THE WAR ON OUR ARMED FORCES

. Not a day passes without the BBC leading the charge against the professionalism and integrity of our Armed Forces. Little wonder the Jihadists figure that the biggest damage that can be carried out on the British Army is by the British media, with the BBC to the fore. This past week has carries stories of plummeting moralE, now abuse, compensations for torture – you name it and the BBC have run it. It really sickens me to see the evident delight that the BBC takes in running down our brave men and women who serve this country so diligently, in the teeth of a savage enemy.

Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to THE WAR ON OUR ARMED FORCES

  1. Martin says:

    Well what a shock. I wonder how long it took for the “millions in compo” to get back to Iraq?

    No doubt Phil Shiner Gareth Pierce and Imran Kahn will be lining up to fill their pockets as well

       0 likes

  2. nbc says:

    DV

    I hate to be a pedant, but please, it’s “morale”.

       0 likes

  3. Joel says:

    No one loves the messenger who brings bad news.

       0 likes

  4. Chuffer says:

    Joel,
    Don’t confuse ‘bringing’ bad news and ‘fabricating’ bad news.

       0 likes

  5. Atlas shrugged says:

    David Vance
    Little wonder the Jihadists figure that the biggest damage that can be carried out on the British Army is by the British media, with the BBC to the fore.

    A logical assertion I grant you.

    However IMO a wholly mistaken one, which you can not possibly have any evidence for. As I do not many of my conspiracy theories. Other then circumstantial evidence, that will never be tested in court for obvious reasons. That is the Courts are wholly and totally controlled by the same establishment that the BBC is controlled by.

    This war was never popular either in The UK or The USA, and it is far less popular now then it was when it started. In spite of this we are no closer to leaving then we where 3 years ago. Obama and Cameron will do as they are told to do by the people that bank role them and whats left of their respective countries economy’s.

    If Jihadists are waiting for the western media to do there job for them they will be dieing and losing for a long time yet in vain.

    The BBC is no ones friend Muslim Christian atheist or Jew. It is a construct of the British establishment designed wholly for the interests of that same British establishment.

    The BBC is trusted only by fools. Jihadists as you call them, are not fools and neither are people like Mugabe. Which is why if any of them can help it no real of potential enemies of the British establishment let the BBC any where near their own country’s.

    This in spite of the understandable observation many may make that the BBC has always given murderous dictators like Mugabe a soft ride.

    THEY KNOW what the BBC is all about and who is controlling it, even if the British people seem to have absolutely no idea whatsoever.

    They know FOR 100% SURE, even if you David Vance seem unaware of the obvious fact, that the BBC is rotten with MI6 agents, and would not know what reporting the REAL truth was if it was attached to a marital aid and inserted where the BBC’s sun never shines.

    The TRUTH and the BBC have not suddenly become divorced or happily living separate lives, sometime in the last 10-20 years.

    They where at best never on speaking terms, and at worst forever sworn enemies fighting to the death of one or the other.

       0 likes

  6. Martin says:

    Has anyone in Iraq sued Osama Bin Laden yet?

       0 likes

  7. Joel says:

    It’s not all bad news:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7503061.stm

       0 likes

  8. Peter says:

    “Joel:
    No one loves the messenger who brings bad news.”

    So sod off then.

       0 likes

  9. Martin says:

    Joel:

    “It’s not all bad news”

    I had hoped it was a link telling us the BBC was to be scrapped.

       0 likes

  10. It's all too much says:

    The BBC, Spanish Civil war and an inability to see the wood from a carefully constructed left wing myth

    I was listening to the Radio on Sat am and heard a piece led up to by a rant about ‘50% want to quit the army – the because it is demoralised with all these pointless and unwinnable wars etc etc’. Nevertheless, the BBC chimes in, there was a time when there were real, moral, causes for which people willingly took up arms.

