The weekend beckons and so here is a new OPEN thread to see us off into the wild blue yonder! DETAIL their rancid bias here please!
WEEKEND OPEN THREAD….
Bookmark the permalink.
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
- StewGreen Dec 22, 00:14
Weekend 21st December 2024
Youtube just pushed a video at me that invading North Korean troops had been smashed cos they were using 19th… - StewGreen Dec 22, 00:09
Weekend 21st December 2024
“Jawdropping” propaganda from woke-Supremacist BBC and police https://youtu.be/IMuafLX0xhQ - Greencoat Dec 21, 23:22
Weekend 21st December 2024
Mantel was a deeply unpleasant, dishonest person. And her books? Next to unreadable. - tomo Dec 21, 23:12
Weekend 21st December 2024
Trump shooter…….. https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/1870474697676325217 - Lazy Cat Dec 21, 22:39
Weekend 21st December 2024
And that ‘Let’s get ready to rumble’ announcer is still going. He was doing the Tyson fights back in the… - Lazy Cat Dec 21, 22:35
Weekend 21st December 2024
Right going to watch the Fury fight now. The build up has been about 5 hours long. I think 4… - Lazy Cat Dec 21, 22:28
Weekend 21st December 2024
Indeed. I’ve seen few NK documentaries down the years. In a few of them, I’ve seen clips and interviews with… - Lazy Cat Dec 21, 22:12
Weekend 21st December 2024
I think we will one day see such things take place. The youngest generations (of white males especially) are, in…
Categories
agw anti-American anti-conservative anti-Israel anti Israel. pro Palestinian Antisemitism BBC - sickeningly biased at all times. BBC agenda BBC bias bbc bias and balance. bbc bias by omission BBC censorship BBC Question Time BBC selectivity bias Biased BBC climate change dhimmis general thread immigration Islam israel Mark Mardell obama obama bias Obamalove open thread pro-labour pro-palestinian pro EU pro Hamas pro Islam pro Labour bias pro Obama PRO OBAMA AT ALL COSTS. pro Obama BBC agenda question time question time live Richard Black save gordon. USA politics US economy US News US politics US presidential elections
Yippee !!
First again !!
Ohhhhhhh, get a life Lobby !!! xx
Oh dear, you’ll have upset Fedup2 now!
Up2
Thank you for predicting my emotion Up2 but no worries eh? I have better things to whinge about like al beebs willingness to put peers on a pedestal . Baroness Trumpington (?) is retiring from the lords at the age of 94.
I would abolish the House of Lords on cost basis alone – but the idea of some one aged 94 being able to represent people in Blighty is a joke – whatever this ladys’ pedigree. I regret being agist but there age limits for other jobs so the lords should be no exception. Al Beeb did the full “ you’re wonderful “ on this lady in the manner of “mo” “Obama” , that South African former terrorist who became president.
I’m a hypocrite though because if someone knocked on my door and offered me a seat in that old folks home with £300 A day tax free and a central London parking space I’d jump at it.
Darn – was stuck on the old thread. Grrrrrr
OLD POSTS PAGE 1
OLD POSTS PAGE 2
OLD POSTS PAGE 3
OLD POSTS PAGE 3 – Last POST by scribblingscribe – “The BBC are lying, shameless bastards who appear to be immune from any form of complaint.”
Yes urm that was a bit snappy.
😀
This is the state of Britain today: A Muslim convert to Christianity gets no protection. MPs, the Police, the Church of England, the Media have all failed him because he is the living embodiment of the big lie that Islam is Peace and that “multiculturalism” that includes Islam is possible.
I love Muslim apostates. Brave people, many who have to escape their own families who want to kill them.
The churches of the west should have had an underground railroad sort of organisation years ago for people leaving Islam. These are real refugees.
Re Kevin Crehan Bristol prison death
Perhaps the reason for no explanation after 11 months could be that there is a forthcoming trial of killers
So authorities don’t want to prejudice it ?
BUT I’ve seen no evidence they charged anyone with murder in Bristol prison
I doubt it. He’s just dead. Nothing to see here folks, please move along.
Did we ever find out the name of the man who attacked people on the train in Switzerland with an axe? I don’t think so. Just another thing which doesn’t matter, please don’t ask too many questions, or we may have to arrest you for disturbing the peace.
By the end of this century Europe will be islamized, and people will not know how it happened. This is how it started.
What a horrendous account? I’m aghast that even the church establishment have even turned their backs on him, such uncaring hypocrites! My heart goes out to the chap and his family.
Most of us know what the Koran says about apostates;
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=89
DM,
‘Carpeting the route for the intensification of islam’.
My cartoon summary of the week’s news:
Calvin,
Good one ! Your comments about the EU Brexit negotiations and money remind me of bargaining in Gambia. I managed to get the bride price of my watchman’s new wife down from £250 to £180 but didn’t try the zero option. However. at £180, I reckon he got a good bargain. A bit expensive because she is only 19.
It’s also why a lot of the Trump ideas are called out for being silly/extreme: he’s a businessman who negotiates like this. A lot of his positions on things are said with the explicit idea that later on he’ll massively backtrack but in the process achieve goals that would be unachievable were they to have been said from the outset.
You couldn’t make it up, ‘cept the BBC always do.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b098tk71/newsnight-11102017
After 13.30 mins
Kirsty Walk on Newsnight interviewing the still sexy Tina Brown. Kirsty and the entire BBC found it appalling that Tina Brown, apparently working close by, didn’t see and didn’t report any of the Weinstein sexual shenanigans.
Indeed, BBC viewers thought, how could an entire corporation turn a blind eye to sexual assault, even if it involved one of their senior employees raping children.
To make it worse for the confused and forgetful Kirsty, it was 2 journalists from Newsnight who were sacked for trying to expose Saville. Liz Mackean and Meirion Jones were not only given the elbow and told they would never again work for the BBC, but that they were traitors. Meirion Jones claims many other journalists were warned to steer clear of the Saville documentary.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/29/bbc-savile-expose-newsnight-meirion-jones
The BBC are lying, shameless bastards who appear to be immune from any form of complaint.
The worst was their mock surprise when the Rotherham scandal erupted. They had done an episode of Panorama about a meeting where the grooming gangs were being discussed then prosecuted those leading the meeting for inciting racial hatred!
How could the Police and social services do nothing, they cried. Well the Beeb did worse than nothing – they actually tried to prosecute those who were attempting to deal with the problem!
thats awful, have you a link Beeb?
Reminiscent of a channel 4 documenary into a group of extremist Muslims in a mosque calling for the over throw of British society amongst other unpleasant sermons. As soon as it was broadcast the local police and the CPS flew into action -er, to arrest the documentary makers.
later the police and CPS were forced to apologise in court and agreed a payment of £100K to the wrongly accused program makers.
The world created by the BBC is just crazy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undercover_Mosque
We are not moving forward, the BBC is holding us behind …
After Manchester attacks 2017 … man finds evidence of hate of Western Ideals in a Mosque “Direct from Didsbury mosque this is a leaflet that I was given on an open day and this says living in a society in which people have accepted Western lifestyle as their way of life brings immorality at every step” – [youtube – BBC Question Time 25May2017 @ 25m49s]”
– BBC, will you send some of your £3.5bn journalists into the Mosques to follow up this story?
Come back (Please!) Guy Fawkes, all is forgiven. Is there a basement to the BBC?
There’s a bunker. Apt.
Not been on for a while, Hello again everyone!
Spent a lot of time this week reading about various treaties enacted into law by our friends in Brussels. From Maastricht through Barcelona, Amsterdam, Nice and Lisbon including the actual wording of Article 50 and 49 etc.
