The BBC is hyping up it’s refusal to air the ad from the DEC appealing for cash for Hamastan, thus suggesting it is without bias. Mark Thompson was on to say that he believed showing this appeal could be taken as favouring one side over another. Quite right. Sky has also refused to show the DEC sppeal so BBC virtue in this regard is not unique! So what do we make of the BBC approach here? Superficially I welcome it but of course having endured three weeks of pro-Hamas propaganda dressed up as news reporting, I rather worry that what the BBC is actually doing here is a little bit of sophisticated triangulating, giving itself cover so that any future criticism of its coverage of matters in the Middle East is invalidated because of this move. Your view?
TRIANGULATION
Bookmark the permalink.
I agree that Nearly Oxfordian might not be genuine. He could be a BBC employee on a ‘special mission’ trying to lower the tone of the debate.
Message to Nearly Oxfordian, I have pre-prepared a reply from you to me in order to save you time, as I know you are busy shouting on several blogs at once at present –
suggested reply for N Ox to use:
“Nearly Oxfordian might not be genuine.”
Lunatic! Look in the mirror! Crap! Crap!
That there Bilal, he’s beside himself. That boy doesn’t know whether to shit or go blind.
If Nearly Oxfordian is genuine, then I really am a bloke sitting in a cave with a bushy beard surrounded by severed heads and a huge pile of simm cards.
Soorry all;
I tried to have a sensible(ish) conversation with Bilal, but I admit got carried away.
Though I regret some of what I said, I was brought up to stand up to bigotry and bullies of all kinds. Religious bigots of any description are my pet hate.
A blog is like a conversation where you don’t get the usual feedback of seeing people’s reactions. Normally, if you make a bad taste joke, people will say Shhhhhh! and you know you are out of line. But in a blog sometimes you don’t know where the line is exactly. For example, if I suggest starting a new religion where we hate elephants (who trample more crops than pigs do with their big clumsy feet) and where we get 72 curry recipes in paradise (appeals to a wider spectrum of the population than 72 naked women, which could be quite scary to some individuals), I don’t know if it is offensive to the type of person whose opinion I would respect.
Normally I would be very tolorent of people’s religious beliefs. But when some members of a religion say ‘kill the infidels’ and there is no huge outcry from the rest of them, then perhaps the bizarre beliefs of the extremists deserve mocking.
A religion that takes a normal child and turns them into a monster does not deserve treating with the same respect as, say the Buddhists.
And this really will be my last post, ever, ever.
Cowards:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FjEd4hJNVCE
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FjEd4hJNVCE
How dare the BBC post this. This proves their bias. Don’t they know that those civilians are terrorists? The young girl deserved to be used as a human shield by the brave Israeli soldiers, because she voted for Hamas. Yes, 72 curry recipes. Let’s all be racist against those Muzlimz but if they ever accuse us of anything, they are guilty of anti-Semitism, bigotry and don’t know whether to shit or go blind. For we are the noble AshkeNazi race.
Anonymous
If you live in Britain and are loyal to the country you live in, I apologise for offending you. In fact, if you do not hate Britain and you do not wish to install Islam as the national religion here, I still apologise. If you think all nations should live peacefully and Palestinians should live peacefully next to Israel, I also apologise. But there are some Muslims in this country, believe it or not, who do hate Britain and whose loyalty is not to this country, but to foreign countries whose rulers hate us, and there are some whose obsession is to drive the Jews into the sea.
Take that doctor in Scotland. One minute a hard-working man studying for a carreer that would give him vast wealth and status. Then he spends too much time in the mosque, which flips his head, and next thing you know, he is driving his car full speed at an airport, setting himself on fire and killing himself in the process.
What should I say to people like him? ‘I respect your religion and the fact that the doctor was partly motivated by the prospect that he was going to be greeted by 72 virgins’?
If jokes about 72 virgins for terrorist suicide bombers are in bad taste, are jokes about Bin Laden okay?
And this really is my last email. You will never hear from me again.
No no don’t get me wrong; I am the ultimate patriot and jingoist. If my country’s allies swat mass infants with white phosphorus in densely populated areas, it’s ok because the nation I happen to reside in are allies of the perpetrators. This blind-patriotic jingoism rule is exclusive to me and people of my ilk though, because I am a white westerner who supports Israel. Albeit there being a clear similitude, this same rule does not apply to the Nazi’s in 1940s Germany, because they are anti-Semitic. Yes, those Palestinian infants deserve all they get because of what the unconnected Bilal Abdulla once did in Glasgow; thus justifying the Palestinians being killed, making a bigoted mockery of Islam, and making baseless assumptions of all those terrorist Muzlimz spending too much time in the mosque. Heil, mein Führer Ehud Olmert!
