The BBC showed a distinct reluctance to report the emergence of these racist ‘Muslim Patrols’….and when eventually getting around to it they emphasised how the perpetrators, and especially their beliefs, were not representative of the Muslim community or religion.

Many people might dispute that….whilst most Muslims would not ‘patrol’ the streets they would endorse the beliefs….as they are integral to Islam….as one Muslim woman said on the Asian Network in response to the below…‘We cannot sacrifice our religion to integrate.’

(It is hardly impartial of the BBC to have an Asian, a Hindu not a Muslim, Nihal, ask on the Asian Network whether Asians should integrate more…you can guess the general drift of the programme)

Here Jane Kelly reports her experiences with a neighbourhood becoming ever more Islamic:

‘I feel like a stranger where I live…As new figures show ‘white flight’ from cities is rising, one Londoner writes a provocative personal piece about how immigration has drastically changed the borough where she has lived for 17 years:

‘Worryingly, I feel that public spaces are becoming contested. One food store has recently installed a sign banning alcohol on the premises. Fair enough. But it also says: “No alcohol allowed on the streets near this shop.”

No alcohol allowed on the public street outside a Muslim shop?….that is no different from the Muslim Patrols in intention and effect….is that shop keeper not ‘representative of the community’?

And here you see the effect of Labour’s immigration policy…the ‘ethnic cleansing’ of whites, especially working class ones who don’t vote Labour,  as intended:

‘I see London turning into a place almost exclusively for poor immigrants and the very rich.’

Here is what a Muslim seeking reform says of the Muslim Patrols:

“The Muslim patrols could become a lot more dangerous and, perhaps willing to maim or kill if they are joined by battle-hardened jihadis,” he wrote.
He compared the Islamist vigilantes to extremists like the far-right Golden Dawn supporters in Greece and right-wing vigilantes in France who ran Roma families out of a Marseilles estate and burnt down their camp.
Countries such as Denmark and Spain have also seen Islamist extremists trying to enforce their own sharia law, he noted.
All were imitating Hitler’s Brownshirts by “enforcing with threats and violence their version of the law in neighbourhoods,” said Mr Nawaz, who spent years in his youth as a leadership member of a global Islamist group.‘
Mr Nawaz is now a leading critic of his former Islamist ideological dogma, while remaining a Muslim.

So the result of  multi-culturalism is in effect that we have an ideology loose on the streets of Britain similar to that which gave rise to Hitler.

The BBC, as I have mentioned before, is hyper-active in its efforts to issue ‘warnings from history’ about the possible rise of the Far Right, in other words another Hitler, in the midst of Europe, due to Austerity economics….clearly they will never issue such a warning about the rise of an ideology that even Churchill thought Fascist…they don’t even do so for the ‘Far Left’ which is on the march once more.

Many programmes and articles have been broadcast and published by the BBC solely to link the hated ‘Austerity’ to the rise of the Far Right in a highly political smear….senior BBC journalists such as Stephanie Flanders and Paul Mason have eagerly pushed this black propaganda benefitting the Labour Party by readily maligning the Tories, the BBC’s scaremongering out to spread fear and anger…even digging out decades old documentaries to back up their legend.

But no such ‘warnings from history’ for the Stalinists rising again in Europe.

Amusingly the BBC do warn us that UKIP’s Nigel Farage has Stalinist tendencies:

Nigel Farage a Stalinist dictator, says UKIP MEP

Never mind the real Stalinists roaming the streets of Greece…or indeed the Islamist Fascists on British streets.

During the highly successful Olympics last year Labour’s Tessa Jowell was a constant guest on the BBC being Labour’s ‘Olympics Minister’.

The BBC presumably keen to let the success of the Olympics rub off on Labour and for Tessa Jowell  to take the plaudits.

From 2005-2009 possibly over 1000 patients died because of negligence and appalling lack of care at an NHS hospital.

From 2005-2009 Labour was in power and these were the Secretary’s of State For Health:

John Reid

Patricia Hewitt

Alan Johnson

Andy Burnham (Labour’s current Shadow Health Minister)

Have we heard much from any of them on the BBC?

The BBC not so keen to hand out the brickbats along with the plaudits to its favoured political party?

What does Labour man Dan Hodges think?

Where is the liberal outrage over Mid Staffs? The Left is killing the NHS by putting it on a pedestal

So now we know. Britain’s nurses and doctors are as bad as Britain’s bankers. Our angels in white are just as selfish, just as arrogant and manipulative and secretive, as the barrow-boys in pinstripes.

In fact, in many ways they’re worse. The bankers bled the country dry, but to my knowledge they didn’t kill anybody. The death toll at Mid Staffs is placed at 1,200 victims.

And what has been the response to this institutionalised carnage? Or more specifically, the response from the radical left, the self appointed guardians of the National Health Service? Nothing but deflection or silence.

Read this BBC report and you would be given the distinct impression that the utter shambles of the NHS PFI schemes are in fact a Tory led Coalition (To use the preferred BBC moniker) disaster….and you would also not realise that Hinchingbrooke Hospital would have closed had it not been privatised.