Partly boring but very enlightening. Why are we constantly hearing about the same old hot button BS, especially on the bBBC, whilst these sneaky little treaties (Maastricht aside) were all being signed up behind our backs.
I appreciate many may have a more consistent knowledge of these treaties over the years but I for one have found it truly eye-opening. The Barcelona treaty, hidden under the ‘cover’ of keeping the Med cleaner, was square one for the uniting of Europe and Africa to oppose US dominance as far as I can see and although it hasn’t been fully implemented, it seems that gEUrmany has gone ahead with it, hence Merkels open arms over the last few years.
Anybody have further or more concrete ideas surrounding any of the above? Or was I just having too much fun to notice when it originally happened?
The key case is ex parte Factortame, where there was a conflict between British and European law and it was established that European law was sovereign. Thus parliament no longer had the power to make or unmake any law.
Oh Beeb – I remember factortame – how easily it was falling asleep reading bloody EU law reports – looks like we are going to have them for more years than we want.
“… because they (EU Commission) talk in generalities. You hear it very frequently in European speeches. You must of heard it many times. I’m one of the few people who says ‘What do you mean by that?. What do you mean by European Union? What do you mean by monetary union? What do you mean by United States of Europe? What do you mean? What do you mean?’ ” – Margaret Thatcher {@00:59 bbc.co.uk}
Euro Moments: Thatcher says ‘no, no, no’ to Europe {bbc.co.uk may2014}
“She (Thatcher) was responding to a call by European Commission president Jacques Delors’ for the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the European Community, the commission to be the executive and the Council of Ministers to be the senate. … Mrs Thatcher herself was ousted from Downing Street by her party a few days later.”
The BBC simply can’t help itself… disgusting and shameful.
How about;
“The uncomfortable truth is that the ‘Muslim religion’ is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on earth”
There, fixed it.
@DearyMe click the tweet time above to open the Twitter thread and you find every comment ridicules the BBC/Libs
The using quotes to make a BBC headline is a cynical trick
The BBC might as well make a headline
I did, Stew, and boy do the twitterati go to town on the BBC. As usual though they are immune to criticism. In fact they’re probably going through them as we speak listing the ones they consider “hate speech” and therefore ripe for reporting to the police.
Surely this woman must be spouting Hate Speech. I feel offended at being labelled a member of the most violent and repressive force on earth. One rule for the POCs and a different one for Whitey I suppose.
Stew,
What a world we would be living in if all of those comments were put on the front page of a major newspaper. The true feelings of what the majority of people are thinking might just slow the train down. I can dream.
@Synchronised I’ve just been into LoonyLibLand on Facebook
– Hollywood case “Why didn’t these women speak out ?
– “Fear of INTIMIDATION and the power game”
Stew says “The grooming gangs story seems a much bigger story in number of victims and magnitude of suffering”
– “You Stew are a RACIST MAN ..cos before you mentioned before a big story on 1 million illegal immigrants”
Moderator : “I’m banning you from this group”
..I paraphrased but that is the gist of what happened on the forum for ALL bbc Radio4 listeners.
The mod chose to ban us 3 non-liberals, not the shouty false accusation-making Libs. Presumably cos the LibsMob were getting wound up with us not conforming to their Lib-groupthink.
Re standard for Whitey — exactly! There is no “double standard ” anymore — There’s only one standard ; and it’s anti-White.
DrearyMe
Bet this thing would like a bit of meat from the cannibal pot.
What are her views on Cannibalism among her people?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/cannibal-south-africa-police-tired-eating-human-flesh-suspect-a7908276.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-safrica-cannibal/crowds-hurl-abuse-at-south-african-cannibalism-suspects-idUSKBN1CH1ZK
Munroe Burgdorf doubled-down in her twitter feed, re: her appearance on BBC’s This Week on Thursday night.
She was given a full 15mins by the national broadcaster to argue her case, unfortunately, as she states here, was up against “three white men”. Not everyone is allotted such a slot and many would give their right arm for such a chance. Oh well, she doesn’t want to have to go through any similar experience again… unless perhaps her demand is met!!
We have a #MoreEqualThanOthers situation
Cos to for BALANCE by skin colour you would have needed 4 More white people since 7 of 8 people in the population are white
for BALANCE by gender you’d need 96 more men and 99 women cos less than 1 in 200 are transgender
You could argue that a panel should be half women
..BUT if you truly believe in equality , you don’t look at gender or skin colour you just treat people as individuals so a panel of 4 will end up with 4 people, so that the outcome could be 0,1,2,3 or 4 women , same for skin colour.
I presume some one who thinks this of the white race will choose to live in a black African peaceful country where they would be naturally be more comfortable and safe.
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/viz/happy-at-home/#all%26Hull
Here is the Right move ‘Happy at Home’ survey into how people feel about the area they live. For me it provides devastating proof of the unhappiness of British people forced to live in multi cultural hell holes, where areas less afflicted by diversity are rated the best places to live. Even a deprived place like hull is rated as one of the better places.
It just proves what a complete and utter failure diversity and multiculturalism actually are.
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/viz/happy-at-home/#all%26Hull
Thoughtful,
Yes it does contain some important messages that the likes of our socialist PM should consider.
Most people prefer living with only a small amount of diversity or none at all. The greater the cultural differences are between groups the more difficult they find it to integrate. This has been obvious to anyone but the liberal left bigots for decades. But those bigots hold many of the levers of power today and they refuse to accept the truth ,instead believing that they can socially engineer integration by punitive measures against those in the indigenous population who don’t go along with their silly integration game. But They seem very reluctant to take any measures at all against those minorities who are reluctant or refuse to play the integration game.
I think it won’t be long before there are compulsory integration classes and integration community activities and re-education classes. Of course only white people will be compelled to attend ?! In the long run it will be completely pointless because Islam will triumph and the only way to integrate then will be to convert. Of course the conversion rate will no doubt be helped by a few heads being removed from shoulders to rustle up more volunteers.
I suppose that the current liberals who believe so passionately in all manner of human rights lunacies will be amongst the first to find virtue in the absolute intolerance of Islam.
‘compulsory integration classes’ appear to be with us already if half an hour of news last night is anything to go by…
Report No. 1 – Kamal Ahmed – Business
Report No. 2 – Leila Nathoo – Politics
Report No. 3 – Anisa Kadri (?) – reporting on the Muslim School Segregation issue where one father stated that the West was so dysfunctional that it should learn from Islam.
Report No. 4 – Chi Chi Izundu – following the chap who swallowed the fish.
I am still recovering from Clive Myrie, in a report on gun laws in America after the Las Vegas shooting, informing us that as an ‘Englishman and a European’ he found the whole situation distasteful.
Even here in Happiness No. 32 the Government dispersal programme is ensuring the watering down of white ethnicity is underway.
How do they explain ‘white flight’? Surely if multiculturalism were so desirable white people would flee to these areas not from them.
They simply do not have the facts on their side. Regardless of how many fluffy narratives or Asian newsreaders they have, the fact remains that Western values are far superior to most ‘vibrant’ values. I bet no BBC staff live in Alum Rock or Luton. Actions speak louder than words.
Beeb,
The BBC staff may have a second , or perhaps even a third, home in the places that you mention., purely to show that they walk the talk. Of course they will hardly ever set foot there due to pressure of work and the dinner party circuit. But if the need arises they could put up a few immigrant invaders there and ease their consciences . After all what does it matter if you have a Bomber in the bedroom , or a rapist in the roof space , as long as you don’t actually live there and they blow up and rape some white trash who probably voted Leave anyway. They sort of deserve it don’t they.
