Midweek Open / Brexit Thread 10 October 2018

We could be coming up to crunch time in the Brexit negotiations and the future of our country .

The far left BBC will do it’s best to undermine the brexit position and we will witness it .


Bookmark the permalink.

365 Responses to Midweek Open / Brexit Thread 10 October 2018

  1. Halifax says:

    Mastermind update . “Tara” came last…..


  2. Guest Who says:

    Hopefully Katty, or indeed most bbc editors, continue to only read approved tweet accounts.


  3. Annunaki says:

    Aren’t we enriched:

    Trigga T, real name Daniel Olaloko, 19 (pictured left) from south London, admitted to dealing the Class A drugs in Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria. The student was arrested after police descended on his halls of residence in a raid at dawn in April (pictured right). Olaloko’s family described him as ‘quiet’ and ‘studious’ and said he was doing well in his studies before his arrest. Peter Adebayo, 19, also received seven years for two charges in a conspiracy to sell Class A drugs in Barrow- where at least 12 people died of suspected drug overdoses in the town of 67,000 people.


  4. Annunaki says:

    Food for thought..

    RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: A jihadi wife rejected seven houses because they weren’t big enough, while 1.1m families are stuck on the social housing waiting list… so why is there always cash for these nutjobs?
    A convicted jihadi wife has claimed a local council breached her human rights by not giving her new home (Stock photo)

    According to the homeless charity Shelter, more than 1.15 million families are currently on the waiting list for social housing.

    Two-thirds of them have been in temporary accommodation for over a year. Another 27 per cent have been waiting up to five years for a suitable home to become available.

    Overall, there is a national shortfall of around 800,000 properties. The crisis is particularly acute in London. So you would be forgiven for thinking that the vast majority of these unfortunate folk might be eternally grateful for any kind of roof over their heads.

    Most are appreciative, I have no doubt — or would be, in the event of their number coming up on the escape committee.

    But sadly not one particular woman, who has rejected seven different houses because they weren’t big enough, or not in the right place, or something. This discerning, some might say ‘picky’, mother-of-two is suing Brent Council, in North-West London, for — yep, you guessed — breaching her yuman rites.

    On legal aid, naturally.
    The council has even offered a £5,000 grant towards a deposit, which would help her take out a mortgage and buy her own place. This, too, has been rejected out of hand.

    So who is this doughty campaigner for social justice? I’d love to be able to name her, but I am prevented by a Reporting Restriction Order issued by Deputy High Court Judge Karon Monaghan QC at the Royal Courts of Justice.

    Newspapers are not allowed to tell you her name because it could help to identify her children, aged five and nine. This is despite the fact that she was named extensively during her high-profile trial at the Old Bailey and subsequent conviction for terrorism offences.
    Lest the snowflakes forget

    Oh, sorry, I forgot to mention that. She was sentenced to 28 months in 2014. Her husband, who is described as a former Islamic State commander, left the UK the previous year to fight in Syria.

    Apparently, she is banned from social media and considered to be such a threat to national security that she has to report regularly to the Funny People.

    Her legal action against Brent began after she was released from prison. Since then she has turned down an assortment of homes, on the grounds that they were too far from her parents, with whom the kids were living while she was doing porridge. One amusing aspect of her claim centres on a complaint that private landlords are reluctant to deal with her because of her criminal record.

    You couldn’t make it up.

    How dare any landlord refuse to accommodate a convicted Islamist fanatic, married to an Izal bigwig? What could possibly go wrong? I mean, it’s her yuman rites, innit?

    This woman’s legal battle has already cost taxpayers tens of thousands of pounds, while she has been put up in B&Bs and hotels for the past 16 months.

    There’s never any shortage of money when it comes to defending the rights of terrorists and other criminals who wish us harm.

    While we may (or more likely, may not) be pulling out of the EU and the European Court of Justice, we will still be subject to the jurisdiction of European human rights laws, the incorporation of which into British statute was once described by Tony Blair as his proudest achievement in government.

    Here’s what puzzles me about this case. We can’t name this woman as it might identify her kids. But, seeing as she’s considered a threat to national security and in danger of further radicalisation, why the hell haven’t her children been taken into care?

