Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.
9 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
moggiemooJan 28, 18:56 Midweek 28th January 2026 Why would he? Their actions don’t affect him and are, surely, mostly his voting demographic.
atlas_shruggedJan 28, 18:47 Midweek 28th January 2026 Amelia goes global – now there is a German version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdV-J9sUhLU
moggiemooJan 28, 18:46 Midweek 28th January 2026 To be fair, that would apply to a frozen 24 hour digital clock.
harry142857Jan 28, 18:38 Midweek 28th January 2026 PMQs https://youtube.com/shorts/uWNzlfje-Is?si=BgIYHaoUuOYJnaVT
diggJan 28, 18:26 Midweek 28th January 2026 I think it’s high time Khan concentrated on the downward spiral of life in his London instead of constant cheap…
Northern VoterJan 28, 18:25 Midweek 28th January 2026 A grammatical error there, strap line should read “to deliver the British people” There, put it right for you, you…
diggJan 28, 17:58 Midweek 28th January 2026 Female Bishop putting on her misogyny boxing gloves… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7v0948vm9go Maybe time is coming for a little Misandry kick-back from the…
MarkyMarkJan 28, 17:25 Midweek 28th January 2026 [img]https://talk.hyvor.com/media/website/14037/CUiJphXMXbWA673GbR5XUCYS4CorteNn6eZbCniT.jpg[/img]
MarkyMarkJan 28, 16:36 Midweek 28th January 2026 It’s like watching science fiction in the USA – as the UK decides if a man can use a woman’s…
Of course, all of Harrabin’s BBC reports on flooding are 100% factually correct. He never quotes individuals having a vested commercial interest, without clearly advising his readers of those interests.
He would never lead readers to believe his sources represented a prestigious professional institution, when in fact they were instead merely a director of a profit-making company.
Have to love the tweeclaimer.
It reads like so many BBC/Not BBC staff priv/pro accounts it’s little wonder some have been convinced Shropshire’s gain to be the planet’s loss.
Have to say, he/it is enjoying a rare old audience engagement.