“How do they explain ‘white flight’?”
The BBC call that “racism” too, of course! How very dare non-muslims move away from ever expanding communities and newly built mosques.
Let us be clear on this, as Douglas Murray says, “The world wants to come to the West, not the other way round.”
They don’t like “white flight ” because they want whites to suffer and also pay taxes to finance their shit.
That ‘Rightmove’ map and survey completey missed out the main part of Cumbria where I live. we are happy because we have the Lake District, very low immigration at the moment, the only town included was Carlisle at the top of Cumbria, which is the worst part in my opinion.
So Tammi Grey Thompson has a budget of up to £100 million to deal with ‘diversity’ for the Beeb.
1. How does being in a wheel chair endow one with the skills to manage a budget and project of such size? I am a white table tennis player with blue eyes, but I would not have a clue how to manage a £100 million budget to help other table tennis players with blue eyes. Just being ‘diverse’ is not in and of itself a skill set.
2. Goals need to be well-defined. What does ‘diversity’ even mean and when will we know we have enough of it? After gender, race and religion could they move onto place of birth, height or what sport they like most? It could go on indefinitely and there will be people with a vested interest in creating as many new categories as possible. With an equalities industry worth £1 billion you can bet no matter what we spend these experts will tell us more money is desperately needed.
3. Would shareholders of a company ever agree to something like this? So much money for an indefinable goal.
4. A company could maybe invest such sums on a substantive project, say a firm wanting to branch out into the US market. They could do all manner of research to show how it could be profitable in the long term. What definite evidence do they even have that ‘diversity’ is such a great thing? If the standard of their programmes is anything to go by it has had a negative effect as anything brave or edgy is sacrificed on the altar to this false God of ‘diversity.’
5. How many of the millions will go on ‘consultants’, which will essentially mean the BBC giving out money to fellow troughers?
BB “2. Goals need to be well-defined. What does ‘diversity’ even mean and when will we know we have enough of it? After gender, race and religion could they move onto place of birth, height or what sport they like most? It could go on indefinitely and there will be people with a vested interest in creating as many new categories as possible.”
Reminds me of Q9 with Spike Milligan: “You are over 6 feet tall in Lewisham!” *
(* or was it Neasden? whereever.)
Comedy as prophecy?
Your question for Point 5. Almost guaranteed, I would have thought.
They are always moaning there is not enough money for things denied by the evil Tories. Do they ever budget? They spend money like it is water. Individuals with web cams and no money at all produce better analysis of news than they do.
BB, Indeed. That’s the trouble with inflation and big government or, more correctly, Inflation and BIG Government. Eventually when departmental budgets get into multiple billions, it is easy to justify; “Oh, it’s only £100 million, a fraction of our annual budget.”
No assessment of what else that £100m might be spent on. And once it is in the budget, then year on year, it is kept there and an inflation factor added to increase it, never for it to be questioned again. Then Government has the cheek to say we haven’t got money for care for the elderly. Piffle!
I may be swinging slightly toward what might be called a more socialist view of things, late in life, but I am also an advocate for small government and effective budgeting and rigorous outcome reviews.
Let’s be thankful that everyone in these ‘diverse’ organisations shares the same common purpose!
There must be some sort of modern joke here:
A black woman, Muslim man, transgender lesbian, wheelchair user and a Corbynista are standing at the edge of a wide, fast-flowing, crocodile infested river and they need to get to the other side.
The black woman says “Let’s jump across!”
The Muslim man says “Let’s jump across!”
The transgender lesbian says “Let’s jump across!”
The wheelchair user says “Let’s jump across!”
The Corbynista says “Let’s jump across!”
So they all jump in the river and are swept away, to be eaten by the crocodiles at their leisure.
All roads lead to diversity … Labour look into anti-semitism and end up recommending diversity…
THE SHAMI CHAKRABARTI INQUIRY 30 June 2016
“While we celebrate our diversity, what surprises me time and time again as I travel around the constituency is that we are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.” – Jo Cox MP, 3 June 2015 (Maiden speech to the House of Commons)
… skip to the end of the SHAMI CHAKRABARTI report …
20. The (Labour) Party should increase the ethnic diversity of its staff.
Cambridge events next week in the Ideas Festival
…seems a lot of the usual weird Libland stuff
RELIGIOUS TRUTH IN AN AGE OF DIVERSITY?
5PM – 6.30PM MON 16 OCT
Join Edward Kessler, Woolf Institute, Canon Chris Chivers, Westcott House, and Atif Imtiaz, Cambridge Muslim College, to discuss identity, diversity and the nature of religious truth.
Pre-book MON 16 OCT 6PM – 7PM
HERODOTUS Join translator Tom Holland and Herodotus expert Professor Paul Cartledge in conversation about this enigmatic figure and find out what we can learn about history from his writings.
Pre-book MON 16 OCT 6PM – 7.30PM
POPULISM Populists can be sloppy with facts and speedy with promises that are impossible to deliver. Yet they can also highlight real inequities and persuade followers that they are in possession of some greater truth. Join Hugo Drochon, Tanya Filer, Ayça Çubukçu, LSE, Nayanika Mathur, Oxford, and Madeline Reeves, Manchester,
Pre-book WED 18 OCT 6PM – 7.30PM
I DON’T KNOW IT FOR A FACT, I JUST KNOW IT’S TRUE: HOW CONSPIRACY THEORIES STAKE THEIR CLAIMS TO TRUTH
Conspiracy theories usually arouse scepticism. Yet when we confront them in the flesh, they can appear – at least on first sight – strangely persuasive. Join a discussion about the strategies conspiracies use in making their pitch for plausibility and staking their claim to truth.
THU 19 OCT 5.30PM – 6.45PM prebook
CLIMATE CHANGE: THE TRUTH David Attenborough Building
Join us for a stimulating panel debate on the difficulties of establishing the truth around climate change; panellists include Professor Mike Hulme, * Rowan Williams *, Joanna Depledge and Bhaskar Vira.
*(well known Climate/logic expert from Canterbury Cathedral ?)
Pre-book THU 19 OCT 6PM – 7.30PM
REFUGEES: TRUTHS AND INNOCENT LIES
Refugees often have to give the most personal details to prove their past and receive asylum. But how easy is it to be open and truthful in a climate of mistrust when governments are looking to keep numbers down? Lucy Popescu, editor of Freedom from Torture, speaks to asylum seekers and writers Noo Saro-Wiwa and Hassan Abdulrazzak, and writer Tim Finch.
Special Thread on Black Europe
Stew, I like this: “Pre-book MON 16 OCT 6PM – 7.30PM POPULISM Populists can be sloppy with facts and speedy with promises that are impossible to deliver.”
Not just the pre-booking bit but ‘sloppy with facts and speedy with promises that are impossible to deliver’ would, I think, include many less populist politicians ie. the ones whose unpopularity has led to them being booted out of office.
In fact, it may well describe most politicians.
I’d like to go to the Thursday one but am not sure I can afford the global warming fuel required to get me there, let alone the time.
More selected events. I’ll just give you Friday’s
by next Saturday they onto a sets of talks about Fake News today and in ancient history
Pre-book FRI 20 OCT 4PM –7PM
NOMADIC AND DIALOGIC: ART & ** ECOFEMINISM **
Director Eliza Gluckman, artist Elena Cologni, author Susan Buckingham and curator Anna Santomauro discuss motherhood, dialogic art and ecofeminism. They address the caring role devalued in neoliberal societies, and the spatial dimension of dialogue as the intercorporeal space of micropolitics.