You would have no idea that Peterborough Hospital was a Labour Government plan, read the article and it deliberately places all the blame within the last two years….in other words …nothing to do with Labour.

This is nothing less than a highly politicised attempt to protect Labour and smear the Tories.

We all know of course that the NHS is safe in Labour hands…despite hospitals being ‘immune to the sound of pain’ under them.

The Independent tells it like it is:

‘A hospital now losing £44m a year was allowed to go ahead with a private finance deal to build new premises despite the Government being warned that the project was unsustainable.’

‘It is embarrassing for Labour because, at the time of the approval, Andy Burnham was a Minister of State in the Department of Health. He is now shadow Health Secretary.’

“This was a disastrous Labour PFI blunder. Labour was warned repeatedly by their own regulator that this PFI deal could bankrupt Peterborough Hospital but they pressed on regardless.”

This  BBC report…not a mention of Labour or a Labour politician…however it does say:

‘In response to the inquiry, Prime Minister David Cameron apologised for the “truly dreadful” mistreatment and neglect.’

This BBC report also gives virtually no clue that Stafford Hospital was a case of massive Labour government neglect and incompetence.

This BBC report…which mentions Labour but only to pass the buck to the hospital management….

‘It also achieved the elite foundation trust status, which is given to the best-performing parts of the health service.

Its bid was approved by another regulator Monitor and signed off in June 2007 by Andy Burnham, who was then a junior minister but later became health secretary and now holds the shadow post in opposition.

In fact, it was the decision by the board to go for foundation trust status that contributed to much of the cost-cutting drive that undermined care.’

I imagine that if you look at many of the BBC’s reports a pattern might emerge….Labour involvement is quietly sidelined with minimal comment whilst any Tory involvement is twisted to turn responsibility onto them.

Hi folks. I’m currently in the Hague on business and thus beyond the remit of the BBC. But this is for you poor souls who listen to it today!

Dame Helen Mirren, once of the Socialist Worker‘s Party tells us: “I was never a left-winger, actually,” she told Time Out. “I was a pretend left-winger because it was more interesting than being a right-winger.  I never really embraced the ideology because socialists were so sexist and racist.”

How true…it seems:

The BBC were happy to give some good publicity to this junket backed by the Socialist Worker’s Party:   Slutwalk London: ‘Yes means yes and no means no’

And, as ‘Notasheep’ points out, the BBC works closely with SWP supporters:

‘Why nothing about this case on the BBC? It’s not as though the Socialist Workers Party is unknown to them. A regular on the BBC is ‘comedian’ Mark Steel, a long time SWP member, albeit one who resigned from the party in 2007, long after he started to make his hugely amusing appearances on BBC radio. The ‘Right To Work’ campaign that the BBC gave huge prominence to last year was a SWP offshoot.
I think it safe to say that an equivalent sex scandal at the BNP would be headline news on the BBC so why not when it’s the equally vile SWP?

Now why might the BBC have a soft spot for the extreme-left Socialist Workers Party? Who can say.’

The BBC aren’t so happy to report on a woman who claimed to have been raped by a senior member of the SWP, and who rather than going to the police accepted their kind offer of an internal investigation or ‘trial’ by their own Disputes Committee…with the inevitable outcome that the senior member of the SWP, who knew the panel of ‘judges‘, walked away scot free leaving the woman in great distress: SWP Rape Scandal Developments

The transcript of said ‘trial’ is here.

From inside the den of iniquity itself:
‘The reason that the DC (Disputes Committee) thought it was fit to investigate this case is precisely because it did not recognise rape within relationship, acquaintance rape, date rape or whatever you want to call this woman’s experience as a ‘real’ rape.  Part of their disbelief may have been because they were friends or long standing colleagues of Delta.  Part of their disbelief may be because the party’s position on women’s oppression is flawed, it has not kept up to date with the most current theories in feminism and it has not kept itself at the forefront of the battle against women’s oppression.  Part of their problem was that they are human, they live in this world, in this time and, despite protestations to the contrary, they were not immune to the rape myths that exist in this society. 
I have also faced the argument that the DC has investigated 9 rapes in the past (I’m not clear on how recently these ‘investigations’ were conducted).  I believe this argument is put forward to reassure comrades of the competency of the DC.  I don’t find it reassuring in the slightest; in fact I find it terrifying.’

Why did the BBC not cover this extraordinary story?

Just how many of the BBC were or still are members of the Socialist Worker’s Party?

Could that be the reason this story seems to be non-existent at the BBC?

They must have discussed it at an editorial meeting…if so who spiked the report and why?

Nick Cohen suggests the end of the SWP is possibly not far often and to be greatly welcomed…if so far unnoticed by most of the MSM…can he mean the BBC?:

‘A few Labour historians are more hopeful. They believe the SWP is dying and a foul Leninist tradition is dying with it. If they are right, not only will the air on the left be sweeter to breathe, but British feminism will have won a notable battle without the mainstream media even noticing.’

