Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
9 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
harry142857Dec 17, 10:12 Midweek 17th December 2025 Daily Mail Free BBC if you live on Benefits Street… and paid for, naturally, by middle-class strivers under Labour. Middle-class…
tomoDec 17, 10:05 Midweek 17th December 2025 Just a bit of lateral thinking. If the Bondi massacre had been a car – would the politicians have been…
BRISSLESDec 17, 10:00 Midweek 17th December 2025 And a lot don’t- according to photos of skiers with no-where to go !
BRISSLESDec 17, 09:59 Midweek 17th December 2025 If I was 25 again I’d be hot footing it on the first plane out of here.
tomoDec 17, 09:54 Midweek 17th December 2025 https://twitter.com/WallStreetApes/status/2001003614329090282
Fedup2Dec 17, 09:52 Midweek 17th December 2025 Another day – another Marxist dis incentive to work – this time it’s fee TV licences for the foreigners/ feckless.…
Mrs KittyDec 17, 09:44 Midweek 17th December 2025 Always have to remind him of that when posting, a bit like referring to a certain mayor as Bodybags Burnham.
Mrs KittyDec 17, 09:43 Midweek 17th December 2025 I’m seriously getting Watergate vibes here, Nixon must be convulsing with laughter in his grave. They’re just digging themselves into…
Mrs KittyDec 17, 09:40 Midweek 17th December 2025 I think that President Trumps legal team would have plenty of cyber wizards that could rummage through cyberspace to recover…
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.