! Please use this thread for comments about the BBC’s current programming and activities. This post will remain at or near the top of the blog – scroll down for new topic-specific posts. N.B. This is not an invitation for general off-topic comments, rants or chit-chat. Thoughtful comments are encouraged. Comments may also be moderated. Any suggestions for stories that you might like covered would be appreciated! It’s your space, use it wisely!
General BBC-related comment thread
Bookmark the permalink.
The photo accompanying this piece goes a long way to explain how the Israelis allegedly killed 2000 “civilians” in the last war in Lebanon.
I can see at least 4 civilians there, not a proper military uniform in sight:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7394853.stm
In case the BBC change the photo it’s this one:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44646000/jpg/_44646313_hezb_ap_226_170b.jpg
Another Lebanese “civilian” here, with his “civilian” car:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7393982.stm
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44644000/jpg/_44644505_11withdraw_ap_226c.jpg
Even the terrorists (huh, that wasn’t so hard) – who the BBC are propagandising for – hate the BBC
“How the BBC just gets everything wrong and the answer is to tip everything over to the commercial sector…” –
Oh, Hillhunt baby, can you hear me on your planet Zog? Al Beeb has just confessed to stealing the little matter of a few thousand squid from charity.
Save Harrison Ford (and billioner Khalid Bin Mahfouz)!
http://expatyank.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/its-about-protecting-harrison-ford-reports-bbc/
via No Pasarn.
The military prowess of these islamic militants who now turn on the BBC and reward them in the traditional middle eastern manner is in much doubt.
They fire rockets at the BBC in Baghdad, but no one is hurt.
Jeremy Bowen comes under fire, but he escapes unscathed.
The BBC, how it defends the Taliban and half the story.
Afghan prisoners given medicine
Red Cross officials in Afghanistan say they have provided medication for 40 prisoners on hunger strike at Kandahar men’s prison. The men are among around 300 inmates who have been refusing food for a week, demanding the chance of a fair trial.
They are also demanding that American forces stop what they say is the harassment of their families while they are locked away.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7395396.stm
The BBC promotes this image about how poor Afghan prisoners are having to go on a hunger strike in which to get a fair trial and that its all the fault of the Americans.
Here is how the rest of the world are hearing this story;
Pakistan
Jailed Taliban suspects on hunger strike
KANDAHAR: Afghan politicians say more than 200 Taliban suspects are on a hunger strike in the Kandahar prison.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008%5C05%5C12%5Cstory_12-5-2008_pg4_19
Canada
Taliban inmates go on hunger strike
KANDAHAR — More than 200 Taliban suspects are on a hunger strike in the Kandahar prison to demand fair trials, officials said yesterday.
http://www.torontosun.com/News/World/2008/05/12/5538271-sun.html
Australia
Afghanistan prisoners on hunger strike
About 300 Taliban suspects have been on hunger strike in an Afghan prison for a week.It is believed the prisoners stopped eating in protest at the handling of their trials by local authorities.
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/news/stories/200805/s2241535.htm?tab=latest
AFP
Taliban suspects on hunger strike in Afghan jail
KABUL (AFP) – About 300 Taliban suspects have been on a hunger strike in Afghanistan’s southern Kandahar prison for a week demanding fair trials, rights groups and local lawmakers said Sunday
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080511/wl_sthasia_afp/afghanistanprisonjustice
I wonder why the BBC refrains from informing the great unwashed just which group these protesting prisoners actually belong to?
The BBC, how it defends the Taliban and half the story.
In the Jimmy Mizen murder case, neither the BBC nor a single newspaper or TV station has been able to report other than the suspect was a “male youth”. Yet today the BBC feel quite able to report that a “white middle-aged man” sought as a witness has come forward.
What can be inferred by this selective reporting?
In its coverage of the crisis in Lebanon the BBC seems to have difficulty referring to the government of that unfortunate country other than as “the Western-backed government.
The implication is that this is not a real government but a western stooge so that the insurrection of Hebollah and the failure to carry out the government’s orders are made legitimate.
The BBC even reports approvingly
“one proposal being discussed is the idea that the current Western-backed government should resign and had over to a military council.”
So a military junta is better than a legal government when that government is “Western-backed.”
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=944&Itemid=59
Did anyone see Headcases on ITV last night? I’m going to try to find out the employment history of the writers on that, because I cannot believe it’s not written by (ex-)Beeboids.
