Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
MarkyMarkApr 3, 21:59 Easter Weekend 4th April 2026 “As Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) from 2008 to 2013, Sir Keir…
MarkyMarkApr 3, 21:56 Easter Weekend 4th April 2026 BBC asks Huw Edwards to return more than £200,000 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clynjvve0gvo The ex-presenter “behaved in bad faith” in continuing to take…
FlotsamApr 3, 21:55 Easter Weekend 4th April 2026 As we all know, Starmer was head of the CPS. A big, difficult and demanding job, he must have deserved…
Up2snuffApr 3, 21:30 Easter Weekend 4th April 2026 I’m hoping, Scrobie as I like to call him, will be here soon. Before my editing time is up! Otherwise…
MarkyMarkApr 3, 20:58 Midweek 1st April 2026 Nobody wants to be called a racist…[img]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQRBG-IX8qjocK0f_Adt6QBRNJm_Int4eYq3g&s[/img]
Lefty WrightApr 3, 20:41 Midweek 1st April 2026 taffman British Army dressed in dresses and minds that match. The powers that be have long ago castrated the minds…
taffmanApr 3, 20:07 Midweek 1st April 2026 G Don’t mess about . Give the job to the British Army dressed in civies. – Simples
diggApr 3, 19:48 Midweek 1st April 2026 Does this twat head realise how many people would need to be onboard Appolo if every sodding nationality and race…
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.