(Publicly funded)
New Hall Art Collection, Murray Edwards College, Huntingdon Road, CB3 0D
Pre-book FRI 20 OCT 6PM – 7.30PM
EU VS UK: IN THE BREXIT BATTLE WILL TRUTH BE THE LOSER? As the Brexit negotiations proceed, who will win the PR battle over Brexit and who will be the losers? What will the outcome be for Britain’s future relations with Europe?
Pre-book FRI 20 OCT 7.30PM – 9PM
FAKE NEWS Accusations of slurs and slanders, lies and misinformation have a long history in democratic politics – but is ‘fake news’ something different? Annabel Brett, John Robertson and Ben Slingo
Lucy,
Where are today’s Orwells ? Douglas Murray ? Milo ?
Grant,
The lib mob are still confused about Orwell but they certainly aren’t about our Douglas.
Synch,
It doesn’t take much to confuse a Lefty. As ha been posted here many times, Lefties are so stupid they do not realise that ” Animal Farm ” and “1984 ” are about THEM.
Dead right Sync.. Orwell was as ready to point out the Lefts little flaws as he was society’s in general. For that reason they are not keen on him.
It’s so comical that the BBC commissioned a statue of Orwell for their London headquarters, accompanied with the quotation about speaking truth to power and telling people what they do not want to hear!
It’s a bit rich coming from the organisation which was his inspiration for the ironically titled ‘Ministry of Truth’, the vastly powerful master manipulator which threatens to prosecute contributors to online fora if they write anything ‘objectionable.’
In a way, that was the most “Orwellian” thing they could have done. They have no shame at all.
Where are all the men in that picture? Were they not allowed?
Grass in greenness shock. Why is it even a story?
Perhaps if you’d bothered to click on the link you’d know the answer “Where are all the men in that picture? Were they not allowed?”.
It should also have been glaringly obvious that the women in the photo are anything but Muslims or their supporters. They are ‘The Southall Sisters’ so yes men are banned, and they are protesting against the Muslim segregation of boys & girls!
The banners they are holding read Gender segregations is Gender apartheid and Gender Segregation is Discrimination.
They are about as close to a BBC approved version of the EDL as you’re ever going to get !
But in the article the BBC betrays its left wing liberal hate filled bias for everyone not Muslims with this paragraph:
About 20 schools – Islamic, Jewish and Christian – are thought to have similar segregation policies.
It’s completely irrelevant to the article and should never have been included at all, especially as it makes no attempt to determine the numbers between the different faiths.
Sometimes you take my comments and yourself too seriously. Do lighten up.
It’s just that every time I see a pic of Muslims men on their own or women I see that comment, forgive me for not seeing any humour intended but it is quite obtuse.
RD,
Just you wait until Sharia takes over………………..
Here is a disturbing story of the suppression of free speech and of Christians at Sheffield University (it’s it in Cleggs constituency).
In a well written and dispassionate blog on a private discussion Black Christian student Felix Ngole spoke that the Bible declare living an active homosexual life to be a sin. That was enough to see him expelled from campus. A Kangaroo court was convened and was headed by an LGBT rights activist, although she didn’t think it was relevant enough to tell anyone about the enormous conflict of interest (Quelle Surprise).
Perhaps though the most worrying part is the amount of money the University has spent defending its totalitarian decision. Even the BBC has reported on it, although it relegated the story as low as is possible to the regional news section of its website:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-41487286
However read the case from a different angle:
http://www.christianconcern.com/our-concerns/education/the-case-of-the-politically-incorrect-student
It ends with this paragraph:
“It is difficult to overstate the importance of this case. Basic freedoms in our society are at stake. It is not really about the politically incorrect student, it is about the politically incorrect Bible. Bishop Ashenden is right to point out the parallels with 1930’s Germany. This case is about state oppression of Christians. It shows the true intolerance of those who argue for tolerance. We await the judgment. In the meantime, your prayers and support (including on social media while we still can!) are appreciated.”
We await the Judges findings in the case, and the reports of the BBC on whether the Expression of Christian faith is now banned in Britain.
Meanwhile they have nothing to say about the treatment of gays and women under Islam . The Lefty agenda is obvious. Destroy Christianity and support Islam. Perverts.
Does anyone suppose that the reason the bBBC support Islam could possibly be that they want sharia and the ability to marry 6 year olds?
Dyst,
The evidence is that some Beeboids do not need to marry children. But I guess the objective is to destroy traditional British family life and ruin childrens’ lives. Beeboids, nice people.
Mostly Pakastani child abusers. Could it be an Islamic thing? Or would it be racist to suggest so?
https://www.rt.com/news/406534-child-brides-age-pakistan-law/
Pakistan’s Senate has struck down legislation governing the minimum age girls can marry, saying a Bill to increase the legal age from 16 to 18 was un-Islamic.
The Child Marriage Restraint Bill was rejected after Senator Sehar Kamran, the lawmaker driving the proposal, had her request for a deferment denied on the grounds that she would not be present.
1000 years ago? 100 years ago? 10 years ago? 1 year ago? NO! This year … 2017
Egypt: Muslim cleric says fathers can marry off their newborn daughters {jihadwatch 18sep2017}
“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria
. . . . . . . Could this be a serious problem in Nigeria as well . . . . .
Nigeria schools: Kaduna primary teachers fail pupils’ exam {bbc.co.uk 10oct2017}
“Thousands of primary school teachers in Nigeria’s northern Kaduna state are to be sacked after failing the exams they set for their six-year-old pupils. State governor Nasir El-Rufai said 21,780 teachers, two-thirds of the total, had failed to score 75% or higher on assessments given to pupils (aged six). ”
– Could the two be connected? Religion and Education in Nigeria – BBC, fire up the £3.5bn News Machine and send your top paid presenter Chris ‘£2.3m’ Evans to investigate.
BBC salivating about a programme going out next week as part of their celebration of the 1917 October Revolution: “The British Road to Bolshevism”. Can’t think of a better epithet for the BBC.
I saw a report in the Telegraph today that fewer and fewer 18 year olds are taking languages. Yet these are the younger siblings of the EU loving snowflake generation who espoused the virtues of the EU and voiced the possibility that they may one day go and work in France or Germany . Indeed for many of the ‘flakes this one a key reason why they voted Remain and are so angry with the old fart Leave voters who robbed them of their future employment prospects abroad. But why are their siblings content to remain as monoglot as the thicko Leavers supposedly are? Suddenly I realised the answer, the ‘flakes and their siblings are so ignorant and narrow minded that they expect to be able to work in France or Germany without being able to utter a single word of the language.
The more I see and hear the flaky generation the more I realise that they know nothing about anything and are well behind where older generations were in their intellectual development. Basically they are pig ignorant , ill educated , children who demonstrate that the voting age should be increased to at least 30.
You are quite right. I can speak German, and in Germany you find many people, even educated ones, who do not speak English. On TV we see a subset of foreigners who do speak English, by definition we do not see the ones who don’t.
Even in the Netherlands, a friend tells me that once you leave Amsterdam, you cannot bank on people you meet speaking English. It is indeed the international language of business, but it is far from the case that the ordinary man in the street can speak it.
The lack of a common language is another of the many reasons why the dream of a United Europe is a pitiful farce, and any snowflakes who think “everyone can speak English” are in for a painful shock.
“United in diversity” – we will all come together by being different?
It signifies how Europeans have come together, in the form of the EU, to work for peace and prosperity, while at the same time being enriched by the continent’s many different cultures, traditions and languages.
Rob
Maybe they think everyone SHOULD speak English.
Mihear a Big Beeby World Sevicing t`ing about pidgin In`lish an all on Feedback, no warram sayin` bruv?
