well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
Zephir April 19, 2024 at 8:12 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024I've been promoting all drugs sport for a while. Take whatever you want and lets see some records broken, looking...
Zephir April 19, 2024 at 7:47 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024And the follow up single ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11Eonlu6KMo
Broadcasting-on-Behalf-of-the-Caliphate April 19, 2024 at 7:34 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Monty Python?
Zelazek April 19, 2024 at 7:22 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Yes, there is something weird about the BBC's obsession with Taylor Swift. In addition to the fanfare on the national...
Zephir April 19, 2024 at 7:21 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Also getting stuck in a Slayer moshpit when they arrived on stage didn't go down well. Never mind, she could...
G.W.F. April 19, 2024 at 7:12 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024https://twitter.com/i/status/1781286141053767973
Scroblene April 19, 2024 at 7:10 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024It's happened already, Fed, and our income tax has reduced our private pension, by around 18%, and it's only two...
Zephir April 19, 2024 at 7:04 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Corey Taylor being the vocalist regarding the above post. BTW not a great place to take a girl on a...
Zephir April 19, 2024 at 7:01 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Ever seen a calm islamic extremist ? it's not in their DNA. Give them an AK47, an Israeli or American...
well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
0 likes
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes