in theory)….they created the celebrity culture…they created the school kids who don’t want to work and dream of a get rich quick life of fame and glamour on the Telly but who ended up disgruntled and disaffected stacking shelves in Tescos or on the dole because of the cheap imported workers Labour flung open the borders for knowing the working class would be sidelined and forgotten.

I imagine Campbell doesn’t really want a chat about who really destroyed Britain….and he’s on safe ground with the BBC.

Here is Nick Cohen being rather less partisan:
It is too easy to dismiss the enormous audience for Brand by saying: “They’re just enjoying the show.” True, artists have always made a show of being drawn towards fanaticism. Extremism is more exciting and dramatic, more artistic perhaps, than the shabby compromises and small changes of democratic societies. You suspect that half the great writers of the 1920s and 1930s supported fascism or communism just for the thrill of it.

Television controllers manufacture celebrities like Volkswagen manufactures cars, and insert them into every niche in their schedules. When I have complained that the actor fronting a documentary knows nothing about African poverty, say, or the comedian on the political panel knows nothing about politics, they reply that the viewers want celebs. If they don’t put them in front of a camera, the viewers won’t watch. In a saturated media market the ambitious celebrity has to go further than the competition to stand out from the crowd.

Celebrity sells…cars, watches and  telly programmes about famine.

The TV execs know it and exploit it to the full.

Campbell loses any credibility by his unbalanced and partial exercise in bashing his political, and the BBC’s, enemies.

After all he was himself one of the ones who created and used celebrity culture to add a bit of glamour to the New Labour project:

Tony Blair and Cool Britannia

Mr Blair writes: ”To this day, I’m never sure of the effect the celebrity thing has. I don’t dismiss it, as some do.
”When you are trying to capture the mood – and this is more often so for a progressive party – celebs can reinforce, even boost the message.
”They add some glamour and excitement to what can often be a dreary business.
”What they can’t do, of course, is substitute for the politics. In fact, if they try to, they become immediately counterproductive.
”If they begin lecturing the people as to why or how they should vote, it’s nearly always a disaster.
”They clearly don’t determine the outcome, but properly used, they help. And frankly, given the difficulty in rousing the damn thing, we needed the help.”

From Guido:

More Amnesia From Toxic Campbell

Campbell is attempting to rebrand as a do-gooder and saint…The new image is just not credible. Leaving aside David Kelly, lets just look at how he operated in his early days in Downing Street:

“Campbell has been on his high horse all week saying he never briefed against Tony Blair’s ministers – apart from the time he lost his temper with anti-Iraq leftie Clare Short and suggested Gordon Brown was “psychologically flawed”. Those of us with longer memories know this is spin. In May 1997 when he first arrived in Downing Street, Campbell shocked senior civil servants by telling them that two Cabinet ministers “couldn’t keep their trousers on”, that Derry Irvine, the Lord Chancellor, hated Donald Dewar, the Scottish Secretary. Smirking, he said “Nick Brown, was ever the bachelor” – before he was outed as gay. He went on to hint at the Foreign Secretary Robin Cook’s then adulterous affair with his secretary Gaynor Regan. All that was just in the first month he was in Downing Street and before he went on – as Michael Howard famously told him – “bullying and lying his way across our political life”.”

Today Peter Oborne has more:

“This protestation that he treated politicians with respect is so completely contemptuous of the truth that I feel a kind of moral obligation to correct it. No political journalist in my lifetime has treated politicians with such utter, total and complete contempt as Alastair Campbell did during his career for the Daily Mirror and Today newspaper (and later as a government adviser inside Downing Street). His personal conduct was far, far worse and more demeaning than any Daily Mail journalist.”