If my country’s allies swat mass infants with white phosphorus in densely populated areas, it’s ok because the nation I happen to reside in are allies of the perpetrators. This blind-patriotic jingoism rule is exclusive to me and people of my ilk though, because I am a white westerner who supports Israel.
…
… and making baseless assumptions of all those terrorist Muzlimz…
Anonymous | 29.01.09 – 12:55 pm |
—————————–
Is there some reason for bringing in white skin colour? Some connection you are trying to make with the white in phosphorous perhaps? No? /scratches head/
Ah, I got it: you’re from the B’oid Farm!
PS: What is Muxlimz? Is it a race or a skin type?
Heil, mein Führer Ehud Olmert!
And this pile of turds will probably claim he is not a Nazi.
I applaud you Millie Tant for your continuance of the tradition of diverting the issues in question by nit-picking on irrelevant points.
No I merely referred to white skin colour as that is surely the polemical justification we Zionists can use in distinguishing ourselves from those Muzlimz of whom many are Pakis, whose (as we know) cultural cuisine is curry; so to make a racist slur in saying 72 curry recipes by connoting curry to the Muzlimz and Izlamic religion based on the fact many Muzlim Pakis culturally eat curry is completely tactful, mature, unprejudiced and dignified; being that we are of white western Zionist profiles.
I too use the tactic of avoiding the issues raised and nit-picking on irrelevant points when dealing with the anti-Semite humanitarians.
I want Bilal back –at least he made sense
I merely referred to white skin colour as that is surely the polemical justification we Zionists can use in distinguishing ourselves from those Muzlimz of whom many are Pakis, whose (as we know) cultural cuisine is curry; so to make a racist slur in saying 72 curry recipes by connoting curry to the Muzlimz and Izlamic religion based on the fact many Muzlim Pakis culturally eat curry is completely tactful, mature, unprejudiced and dignified; being that we are of white western Zionist profiles.
I too use the tactic of avoiding the issues raised and nit-picking on irrelevant points when dealing with the anti-Semite humanitarians.
Anonymous | 29.01.09 – 1:39 pm |
————————————–
Well, yes, there you go, doing it again, this time bringing in the irrelevant issue of skin colour into curry eating. When you bring in curry eating, the issue is curry eating vs non-curry eating, not curry eating vs skin colour. Can’t you see that?
Well if you are a B’oid, maybe not, as that is how they are programmed.
we seem to be wandering from the righteous path of BBC bias?
But I love curry and I am not even muslim! This is so confusing!
This will definitely be my last post.
Oh, yes, francos. What was the subject again? That link above didn’t work, only adding to the confusion.
Don’t get me wrong either. I’m as patriotic as the next mullah. If my country accedes to my demands and alters its foreign policy it’s okay because if they don’t I’ll thcream and thcream till I’m thick. Thith blind patriotic rule ith (okay I’ll thtop lithping now) exclusive to me and people of my ilk, because although I am a British born Moslem, I am loyal to my idealogical rulers who support the extermination of Israel and the Jews. Albeit there being a clear simililiililitude, this same rule does apply to the Nazi’’’’s* in 1940s Germany, because they were antsemitic and so are we. Yes, those Palestinian infants deserve all they get because we would rather hide behind them to save our own skins, and encourage the older ones to self detonate so they can get the virgins, or the raisins. Islam can make its own mockery for itself thank you very much, and doesn’t need your help, as many Bilals demonstrate. Allah ackbar or whatever.
*Greengrocers to a man.
Nazis – pathetic! leaving a job half-finished and stopping at only 6 million. We have bigger and more glorious aims for our honour than they ever had!
(last post)
Suenonymous why emphasise on the apostrophe as opposed to dealing with the common issues raised by humanitarians? Surely this as our Zionist tactic will not wash for long as people with an iota of a brain cell is bound to see through it sooner or later? I wonder if it is because us Zionists don’t have any worthwhile answers and thus have to stoop to such a pitiable attempt of a defence. Yes, the Palestinians deserve to die because Anonymous put an apostrophe when they wrote “Nazi’s”. 1000 civilian deaths for every mistyped apostrophe via white phosphorus, I say. Because although I am a British born Zionist, I am loyal to my ideological Israeli rulers who ENACT the extermination of Gazans and Palestinian civilians and infants. Let us hope that our efforts via BBC Bias Blogspot works to ensure Israel does not accede to the demands of International Law.