    After all, surely they are at grave risk of being brainwashed and radicalised by their mother.

    Why are we forced to bankroll her attempt to blackmail Brent Council into providing them with a satisfactory home where they can all be together? Consider, too, the way in which the authorities make special arrangements for the families of convicted terrorists like Captain Hook, currently serving 999 years in an American supermax prison, and odious hate preacher Ram Jam Choudary, about to be released after serving a derisory half of his sentence.

    Still, this madness is at least consistent with the craven approach of the authorities, who are terrified of being accused of ‘Islamophobia’.

    That’s one reason why they go out of their way to pretend that we face just as much of a threat from so-called ‘extreme Right’ fanatics as from Islamists.

    Look, no one denies there are dangerous Right-wing loonies out there, as evidenced by the horrific murder of Labour MP Jo Cox and the vehicle attack outside Finsbury Park mosque.

    But to maintain there is some kind of equivalence between a handful of knuckle-scraping neo-Nazi wannabes and a well-organised, well-funded global jihadist movement is absurd.

    That, naturally, hasn’t stopped the UK’s terrorist watchdog this week talking up the threat from the Far-Right, which basically consists of a few skinheads above a kebab shop in Romford.

    I’m not trying to make light of the problem, but when was the last time any Right-wing extremist hijacked a plane, or blew himself up on the Underground, or beheaded someone on the internet, or attacked an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, murdering and maiming dozens of innocent young people?


    Until that happens, or until we lavish legal aid on a neo-Nazi criminal so that he can sue the local council for a better house, I’ll stick to worrying primarily about Islamists and the outrageous determination of our own Government to appease them.


    • theisland says:

      Her name is easy to find on the bBC webshite.


    • Kaiser says:

      “Look, no one denies there are dangerous Right-wing loonies out there, as evidenced by the horrific murder of Labour MP Jo Cox and the vehicle attack outside Finsbury Park mosque.”

      hmmmm I dont see that as evidence of far-right loonies

      to do that we would be saying the nazis were carrying reprisal attack on jews , who had been raping bombing and stabbing their way through germany , I dont see any equivalence.

      what I see is one mentally ill man who asked for help and didnt get it, and a loser of a man looking for payback.

      loonies perhaps but far right ??? no just dont see it


    • Moodswing6 says:

      Very strange. I was under the impression that if you were offered a property you had to accept unless there was a very legitimate reason. Non acceptance meant you were off the list and no longer entitled to help as the council had fulfilled its duty of care.
      Not only are they destroying our hard won freedoms, they are costing us billions in extra security, legal fees, child benefits and jail time. In a millisecond the DWP will stop someone’s benefits for the smallest slip up, although not if you are Muslim. Why are the BBC always defending and promoting Islam. From memory (I can’t verify the accuracy) Grenfell residents were offered luxury brand new apartments in Kensington. Some refused to accept. It’s ludicrous and it all stinks.


  5. Guest Who says:

    I wonder what he leaves at whose door?


    • Annunaki says:

      He did not get a second chance for his penalty against Brazil we should have had a peoples vote maybe for a second chance ?


    • Guest Who says:

      And here he is invoking deities in ways some others would not tolerate.


      • Kaiser says:

        well we know where jug ears stands come the revolution, I hope he doesnt expect to hide behind any squaddies, because I dont think any will be dying to protect him and his family


  6. Fred Stubber says:

    I’ve just watched a Discovery documentary (on Quest HD Freeview 114). It was about the Costa Concordia. It told the story clearly, with good explanatory graphics and talking heads. No gimmicky camera work such as out of focus shots, deliberate over exposure, too much or too little colour etc. No agenda items crowbarred in. No environmental nag. No strange over-abundance of brown or black people. No gay angle. No wimmin’s angle. It was a really good programme, a pleasure to watch. I don’t think we need the BBC nowadays do we?


