The Great Asylum Seeker Bidding War

 

 

There is a bidding war going on as to who is the most humane, the most compassionate, who can get the most brownie points for making the boldest bid for pro-asylum seeker empathy.

Labour’s Yvette Cooper opened the bidding, no doubt as a cunning ploy in her leadership election run, with a grandiose gesture of 10,000 whilst Andy Burnham claimed he had always been thinking along those lines and she had stolen his glory.  Meanwhile the world’s conscience that is Bob Geldorf trumps them both with a personal pledge to adopt 4 Syrian families.

Not to be outdone the Green’s Natalie Bennett displays the usual measured and rational approach so long associated with the Greens and suggests we take in 250,000…or 1 in 8 of the refugees…not sure about her maths as there are over 4 million refugees from Syria alone..never mind those from Afghanistan and Eritrea that she also thinks in need of help.

Finally of course, and where would we be without him, there is the right irreverent Giles Fraser who has said that the Bible is clear: let the refugees in, every last one

Thousands more, says David Cameron now, grudgingly conceding to popular pressure. But why not all of them? Surely that’s the biblical answer to the “how many can we take?” question. Every single last one. Let’s dig up the greenbelt, create new cities, turn our Downton Abbeys into flats and church halls into temporary dormitories, and reclaim all those empty penthouses being used as nothing more than investment vehicles. Yes, it may change the character of this country. Or maybe it won’t require anything like such drastic action – who knows? But let’s do whatever it takes to open the door of welcome.

Another good paycheque gone into his bank account then.  Nothing like a bit of controversy to get yourself into the papers or on TV and sex up your career prospects…and Giles is an expert at that…having fled his job in disgust at the capitalist ogres of the Church who wanted outrageously and selfishly to use their churches without them being occupied he has gone on to make a tidy wedge, ironically, from his worthy statements that he churns out relentlessly proclaiming both his humanity and his anti-Establishment credentials at the same time.  No wonder the BBC and the Guardian snapped his talents up.

 

 

Off The Rails

 

From the Guardian:

John Whittingdale told the corporation its track record was ‘not faultless’ and it needed to correct ‘erroneous views’ quickly, letters reveal

The culture secretary warned the BBC that it must be impartial in covering the EU referendum and act quickly to tackle complaints about “erroneous views”, it has emerged.

John Whittingdale wrote to Rona Fairhead, chair of the BBC Trust, and broadcast regulator Ofcom, claiming that the corporation’s “track record in coverage of EU matters is not faultless”.

Whittingdale, who sent the letters in June but only made them public on Thursday night, said that the BBC and Ofcom should act on complaints about EU referendum coverage within 24 hours.

“The potential for unwarranted distortions to informed debate bears high risks,” he said. “And the longer that erroneous views or partial coverage are allowed to stand unchallenged or uncorrected, the greater the chance of public and democratic detriment.”

He said that Ofcom currently can “expedite” investigations into complaints about coverage in seven to 10 days, adding that it is in the public interest to slash this to as short a timeframe as possible.

“Where lapses occur, it is of course vital to the public that adequate and proportionate corrections are made in prompt order,” he said. “In light of the huge importance the public will place on the EU referendum, and the coverage of it by broadcasters, I would encourage Ofcom and the BBC Trust as the responsible regulators to consider whether your respective processes for redress for complaints which are upheld are as efficient and timely as possible.”

In 2005, an independent report commissioned by the BBC’s board of governors found that the corporation was guilty of “cultural and unintentional bias” in coverage of Europe

Why would he ever consider that the BBC would receive any complaints about its EU referendum coverage?

I wonder if that will include the BBC’s coverage of the ‘European’ migration crisis in which it has helped to apply massive pressure upon Cameron to change his asylum policies.

The BBC independent?  Not when it takes part in the political arguments and tries to influence them itself.

 

Holme Run

Quotas…how does that work?  If the migrants don’t want to live in the country they are forced to go to what use are quotas and why should one country or another then have to take them just because they have decided they want to go there?

 

The Today programme devoted the last half hour to the migration crisis….that’ll be half an hour and the other 23.5 hours on the BBC devoted to promoting the migration crisis.

They had on Sir John Holmes, former UN Under Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs.  (08:39)  I’m not sure why they [Sarah Montague, emoting beautifully about migrants as per the norm] had him on as they pretty much ignored everything of relevance that he said….’everything’ that is if it didn’t reflect the BBC’s own extreme position on immigration.

Holmes said that there is an asylum crisis but there was also an underlying migrant crisis, ie that of economic migrants.  Montague ignored that serious point that has been raised before, that the question of how many refugees any country can take is also wrapped up with the issue of the number of economic migrants that have already flooded into a country.  Holmes also made the very relevant point that quotas simply won’t work because the migrants have no intention of being told where to live….so all the pressure on the UK to take ‘their quota’ is nonsense if most migrants seemingly want to go to Germany.  Holmes says the UK has done very good work in helping the refugees in the Middle East but he says we should take more here..however he also said that accepting asylum seekers wasn’t the answer and that the crisis in Syria had to be addressed.  You may have expected Montague to leap on that in a journalistic fashion, but no, she dodged asking the question, perhaps the answer would not be to the BBC’s liking….how to siolve Syria?  That’s the only question that really matters.  But not to the BBC?  Usually the BBC is all too eager to end a war if it means stopping the West or Israel bashing Muslim terrorists…but seemingly not a war that sees Muslim terrorists being all too successful.

