The unavoidable man-made hell-hole reached by denial and silencing of truth

 

From Nicky Campbell’s good mate….

 

 

As Jews are once again being purged from Europe just for being Jewish, and the BBC looks on apparently with the feeling that they get what was coming to them, many people point out a few problems arising from mass immigration that the BBC is all too often not just reluctant to debate but actively seeks to hide and dismiss….denying and silencing truth.

The final image of Dr Jacob Bronowski, in his “Ascent of Man”, standing in the mud at Auschwitz is implanted in my brain. He wept and said that Auschwitz and, by implication, all the other hell-holes constructed by Man, is the unavoidable destination reached by the denial and silencing of truth.

And no…Muslims are not the ‘new Jews of Europe’.  An irony that the BBC recently tried to invoke the Holocaust to defend Muslim immigrants and to label opponents of mass migration as something akin to the Nazis….whilst at the same time ignoring the real ‘Jews of Europe’.

There’s the Truth, and there’s the Truth as reported, or not reported, by the BBC…as Rod Liddle points out…

In Sweden there are riots…almost all the people doing the rioting were, to adapt Nick Robinson’s phrase, people of non-Swedish orign.  These were…are..race riots.

It was not the ordinary Swedes rising up against the oppressive Swedish state; it was immigrants.  Come on James – why not tell us the truth?’

From Boris Johnson:

To any non-Muslim reader of the Koran, Islamophobia – fear of Islam – seems a natural reaction, and, indeed, exactly what that text is intended to provoke. Judged purely on its scripture – to say nothing of what is preached in the mosques – it is the most viciously sectarian of all religions in its heartlessness towards unbelievers. As the killer of Theo Van Gogh told his victim’s mother this week in a Dutch courtroom, he could not care for her, could not sympathise, because she was not a Muslim.

The trouble with this disgusting arrogance and condescension is that it is widely supported in Koranic texts, and we look in vain for the enlightened Islamic teachers and preachers who will begin the process of reform. What is going on in these mosques and madrasas? When is someone going to get 18th century on Islam’s medieval ass?

It is time that we started to insist that the Muslim Council of Great Britain, and all the preachers in all the mosques, extremist or moderate, began to acculturate themselves more closely to what we think of as British values. We can’t force it on them, but we should begin to demand change in a way that is both friendly and outspoken.

 

David Goodhart managed to slip this out on the BBC one day:

The gulf between conservative Islam and secular liberal Britain is larger than with any comparable large group….for those of us who value an open, liberal society it is time to explain why it is superior to the alternatives.

He told us that…

Some claim that if people understood Islam more everything would be fine, they would be more tolerant, I think quite the contrary….the more they understand about it the more alien they would find it…authoritarian, collectivist, patriarchal, misogynist…..all sorts of things that Britain might have been 100 years ago but isn’t now.

David Coleman, professor of demography at the the University of Oxford, said:

“Many of the consequences of large scale migration are damaging.  We do not need up to 13 million more people by the mid century.   Almost all that increase will be immigrants and their children.  It will not make the UK a happier or richer place.  Crowding and congestion will have entirely negative effects, increasing pressure on schools, hospitals and particulary housing.”

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi gave a speech on the occasion of the birth of the Prophet Muhammad on Jan. 3, when he called for breaking free from texts and ideas that were sacred centuries ago and that have become a source of anxiety for the whole world. In the presence of Tayeb, Sisi said, “How is it possible that the ideologies that we have sanctified for hundreds of years breed feelings of anxiety, danger, murder and destruction in the whole world and nation?”

“Moderate” Muslim Leader says all Muslims are “Radical” and “Extremists”

“Every now and then, every time we have a conference, every time we invite a speaker, they [the media] always come with the same accusations: This speaker supports the death penalty for homosexuals, this speaker supports the death penalty for this crime or this crime or that he is homophobic, that he subjugates women, etcetera. I always try to tell them that it is not that speaker that we are inviting who has these ‘extreme radical views,’ as you say. These are general views that every Muslim actually has.
Every Muslim believes in these things. Just because they are not telling you about it, or just because they are not out there in the media, doesn’t mean that they don’t believe in them.”

The measured and rational Charles Moore in the Telegraph voices some of his concerns about this influx of Muslims to Western Europe:

Nothing has changed in 25 years to ease my concerns about Islam

It seemed to me that most Muslim leaders saw their role not in integrating Muslims in Britain, but in asserting difference and increasing their muscle. Many favoured sharia law trumping British law. They would not support Muslim membership of the Armed Forces if those forces were deployed against Muslim countries. They wanted it to be illegal to attack Islam, let alone denigrate its prophet; and they waged constant “lawfare” to try to silence their critics. They tended, I thought, to see the advance of their cause as a zero-sum game in which the authorities had to cede more ground (sometimes it is literally a matter of territory) to Muslims.

Even the Mirror is dubious about Muslim agitprop…

WE MUST NOT GIVE IN TO MUSLIM BLACKMAIL

AS the country vexes itself over how to deal with the radicalisation of British-born Muslim youths, it’s revealing to know some of their leaders believe they have the answer.