Only casting a few million too, y`all. Big value.
Maybe this is where we all need to go-might get some BBC funding if we debauch the mother tongue and give up on our eltist language.
Got to be some creole crappy GCSE , or pidgin english linguistic courses at uni by now.
Pace setting apparently-sounded like piss-sitting to me though, when I heard our Lagos moocher say in on Feedback.
Forcastotainment
Don’t be misled by Philip Avery’s old school BBC delivery and apparent gravitas – informally rechristened “Phil” he pops up on the BBC News Channel showing us he can dole out his whether or not weather forecast teasers like a newly graduated peroxide autocue kitten.
“24 degrees!” he promises from his soapbox, as though he’s some snake oil huckster
Reaching far out into mid-Atlantic “We’ll be talking about this hurricane from Monday onward” he pledges – although he qualifies somewhat that this will be an ex-hurricane (someone call John Cleese) no matter that it’s an ex-hurricane, our Phil just nailed it to the BBC perch.
All to the backdrop of some library picture of a fallen tree. Just so we know what they look like. And yes, if this one fizzles out or misses us by nautical miles , then at least we experienced it by proxy or subliminally or something.
Oh how the once mighty BBC weathermen are fallen. Libary picture of a broken down hobo Philip Avery in a gutter – weather watcher Pennine Tramp Spotter? (someone call Shelley – Percy Bysshe not the newly graduated College of Journalism gal) “My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings; Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair! ”
We’ve become accustomed to the BBC reaching for the moral imperatives (‘It is 5 degrees warmer than it SHOULD be in January….’)
Today our Phil suddenly introduces the brand new concept of weather grievance: “If you’re feeling hard done by, it’s because you are near a weather front….” (blame Brexit if Global Warming don’t fly)
“Phil” Avery is in a class of his own. The way he conducts his forecasting is preposterous, and is a mixture of opinion (“there’s sadly going to be a lot of rain”), unwanted advice for we ignorant listeners (“don’t forget a coat”, “take an umbrella”. “wrap up warm”), crazy phrase-making (“bit and piece of rain”) and imprecision (“perhaps 11, 12, 13, 14 degrees or thereabouts”). His forecasting is guaranteed every time to make me roar out loud at the radio – “for God’s sake, just give us the simple forecast”. [‘There will be some light rain showers with temperatures between 11 and 14 degrees’ – is all that’s needed]. I think we know what clothes to wear, and that forecasts of temperature are, by their very nature, always ‘thereabouts’. As you can tell, that man winds me up something terrible.
Do you remember Dan Corbett? He was about as bad as it gets. I used to cringe with embarrassment every time he appeared.
No, I don’t remember him. Sounds like it’s a good thing I don’t!
Sorry Mr Goat!
I met Daniel Corbett just before he set off for New Zealand…a charity fete, I grant you-but what a charming metrosexual fop, completely camp yet a father of kids.
We rather liked him-bit of a challenge to the predatory sherry types (of who I know nothing).
A camp caricature-but compared to Stefan Shaffanakka, he`s Mick McManus!
He did start the rot mind, but was smart enough to see Blair going and Brown coming…
In the days of the last Labour government, I used to wake up everyday to the Today programme and be so enraged as they started every day with, ‘Today the Labour government will….’. Maybe I am getting older but I am often awake at 6 a.m. and the dulcet tones of Misha and Sarah et al just send me back to sleep.
However two items today caught my attention. The first was Sarah Montague’s stupidity when interviewing an Australian doctor about the flu epidemic there. The doctor mentioned that more children than usual had died there this winter from ‘flu. Cue Montague’s amazed interjection, ‘children have died?’. I suspect that she thought she had got a headline, however the man then patiently repeated that children died every year from flu, just this year there were more than usual. He went on to say that the British government had done things (like having children inoculated) that reduced the UK’s chance of the flu outbreak this winter being as bad as the Australian one – this was something that Sarah did not want to hear – so once he started praising the UK government, she cut the interview!
I also heard an interview this morning with Jeffrey Sachs, professor of Economics at Columbia at 7.35. Well he ticked every box.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0977v7w (link if you can face listening to him).
I quote words directly from his interview below.
Growing inequality – especially in the high income world – produced environmental disaster – redistribution of income – high carbon to low carbon economy – US under Trump doing the opposite – Trump trying to raise inequality – Trump’s policies mean spiritied – Trump is a sociopath – his policies to cut taxes for the rich and deny benefits for the poor – hurricane in Puerto Rico caused by the climate policies in the US – all sociopathic – Trump’s motives are deliberate – Trump is psychologically ill – malignant narcissistic sociopath and a racist – this is the grim reality – (Sarah – Brexit, IMF had to temper their forecasts of Armageddon but we are beginning to see the negative effects) – clear that companies are moving parts of their operations out of London – Trump blamed US ills on China, Muslims and Mexicans whereas it was the profound inequalities of income within the US – poor hit upon by the rich who own the political system.
This man is apparently an advisor to several UN Secretary Generals, all I can suggest is that UN Secretary Generals should pick their advisors more carefully. How did this man get to be interviewed on the Today programme, I cannot possible imagine. (OK sadly, I know exactly why he was invited). But I think even he went over the top as either I heard Sarah laughing in the background during the interview or she was stifling a coughing fit.
China build environment altering machine … but nobody is interested in a country that can do whatever it wants …
China’s Monster Three Gorges Dam Is About To Slow The Rotation Of The Earth {businessinsider 18jun2010}
Raising 39 trillion kilograms of water 175 meters above sea level will increase the Earth’s moment of inertia and thus slow its rotation. However, the effect would extremely small. NASA scientists calculated that shift of such as mass would increase the length of day by only 0.06 microseconds and make the Earth only very slightly more round in the middle and flat on the top.
– The world goes crazy over pollution accords, but not a country changing the spin of the Earth – where are the thousands of scientists running computer models on that incase we got it wrong?
Lovely story about a girl being sexually assaulted three times around Bethnal Green.
The Beeb send off CVs named Mohammed or Neil and see differing responses from employers, then running a typical SJW article about it. Why don’t they report on a test where a white English girl walks through a ‘diverse’ area at night and compare her experience to that of an Asian woman in a burqa?
Somehow I think they would never do such an experiment.
Yes I note the police are looking for a “bearded man”.
How can they be sure it wasn’t a bearded child?
Girl, 17, sexually assaulted three times by separate attackers on walk home – Sky News
https://apple.news/AZyThugl3TsWgNtg2Cz8jRQ
Our government is as guilty as the Muslim attackers. Our young women and girls are war booty now.
The government knows it. They do nothing but encourage it further & embolden the criminals.
Compare the coverage on BBC News home page of the Bethnal Green story and the Weinstein story. The latter story splashed all over the place as if the BBC has now taken the place of the ‘News of the World’. Bethnal Green story just an afterthought. Strange sense of priorities.
I imagine the Bethnal Green rapists were all part of the same gang. One of these ‘Asian’ gangs that the BBC tells us about. They were probably letting each other know by phone or text that there was an easy victim out on the streets.
Heisenberg,
You make a very telling point in your last sentence.
As an aside Walter White was interviewed on C4 the other night and said he seriously believed Trump is Ill. Rather soured my love of Breaking Bad.
The political views of actors are worth as much to me as those of next door’s cat. In fact, he’s probably a fair bit smarter than a lot of them.
Let`s hope we don`t settle for Hollywood merely taking Horneys name off all his films.
Let`s make sure that all his output is banned if Miramax or Disney put it out in the last twenty years…Kings Speech, Cumberbatch and Coogan etc?