    We were them treated to twenty minutes of horrific and sycophantic ars*e licking. Yes the BBC have found a 92 year old unrepentant communist who ‘fought fascism’ on the side of Stalin during the Spanish civil war. We were treated by the BBC to everything in the pantheon of 30’s heroism starting with cable street, through dealing with wounded comrades and ending with “then the massacres really began when Franco took Madrid…”

    I was sickened by the failure of the BBC to ask what the internationalists were fighting for rather than against. Many of them were fully committed to Stalinist purges of the population and approved the murder of the bourgeoisie (see Homage to Catalonia) The old comrade himself said that the whole trip to Spain was organised by the communist party. The same bunch that were murdering millions in the East at the time. The moral argument about fighting fascism is utterly hollow (although unchallenged by the ignorant and fellow-traveling BBC)as British Communists a) campaigned in the mid 30’s for total disarmanemt and the abolition of the ‘provocative’ RAF and b) were strictly enjoined not to fight the Germans after was broke out in 1939 – they wouldn’t fight an imperialist capitalist war. Strangely this opinion changed into strident demands for a “second front now” as soon as the Nazis attacked the USSR in 1941

    To top it all off at the end of this piece of historically bankrupt crawling, the odious Will Self (whenever has a surname been more appropriate) was asked if ‘the cause’ would have had him taking up arms. “Almost certainly” he said. This is a cause that in my view is morally equivalent to the Nazis.

    Final thought – do we believe that the BBC would do a puff piece for the morally committed Irish catholics who formed a brigade to fight for Franco?

       0 likes

  11. Anonymous says:

    traitorous beeboid scumbags

       0 likes

  12. Anonymous says:

    “the odious Will Self (whenever has a surname been more appropriate) was asked if ‘the cause’ would have had him taking up arms. “Almost certainly” he said”

    Easy to be heroic in retrospect.The H might have been an obstacle though.

       0 likes

  13. It's all too much says:

    here are a few useful links

    http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=9250

    the true story of Sam lesser….

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/saturdaylive/saturdaylive.shtml

    the Listen again facility

       0 likes

  14. Reversepsychology says:

    Seems mightily strange to me that a • right on – politically correct organisation such as the BBC, could willingly align itself to a prime minister that possesses the same psychological floors as one Adolf Hitler…

    http://my.telegraph.co.uk/innit/ …brown_autistic_

       0 likes

  15. Anonymous says:

    Reversepsychology | 13.07.08 – 8:34 pm

    What’s a psychological floor?

    Is it when you only think you’ve got your feet on the ground?

       0 likes

  16. Tim says:

    Joel,

    Don’t piss about or joke on this subject.

    Sure, you can with others.

    But the BBC are really the enemy from within.

    And their propaganda has cost British (and other) lives.

    No doubt about it…

       0 likes

  17. adam says:

    left hates the nation state

       0 likes

  18. Mike_s says:

    CONTRAST THIS
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,381403,00.html
    WITH THIS
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7504952.stm

    FOX NEWS SAYS;
    “The attack on the American troops began around 4:30 a.m. and lasted throughout the day. Militants fired machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and mortars from homes and a mosque in the village of Wanat in the mountainous northeastern province of Kunar, NATO’s International Security Assistance Force said in a statement.”

    BBC;
    “homemade mortars”

       0 likes

  19. Mike_s says:

    CNN;
    During the fighting, insurgents used homes, shops and a village mosque for cover, the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force said. ISAF troops, along with members of the Afghan army, responded with firepower.

       0 likes

  20. Tim says:

    Exactly!

    What the F**K is a Home Made Mortar?

       0 likes

  21. Alan says:

    Home-made Mortars? These were used by the IRA, but the Taliban have no need, they’ve plenty of the real thing, left behind by the Russians, or supplied by Pakistan or Iran.

    The BBC, true to form, is trying to paint a picture of a plucky group of home-equipped ‘freedom fighters’ standing up against the evils of the USA and NATO. Anyone who fights the USA cant’t be bad – even if they are homophobic, fascist, misogynistic zealots who ban women from education and work, and destroy the heritage of their own Country.

    Why am I not surprised by this?

       0 likes

  22. Tim says:

    Sure!

    I was being sarcastic!!

    How does he know a few hours after the attack in the remotest part of the country, that they were improvised. (or Home made, you know like my mum’s Home made Jam)

    I have personally been on the wrong end of improvised mortars in Ulster and Iranian made mortars in Baghdad.

    I am also qualified in Advanced Demolitions with UK Special Forces. So yes I do know what an improvised mortar is.

       0 likes