    • Annunaki says:

      One would expect our national news service to provide a service to the 85% indigenous population yet they clearly do not, their other output is similarly not provided for these people, and we have a choice, and luckily enough we can avoid the BBC “entertainment” programmes, asians (but only black asians of course conveniently ingoring Chinese who are not black enough but comprise a major part of our ethnic minorities ) , mixed marriages etc etc (but only black men with white women other way round is probably racist) easy to avoide but on the news service this bias is unacceptable


  7. Celtic_Mist says:

    The biasedBBC will never tell you the truth about Florida Hurricanes –
    “I’ve updated a plot of Florida major hurricane strikes since 1900 with Hurricane Michael, and the result is that there is still no trend in either intensity or frequency of strikes over the last 118 years”


    • Annunaki says:

      If I could be bothered I would register and comment on the BBC website as to why a wimmin is like a hurricane:

      … takes half the bloody house when she goes,
      I am sure that comment would last milliseconds before being removed, yet Joe Brand (Corbyn’s version of Bernard Manning without the charm) and Loose Wimmin can continue to hurl abuse at men of course….
      I’ll get my coat…


      • TrueToo says:

        Annunaki , much as I appreciate your input, you are being a touch objectionable here by insisting on pasting the edited part of your comment back in time and again.

        Take a moment to think about the few women who post here and whose comments we also value. We don’t want to drive them away from the site.


        • Annunaki says:

          Back in time and time again ? please explain ? there is one comment regarding this, as above, which I edited once


          • Annunaki says:

            Correction, I will be honest, more than once, due to the clunkiness of this site, but my point remains, a simple joke like that gets criticism compare and contrast with the diatribes from the above we as men put up with on a daily basis, the BBC prioritises wimmin, even those with a five o clock shadow and a cock, hang on I have just borrowed my wifes bra, its a bit tight but now I am a wimmin….I totally agree with you, I am now off to burn the bra and liberate myself, oh now wife is shouting at me and she has nicked the lighter


        • Deborah says:

          Thanks True Too. I really prefer it where there is little (better still no) swearing on this site and I don’t do ‘likes’ to comments that do. Swearing only reduces the strength of an argument. I have found another site with similar views to those expressed here but apart from all the ‘good morning’ and ‘good night’ comments which I really don’t find that interesting, I don’t really like (ie don’t like) the pictures of clantily clad women that sometimes appear there.


          • Annunaki says:

            FFS, go letch over a fireman / policeman / topless Poldark / or any prince that you would jump at to marry no matter how old or ugly, somewhere or other in your wimmin magazines as you usually do, thats ok for some weird reason, and consider:

            compartmentalization. disassociation, a state in which some integrated part of a person’s life becomes separated from the rest of the personality and functions independently
            Compartmentalization is a subconscious psychological defense mechanism used to avoid cognitive dissonance, or the mental discomfort and anxiety caused by a person’s having conflicting values, cognitions, emotions, beliefs, etc. within themselves


            • BigBrotherCorporation says:

              Hey guys (and girls) aren’t we here to talk about BBC bias, rather than bringing their ‘gender war’ provocation here too?

              Deborah, I’m sorry if I’ve ever sworn here, and if it offends, will try to control my language. Am quite sure most of the other men would agree with me, if I said we don’t want to be a ‘boys only club’, any more than you surely want it to be (yet another) wimmin’s hour (as provided in spades by the Beeb).

              I do get hot under the collar about some of the feminist twaddle on the BBC, but that doesn’t mean I hate women (quite the opposite), or that I think ‘equality’ between the genders (all 265 of them?) is wrong, just sick to death of being told I’m ‘evil’ simply because I was born with testicles and a penis. Try reversing the rhetoric and see how it makes you feel, day after day, without respite… not nice, is it?

              As for scantily clad ladies… well, I am heterosexual, and divorced (and therefore single), and I like looking at attractive women (ideally my kind of age, I’m not into girls young enough to be my daughter, or old enough to be my mum), that’s just biology, and I’m not sure why I should apologise for it? If you must blame anyone for it, blame Mother Nature. However, I take your point about how it must be a bit off putting for (heterosexual?) women to see them plastered all over a website, but I don’t see too many here, do you?