This could screw them, wheels within wheels and golden funding chains and distribution deals, Total boycott NOW!
Make the luvvies squeal, and tell us why we should have to watch any of their output that Harvey facilitated…should knock off a lot of liberal propaganda and put Dame Judi into social care.
rob
Or those of next doors cat’s crap.
Synch – Breaking Bad was indeed a very good series – but I’m afraid the default American actor is decidedly a Democrat lefty-luvvie , on a par with our own Cumberbutch. At least the yanks do have a few right wing actors though, we have none unless you count old Michael Caine.
Bryan Cranston played Dalton Trumbo in a biopic (quite boring by the way), fighting the fight against the House UnAmerican Activities Committee. But of course he was in truth like many of them in the 40’s and 50’s – card carrying Communists. I read somewhere that he was still a fan of Stalin to his dying day.
As for the whole Weinstein scandal – I must need my prejudices or my privilege checked (whatever), as I had always assumed the big money Hollywood producers were all homosexual.
@BB Imagine if you did the same CV test with the BBC
CVs named Mohammed or Neil
MO would be offered the job in every department …unless Neil is Transgender or black etc.
4:30pm R4 Feedback
Trailer says they will cover
– BBC’s Pidgin service
– The Editor of PM defends his programme against listeners’ accusations that presenter Eddie Mair’s interview with Home Secretary Amber Rudd was hostile and biased.
– allegations of imbalance in home schooling prog which was mainly about a Muslim boy being sent back to be schooled by his non English speaking mother.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b097cjzx
I heard this “Feedback”. Crock of nonsense, but revealing.
Mairs monkey who runs Today said that stuff like the Second Amendment is not really what Eddie and he are about. It`s about “context”-so next time we get another Las Vegas, we`ll be triggered and think back to Eddies roll call of all the gun incidents he read ,out over the tape of Paddock firing into the crowd. There you have it-none of that facts stuff, or law…just visceral emotional fascism getting implanted into the idiot listeners.
No further enquiries needed-Janov meets Watson and Skinner. Behaviourists for Beria.
Paul Joseph Watson points out how lazy, uncool and uninspiring the MSM is – just the same tired old virtue signalling wank with no wit, style or panache. Contrast this with the brilliant memes and YouTube channels.
The Left just is not cool anymore, and that means a lot. Where’s the counter cultural thrill in reporting a micro aggression to the authorities?
Well the left have produced at least two generations brought up with the idea of sticking it to ‘The Man’. Until their favourite hate group are reduced to poverty and slavery they will keep flogging a dead horse until they get their dystopia.
Deborah
‘This man is apparently an advisor to several UN Secretary Generals, all I can suggest is that UN Secretary Generals should pick their advisors more carefully’
An example of a United Nations Assistant Secretary General gene pool which says all you need to know.
Emily Thornberry’s father was a United Nations Assistant Secretary General and worked as a consultant for NATO. The same Emily Thornberry who always claims to have been brought up in extreme poverty.Her mum was a Mayor.
One can only assume that when her parents split up that her Dad didn’t pay any child maintenance money!
I cannot believe The Sun/Daily Mail has never investigated her claim of ‘poverty’. -Especially as she always uses the term in every debate. It might for once and all prove that she hasn’t a clue what she is talking about.
Wronged,
Checked on Wiki and It seems her probably wealthy father, I expect that UN bosses pay themselves well, didn’t pay her school fees , so she went to the local secondary school in Guildford after failing her 11 plus , Kent being one of the few sensible who have retained selection and Grammar schools. Her failure may have done untold psychological damage and turned her into the cow that she is today. Anyway now she can afford it she is sending her children to selective schools . Nothing wrong with that of course except for the usual stench of hypocrisy that surrounds these Labour women e.g. aboott and Harry , who support the abolition of selective schools and private education but use it for their own children. Hypocrisy and Labour go hand in hand.
Twas always thus – remember Shirley Williams tryng to ban private schools after her son left Winchester.
I hope the perp in the France rape of eleven year old case is not a Muslim, cos that would mean media have suppressed that info.
Did the BBC report this ? Or are they too busy with Weinstein ? I don’t know but I guess he is Jewish so that would explain it.
StewGreen
Perhaps it does not matter if the perp is a moslem. It seems as if this ruling is a message to them that French children
have the same status as British children
It happens because the French are as depraved as the people they live with. Remember that they could have voted to stop this kind of thing and chose not to.
Take a look at this Greenpeace tweet
Spot anything wrong ?
It declares that a policy decision has ALREADY been made … and that afterwards a consultation will be made.
Sounds like Lib-Supremicism to me ..we the masters will make the decision then have the consultation.
The race is on with Krankie.
Thatcher,
I flew into Edinburgh yesterday. The new Forth Road Bridge looks great but what is the point ?
The bridge or Edinburgh? Or, indeed, both?
The Sham Ban
It’s a tiny area of mostly already pedestrianised streets
See Ben Piles tweets about Telegraph article
https://www.thememo.com/2017/10/13/oxfords-2020-petrol-car-ban-is-a-sham/
Do they plan to bring back Sedan chairs or what?
Bring on the electric trucks.
Islamic nutters will have to find a power point to plug in before they lay into the crowds. It`ll all be sporadic green windmill jobbies by then, so they`ll do no harm-basically milk floats.
Good old Oxford.
Alicia Sinclair
Electric trucks might be prevented from laying into crowds if bacon is placed on the power points. Ooops. Is that a hate thought?
Just watched Milo on YouTube ” I have much bigger nuts than they do “. He is touring Oz in Dec but the Lefties there are trying to prevent him getting a visa .
There is a petition at http://www.dontbanMilo.com
BBC WS history show yet again promotes political narrative
The subject matter of programmes in the BBC World Service radio history series ‘Witness‘ is often tied to an anniversary on or around the time of broadcast. That, however, was not the case in the programme’s October 4th edition – titled “Israel Withdraws From Gaza“.
Unusually, presenter Mike Lanchin travelled to the Gaza Strip to make a programme less than nine minutes long and also produced a filmed version which appeared on the BBC News website’s Middle East page on October 4th under the title “‘My house was occupied by Israeli soldiers’“.
https://ukmediawatch.org/2017/10/11/bbc-ws-history-show-yet-again-promotes-political-narrative/
In the audio version listeners heard a substantial amount of commentary from Lanchin himself, much of which was inaccurate and failed to provide them with the full story. In his opening words, Lanchin described the Gaza Strip as “Palestinian territory” without providing any explanation of the area’s history – and not least the fact that it was included in the territory designated by the League of Nations for the creation of the Jewish homeland.
Lanchin: “Today we’re going back to 2005 when Israel completed its withdrawal from the Gaza Strip after nearly 40 years of occupation. Around 8,000 Jewish settlers were evicted and all Israeli military personnel were withdrawn from the tiny Palestinian territory. I’ve been hearing from one young Gazan woman who was there when the Israelis left.”Listeners then heard archive recordings from the time of the 2005 disengagement followed by the programme’s sole interviewee, Maisoon Bashir
Maisoon Bashir describes herself as follows:
“I have been asked to introduce myself. I am wondering how I should, as an activist or a journalist, who tries to raise the voice of Palestine? Both are true, but I prefer to introduce myself just as a Palestinian girl, because my nationality is a testament to the authenticity of my homeland and the injustices borne by my people.”
Her activism is given a platform at a site called ‘We Are Not Numbers’ that is linked to a political NGO currently called ‘Euro Med Rights’ (which has Richard Falk as chair of its board of trustees) and which was founded by a self-described “social justice activist” called Pam Bailey who is also associated with Code Pink. Bashir’s writings have also been posted at the Hamas linked outlet MEMO.
