well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
tomoOct 26, 11:14 Weekend 25th October 2025 and wallow in ignorance…. I wasn’t joking comparing Poleansky to Plug from Beano https://twitter.com/Artemisfornow/status/1982354597852090725
MarkyMarkOct 26, 11:14 Weekend 25th October 2025 Turkish charity owner Sadettin Karagoz denies allegations that he sexually assaulted refugees who came to him for aid https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgkzg680j7lo BBC…
vladOct 26, 11:02 Weekend 25th October 2025 “Arrest him now!” ‘Sadiq Khan must be forced out & investigated.’ Yes, YES, Y-E-S-S https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlXL2kGK6qI
StewGreenOct 26, 10:57 Weekend 25th October 2025 9:26am actually LBC newsroom tweeted it 1 minute later Goodhall also spelled the name wrong Now found The Sun guy…
tomoOct 26, 10:47 Weekend 25th October 2025 Would anyone here be surprised? https://twitter.com/JeremyCordite/status/1982368403638911335 ….. now that they have him, the paperwork can be sorted
diggOct 26, 10:46 Weekend 25th October 2025 Yes, it seems the screeching leftie Royal haters want to go straight to the punishment without trial as far as…
StewGreenOct 26, 10:39 Weekend 25th October 2025 Lewis Goodhall was first “Police have arrested Hadesh Kebatu, the Epping sex offender, in Finsbury Park” He tweeted that at…
tomoOct 26, 10:33 Weekend 25th October 2025 I really can’t abide FB – it seems deliberately stupid and confusing. I have it on one quarantined device -…
tomoOct 26, 10:29 Weekend 25th October 2025 If curated internet content ( near all of if consumed via big tech search and corporate apps ) is a…
well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.