I’m guessing she had an agenda that didn’t include anything that not only stopped a war but stopped the flow of migrants to Europe….despite her admitting that the current situation just encourages more to come to Europe...’it is unlimited’.

 

Yesterday we had the pleasure of listening to the Chief Rabbi on the Today programme lecturing us about humanity…he’d just had a conflab with the Pope who declared that ‘We all share this world together, therefore we need to care for this world together,’”...the chief rabbi told us we must help these people ‘knocking on the door of Europe’.…hmm….whilst I support the existence of Israel I have to say I’m not being lectured about how we must reach out to everyone and open the borders when he doesn’t say the same about the Palestinians….when I hear him advocating a ‘one state’ solution for the Israeli/Palestinian conflict I might take his words and sentiments seriously…but he knows that such a policy would destroy Israel….strange he doesn’t recognise the same will happen to Europe…as Boris Johnson has already alluded to with his ‘mass migration doomed the Roman Empire’ comment..

We need a paradigm mindshift he tells us…we look on these migrants as if they are from Mars he tells us….the Palestinians might say the same, he doesn’t tell us.

He refused to name numbers which makes his pleas meaningless….though definitely ‘some of them should be allowed in’

Webb managed to get him to proclaim that economic migrants were equally worthy of ‘asylum’ as their lives were in danger.

The BBC got what it wanted.

 

I was also listening to Lyse Doucet the other day on the TV news and if I hadn’t known she was BBC reporter I might have mistaken her for some sort of pro-immigration campaigner as she told us that something must be done and more migrants must be allowed in….having said that one look at her Twitter feed says it all…here curiously echoing the good Rabbi’s words….

 

lyse doucet retweeted jagmeet singh

lyse doucet added,

What?

It seems we are being fed a line on the migration crisis and people are happy to look the other way and accept whatever is said if it makes the migrants tales more harrowing and piles on the ‘guilt’ that puts pressure on politicians to open the borders.   The Today programme had a tale of terror from Kobane in Syria telling us of the dreadful dangers that the inhabitants still live under and that many are still fleeing…could that have been a counter to the story that the father of the drowned children has gone back to Kobane in war torn Syria to bury his family and live there which no doubt has raised a few eyebrows in question about his reasons for taking that terrible risk with his family…

Aylan Kurdi buried alongside brother and mother in Syria

The funeral of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi, his brother Galip and their mother takes place in their hometown of Kobane in Syria

The father whose wife and sons drowned as they attempted to reach the Greek island of Kos from Turkey warned fellow Syrians not to risk the lives of their loved ones by attempting to flee the country, as he buried his family on Friday.

Speaking at the funerals of Aylan Kurdi, three, his brother Ghalib, five, and their mother Rehana, in the Syrian town of Kobane, Abdullah Kurdi blamed the international community for its failure to protect civilians caught in the nation’s bitter civil war.

Local officials had reportedly tried to organise the funeral in neighbouring Turkey before crossing the border into Kobane. But Mr Kurdi insisted it should take place in the land of the children’s birth.

 

Apparently he is now saying he will stay there with the graves of his family.

This is a man who put that family onto a tiny boat to make an unnecessary sea crossing knowing that his wife was terrified of the water and that a 3 year old and a 5 year old, without life jackets, would have no chance of survival if the worst happened, as it did, as he should have expected.  He is no hero or ‘victim’ of the West and its asylum policy as the BBC seem to be trying to portray him as.  Every sympathy for his wife and children but for him?  Not so much.

His family were safe in Turkey but we were told that because of a log jam in the Turkish asylum process applicants were forced to take the dangerous DIY route in dangerous small boats…how true is that?  They could of course head off across land or go by ferry perhaps….in May the Telegraph reported that Syrians were in fact being allowed to take ferries to Greece quite freely and openly…

Turkish border officials are allowing huge numbers of Syrian asylum seekers to cross into Europe on holiday ferries serving the Greek islands, a Telegraph investigation has found.

Residents of Greece’s eastern Aegean islands say ferries carrying hundreds of Syrian migrants at a time are making the short hop from Turkey’s coast, with Turkish officials making no attempt to stop them boarding.

In what appears to be yet another gap in Europe’s border controls, the migrants have no need to risk their lives in rickety people-smuggling boats or pay exorbitant fees to smuggling gangs.

It turns out also that the family never made an asylum claim to go to Canada as was claimed to much anguished comment in response..’if only…they’d still be alive…’.guilt guilt guilt.

One other thing….a UKIP candidate tweeted this: “The little Syrian boy was well clothed and well fed. He died because his parents were greedy for the good life in Europe. Queue jumping costs.”…now maybe the word greed is one of those trigger words that are too honest to be allowed but why the outrage…other than the fact it was a UKIP man who said this?  After all Tory Malcolm Rifkind on the Today programme said exactly the same thing in less emotive wording…

The point I would have to make from a humanitarian view, I don’t blame people wanting to find a better life in the countries of northern Europe, but from an asylum point of view, if you are already in Turkey than your life is not in danger, your children are not going to lose their lives, your children are safe from Syria, so it becomes a separate issue as to whether the countries of Europe should be expected to have, as it were, an open ended position for anyone who wants to come here.