BBC audiences, however, were not informed that they were in fact listening to a political activist (in breach of BBC editorial guidelines on impartiality) and neither were they given any insight into how Mike Lanchin was introduced to her story or why he visited the Gaza Strip (where the BBC has a staffed local office) to interview her.
Once again we see that the radio show touted by the BBC World Service as a ‘history’ programme is in fact used as a vehicle for the advancement of one-sided political narrative.
Lucy,
Thanks for that one. Once again the BBC prove themselves to be the world leaders in Fake News.
Grant you’re too kind to them! Fake News is just their standard operating manual. I rather think of the BBC as the common enemy of mankind (after Emperor Caracalla). I just wish we had a mad psychotic thug of our own to take the BBC on.
J#1 Prof Bruce Gilley publishes peer reviewed paper on positives if colonialisation
#2 Journal receives death threats so withdraws paper.
“Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.”
– Charles James Napier
MM
Peccavi.
StewGreen
Thank goodness Treezer and Amber are tackling extremism. Whoever made these threats will soon be behind bars – that is, if it can be shown they are patriotic British people with links to far right parties.
Not BBC, but definitely falling into the category of ‘I’m sorry, I’ll read that again…’
Talk Sport Radio’s top of the hour news leads with the sex segregation case and headlines their story with:
“An Islamic State School in Birmingham….”
Whoops. There’s a so-called Freudian slip.
“In biology, evolution is not what we (Islamic Teachings) believe”@0:58 {bbc.co.uk – 09Jun2014 – From the section Education }
Michael Gove on extremism in schools: ‘We have to act’
“It is important that no-one allows concern about these finding to become a pretext for criticism of Islam itself,” he added.
– this was in 2014 – have things changed or been forgotten?
“An Islamic State School in Birmingham….”
Many a true word…
Or as the BBC would say: “A so-called Islamic State School…”
Not BBC bias but a certain lack of equality appears here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-41609527
In these days of strict gender equality, should not the couple here have shared the total of 24 months in prison equally?
I wonder if the BBC will raise the equality question connected to this in interviews and News programmes?
Meanwhile: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-41571333. They appear to have forgotten Prof Ngaire Woods, Prof Silvana Tenreyro, Rachel Reeves MP, Steffie Flanders and countless others. The BBC are truly useless at times.
6pm BBC1 news on Friday. Hillary Clinton clip of her being interviewed on Maar. What is the difference between what her husband did with Monica and what Harvey Weinstein was doing? May I suggest very little and she didn’t seem to be held to account. And I cannot forget her laughter when she got a not guilty verdict for a paediophile.
Deborah,
Hillary never stood up for women’s rights when her husband was abusing women. The difference with Harvey is that Bill is not Jewish .
Deborah,
“What is the difference between what her husband did with Monica and what Harvey Weinstein was doing?”
What her husband did with Monica was consensual. What Harvey Weinstein was doing wasn’t. Spot the difference?
“ And I cannot forget her laughter when she got a not guilty verdict for a paediophile.”
Never happened, Deborah. Yet still you can’t forget it…
http://tinyurl.com/jmovtwx
Going with the Prezza precedent, Mx?
Sound.
The BBC sisterhood will so approve.
And the junior ladies.
Just ask Dame Janet.
If she’s allowed to share.
Maxi:
You will recall that the Monica Lewinsky case came about because Clinton was being sued by Paula Jones, who said that when she was a state employee in Arkansas, Clinton, then the Governor of the State, had exposed his penis and asked her for oral sex.
Clinton denied this, but the Lewinsky case proved that he was indeed the sort of man who would proposition junior female employees for sex. Eventually, the case led to Clinton being impeached in the House of Representives. He also had to pay Paula Jones $850,000, he was fined for contempt of court and was disbarred as a lawyer.
This is quite apart from accusations from women such as Juanita Broaddrick that Clinton actually raped them.
Quite the role model isn’t he? A real poster boy for “consenual sex”, nothing like Harvey Weinsten at all.
There are some arguments worth having Maxi, but this isn’t one of them. Clinton and Weinstein are both sleazy sexual predators, cut from exactly the same cloth.
Wow Snopes comes up with mostly true for those claims
\\In April 1999, U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright found Clinton in contempt of court for giving false testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment trial and fined him over $90,000:
In 1994, Paula Jones filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Bill Clinton. Thar case dragged on for four years (while Clinton was serving as President) before it was finally settled in November 1998 with a check for $850,000://
http://www.snopes.com/bill-clinton-fined-and-disbarred-over-the-monica-lewinsky-scandal/
Spunked over a women using his power whilst married in a house that represents the American people. Then lied, lied and lied. Was found out and then said it’s my private life … best I can do in so many words. Vulgar, but succinct.
What happened? (Clinton) …. No One Left To Lie To (Hitchens) …. Except the BBC audience (markymark)
https://twitter.com/crusher614/status/918935447987929088
The News Quiz has just told me that the pound Sterling tanked today. It is up 0.4 of a cent against the Dollar and 0.3 cent against the Euro , nearly one whole cent against the Canadian Dollar, up against … well I could go on at length. Among major currencies it is down against the Japanese Yen and the Aussie & Kiwi dollars.
If that is a collapse or tanking then we could use a few more trading days like today.
Hammond makes an apology for a poor choice of words. Why? It’s apparent to me on the subject of which he was talking he’s bang on.
BBC Look North wasting time on its Daily Mail tabloid stuff
“Mumsy is an insultling term to women, there is no equivalent for men”
They’ve never heard of the phrase “dad dancing”
The female expert just said “Mums are super heroes”
…. what a and dads aren’t ?
Next item the local photos : Focus on 2 Muslim girls working in their fathers chip shop. Since they both wear headscarves all you see is their eyes and mouth.
BBC1 Now Hillary Clinton on the One Show
..seems like she is the wallpaper on the BBC this coming week
I so look forward to the bBBC inviting a right of centre republican onto the OneShow sofa and giving them an agreeable, sympathetic, easy, free time to espouse their opinions without making any implied criticism.
But then again, could I actually live for another 100 years minimum?
What happened? (Clinton) …. No One Left To Lie To (Hitchens) …. Except the BBC audience (markymark)
Breaking News:
Snuffy made it through the News Quiz tonight without hitting the OFF switch.
“Something for the weekend ?”
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4673717/bbcs-hissy-fit-over-brexit-bias-research-proves-it-has-something-to-hide/
Excellent news. BBC on the back foot ….
Sound article
..but I wonder why it and yesterday’s Sun article generated so few comments beneath themselves.
Is no one reading them
So few tweets also
Yesterday’s article :
It’s not just the numbers, look at the way a Brexit supporter will be constantly interrupted and verbally attacked, whereas a Remainer will be treated respectfully and with the utmost restraint.
A blind man can see the bias.
“Philip Hammond says his remarks were a poor choice of words”……….
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-41608243
Time to bring in Jacob Rees-Mogg as Chancellor and Nigel Farage as the government’s EU negotiator.
Again there some interesting ‘posts’ on HYS .
The beauty of the BBC and Channel 4 is that if THEY think that Trumps making a hash of it over Iran? If Obama, John Kerry and Clinton-the E.U and Labour?…all think he`s wrong…well, we all KNOW that he`s correct.
No need to even look into it anymore-they hate Trump anyway, so when he steps on their liberal corns; then it`s a joy to hear them squeal-and he`s going to be correct.
Alicia
That’s my yardstick too.