The Guardian has it:
Why ‘leftists revolutionaries’ are not the best feminists
The rape allegation against a member of the SWP is hardly surprising, given the party’s attitude towards women.

The Daily Mail has it:
A show of hands! That’s how the Socialist Workers Party cleared a comrade of rape

The Independent has it:

Ranks of the Socialist Workers Party are split over handling of rape allegation

Lots of papers have it….but seemingly not the BBC.

Photograph from Tom Gross website on the Roma

The BBC had a small programme on Roma immigration hidden away on the World Service but played at 0400 on Saturday morning on R4.

Definitely worth a listen whether you are pro or anti-mass immigration.  Shame the BBC hides such a revealing programme away.  I can only imagine that once they had listened to it they realised it was too likely to bolster the ‘anti’ case.

Two things of great note….one that David Blunkett admits that we have too many immigrants who are, by virtue of their great numbers and special demands, undermining society…and that ‘you ain’t seen nothing yet’.

The programme revealed many things about the Roma and also the BBC’s attitude….here the presenter, Simon Cox, was having a problem deciding whether to present the real facts or the BBC ‘facts’ about immigration.  He is clearly schooled in the BBC ‘immigration speak‘…but couldn’t help the facts getting in the way of another tale of poor immigrants facing discrimination.

Many Roma children are being taken into care, at great cost.  Why?

It is we are told, a conflict between the Roma and the English State….a cultural clash.

There are huge problems…a different culture, language and attitude to children…it’s very complicated…the Roma are easily misunderstood.

The children often don’t get fed enough, or don’t go to school or to the dentist or the doctor, there’s physical chastisement and they can be sent out begging on the streets.

Their culture is at odds with Britain’s far more protective attitudes…its Anglo- Saxon domesticity and desire for boundaries.

The BBC seem to push the case that Roma cultural attitudes to children should be recognised and accepted…isn’t that where we came in with Rochdale, female genital mutilation and witchcraft?  Turn a blind eye to criminal behaviour because ‘it’s their culture‘.  ‘Cultural cringe’.

Cox advances the BBC line…that any talk of immigrants coming here for reasons not wholly legitimate is ‘falling into negative stereotyping’.

Strangely he applies that to a Roma who has an in-depth knowledge of the situation and states that they often come here purely for economic advantage…not running from discrimination or abuse as the BBC so often suggest….though many do so suffer.

As even the Czech ambassador admits…..‘The welfare system in Britain is quite generous‘.

Here’s what the Roma said: ‘They come here to get child benefit, to get money from government, some would like to work but some just use system for the money, it’s really bad but this is why they are coming here because they can get money for each child.’

Here’s Cox’s BBC standard response:  ‘Based on attitudes like that its not surprising that Roma have left their homes in Central Europe and are coy about their true ethnicity.
The problem, of racism, is likely to become more severe…campaign groups claim many 10’s of thousands will flock to the UK.’

Ah…so it’s somehow racist to suggest they come purely for the benefits they can receive…even if it’s true?

The BBC egregiously bring on Labour’s David Blunkett who suggests it’s only ‘political groups’ that oppose immigration…but he reveals that 700 Roma are registered with one doctor’s surgery…cheekily he says we cannot keep accepting such numbers of people as it will undermine society…and who knows what will happen when immigration restrictions are lifted.

No recognition of Labour’s guilt in opening up the borders to allow in a mass influx of immigrants who are now swamping the welfare services.

The numbers already here are vastly underestimated according to a Roma organisation…it estimates that over 200,000 Roma are already in the UK.

But even the Roma themselves admit there may be an even greater influx soon.

‘If anyone thinks there are problems integrating existing communities you ain’t seen nothing yet….you’ve got a huge numbers of Roma and they will come here in huge numbers.
Will the challenges get greater…yes….they are a proper Roma people…it is quite hard to work with them…its going to be interesting.’

Some readers may have read the title to  this post and already have leapt to comment.

However it is used quite deliberately…regardless of whether you think an immigrant coming here solely to pick up the ‘generous benefits’ is committing a fraud…a theft…or not…..the title is used because the BBC are quite happy to use a similar headline on their frontpage…..

Features

Generational theft?

The argument that young people have never had it so bad

It goes on to ask:

‘So why are the young not taking to the streets?’

So not only is the BBC defaming and slandering a whole generation but incites riots.

Negative stereotyping?  If it’s unacceptable to do so to immigrants why is it OK for the BBC to launch an attack on a particular age group?

Must just be a coincidence that the latest series of Mrs Brown’s Boys had a theme of gay marriage…and the final episode, with a stern lecture to the priesthood on ‘love’,  was broadcast the night before a Commons vote on the subject.

I imagine someone thinks every little bit of pressure helps the Cause however unlikely.

Having said that..not so unlikely….most people would listen to the rib tickling ‘Mrs Brown’ than the no doubt earnest and well meaning but too in your face, so to speak, Peter Tatchell and his ilk…Ben Summerskill.

Cunning people at the BBC.

Monday arrives and so does this! Off you go…

2 NEWS REPORTS.

Guess what is missing from this first one from BBC … Here you go….