Yes Osma bum Laden, I agree. We have fulfilled the criteria of your rhetoric through our actions; let us openly declare it now. Let us seek vengeance on the Palestinians for what those unconnected-to-Palestine German Nazis did to our ancestors.
Now now Millie Tant, why get defensive over your obvious rhetoric clearly attempting to justify the racist comments made by Osma bum Laden and effectively the camel connotations made by Andy and boring tiresome broken record jibes regarding the 72 virgins? We’re all Zionists here 🙂 After all; when you think of curry, a particular group of people never comes to our mind, hey? Because it is not anyone’s cultural cuisine; is it?
I suppose I’d best be careful given the hostility I appear to be somehow emanating. I wouldn’t want Nearly Oxfordian to be alerted to my mistakenly-perceived disagreement/objection to slaughtering Palestinian children; thus automatically pigeon-holing me as an anti-Semitic Nazi (as is everyone and anyone who disagrees with Zionism, including the Socialist deceptively-named Anti-Nazi league). I do apologize the link doesn’t work; which incidentally shows our brave Israeli soldiers hiding behind Palestinian children using them as human shields. I just assumed that the function of “copy and paste” for the link given was known to you fellow Zionists.
Yes Suenonymous, I agree. Because we forced the Palestinian infants into the open air prison of Gaza along with Hamas; that herding justifies us killing them all via cluster-bombing and blanket spraying of white phosphorus; i.e. under the guise of collateral damage. It is the infants’ own fault because they dared live in the same claustrophobic vicinity as Hamas (that us Zionists incidentally put them both in to start with).
us Zionists incidentally put them both in to start with
Visited any nice neo-Nazi sites lately?
Anonymous.
Role-reversal is too taxing so I’m reverting to my real persona, evil zionist. Now we’re on the same side, I think there are some things you should be told. The Palestinians who support Hamas, and voted for them, have been brainwashed from birth to hate us by the likes of retarded tablecloth wearing gents such as Amin Al-Ansari.
“The corruption spread by the Jews was very great. Very great. It got to the point that the rulers themselves had no solution but to annihilate them.’
Disturbing video on Harry’s place. And much, much more. That one’s off the page now but there’s good info about the ‘massacre of children’ at the UN school that wasn’t quite what it seemed
http://www.hurryupharry.org/
Wars are bloody, but no-one but Hamas (except child soldiers in Uganda) would deliberately place children in harm’s way. We evil zionists would prefer it if Palestinians loved and respected their children and stopped them from playing on the roof or mingling with war paraphernalia.
Something in your demeanor reminds me of Bilal. In fact I suspect you are really Bilal and are only pretending to be a zionist. A heavy disguise adopted to save face after promising the final exit? If you aren’t Bilal, you might as well be.
There is another whole thread devoted to apostrophes if you’re interested. It’s a fascinating topic, isn’t it?
Anonymous | 29.01.09 – 4:27 pm | #
What strange double standards you have Anonymouse.
Did you not see some of the vitriol in scumbag Bilal’s earliers posts, all because people had the audacity to disagree with him?
Why don’t you take a run and jump?
That one’s off the page now
Sue,
All threads are available on the left-hand side, but you need to choose a topic (this one may be under I/P).
As to this latest antisemitic ranter: of course he’s not a Zionist. It’s his clunky attempt to be ‘ironic’.
Several high profile actors including Peter Mullan and Samantha Morton have said they will never work for the BBC again, unless it agrees to screen the appeal
A bit like the ululating prat Barbra Streisand, vowing to leave the USA if Bush were elected. She never did, the greedy sow – where else would she live in such ill-deserved opulence? The same goes for these self-important twerps: of course they’ll work for the BBC at the merest whiff of a part in a production.
Time to close this thread.
The two topics which always seem to bring them out of the woodwork are Israel and the US. I wonder why so many of them don’t come in here looking for a fight when the subject is Global Warming fascism or shilling for Gordon or BBC employees criticizing certain religious beliefs? What could be the reason?
Sue,
No I really am a Zionist. Amin Al-Ansari’s rhetoric surely justifies the killing of all the Palestinian children; for the occupants of Palestinian nurseries should have to pay the price for what Amin Al-Ansari said.
I thank you for the link. It’s good to know that the only non-biased media outlet is http://www.hurryupharry.org whereas the collective entirety of all the other media source outlets and every non-Zionist in the world are all lying anti-Semitic Nazis.
I agree, no one but Hamas would put children in harms way. It must be Hamas who were responsible for killing all those infants.