              • Alicia Sinclair says:

                I like this site very much.
                Funny, good-natured despite real provocations from the BBC etc.
                The composition reflects the Twitter and Facebook imbalance-until my girls give me some grandchildren, I`m happy to linger here.
                Like a washing line where you don`t risk getting wet blown over or overheard.
                Good fun.
                Now if only that nice FedUp chap would let me know wnen the new thread is offered,
                I`m working late tomorrow, but Sunday after church (my turn to make coffee-shall we say 11.40 a.m?) would be sweet.
                Which is more that what Maggies healthy bran muffins will be on Sunday. Be a few left over for you Feddie, if you choose to give me warning.


        • Loobyloo says:

          This site is a lifeline for me, and I don’t think I’ve ever been offended. I like jokes, and have lived through the era of Bernard manning and chubby brown. You can tell when there is an underlying nastiness to them.
          I also appreciate the efforts of our moderators who need to monitor truly offensive and phobic comments – and I don’t mean in the snowflake way.


          • Fedup2 says:

            Looby – me too.- it’s a sane – place – I try to keep intervention by editing to the minimum but do say if I edit something and am happy to be reversed if I get it wrong …..


  8. Annunaki says:

    Islamist extremists rally in Pakistan to demand judges uphold death sentence for Christian woman convicted of insulting Prophet Mohammed

    Islamist group hold rally demanding Christian woman is executed
    Mother-of-five Asia Bibi, 53, from Punjab, Pakistan, on death row since 2010
    Accused of insulting Prophet Mohammed during an argument over cup of water
    Supreme Court is due to announce ruling on her appeal against death sentence
    If they don’t rule in her favour, Ms Bibi will be the first executed for blasphemy

    By Sara Malm For Mailonline and Associated Press

    Published: 12:41, 12 October 2018 | Updated: 15:45, 12 October 2018

    Thousands of Islamist extremists rallied in eastern Pakistan today, in order to pressure judges to uphold a death sentence for a Christian woman convicted of blasphemy.

    Asia Bibi, 53, has been on death row since 2010, after being accused of insulting the Prophet Mohammed during an argument over a water bowl in Punjab province.

    Supporters of the ultra-religious party Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) gathered in several cities today, threatening nationwide protests if authorities free Ms Bibi.


  9. Annunaki says:

    If anyone is in any doubt that the third world war has already started think again


    • fakenewswatcher says:

      Annunaki- I fear you may be right. Samuel Huntingdon spotted its breakout long ago, although he called it ‘a clash of civilizations’ rather than ‘the third world war’.
      Much of the West is in denial through fear, and by their obsession with ‘human rights’, ‘tolerance’ and ‘being nice’ which they think will win the argument by impressing ‘the opposition’.
      Of course, one can go back to Oswald Spengler, who postulated the ‘death of the West’ long before Huntingdon popped up.
      What is NOT inspiring in this situation is to look at Europe and find we have leaders like May, Merkel and Macron.
      We may ‘get the leaders we deserve’, but what -in Heaven’s Name- have we done to deserve THOSE?


      • Annunaki says:

        The more civilsed a nation becomes, the more vulnerable it is to savages through this tolerance, it seems a continuing mistake of the human condition throughout history


  10. Celtic_Mist says:

    @bbcnews failed to challenge it at the time, oh I forgot, biased BBC policy is not to challenge such false claims.

    GWPF will refer 2nd part of the complaint, relating to the cost of generating electricity, to media watchdog Ofcom. #biasedBBC #ClimateChange



  11. Annunaki says:

    Complaing to the BBC is like pissing into the wind, farm or not it will generate nothing unless it comes from the muslim council of Britain, who have nothing to say at all about their members gang raping non muslim children and holding meetings showing videos of muslims beheading Americans and Europeans, but a lot to say about any one criticising their members


    • kingkp says:

      It’s quite clear there is a sizable majority within the establishment who are working to the agenda of the Muslims. I don’t just mean because they fear them. John Brennan is rumoured to have converted to Islam and it would not surprise me if a significant proportion of our betters have inclinations that way. There may be some who have secretly converted. Would it be a surprise if it turns out May is a practising Muslim? Not really. It would explain an awful lot of what she has said and done in the past.


