Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
9 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
non-licence payerDec 26, 20:48 Christmas 2024 CRIII should have recommended a new year clap for our hard working anychess.
non-licence payerDec 26, 20:41 Christmas 2024 Hmmm the stuff I have drunk has been …..shite.
StewGreenDec 26, 20:40 Christmas 2024 Rupert Lowe about the invasion continuing on Xmas Day “Let’s use language accurately here – illegal, they are illegal.” 26,000…
Lefty WrightDec 26, 20:36 Christmas 2024 Up2snuff I must be a few years ahead of you. I can still remember listening to ITMA (It’s that man…
JohnCDec 26, 20:29 Christmas 2024 And another £70,000 a week for the taxpyer to stump up for their rooms. I still have not seen any…
SluffDec 26, 20:19 Christmas 2024 That’s another 6 or 7 hotels no longer available to passing travellers, holiday makers, or business people. Once Labour stick…
StewGreenDec 26, 20:06 Christmas 2024 FFS Jo Brand is on Radio4 again
Up2snuffDec 26, 20:05 Christmas 2024 popeye, I started listening to BBC radio when it was still the Home Service (before the name was changed to…
JohnCDec 26, 19:33 Christmas 2024 Not having a ‘woke free’ Xmas at all with the TV this year !. After the ridiculous black-washing of history…
moggiemooDec 26, 18:47 Christmas 2024 Merry Christmas to us all.
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
25 likes
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
9 likes