How interesting. I happened to be listening to the BBC Today programme this morning and around 6.55am there was an item on the French Presidential election. Those of you will follow these things will know that the BBC is cheer leading for the Socialist candidate, Hollande. He has said that if elected he sees “finance as the enemy”, he will raise taxes and he will employ tens of thousands of extra public sector workers. You can see why he appeals to the BBC. Anyway, the BBC item concerned itself with Sarkozy’s declared intention to run. Naturally his chances were given as being low (despite the latest poll showing the significant narrowing of Hollande’s lead). Then came the moment. Whilst discussing which candidates would get through to the second round of the Presidential election contest the BBC journalist (Hugh Sykes, I think) said “We wouldn’t want to see the National Front through to the second round” He quickly corrected himself to say “France wouldn’t want to see the National Front through to the second round.” Now I carry no torch for Le Pen and his wretched Party BUT I was disgusted at this clear insertion of BBC prejudice against that Party. Surely ALL parties should be treated fairly and with impartiality? I went looking the link for you but guess what? It is not there yet items before it and after it are available to link. Looks like a black hole has swallowed up this blatant instance of bias. The “We” is the term the BBC are most sensitive about using since it reveals the groupthink and they much prefer to hide behind euphemisms. In this instance, it was blurted out but it is now covered up!
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
- wronged Apr 23, 20:56
Midweek 23rd April 2025
lucy Connelly goes to jail for race hate. Muslims get a free pass ! Two tier justice. The country is… - MarkyMark Apr 23, 20:28
Midweek 23rd April 2025
We can send a rocket full of woman to the edge of space … yet we take 5 years and… - Zephir Apr 23, 19:55
Midweek 23rd April 2025
I went on a spending spree and bought too much red paint.. Now, where’s Rachel..it’s about erm covid or somefink - Zephir Apr 23, 19:53
Midweek 23rd April 2025
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/tCFzV7PC/Screenshot-2025-04-23-195111.jpg[/img] - Guest Who Apr 23, 19:42
Midweek 23rd April 2025
Seems the Cabinet has been issued a spluttering coach… Reeves, Rayner, all reduced to gibbering wrecks when a rare ‘but… - Zephir Apr 23, 19:41
Midweek 23rd April 2025
Note for all artists, labour is open for business, with a keen eye for..erm….fine art,,,,or somefink “Reeves replaces portraits of… - Zephir Apr 23, 19:27
Midweek 23rd April 2025
Just imagine, if starmer were to catch some horrible disease from his extra parliament recreation,not involving a wife, and one… - Zephir Apr 23, 19:20
Midweek 23rd April 2025
She is the gift that keeps on giving, if pessimism is your thing “celebrating amazing women” etc etc Yes, she… - Fedup2 Apr 23, 19:15
Midweek 23rd April 2025
The figures today showing that Rachel borrowed £15 billion more than the ONS calculated shows that she has created her… - digg Apr 23, 19:14
Midweek 23rd April 2025
Watching Starmer trying to defend himself against accusations of dithering and changing horses re the Trans ruling I was suddenly…
Categories
agw anti-American anti-conservative anti-Israel anti Israel. pro Palestinian Antisemitism BBC - sickeningly biased at all times. BBC agenda BBC bias bbc bias and balance. bbc bias by omission BBC censorship BBC Question Time BBC selectivity bias Biased BBC climate change dhimmis general thread immigration Islam israel Mark Mardell obama obama bias Obamalove open thread pro-labour pro-palestinian pro EU pro Hamas pro Islam pro Labour bias pro Obama PRO OBAMA AT ALL COSTS. pro Obama BBC agenda question time question time live Richard Black save gordon. USA politics US economy US News US politics US presidential elections