We had four sketches about the Tories, and one tiny little one about Brown.
Thank you Arthur Dent and G.Cooper for your reassurance ! I thought this play was such blatant propaganda that it must have had some hidden depths which only the British could fathom.
I did now phone the BBC about it and might try Feedback.
Thanks folks.
Did anyone else see the terrible coverage of the Jimmy Mizen murder story on Breakfast Time this morning ? There was an interview with the chaps poor parents and then straight over for an interview with the awful Camila Batmanghelidjh in the studio. Sadly this woman pushes all the right buttons for the Beeb. So for the next ten minutes there was no mention of law and order or punishment just more failed 60’s claptrap about how their are troubled children out there needing “help”. All of these views were met with nodding heads from the interviewers.
Sadly whenever I see her the only thought in my mind is why a half Belgian Iranian is dressed like that.
The BBC, its promotion of Islam’s hatred of Israel and half the story.
Islamists in Mauritanian cabinet
Mauritania’s Islamist opposition is in the government for the first time.
The moderate Islamist National Rally for Reform and Development (RNRD) has joined the cabinet of new prime minister, Yahya Ould Ahmed Waghf.
Mr Waghf said severing diplomatic ties with Israel was not on the agenda. Mauritania recognised Israel in 1999
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/7395685.stm
So from the above do you get the impression that the march of Islamists governments has taken Mauritania? That the only thing on their mind is severing ties with nasty old Israel?
Here is what the BBC isn’t telling you.
The Islamists are the opposition, they are not in power.
Here is how the rest of the world are getting informed of this story;
Reuters
Mauritania names old hands, Islamists in new cabinet
NOUAKCHOTT (Reuters) – Mauritania’s new prime minister named a cabinet late on Sunday, handing powerful posts to figures who served the authoritarian administration ousted in a 2005 coup and bringing in Islamist opposition politicians.
The broad-based government is the latest step by President Sidi Mohamed Ould Cheikh Abdallahi to consolidate his political and parliamentary power base as the arid Saharan country faces twin threats from al Qaeda attacks and soaring food prices.
http://africa.reuters.com/country/SN/news/usnBAN241699.html
Associated press
Mauritania’s new prime minister names opposition leaders to top posts
NOUAKCHOTT, Mauritania: Mauritania’s recently appointed prime minister has named five opposition leaders among 30 ministers making up his new government.
This is a first because previously there has not been anyone from the opposition heading ministries in this northwest African nation.The opposition figures’ posts include the health and employment ministries.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/11/africa/AF-POL-Mauritania-Ministers.php
Funny enough only the BBC asks the Israeli question. I wonder why?
The BBC, its promotion of Islam’s hatred of Israel and half the story.
While the BBC is flaunting the vested interest, Stephen Fry, to propagandise the BBC’s case on licence-fee, he makes no mention of his support for the BBC’s ‘multiculturalist, political correct’ programming:-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/thefuture/
Nor does he mention the corollary – his hatred of the ‘Daily Mail’s politics:-
“Stephen Fry attacks the Daily Mail. Then he does it again. And again. And again.”
http://debunkingmediocrity.blogspot.com/2007/12/stephen-fry-attacks-daily-mail.html
The BBC, its promotion of Islam’s hatred of Israel and half the story.
pounce | 12.05.08 – 1:13 pm
Indeed, here’s another story that demonstrates the BBC’s willing assistance in Islam’s demonisation of Israel:
http://www.haloscan.com/comments/patrickcrozier/838933411045121772/#398161
A couple of recent headlines above stories on BBC web based on Labour rebuttals.
• Brown ally attacks rebel MP Field
• Downing St brushes off criticism
And how much attention was given to Mr. Fields attack on the Beeb’s beloved Mr. Brown?
In the Jimmy Mizen murder case, neither the BBC nor a single newspaper or TV station has been able to report other than the suspect was a “male youth”. Yet today the BBC feel quite able to report that a “white middle-aged man” sought as a witness has come forward.
What can be inferred by this selective reporting?
keith | 12.05.08 – 11:26 am |
It’s special BBC language. If they don’t specify ethnicity you can assume that it’s non-white.
This avoids having to keep mentioning the word “black” which might give the unhelpful impression that most violent crime is commited by non-whites.
1327: The likes of the BBC are not interested in punishment. That’s a bit “Tory” for them. Much nicer to sit around drinking a Skinny Latte with a copy of the Guardian and blame it all on Thatcher.
I’m wondering if any of the ‘Israelis’ are going to the Jacob’s Ladder (Sulam Yakov) festival over the weekend. If so I’d like to meet you.
The festival has been conducted every year since 1978 and as far as I can tell has never been even refered to by the BBC. Why would they? A peaceful gathering, for a largely English speaking, all age, audience (Anglo-Saxonim in Israeli terms) to enjoy British/American music is clearly irrelevant to the BBC ‘everything revolves around the Palestinians’ narrative.
❓ David, is there a recognised means of making private contact with commenters on the Biased-BBC blog? I’d rather not give my real email over the Internet but I could create a temporary one just for the initial contact.
Slightly OT: BBC-ism outside the BBC.
Today: news include catastrophes in China and Burma, murder in central London, civil war in Lebanon, the human fertilization bill, worldwide food price hikes, possible recession, and certain political crisis. And what did the ITN morning “news” period lead with?
A Politically Correct nonsense about some know-nothing MPs insisting that our poor wee children are being over-tested by those evil government ogres imposing SATs. Featuring a sixteen-year-old saying that she felt stressed.
I had to check that I was not watching the BBC by mistake.
And you are an expert, Fabio? How many years have you spent in education?
The whole testing system is stupid: it’s vastly over-engineering, poorly designed and dreadfully implemented.
As a matter of fact, Nearly Oxfordian, I am. Now stop being silly, if you can. My point was not even about the testing system, though I disagree with you about it, but about the bizarre choice of priorities on what is supposed to be a news spot. It is not news at all that the educational establishment in this country dislikes testing. There are dozens of more or less authoritative reports. To treat it as more important than, say, the Lebanon crisis, is at least weird.
Ref the murder of Jimmy Mizen, it now transpires the Police are after a young Turkishman who they think has legged it to North Cyprus
Here is how ITN report this story;
Teen murder suspect may have fled UK
http://itn.co.uk/news/cad07187a0a80ce96898498cd4defe18.html
I won’t even bother with the excuse the BBC panders as news.
But here’s a thought about the religion of peace. How can a 19 year old man simply just pack his bags and bugger off to Cyprus without his family asking questions?
Questions that would have been answered by anybody who had a bought a paper, listened to the radio, watched the TV or just listened to the street gossip.
Just think if the Police and Media had reported to the public what this thug looked like (or even named him) we may have this evil man locked up.
Shock news: BBC Trust opposes licence fee sharing:-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1950179/Sir-Michael-Lyons-BBC-licence-fee-not-for-sharing.html
Anyone see Have I Got News For You last night?
They had a good laugh at some ridiculous Daily Express phone poll – something like “do you agree that this disgraceful government never ceases to rip us off and shockingly wastes all our cash (calls cost 25p a minute)”
Hislop then asked pointedly when they were going to take the piss out of the Guardian. There was a moment of awkward silence then a really clunky cut into the next section. Somebody made the effort to include this in the show?? bizarre….
Cockney – any links to that on say YouTube? I’d like to see it if possible.
The BBC reports the Queen’s visit to Turkey.
This visit can be seen as being orchestrated by the Labour government, Brown-Miliband-Murphy in particular, as important in getting Turkey into their megalomaniac European Union, as soon as possible. (The fact that most people in the EU, including the UK, do NOT want Turkey in, is irrelevant to the non-listening powers that be.)
The BBC report includes the debate-precluding soundbite:
(Turkey) “is seen as a key ally in the fight against terrorism.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/020446.php
Seen by whom? On historical evidence, it is more realistic to see Turks as supporters of Islamic jihad:
“Thousands of Turks chant ‘Death to Israel’, praise jihad”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/020446.php
“The Sudeten Turks?”
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/02/sudeten-turks.html
Yes, carry on with your priorities, Brown and Miliband, get the 80 million Muslim Turks in the EU, so that as many of them, in numbers uncontrollable by any UK government, come to the UK as possible. And the consequences will be good for Turks and Islam, and bad for British people and Christianity. But don’t forget, Labour and BBC: ‘DIVERSITY’ is all.
Allan – I don’t think it’s up yet, but keep an eye out.
George
“Seen by whom?” – the US, UK and most European secular Turks who see parallels between their fight against separatists on the South East and the “war on terror”.
I’ve just read an interesting piece in the American Spectator about the natural born citizen of the United States, who is also qualified to run for President. That would be one BORIS JOHNSON.
Has this been on the BBC?
The Current Crisis
London’s American Mayor
By R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.
Published 5/8/2008 12:08:37 AM
WASHINGTON — The most momentous political story of the hour is not what you might think…whatever you might think. It has to do with an American politician now living in London and his aspiration to become president of the United States. His name is Boris Johnson. He, an exemplary conservative, has just beaten one of the most rebarbative left-wing reactionaries in the United Kingdom, to become mayor of London. Johnson ran a very fine campaign, an amalgam of high intelligence, sound principle, rollicking good humor, and energy that could be branded New Tory. Mind you, New Toryism will arrive on these shores in due course.
Cockney:
Re- Turkey and Islam:-
“Turkey and Straw”
http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/11477
Great car crash telly on the Daily Politics.
Andrew Neill to Clair Ward MP(Labour whip):- “When is the baby due?”
Response:- “The BABY is 3 months old!”
I object to paying the licence fee just for Mr Neill but he gave me some value today.
Apparently the BBC think that the rescue effort in China is “Chaotic, but organised”. Hmmm, interesting grasp of semantics there.
BBC. Not such much biased as bewildered.
It’s interesting to compare the BBC’s reporting of Israel’s war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, when the BBC talked about 2,000 killed, “mostly civilians”, with the recent fighting in Lebanon where it seems only “people” are being killed:
Clashes resume in north Lebanon
More than 60 people have been killed in Lebanon since the fighting started last week in the capital, Beirut.
…
At least six people were wounded in Tripoli as Sunni fighters loyal to the government based in the Bab Tebbaneh district exchanged fire with Shia opposition supporters in nearby Jebel Mohsen, officials said.
…
Earlier, troops were deployed in the Chouf mountains after an overnight offensive by Hezbollah on the forces of the pro-government Druze leader, Walid Jumblatt, left at least 13 people dead.
…
Security officials have told the Reuters news agency that at least 36 people, including 14 Hezbollah fighters, were killed during Sunday.
Eleven people were killed in the town of Chouweifat, officials said.
Rest assured if Israel had been responsible we’d be told clearly if the dead were civilians, women or children.
Biodegradable:
Yes, we have to turn away from Al Beeb to get more reliable accounts on Hamas and Hezbollah:
“It’s 3 am. In Beirut”
http://blog.americancongressfortruth.com/
Anyone able to hazard a guess as to why ‘restorative justice’ programs are of such interest to the Beeb again, apropos of nothing I can make out?
We had Will Riley of Islington and Peter Wolf, who burgled Will’s home, assaulting Will in the process, taking up a big chunk of ‘Today’ on Tuesday. Mr Wolf and his very big eyes had supposedly renounced crime as a result of meeting his victim but still sounded sufficiently addled to lift anything convertible into drug money without thought of the consequences.
Now the same dramatis personae turn up in the first half of the R2 Vine show today.
It could be nothing but I don’t trust these conniving bastards
BBC News 24 praising St Gordon for the Tax changes.
Sky call it a massive U-turn based on more borrowing (so we pay for it in the long run).
I noticed that when Vince Cable asked Glove Puppet about how many of the 5 million people would be compensated, the BBC cut away.
Interesting that the BBC haven’t spotted the obvious (although when you’re licking McBeans piles clean I guess you wouldn’t)
I got a nice little wedge (cheers Gordon) when the 10p tax was abolished and the 2p tax cut was brought in.
However, I now gain again for this year with the personal allowance change.
However, all that McBean and his glove puppet have done is give back some money to those who lost out, but they will not be better off at all (that’s if they even get back what they lost)
Yet the dumb arseholes in Parliament (the Labour lot) were all cheering. How shocked are they going to be again when the find out that McBean is even MORe unpopular?
Martin | 13.05.08 – 4:15 pm |
Never have I seen the BBC website rush anything out as quickly as they have here and give it so much prominence.
Basic rate taxpayers to get £120
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7397705.stm
As you rightly point out: ‘The BBC cutting away when the truth is about to be revealed’
The BBC biased. Not a bit of it we are always impartial.
I see they are even headlining:
Tax rebel Field apologises to PM
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7398980.stm
I really do need independent verification on all aspects of what Frank Field said.
You just cannot trust the BBC when it comes to reporting on Labour.
TPO: But those who lost out will see people gainig twice.