      • Annunaki says:

        They are organised and motivated to complain at every single opportunity unlike the indigenous population, they will circulate emails to all to complain about anything and everything for example:


        but their homophobia and hate were overlooked for some strange reason, who betide any white person that was to do the same….they will attack en mass anything and everything to promote their anti British anti Christian agenda and rely on the British laissez fair until it is way too late for us to protect our families and culture from their insidious cultural perversities, it makes one wonder why they have fled from their own little war torn hell holes thousands of miles over here, only to promote the same intolerances,, like most predators, they can sniff weakness from a mile away and they sniff it here….


  12. fakenewswatcher says:

    The most two-faced, whining, pathetic anti-Trump, anti-Kavanaugh tirade I have yet heard, has come from one Howard Jacobson on ‘A point of view’ this evening. You can just hear the contempt for the deplorables (of which he is very much aware) dripping from almost every superior sentence. Kinda answers my own question posed a few comments earlier.
    On beeb R4. Where else?


  13. scribblingscribe says:

    Sky news is now officially as ludicrous as the BBC.

    At 9.50 it had an interview with Jack Monroe the gender bender from the Guardian that no one cares about – apart from the Guardian, the BBC and now bloody SKY news. never has an individual with so little to say that is worth listening to being given so much space to say it.

    I am so glad that a professional organisation has taken over SKY and can hopefully do something about its news service. If people wanted to read the guardian they would buy it. And as so few people do, no one cares what it or the BBC thinks.

    Bring on change, the SKY news was once very good, just a few years back. Now it’s just soft left drivel.


  14. Guest Who says:

    School for Scoundrels.


    • Fedup2 says:

      2 minutes 20 seconds of c class luvvies who are either too thick or up them selves to realise the self harm they are doing.

      I would love to see the list of people they approached who refused ….

      There are only 3k retweets which says a lot. I encourage to not to watch it – it will only encourage them to subvert negotiations and democracy further – no ifs no buts – as a former PM said

      It kind of reminds me of the celebs in America who undermined the Vietnam war –

      And someone should tell them it’s 160 days until we leave – they can always apply to rejoin in a few years if the ReichEU is still there ….


  15. Guest Who says:

    Goodnight sweet princesses and princes. Sweetest of dreams.

    Oh, and this post… #CCBGB


  16. taffman says:

    Is there anyone out there that has some evidence of pro-Brexit, right wing bias broadcasts by Al Beeb?


    • Fedup2 says:


      I think you’ve asked that question at least half dozen time but I’ve not seen any evidence of a reply eh?


  17. Annunaki says:

    I believe in fairies as well.

    Unfortunately they are no longer delicate things with pink dresses and little wings, but the BBC millenial fairies are 6 ft with five o clock shadows, size ten feet, taking people to court for hate crime for noticing their hairy balls hanging out of their panties


  18. StewGreen says:

    #1 Sky do a dishonest hitjob against TR, so bad they had to withdraw it
    #2 Newsnight do a dishonest hitjob against TR, and Sammy Woodhouse tweets THE crucial part of her interview was edited out
    #3 Daily Politics did an AMBUSH interview against Batten on the TR issue
    ..and it came off as a car crash for JoCo not Batten

    The rule is the closer to the target you are , the more the flack you get.

    It’s normal on the internet that when the metrolibs gets truth put in their faces their cognitive dissonance kicks in
    … and they get angrier and angrier
    … and then if they can’t run away they will double down


    • StewGreen says:

      Last week Sammy tweeted


  19. StewGreen says:

    The champion of CCBGB
    And note the people write fully , rather than the short sneers you get from libmobbers


  20. Fedup2 says:

    The New Thread is up …. please link to the previous comments as there is really valuable comment which should not be missed – in my view…


  21. JamesArthur says:

    Working early..listening to a R4 programme I usually like – farming today..but today the presenter’s whole angle is.. BREXIT PROBLEMS…every question is prefaced with ‘what problems” linked to Brexit , exporting…Europe issues, statements like M26 will be closed…just scare mongering..

    Funny she didn’t say much when the Irish said – we would suffer a lot if we couldn’t sell to the UK…
    A completely biased report..


  22. lojolondon says:

    Enjoy some non-BBC #FakeNews for a change – as CNN pretends that Kavanagh protesters are peaceful and deny the ‘Mob’ repeatedly – not helped by every other network’s coverage – fakenews brutally exposed. https://twitter.com/i/status/1050983084756271105