It angers me how the Nazis at the Jewish-owned Independent newspaper clearly lie about stories such as this
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/gaza-i-watched-an-israeli-soldier-shoot-dead-my-two-little-girls-1452294.html
It must have been a Hamas militant lying to the media and hence his 2 young children deserved to get shot dead by our brave Israeli soldiers, who never hide behind children (that BBC report I posted above http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FjEd4hJNVCE must be a biased-BBC anti-Semitic camera trick of some kind).
Or those camel-riding terrorist liars who eat curry and don’t attack us because we kill their children; but solely because they want 72 virgins, at IslamOnline; whose article was quoted in Information Liberation:
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=26412
It must have been the 4 year old of a Hamas terrorist; and thus our shooting the child and having our dogs eat “it’s” (I say “it”, because us Gentiles are always superior and right regardless of anything) corpse is commendable and heroic work. But remember it is must have been because Hamas were hiding behind the 4 year old, or the 2 young girls, or the other nearly half-a-thousand children that were rightfully murdered during the Gazan liberation from Hamas terrorists who are solely to blame for our dropping bombs on children.
Yes, of course I would love to see the apostrophes thread. After all, mistyping an apostrophe can be used against the Muzlim and Socialist Nazi humanitarians as a relevant means to justify the killing of infants.
I do know that, (for that clip you only need to click on ‘previous’ at the bottom of the page, because it’s still only on the previous page) I just thought Anonymous might not be bothered to. And I wanted him to see why we have serious doubts about the intelligence of his masters.
Have you seen that video? I linked to in on another thread as well. It’s awesome. Not in a good way.
I was being clunkily ironic too. You see, I suspected he wasn’t a Zionist all along, so I pretended to be a Pali in a subtle parody of him pretending to be a Zionist, using the subtle but cunning pseudonym Suenonymous which was very devious, then I couldn’t be bothered to keep going as the subtlety got too much of a strain then I reverted to being a zionist but pretended that I believed he was really a zionist, and then I suddenly revealed that I though he was really Bilal, returning in digsuise because he had promised not to come back, then you tried to explain what I had been doing, but I’m still not sure he is Bilal, some of us aren’t even sure that Bilal was real.
The apostrophe thing seems to get everyone going whatever their perspective on the middle east.
I’m glad to say that I’ve never heard of those high profile actors, thank God. But you will remember that we once had a row about that subject, and you said female actors are still known as actresses. I said that nowadays they need to be called actors under pc regulations. Youv’e just called them actors, and one of them sounds like a lady.
So, do you give in?
Only joking, Nearly Ox. I think you should stay and I like reading your comments even though you often snap at me as well as everyone else.
A bit like the ululating prat Barbra Streisand, vowing to leave the USA if Bush were elected. She never did, the greedy sow – where else would she live in such ill-deserved opulence?
Look on the bright side the far stupid cow might have come over to the UK. With a nose like that the coke dealers over here would be over the moon.
Sue,
I tried to follow all that but towards the middle bit of the first section of the last part it got a bit very terribly a little complicated, especially as I had no proof that you were really Suenonymous – only you can know that for certain 😉
OK, I’ll try very hard not to snap at you, if you promise not to snap at me when I correct DV’s spelling!
I know it’s very sexist, but when talking about a mixed group it has to be actors ;-(
This will definitely be my last post, and probably the last post on this entire blog. May anyone who temps me to come back again get 72 raisons instead of 72 virgins. Please do not tempt me to reply again. I will resist the temption this time.
And, unlike certain other contributors who cleverly come back under a different name after saying they will not come back, I really will not come back. Ever.
(This will be my last comment)
Osma bum Laden, your last post? Oh dear, you are leaving us? May 72 corpses of innocent children be with you on your departure.
I just had to come back for those 72 raisins.
I said this is my last message BYE
Osma why use the Bum in your name?
This will be my last message as well
I’m outta here before Bilal comes to annihilate me. This is my last post ever on teh internet BYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE world!
I have proved this blog is down the toilet as anyone can impersonate anyone – what load of nonsense – you are wasting both the Zionist, nazi, Muskims, Christian, atheists, theists, aliens and everyone’s TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I AM GOING TO DESTROY THIS BLOOOOOGGGGGGG! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
OOPS… I HAVE DESTROYED MYSELF!
8 Visitors Online
0 Visitor Online
DESTROYED HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
BYE!
I will be happy with just one virgin
Richard Branson!
The Virgin Richard Branson is all I need – can he give me a job?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/01/30/councillors-who-voted-to-scrap-apostrophes-accused-of-dumbing-down-115875-21082235/
http://pennyforyourthoughts2.blogspot.com/2009/01/cbs-is-peace-out-of-reach.html