The following probably comes into the category of ‘what the BBC won’t report’.
Admittedly, few outside the Israeli press have covered the story, but it merits a little mention by the BBC because ill-conceived references to the incident in question still rear their heads in the course of the day-to-day Israel-bashing to which we have become accustomed.
The news that the BBC ignores is that the French supreme court has acquitted an Israeli doctor named Yehuda David who had previously been convicted of slander. He had been sued in a French court by the father of the Palestinian ‘martyr’ Mohammad Al-Durah.The infamous Al-Durah incident in 2000 was very likely a Pallywood production, but this has not been conclusively proven. I have written about it in the past, and the intriguing background is extensively covered here, here and here.
Honest Reporting links to an article by a writer who seems pretty convinced that the Al-Durah case is closed, the evidence of Al-Durah senior’s dishonesty putting the final nail in its coffin. But on the principle that just because you lie about one thing it doesn’t automatically mean you lie about everything, I think it’s safe to just say the jury’s still out.
Doctor Yehuda David revealed that Al Durah senior’s scars – allegedly from wounds inflicted in the incident in which little Mohammad was allegedly killed by the IDF – were in fact from wounds inflicted upon him at a much earlier date by Hamas for the alleged crime of collaborating with the Israelis. The doctor was in a position to reveal this, because, dear reader, he recognised the scars. He was the very surgeon who had operated on Mr. Al-D. several years before the notorious Mohammad Al-Durah incident occurred.
Dr. Yahuda David gave an interview to this effect, which was published in a magazine. Someone stumped up for Mr. Al-D’s legal fees, enabling him to sue the doctor for slander, somehow managing to win damages to the tune of 30,000 euros. But the doctor fought back, and the court overturned the conviction last week; deep joy all round in Israel.
The case looks as though it is set to be one of those never-ending sagas, because it seems Mr Al-D and his backers intend to appeal.
For the information of anyone following the Al-Durah story, it seems that the legal procedure is still ongoing in respect of Philippe Karsenty’s conviction / overturned conviction for slander against Charles Enderlin of France 2.
The question of the Al-Durah footage itself has never been resolved, but there is still the mysterious extra bit of film which Mr Enderlin wouldn’t release to the French court, part of which (I think) can be seen via The Augean Stables. Many people feel this provides convincing evidence that the whole thing was a set-up.
But, with the help of massive press coverage, it sparked a deadly intifada, and that is why the BBC should at least pay their respects and acknowledge the tale.
Something else the BBC won’t report, Glieck confesses to stealing (unlawfully6 obtaining private documents via deception) the Heartland institute documents. He does NOT admit to creating the fake document, but it IS clear that this was a crime committed specifically to hurt the reputation of cAGW opponents.
Nothing from Richard Black or the BBC about this development.
Well done again Sue for keeping good tabs on an important story; one in which the left has no reason to be proud in the way that they have behaved.
God love and keep you Sue.
I remember this story, and would have fallen for the Beebs guff had I not come across this site.
Certainly joins the ranks of stories that the BBC won`t telling us about…along with Liverpools sex ring, Rochdales sex ring “involving men”, and Strauss Kahns sex ring too.
Very selective in their Islamophilia and Europhilia aren`t they?
As to who`ll be paying for it…no doubt Les Lawyers d` Interest Publiques avec Cherie de la Booth, Phillippe de Shiner et Gareth Peirce…Les Euroscummes!
The BBC news did report on the Liverpool sex ring last night.