How many of the 5 million that lost out will now be better off? At best they will be back to where they were and I suspect most will still be worse off. Yet people like me who earn good salary have gained twice!!! And I don’t vote Labour
You think the BBC would have learned by now not to fall for the Labour spin.
On the top of the BBC’s webpage they run a ticker tape of the latest news stories.
Just so no one misses it, Labour’s placemen in the BBC are running Frank Field’s ‘apology’ every fifth headline.
The importance of this ‘apology’, and you cannot trust the BBC on such things, is lost on me, but clearly 10 Downing Street and the BBC think that it must not escape anyone’s notice.
If McBean thinks that people will be happy he’s got a thing or two to learn.
if you’re are on a low salary would you be happy that you get extra on your allowance, but so does everyone else!!!!!!
So I’m better off, but they are only back to square 1. And the media have fallen for it again.
Diogenes | 13.05.08 – 12:36 pm
Priceless!
10 mins 30 secs in for those who missed it:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/the_daily_politics/
This is the real big story.
Housing crisis: Caroline Flint gaffe lets slip Government’s price fears
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1952417/Housing-crisis-Caroline-Flint-gaffe-lets-slip-Government%27s-price-fears.html
Follow the story onto this link
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1952226/Housing-crisis-Caroline-Flint%27s-Cabinet-meeting-notes-deciphered.html
Of course the BBC have buried this on the back of Darling’s sleight of hand.
Before Darling’s announcement the BBC had a different spin on this story when it was more prominent. It was written in a damage limitation, ‘nothing to see here’ manner.
And of course don’t forget that the fiddled inflation figures are soon going to hit 4% (The reality being that they’ll go into double digits)
Much the same as the fiddled unemployment figures.
Forget the tax allowance increase, the big crash is coming.
The BBC will doubtless play it all down.
This how the BBC should have reported the tax change by Labour and not by indulging in propagandising for this failed bunch of corrupt and venal people:
10p tax victims get £120 compensation
Gordon Brown has gambled by borrowing £2.7 billion to buy off Labour tax rebels, in a move which he hopes will get his faltering premiership back on track.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1952560/10p-tax-victims-compensated-andpound120-by-rattled-Gordon-Brown.html
So if Frank Field ‘apologised’ then this is the price.
Re today’s Daily Politics – I also enjoyed this exchange between Andrew Neil and Tony Juniper from Friends of the Earth:
Juniper: Global average temperatures are increasing.
Neil: Well they haven’t increased since 1998.
Juniper: But you can draw a line between any two…
Neil: Correct? They haven’t increased since 1998?
Juniper: You can draw a line between any two points on a graph and make any point you want. (You said it, Tony.)
Neil: What I’m saying is they haven’t increased for ten years.
Juniper: That is statistically the case. (As opposed to what – the pseudo-religious case?)
DB: Yes that prat Juniper made a complete knob of himself. Did you also hear what he said when James Whale asked about cutting the worlds population?
That tit Juniper said that the number of people didn’t matter is was how they used Carbon that counted!! Unbelievable.
Lok at the deforestation around the world, the cost of basic food products like Rice and does Juniper really think the 1.3 billion people in China or the 1 billion in India don’t want to own a car or fly on holiday?
What Juniper really meant was, the left like lots of young people as they tend to vote leftie.
Juniper is a prat of the first degree.
How does Juniper think this Country can cut Carbon emissions if we keep growing the population?
That comment from Andrew Neil was spot on. It just shows what an easy time these wankers get off the BBC normally.
One good thing about James Whale when he was on the radio was he gave scientists who oppose the view that Carbon levels are directly linked to climate change.
Many think that was the real reason Whale was booted off the air.
Anyone see the latest Al Bore recruitment film by David Shuckman on the 6pm news.
Now I though that the left were telling us that “climate change” was going to give us warmer and wetter Winters and summers? (so they can explain away the flooding of last year as part of climate change)
Yet we see that prat Shuckman doing a report from Spain where they’ve got half empty reservoirs. Well blow me down, why didn’t he do the report here in the UK? Er could it be because our reservoirs are overflowing with water and that wouldn’t look good to do some wank climate change story about water would it?
The left never fail to amaze me. THey will go to any part of the planet to find climate conditions that fit their twisted view of climate change.
DB | 13.05.08 – 6:03 pm |
Who actually pays Juniper?
Or does he make his dosh by getting the £250 appearance fee + taxis + lunch and pocketing the canapes every time he sets foot in a BBC studio..