No BBC journalist declaring Rifkind is the ‘worst human alive’:

H/T Don’tblamemeivotedukip:

Screen Shot 2015-09-03 at 18.47.07

The BBC confirmed to Breitbart London that Morrison’s use of his BBC-linked Twitter account was inappropriate, and that the licence fee-funded journalist had removed the comment.

A spokesman for the organisation said: “The BBC has clear social media guidelines which staff must adhere to, even when using personal accounts.

“We have spoken to Alex and reminded him of his responsibility to uphold our guidelines. He has deleted the tweet.”

 

That family would still be alive if they didn’t think the streets of Europe were paved with gold and were encouraged to do so by the pro-immigration extremists cheerled by the BBC.

 

WEEKEND OPEN THREAD!

Well, the emotional blackmail from the BBC (along with others) has worked and we can now look forward to thousands of Syrians enriching our country. You have to hand it to the BBC, they use the power of their broadcasting monopoly to undermine our country at every opportunity! Anyway here’s a new open thread.

Back To The Future

 

 

Map

 

 

Boris Johnson counters Dan Hodges’ judgement of history with a bit of historical perspective……

‘Mass migration brought down the Roman Empire’?

Boris Johnson has reacted to the image of Aylan Kurdi and described it as a “very, very shocking image”, writes Henry Samuel in Calais.

“It’s very difficult; we have to address the problem at the source and stop people coming like this, but certainly if people are really in need and are scared for their lives, we must receive them,” he said.

But should the UK take more refugees?

Quote It’s is very difficult because we mustn’t create the feeling around Europe in all these zones where there are problems that they can get here without any problem. We mustn’t created a pull factor and that’s the problem now, we must distinguish between those who are really scared of persecution and those who are migrants looking for a wealthier life.”

“We must above all be very clear with people who want to come from these countries that it’s not an Eldorado here, it’s not simply a question of turning up and receiving benefits. And I fear that if we don’t make this clear then we will create the conditions for migration to continue and increase.”

“Let us not forget that the fall of the Roman Empire was down to immigration. Massive movements of people in the end is not sustainable.”

 

Of course there is another historical perspective that invites comparison as millions of Muslims eye up an attempt to cross into Europe…..that BBC map at the top of the post looks awfully familiar…the Ottoman Empire and its incursion into Europe……

 

ottoman-conquests

 

‘Europe’ as we know it will no longer exist in a very short time.

 

 

“Germany, Germany.”

Over 150,000 migrants have reached Hungary this year, most coming through the southern border with Serbia. Many apply for asylum but quickly try to leave for richer EU countries.

 

The Telegraph reports an example of those ‘desperate’ migrants….refusing to go to a refugee camp…..no longer ‘refugees’ then?…what is it they want, was it safety or a new life in Europe?….Maybe the BBC can answer as they report the migrants chanting “Germany, Germany.”

 

EU migration crisis: Hungary refugees trying to reach Austria refuse to be taken to camp and forced off train – latest

The train, which left at 10.20 BST was bound for towns near the Austrian border and several hundred migrants were on board.

James Badcock in Budapest said that the train then stopped at Bicske, which is one of the country’s four main refugee camps.

Migrants were then taken off, state news agency MTI reported, and AFP estimates that about 250 to 300 migrants were on board.

The train was due to split, with three carriages due to travel to Szonbathely and the rest to Sopron, both near Hungary’s western border with Austria.

ITV’s James Mates has tweeted that a man and woman with a baby were on a track at a Hungarian train station in a desperate attempt not to be taken to a migrant camp nearby.

But he later tweeted that Hungarian police were forced to let them back onto a train.

History Will Judge [Though of course Tony Livesey & Co already have]

 

It’s all about the posturing, refugee one-upmanship……

 

retweeted

Peter Dominiczak retweeted Michael Deacon

Disastrous comment…

Peter Dominiczak added,

19 retweets 7 favourites

Dan hodges does his own bit of posturing with this hostage to future events:

Refugee crisis: David Cameron is placing himself on the wrong side of history

The comments absolutely slaughter him…and I’m sure this only confirms in his own mind how right and righteous he is.

 

 

 

SHILLING FOR SYRIA….

I don’t know about you but it strikes me that the BBC has gone into overdrive to soften up the Nation for a wave of “Syrians”. The image of the little 3 year old Syrian boy who drowned on the beach has been milked for maximum emotional blackmail and true to form the Left have seized upon this and are insisting that our borders open up and we let ’em in. The BBC are also very cute to throw about terms such as “refugees”, “migrants” “asylum seekers” to make THEIR case when it suits them. It’s a moments like this that the menace of the BBC crystallises. It is a force for the destruction of all that so many of us hold dear. It is colluding with those who smuggle people to ensure that the UK becomes part of Northern Africa.