“The corporation is worried about being criticised by Lord Hutton if it transmits details of his conclusions before they are published. It is possible, however, that senior BBC journalists may learn of the report’s contents from sources outside the BBC: in that instance, the corporation would run the story if the sources were strong.”
But only if the “external leak” is favourable to the BBC?
Eh, this is why I hate cryptic posts that don’t give you any idea what they’re about (e.g. Briffa’s, below). I’m not going to risk the Death of a Thousand Pop-Ups by actually clicking on the link, and most days I won’t aggravate my carpal tunnel by moving the mouse over it, either. Phooey.
That said, the actual story is less chutzpah-riffic than the Guardian would have you believe. They just bought one of those side ads urging you to go to their site for all your Hutton inquiry needs. It’s not like they bribed google into diverting all relevant inquiries onto the BBC site, which is how the Guardian story read for the first five paragraphs.
It’s a Guardian vs BBC cage match! Is there a way they can both lose?
Latest news on BBC Online News – 3 US soldiers killed in Iraq.
Latest news in the real world – Sun has leaked copy of Hutton report, BBC heavily criticised.
But did BBC buy up the Google links to “Corruption in the Media” or “Corruption in the BBC”?
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
Philip_2Nov 19, 17:06 Midweek 19th November 2025 THE AGENDA – (film) The Agenda: Their Vision – Your Future (2025) | Full Documentary (4K) A story of our…
Guest WhoNov 19, 16:35 Midweek 19th November 2025 https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2025/11/19/summers-epstein-connection-too-stupid-to-work-in-artificial-intelligence-n3809056? Summers: Epstein Connection Too Stupid to Work in Artificial Intelligence — But Not Harvard? Harvard of course has also…
Philip_2Nov 19, 16:35 Midweek 19th November 2025 Lucy. It reminds me a bit of Gordon Brown who ‘wanted to change the World’ and everybody in it (including…
MarkyMarkNov 19, 16:25 Midweek 19th November 2025 Theatre! ……… In 2017, the then-European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker publicly branded the European Parliament “ridiculous” for the low attendance…
Philip_2Nov 19, 16:09 Midweek 19th November 2025 This might be of interest to some of us. it was NOT an accident but a TEST to turn OFF…
Emmanuel GoldsteinNov 19, 15:59 Midweek 19th November 2025 I understand why it’s called Prime Ministers Questions (PMQ’s) and not Prime Ministers Answers. *Just watch Lee Anderson’s question (it’s…
Van HelsingNov 19, 15:39 Midweek 19th November 2025 Lucy, Ah, it’s the good old Positive Discrimination* train. To hell with merit, let’s select on the basis of (in…
Richard PinderNov 19, 15:32 Midweek 19th November 2025 President Trump plans to sue the BBC for five billion dollars, and could use the money to compensate British people…
MarkyMarkNov 19, 15:29 Midweek 19th November 2025 “Perhaps one of the most seriousunanswered questions is, for someone granted asylum, over 20 years how many extreme right-wing Home…
Briffa already covered it. See two posts below. Time for a stealth edit?
http://media.guardian.co.uk/huttoninquiry/story/0,13812,1129097,00.html
“The corporation is worried about being criticised by Lord Hutton if it transmits details of his conclusions before they are published. It is possible, however, that senior BBC journalists may learn of the report’s contents from sources outside the BBC: in that instance, the corporation would run the story if the sources were strong.”
But only if the “external leak” is favourable to the BBC?
above hat tip
http://idleryet.blog-city.com/
Eh, this is why I hate cryptic posts that don’t give you any idea what they’re about (e.g. Briffa’s, below). I’m not going to risk the Death of a Thousand Pop-Ups by actually clicking on the link, and most days I won’t aggravate my carpal tunnel by moving the mouse over it, either. Phooey.
That said, the actual story is less chutzpah-riffic than the Guardian would have you believe. They just bought one of those side ads urging you to go to their site for all your Hutton inquiry needs. It’s not like they bribed google into diverting all relevant inquiries onto the BBC site, which is how the Guardian story read for the first five paragraphs.
It’s a Guardian vs BBC cage match! Is there a way they can both lose?
And the problem with this is?
Much ado about nothing, methinks?
Latest news on BBC Online News – 3 US soldiers killed in Iraq.
Latest news in the real world – Sun has leaked copy of Hutton report, BBC heavily criticised.
Sorry, that’s 3 MORE US soldiers killed in Iraq
But did BBC buy up the Google links to “Corruption in the Media” or “Corruption in the BBC”?