The introduction of Sharia Law in Britain along with important religious days in the Muslim calendar becoming public holidays for followers of the faith should do the trick, or so claims the secretary general of the Union of Muslim Organisations in the UK and Ireland.

As Dr Syed Aziz Pasha says: “If you give us religious rights we will be in a better position to convince young people that they are being treated equally along with other citizens.”

This sounds perilously close to blackmail. Thus far the British people have shown exemplary tolerance in the face of terrorist threats.

There are enough wedges between us without introducing more in the form of Sharia Law or Muslim Bank holidays.

Nor should we feel it necessary to beat ourselves up because willing recruits, who happen to be born here, have signed up to become human bombs.

Some people, John Reid reminded us last week “just don’t get” the seriousness of the threat facing the West.

What will it take to understand? Ten planes destroyed and thousands of innocents dead while the family of the perpetrators weep into the cameras and say, “he wouldn’t do a thing like that”.

Oh yes he would. And believe me, he will.

 

 

Definitely a discussion people should be having about the consequences of mass migration from Muslim countries into a western, secular and democratic Europe.

On the other hand we could just have pictures of women and children crying at razor-wire topped fences and dead babies on beaches as the preferred narrrative as well as the labelling of anyone who dares to criticise that approach as racist nazis.

Your choice…oh no…it’s not…it’s the BBC  that gets to choose the narrative…..

The BBC, paying lip-service to the issue, does a body swerve around the problem by adopting the usual stance that it is not Islam but Islamism that is the problem and that of course it is ‘moderate’ Muslims who will suffer the ‘backlash’, that problem that the BBC is really concerned about rather than the activities that are the cause of any such ‘backlash’….

Across western Europe, liberally-minded societies are beginning to divide over how best to deal with radical Islamism and its impact on their countries, while governments agonise over the potential for a backlash against Muslims living in Europe.

Today, mainstream Muslim organisations in the UK and France have unequivocally condemned the killings, saying that terrorism is an affront to Islam.

But the potential backlash, including support for far right parties and groups, may well hurt ordinary Muslims more than anyone else, leaving the authorities and religious leaders in western Europe wondering how to confront violence in the name of religion without victimizing minorities or being accused of ‘Islamophobia’.

Muslims themselves hate the term ‘Moderate’ as it implies they don’t follow the true Islam and all its teachings…“Are you saying I’m only 50% Muslim? When someone says to me ‘you’re moderate’ it suggests to me they’re saying ‘you’re not fully Muslim’.”

Stop Saying “Moderate Muslims.” You’re Only Empowering Islamophobes.

 

Can we drop the term ‘moderate Muslim’? It’s meaningless

 

In fact, there is only One Prophet Muhammad, and there is only One Allah, and there is only One Quran, and there is amongst Muslims only One Islam, hence there can be Only One Muslim. A Moderate Muslim is an oxymoron because there is no such thing as a “Moderate Islam.” A Cultural Muslim

 

Turkey’s PM Erdogan: The term “moderate Islam” is ugly and offensive — Islam is Islam

 

And of course Iqbal Sacranie, when head of the Muslim Council of Britain, stated that ‘There is no such thing as moderate or extreme Islam, there is just Islam.’

Islamists and normal, moderate Muslims?  The difference isn’t in the beliefs but in the way they try to impose them upon society.

The BBC weren’t so quiet  and in denial when it came to a Christian birthrate:

A Womb is a Weapon

First broadcast:
Saturday 18 May 2013

Across the world, and increasingly in Europe and the UK, a unique Christian evangelical movement is growing.

For some, encouraging larger Christian families is part of a project to outbreed other religions, particularly Islam, winning back the world for Christ one baby at a time.

 

 

Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to The unavoidable man-made hell-hole reached by denial and silencing of truth

  1. Old Timer says:

    So what can we do?

    They are all scared, stupid, ignorant, in their pay, or are one of them.

    By “they” I mean everyone in any position of power.

    Prime Minister of UK – first three at least of course, probably the fourth too.

    Merkel – Same as her bitch Cameron. And anyway, what happened to “ where are your papers”?

    Obama – All of them, particularly the last. That is if not watching TV soaps, playing golf or chewing a Big Mac. And it’s all Russia’s and Israel’s fault, nothing to do with me I never gave any money at all to rebels in Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, the Ukraine or Hamas. And I have never heard of any of them anyway. And Churchill started it cause he was white and upset my father in my dreams.

    Then there is: – The Far Left Illegal Muslim Immigrant Propaganda Tax Payer Funded Supporter of Paedophile Presenters, the so called BBC – This wonderful entity is all of the above but we must now add delusional and traitorous, with Beatific Pretentions. It is further attempting to ascend to another level of unconsciousness now called, Universal Imperial Perfection. This definition is not complete and needs updating.

    By the way, did you know that when I clap my hands another thousand migrants have squeezed into Hungary, on their way to Germany, to pick up a European ID card, to get through Heathrow, to get to the very street where you live. So lock up your daughters, again, and then pop down to Asda for some Halal kebabs.