Hillary on the One Show: Why did she lose? It was misogyny what did it! No, it was THE RUSSIANS what did it! No it was cos Americans don’t like successful women! But hey, BUY MY BOOK! Did the interviewers ask Hillary some tough questions? About the Clinton Foundation? About Bill? You gotta be kidding. For the BBC it was all about ‘how to bounce back’! AND BUY HER BOOK!
And what a golden opportunity to bash Trump again, something the BBC has been doing DAILY, since he was democratically elected. Sopel makes a living from it. And O’Donahue. Hillary says Trump is ‘dark and divisive’. A ‘cry from the White nationalist gut’. Same stuff as ol’ Sopel gives us every second day, non-stop.
Hillary says ‘ Trump is deeply troubling’. He is ‘visceral’. SO BUY THE BOOK. Emily Pankhurst was mentioned. Goodness, what A BIG SURPRISE: BBC makes it about women’s rights. And Hillary, of course, is NOT divisive. NOT visceral. Nope, it’s those white men; aren’t they bad, bad, bad? Some of them had the nerve not to vote for Hillary! Maybe that’s what did it? (In the back of one’s mind a shocking thought drifts vaguely about: could it be there were even some women who didn’t vote Hillary? Who voted for ‘the thug’ as R4 described him..? Treacherous stuff, this Democracy business)
It’s also about Hillary’s British connections (she’s one of us, you know). And Hillary is part Welsh. The interviewer makes her say ‘vote for Hillary in 2020’ in Welsh. Will they invite Trump next and make him talk Gaelic? (Joke) Buy her book. We’ll find out about that naughty, terrible Trump, who’s sitting where SHE should be! And do we want HIM in Britain? Course not. Nasty stuff, this Democracy business. Just look what happens…
fnw- solid post.
The Democrats just wish she’d f**k off! But she sticks like s**t to a blanket.
Link to a Utube clip which is the parody of an advert at the time .
As well as being funny , it sums up how the left wing were expecting Clinton to walk into the White house , & have been upset about it ever since .
ITRW – that is FANTASTIC! So funny, thanks for posting it.
What are the viewing figures for the BBC? Surely they must be falling with the advent of all the other options ?
Are they becoming defunct ?
Its time to end the TV Telly Tax and replace it with a voluntary charity.
NewsWatch on BBC… they reveal they listen by repeating complaints. But don’t update on the story … £3.5bn go excuses.
BBC beyond 100 days advert.
Far right – tick.
Far left – missing
Hitler picture – tick
Trump – tick
Ends with “he (trump) must have one strategy?” With a confused look from Christian Fraser.
This is not news! It is image and word association game. Stop it BBC.
Followed by advert for Tunes gr8 Tyrants….
Re Hollywood sleaze
Anyone read Branson’s biography ?
when he first saw hi now wife he quickly figured out a way of getting close to her
.. He just ran up to her and started hugging her like crazy
… and then used the excuse ..”oh sorry I mistook you for my friend Jenny”
That broke the ice and he got away with it.
TV is so Fake
Over on Channel-5 Larry Lamb are supposed to be doing cycling tours of Britain. Yet apart from bits of cycling they just magically reappearing at places 40 miles away and then they’re 30 miles back in the other direction.
Same with Simon Reeve ..where he changes 1,000 mile in one camera shot.
Apologies if this is not new, too many posts to read all of them.
I lost my internet connection for a week recently.
Whilst waiting for normal service to be restored, a phrase so well known to older BBC users, when the BBC was, well the BBC, I noted a modern bbcism which I will now relate.
Radio 4 last week, the arse-antics party were in receipt of some bad publicity due to the behaviour of one of their former perverts. Former in that he is dead, not that he stopped his perversions. They never do.
Cyril Smith. But albeeb, bless them, could not waste an opportunity. They read section 22975.512.129.35 of the
mass-murderering communist propaganda handbook.
So, before the latest news about the list of sins of this fat LibDem pervert, was broadcast, the bbc treated us to
an oration given by the said fat pervert, denouncing Enoch Powell’s “rivers of blood speech”.
The bbc don’t you just hate them? Well I do, 24/7/366.
‘Have I got news (aka bias) for you’ this week
First 8 minutes anti Tory bitter and twisted bias
Then just as 20 seconds of anti Corbyn beckoned, treezer’s swipe at him about Venezuela was cleverly turned back on her by the programme. Then on to the Grant Shapps story, subtext Tory revolt.
After ‘only’ 11 minutes of this tripe we go on to question 2, about…….a Nobel Prize winner linked to urinating accurately.
Later we get a story about how awful was a recipe of Margaret Thatcher, and the predictable anti Trump polemic.
Not a single Labour Party comment.
And mysteriously, this ‘topical’ programme managed to take 23 minutes to mention a story which has had quite a lot of coverage this week, about the predatory sexual approach of a multimillionaire Democratic Party contributor and the fact that many millionaire actresses have remained silent on the issue until now, surely prime material for an impartial satirical programme. But after all of 2 minutes it was time to shoehorn in another anti Trump narrative.
i wonder why?
Well I know. It’s because the programme is total biased shit.
Admirable analysis Sluff, and one that shows great perseverance and guts.
Me? I haven’t watched HIGBFY for years now. Hislop and Merton have simply become narcissistic bores, and in fact you have to go back to Angus Deaton, who was genuinely quick witted enough to keep them in their original subsidiary roles – which is why they worked so hard to get him replaced.
He was paid more than them. They really hated that. Do you think they really cared about the coke & hookers story? They weren’t that naive.
No, like most things concerning leftists, it was all about the money. Now they are the two stars of the show, the guest chairman is just their stooge. And the programme has become an unwatchable pile of left wing horse shit.
Good job that the BBC doesn’t depend on anything as vulgar as ratings isn’t it?
Channel 4 Trailer
“Wednesday 10pm : Matt Frei’s : Trump and Russia”
(no Twitter promo yet)
Strangely they put out a page ..and then withdrew it.
My guess is they’re now looking to connect Trump and Weinberger.
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/trump-and-russia-sex-spies-and-scandal
I can see it from Googles cache
BTW News : Claim is that Russian sources spend $100K lobbying on FB for Russian election yet that’s a drop in the ocean.
FB has just said that FB have spent $5.6m lobbying the US congress in the last 6 months.
Sunday 1st Oct. Marseille #France, a clandestine #migrant stabbed 2 women to death in #Marseilles
The man was just being released from a police station
It was a police screw up, they’d arrested him for shoplifting. Finding that he was illegal with no documents they should have started the deportation process by putting in the deportation centre. However they assumed wrongly that it would be full so they let him out on the street.
How important is the law? Let the innocent people find out ….
All our lives are horrifically affected by the lefts hatred of everything we stand for in this country. Far left militants who are desperate to destroy our way of life use the death cult, antifa, BLM to create fear…the far left political deviants (Liebour, Islamic Al ShaBBC..) use socialism…
The main man Mogg himself delivers big time with this magnificent description of what socialism actually is and means for those who live with it’s horrors…epic viewing, and the best way to respond to those in our lives who have fallen for the lies of Commie Corbyn and the Islamic Al ShaBBC.
Moggie for PM !
Why does the BBC keep little Johnny Sopel in America? even his mum thinks he’s a dick.
So BBC is now on the side of Iran – oh dear oh dear
i dont know whether this was posted before but i read the bbc’s vikings buried in allah clothing whilst away
the so called bbc were getting very exicited about it
here
despite the fact that the vikings were world wide trader/raiders and could just have easily bought/stolen the coat
but the bbc basically jump/cling to the conclusion its because the vikings became islamic , i thought it was stretching the evidence when i read it, but the gatestone institute debunks it better