    Next year we’ll all be enriched Rodney.

    England you are _ _ _ _ _ _

       59 likes

  2. Martin Pinder says:

    David Goodhart is right. I have been studying Islam & reading the Koran & it makes me more & more hostile to it. Perhaps it would be a good thing if more people studied Islam, then they might feel more concerned about this horror in our midst.

       47 likes

  3. jibu says:

    Thanks to David Goodhart for his work. he know’s different between write and wrong. economy news

       10 likes

  4. Dover Sentry says:

    I have never met a muslim who has condemned 9/11. No matter how ‘westernised’ and ‘moderate’ they appear to be.

    Ask a muslim what he thinks about 9/11. I’ve heard the following replies:

    1. It was a terrible loss of innocent life. (Innocent refers to muslims who died in the attacks).

    2. It was done by Bush.

    3. It was a western conspiracy.

    4. No reply and subject changed to western foreign policy (similar to BBC ‘victim’ narrative).

    5. The British police are secretly killing muslims.

    ..

       29 likes

  5. Edward says:

    There are many comments I could make on this subject, but seeing as biasedbbc.tv seems to have a pro-Christian bias of its own, I would probably be wasting my time.

    Alan writes: “Definitely a discussion people should be having about the consequences of mass migration from Muslim countries into a western, secular and democratic Europe.”

    Britian is not secular! To Christians it might seem to be secular because religious privelege is given equally to all religions. This is where the problem arises amongst British Christians – Muslims are seen as equal! Rather than campaign for REAL secularism (the separation of church and state as they have in the USA and many other countries) Christians would rather keep their privileges and remove the privileges of all other religions (apart from Judaism perhaps?).

    As a non-religious person this all smacks of hypocrisy.

    If you want to remove the danger of Islamic influence in our country, you need to campaign for secularism in our government and constitution. But I doubt very much whether most Christians would be happy to say goodbye to their privileges.

       2 likes

    • Demon says:

      I’m an atheist with one parent brought up in the Catholic persuasion and the other in Reform Judaism. However, I fully support the CofE being the state religion of this country to act as a reminder to our enemies, within and without, that they cannot foist alien religions upon us with impunity as it is against our constitution (as well as our well-being and our peace).

         9 likes

      • Edward says:

        You’re not an atheist.

           3 likes

        • Old Timer says:

          The separation of state from religion will not happen in Britain, by peaceful means or otherwise and it certainly will not happen if we are over run by Muslims. They would turn us into an Islamic state overnight if they could. Secular leaning folks would soon be separated from their heads.

          It is my belief that had we kept strong Christian values in this country this invasion of third world people and beliefs would not of happened. We have simply been let down by weak and politically correct church and political leaders. The latter with added brown envelope motives.

          The fact that the BBC seems to have led the charge by dumbing down our Christian values must not be underestimated either. Their enormous influence has over the last thirty years been transparently traitorous and harmful to this country, especially to any children that came into the hands of its evil band of presenters over the years. Under no circumstances could the BBC ever be described as Christian.

          How can an organisation with unlimited funds, that answers to no one and that governments are frightened of ever be a good thing?

             5 likes

          • Edward says:

            “Strong Christian values”. What exactly are they then?

            The death penalty for homosexuality? Imprisonment for blaspheming – including being an atheist? Bringing back the slave trade?

            Isn’t that more in keeping with Sharia Law than British law?

               0 likes

            • taffman says:

              Since when was “The death penalty for homosexuality? Imprisonment for blaspheming – including being an atheist? Bringing back the slave trade”? a Christian value ?
              Are you referring to the Old Testament ?

                 4 likes

              • Edward says:

                Nope. All of those things were reality up until only recently;

                Slavery abolished 1833
                Sodomy abolished 1861
                Blasphemy abolished 2008

                I’m pretty sure most Christians would like to see a return of laws against Sodomy and Blasphemy. I’m also quite sure most Christians would like to see homosexuality outlawed again.

                You have a choice; if you believe Britain is built on Christian values, then you need to explain how the laws that give us more freedom and democracy fit into Christianity historically. The alternative is to accept that Britain is actually built on common sense values.

                In my opinion, Christianity has adapted itself to fit in with common sense values, but still lays claim to the moral high ground. Even The Vatican accepts that Darwinian evolution is a fact these days!

                For someone like me who is not religious, the idea that we return to ‘Christian values’ is just as scary as allowing Sharia Law into our justice system. Because Christian values are not that far removed from Islamic values.

                   2 likes

                • Guest Who says:

                  Pretty sure ‘abolishing’ is a fair sign of not bringing back.

                  And in the spirit of two wrongs, it may be worth comparing which value systems saw what light when, and acted rather than talked.

                  But what you are ‘pretty sure’ about is noted.

                  Maybe take it to A. Spurned Tory Donor, or better yet, A. BBC Editor.

                     2 likes

              • Edward says:

                You might want to watch this video:

                   0 likes